Tonight's Boxing - Who's Watching? (No non-boxnation spoilers please.)

First topic message reminder :



Jarno Rosberg vs Manuel Alberto Pucheta next up.

All nighter for me.

AlexHuckerby wrote:

azania wrote:

AlexHuckerby wrote:jaime moore beats SRR was enough to take away all the credibility away az

It would be but thankfully that ridiculous statement wasn't made by me. Jamie Moore couldn't beat an egg.

he would knock you out

My dad's bigger than his.

azania wrote:

oxring wrote:

azania wrote:

oxring wrote:1 nice thing this fight has proved - Helenius is not the next big thing.

I said that in the begining of this thread (or was it another - regardless I said that anyway). You guys should listen to me more often.

After the war chat and the overrated debate, especially after Johnson's fundamentals - I'm finding myself wondering whether I'm listening to you too much

A blind man throwing darts at a board is bound to hit the bullseye once in a while...

Hahaha. I study the fundermentals of all fighters before making my decision

I also said Haye would beat Vit. Watch this space. I'll make you a believer sooner rather than later.

Who knows - lighting can strike twice ;-)

Good pick for tonight mind. Helenius can't back up for toffee. Windy stated he didn't rate him - as he looks to throw pathetic arm punches. So did Monzon - but it seems that Monzon's came with considerably more force. Hopeless display from a big man. Please - feed him to Wladimir.

oxring wrote:Correction - Chisora made Fury uncomfortable every time he landed. I don't necessarily disagree with the second sentence - but it ignores the point that most of Chisora's punches - even in the first 3 rounds when he wasn't totally gassed - where incredibly telegraphed and Fury was able to lean out of the way of them, for the most part.

Nope. Every time he threw. Fury didn't really have an answer.

Scottrf wrote:

azania wrote:

oxring wrote:1 nice thing this fight has proved - Helenius is not the next big thing.

I said that in the begining of this thread (or was it another - regardless I said that anyway). You guys should listen to me more often.

Said it last year. Scottrf KO1 Azania.

Come on then. Man up. Step outside..

oxring wrote:

azania wrote:

oxring wrote:

azania wrote:

oxring wrote:1 nice thing this fight has proved - Helenius is not the next big thing.

I said that in the begining of this thread (or was it another - regardless I said that anyway). You guys should listen to me more often.

After the war chat and the overrated debate, especially after Johnson's fundamentals - I'm finding myself wondering whether I'm listening to you too much

A blind man throwing darts at a board is bound to hit the bullseye once in a while...

Hahaha. I study the fundermentals of all fighters before making my decision

I also said Haye would beat Vit. Watch this space. I'll make you a believer sooner rather than later.

Who knows - lighting can strike twice ;-)

Good pick for tonight mind. Helenius can't back up for toffee. Windy stated he didn't rate him - as he looks to throw pathetic arm punches. So did Monzon - but it seems that Monzon's came with considerably more force. Hopeless display from a big man. Please - feed him to Wladimir.

Del would also give Wlad a very incomfortable night. Only problem with him is that he doesn't hit hard enough. He's quick, good upper body movement and has a variety of punches. I like how he leads with a good jab also and gets in range quickly. He's the perfect fighter for these elongated giants who seem to rule now.

Chisora is a better version of Perez in my opinion.

Scottrf wrote:

oxring wrote:Correction - Chisora made Fury uncomfortable every time he landed. I don't necessarily disagree with the second sentence - but it ignores the point that most of Chisora's punches - even in the first 3 rounds when he wasn't totally gassed - where incredibly telegraphed and Fury was able to lean out of the way of them, for the most part.

Nope. Every time he threw. Fury didn't really have an answer.

Hmm. I know you love to be pedantic. So I'll pedantically post this: 8.05 - First round, Chisora throwing a huge hook and being casually defended. Didn't look that uncomfortable there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFvO3vMWMSw

The overhand right after the jab gave Fury problems - although arguably no more problems than Fury had against Paycheque and Firtha.

Agree w/ comparison of Chisora and Perez - Chisora has a nice jab as well actually - deserves a mention.

He ran backwards...

He stepped back and smiled. Hardly uncomfortable.]

oxring wrote:

Scottrf wrote:

oxring wrote:Correction - Chisora made Fury uncomfortable every time he landed. I don't necessarily disagree with the second sentence - but it ignores the point that most of Chisora's punches - even in the first 3 rounds when he wasn't totally gassed - where incredibly telegraphed and Fury was able to lean out of the way of them, for the most part.

Nope. Every time he threw. Fury didn't really have an answer.

Hmm. I know you love to be pedantic. So I'll pedantically post this: 8.05 - First round, Chisora throwing a huge hook and being casually defended. Didn't look that uncomfortable there. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFvO3vMWMSw

The overhand right after the jab gave Fury problems - although arguably no more problems than Fury had against Paycheque and Firtha.

Agree w/ comparison of Chisora and Perez - Chisora has a nice jab as well actually - deserves a mention.

Thats not being pedantic. Thats just you being silly.........again.

Anyone, yes anyone, even waingro, can pick incidences where Fury looked very comfortably in defending hooks, jabs etc. Doesn't prove a thing. When Del decided to shift his body to attack, Fury flailed away uncomfortably. Try harder Oxy.

Awesome. I can probably find video of him smiling after Chisora landing, so if that's your judge then your correction was wrong too.

