Bell or Bairstow?
+5
Hoggy_Bear
skyeman
amanuensis
jbd349
msp83
9 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Cricket
Page 1 of 1
Bell or Bairstow?
So the ODI series between India and England is just round the corner.
England are better placed than at any other point in recent history to effect a positive change to their pretty ordinary ODI record in India. at the eve of the match, the most interesting question for England is whether they go for Ian Bell or young Johny Bairstow. Bell, ever since that historic tour to South Africa, has been a rock of a batsman, producing test runs like a machine. Although he made a few decent contributions in ODIs in the same time, his overall ODI record is nothing great. Besides, Jonathan Trott, one of the most consistent England ODI batters of recent times, is just not fitting in at any other position other than at 3. That means Bell will have to bat down the order, and he hasnt shown enough of a power game that is required down the order, particularly in the sub-continent.
Bairstow meanwhile, has been a revelation, and his debut ODI innings was a real class act. Now he has followed that up with a steller effort in the practice game, scoring a hundred of just 53 balls.
One alternative suggestion is that England could go in with both of them, and leave the spinning all-rounder Samit Patel out of the 11. But then, England are already without Stuart Broad, and of course James Anderson, and not many of their young bowlers have enough of sub-continent experience. Also, Bopara, Pietersen, and Trott can't be expected to trouble the Indians much in their backyard.
A third option that has been suggested is to leave Kevin Pietersen out and go with a middle order of Tott, Bell, Bopara, Bairstow and Patel. I think that will be downright stupid. Pietersen at 50 % is a better ODI player than Bell, and KP has scored big in the India test series, and England should give him all opportunity to find his form in the ODI format as wwell, as he and the injured Eion Morgan are key to their ODI success.
I would go for Bairstow in pllace of Bell.
England are better placed than at any other point in recent history to effect a positive change to their pretty ordinary ODI record in India. at the eve of the match, the most interesting question for England is whether they go for Ian Bell or young Johny Bairstow. Bell, ever since that historic tour to South Africa, has been a rock of a batsman, producing test runs like a machine. Although he made a few decent contributions in ODIs in the same time, his overall ODI record is nothing great. Besides, Jonathan Trott, one of the most consistent England ODI batters of recent times, is just not fitting in at any other position other than at 3. That means Bell will have to bat down the order, and he hasnt shown enough of a power game that is required down the order, particularly in the sub-continent.
Bairstow meanwhile, has been a revelation, and his debut ODI innings was a real class act. Now he has followed that up with a steller effort in the practice game, scoring a hundred of just 53 balls.
One alternative suggestion is that England could go in with both of them, and leave the spinning all-rounder Samit Patel out of the 11. But then, England are already without Stuart Broad, and of course James Anderson, and not many of their young bowlers have enough of sub-continent experience. Also, Bopara, Pietersen, and Trott can't be expected to trouble the Indians much in their backyard.
A third option that has been suggested is to leave Kevin Pietersen out and go with a middle order of Tott, Bell, Bopara, Bairstow and Patel. I think that will be downright stupid. Pietersen at 50 % is a better ODI player than Bell, and KP has scored big in the India test series, and England should give him all opportunity to find his form in the ODI format as wwell, as he and the injured Eion Morgan are key to their ODI success.
I would go for Bairstow in pllace of Bell.
msp83- Posts : 16222
Join date : 2011-05-30
Location : India
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Agree with most of what you say and I would go in with that side, although I think it might be worth trying Bell opening with Cook and Bairdtow taking the gloves.
jbd349- Posts : 181
Join date : 2011-04-08
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
jbd349
If Cook & Bell were to open, then you wouldn't be able to send Trott out at three, at least on a typical subcontinental wicket.
If Cook & Bell were to open, then you wouldn't be able to send Trott out at three, at least on a typical subcontinental wicket.
amanuensis- Posts : 109
Join date : 2011-10-12
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Both to play, and drop Trott.
skyeman- Posts : 4693
Join date : 2011-09-18
Location : Isle Of Skye
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Even as a fan of Bell, I'd say you've got to give Bairstow a go. Especially batting at 5 or 6.
Hoggy_Bear- Posts : 2202
Join date : 2011-01-28
Age : 58
Location : The Fields of Athenry
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Craig Kieswetter has done a decent job at the top for England. He has had a good run in the CLT 20 as well. Unlike Bell, Kieswetter has a power game, and that is what England need at the top. Despite Cook's adaptability at the top in recent times, I just can't think of a top order of Bell, Cook and Trott.jbd349 wrote:Agree with most of what you say and I would go in with that side, although I think it might be worth trying Bell opening with Cook and Bairdtow taking the gloves.
msp83- Posts : 16222
Join date : 2011-05-30
Location : India
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Hoggy_Bear
Indeed - Bell is a top three batsman in limited overs cricket, who can just about get away with coming in at four. Any other position is a waste of his time & the team's. As I've pointed out on another thread, his international career in the shorter forms of the game is realistically over. In a sense, he's been desperately unlucky - that injury against Bangladesh basically robbed him of the opportunity to cement a place at three. It does though put Strauss in a potentially awkward position - with only the long form of the game left in play for him, I suspect Bell will be pushing more aggressively for promotion in the test batting order.