To see you accepting that you were wrong online is enough for me Scott.

I'll accept that not quite every time Chisora threw, Fury was uncomfortable and maybe not every time Chisora landed Fury was uncomfortable.

Isn't it nice when people follow your posts with 1 liners.
-------------------------
For the record and being serious - Fury wasn't seriously discomforted in any round after 3/4 (memory fails). And given what I witnessed against Firtha and Paycheque - that's a pretty dismal effort from Chisora.

I wasn't wrong because I wasn't talking literally.

I'll remember that for the next time you reply to a 2/3 paragraph with 1 line.

What does the length of a post matter? You're being pathetic. Sounding worse than TRUSSMAN.

Was merely a test Scotty. Was intrigued to see your response. Am duly gratified now I have the answer to a nagging query I've had for a while.

i put a bit of my winnings from the povetkin fight on murray..hes gone up to 6/1. its a longshot but i got nothing to lose.

Good heavens. And you laughed at me when I said Haye would beat Vit!!!!!

http://boxingchannel.tv/

Top Rank Undercard. Mods - It's legal.

I have wood.

Cotto by UD

I need tissues.

I'm not drunkm at all.

Tapia, what a turn around!

coxy0001 wrote:I have wood.

I need tissues.

Just heard about the new Margaret Thatcher film I take it then Coxy.

From Inez Sainz coxy or the boxing?

Scottrf wrote:From Inez Sainz coxy or the boxing?

Huh?

And yes, Maggie played by that bird = i've sprayed everywhere

I apoloigise to ze mods, i amm may have had a drinl. I love yoy all

coxy0001 wrote:

Scottrf wrote:From Inez Sainz coxy or the boxing?

Huh?

And yes, Maggie played by that bird = i've sprayed everywhere

I apoloigise to ze mods, i amm may have had a drinl. I love yoy all

Spoiler:

She's on Top Rank.

Oh boy. Someone's seeking attention again. Give it a rest coxy and grow up.

coxy0001 wrote:

Scottrf wrote:From Inez Sainz coxy or the boxing?

Huh?

And yes, Maggie played by that bird = i've sprayed everywhere

I apoloigise to ze mods, i amm may have had a drinl. I love yoy all

we love you too!!!
come on Margarito, make me rich!!!

azania wrote:Oh boy. Someone's seeking attention again. Give it a rest coxy and grow up.

What are you doing on here? There's not a discussion about old vs moderen.

And azi, how did your stint as mod go? Didn;t you get banned? Why were you banned? Does that make you respected on here? No, so shut the sod up.

Lance wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:

Scottrf wrote:From Inez Sainz coxy or the boxing?

Huh?

And yes, Maggie played by that bird = i've sprayed everywhere

I apoloigise to ze mods, i amm may have had a drinl. I love yoy all

we love you too!!!
come on Margarito, make me rich!!!

Have made a decent bet on Cotto by UD, so i may be shouting "dance you ******* fairy" if he hurts him. And i just can't see Marg winning and if he does it's late....

coxy0001 wrote:

Lance wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:

Scottrf wrote:From Inez Sainz coxy or the boxing?

Huh?

And yes, Maggie played by that bird = i've sprayed everywhere

I apoloigise to ze mods, i amm may have had a drinl. I love yoy all

we love you too!!!
come on Margarito, make me rich!!!

Have made a decent bet on Cotto by UD, so i may be shouting "dance you ******* fairy" if he hurts him. And i just can't see Marg winning and if he does it's late....

cant say im confident. the reason im lookin forward to this cos anything could happen. but at 2/1 margarito seems good value

Jorge Arce saying he wants Donaire at 122, anyone got any thoughts on that potential fight?.

WORD FROM NY: Naazim Richardson has been bought in by Cotto to watch Margarito's hands being wrapped!!!

No non-boxnation spoilers please.

Boxnation don't even know!

Wasn't talking to you!

I meant I don't wanna hear about the Bantamweight fights.

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/7299977/how-much-punishment-enough

Hardly a fight spoiler since Arce is on Mexican commentary.

I'm not saying anyone has spoiled it! I'm just asking you don't!

Wasn't planning to since I've never mentioned anything about the other card in California tonight anyway. Don't think anyone has.

Commentary is poor tonight

Dass wrote:Wasn't planning to since I've never mentioned anything about the other card in California tonight anyway. Don't think anyone has.

Chill. It was precautionary.

Scottrf wrote:

Dass wrote:Wasn't planning to since I've never mentioned anything about the other card in California tonight anyway. Don't think anyone has.

Chill. It was precautionary.

Thanks for the advice, I was almost exploding with rage there.

Reports of Cotto-Mayweather if he wins.

This Mike Jones fight is poo.

Kell Brook would take Jones easily.

Scottrf wrote:Reports of Cotto-Mayweather if he wins.

Where'd you hear that one Scott?

School Project wrote:

Scottrf wrote:Reports of Cotto-Mayweather if he wins.

Where'd you hear that one Scott?

Boxing insider reported it, Tris Dixon hinted at it.

Scott, where are these reports for Cotto-Mayweather? I think Cotto has lost a step now but I'd take him in his prime to actually beat Mayweather in a close decision type of fight.

I really don't think Mayweather has the balls to step in with Cotto - not then, and not now!

NYSAC aren't letting Richardson in as he's not part of Cotto's camp!?

2:57 and I've finally called a fight right