Indeed - Bell is a top three batsman in limited overs cricket, who can just about get away with coming in at four. Any other position is a waste of his time & the team's. As I've pointed out on another thread, his international career in the shorter forms of the game is realistically over. In a sense, he's been desperately unlucky - that injury against Bangladesh basically robbed him of the opportunity to cement a place at three. It does though put Strauss in a potentially awkward position - with only the long form of the game left in play for him, I suspect Bell will be pushing more aggressively for promotion in the test batting order.
amanuensis- Posts : 109
Join date : 2011-10-12
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Although Bell is not a slogger, he can still score quickly up front as he has brilliant timing and placement. IMO, he needs to bat top 4 or not play.
jbd349- Posts : 181
Join date : 2011-04-08
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Vintage Gregers!!, yet again!!.Gregers wrote:Bell with Bairstow instead of the deadweight at 4...
I think KP will come good though.
And, how would you rationalize Bell over KP?
msp83- Posts : 16222
Join date : 2011-05-30
Location : India
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Bell, Trott and Cook cannot function in an ODI side especially on the subcontinent. If you add to that that Cook is the captain and Trott > Bell then I think its obvious who should be left out.
GG- Posts : 1878
Join date : 2011-01-28
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Agreed with about everyone, in that Cook, Trott, Bell and Bopara cannot all bat in the same top six. Factor in Patel at 7 who is another man who isn't a renowned six hitter, we can't afford to play them all. The logic has been shown already, Bopara will play at 6 as he is the man in form. And then Cook is skipper and Trott is better than Bell, Bell is the man to miss out. So logically, Bairstow comes in. I would prefer to see Buttler in that role, but what I have seen of Bairstow has been impressive so I have no qualms with him playing, he deserves a decent run in the side now. A top 6 of Cook, Kies, Trott, KP, Bopara, Bairstow/Buttler has a nice balance to it I think!
Gregers, I am dying to know the reasons why you despise KP so much! Please, I am desperate to know, haha!
Gregers, I am dying to know the reasons why you despise KP so much! Please, I am desperate to know, haha!
JDizzle- Posts : 6927
Join date : 2011-03-11
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
I'll get an article up saying why I despise KP some day.
msp IMO Trott shouldn't be near the ODI side either and hecne Bell should be at 3.
msp IMO Trott shouldn't be near the ODI side either and hecne Bell should be at 3.
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
It will be the most eagerly anticipated article in V2 history. A truly landmark moment.
Trott > Bell in ODI's. Trott scores more runs and he scores them at a s/r of between 70/80 which is fine if other people are going fast around him. Bell has a similar strike rate, but doesn't score as many runs as Trott. Maybe this is due to him not batting high enough in the order, but Trott is the man in possession and plays ahead of Bell. for me.
Trott > Bell in ODI's. Trott scores more runs and he scores them at a s/r of between 70/80 which is fine if other people are going fast around him. Bell has a similar strike rate, but doesn't score as many runs as Trott. Maybe this is due to him not batting high enough in the order, but Trott is the man in possession and plays ahead of Bell. for me.
JDizzle- Posts : 6927
Join date : 2011-03-11
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
JDizzle wrote:Agreed with about everyone, in that Cook, Trott, Bell and Bopara cannot all bat in the same top six. Factor in Patel at 7 who is another man who isn't a renowned six hitter, we can't afford to play them all. The logic has been shown already, Bopara will play at 6 as he is the man in form. And then Cook is skipper and Trott is better than Bell, Bell is the man to miss out. So logically, Bairstow comes in. I would prefer to see Buttler in that role, but what I have seen of Bairstow has been impressive so I have no qualms with him playing, he deserves a decent run in the side now. A top 6 of Cook, Kies, Trott, KP, Bopara, Bairstow/Buttler has a nice balance to it I think!
Yeah with Morgan out that is quite likley what will be picked.
Peter Seabiscuit Wheeler- Posts : 10344
Join date : 2011-06-02
Location : Englandshire
Re: Bell or Bairstow?
Gregers loves KP!!!!!. He just can't take any failure from Pietersen.JDizzle wrote:, Gregers, I am dying to know the reasons why you despise KP so much! Please, I am desperate to know, haha!
I even doubt whether he is KP in disguise!!!!!!.
Gregers, the upcoming KP article is going to be the next big thing on these bords, of course after the article of the year on Bopara!!.
msp83- Posts : 16222
Join date : 2011-05-30
Location : India
Similar topics
» Replace bairstow with?
» Bairstow/5 bolwers
» Well Played Bairstow and Well Done
» Bairstow called up to face WI
» BAIRSTOW NOT IN THE SRI LANKA TEST SQUAD :(
» Bairstow/5 bolwers
» Well Played Bairstow and Well Done
» Bairstow called up to face WI
» BAIRSTOW NOT IN THE SRI LANKA TEST SQUAD :(
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Cricket
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum