Each country's review of their performance in europe

Ireland
Positive - Got three through and all looked compeditive. Seemed to have a real belief in themselves.
Negative - The only way is down. Will they be targeted more by others or strugle with favourite tag espailly Ulster. Will Connacht getting stronger weaken the other three

Wales
Postive - They got two second places. Lack of expectation
Negative - Poor crowds for big games. Loss of key players for next year. Poor coaching

Scotland
Postive - One second and one semi. Looked to have belief. Young teams and lots of people signed and extended.
Negative - Higher expectaions. No more being overlooked by others

England - Glaws and Quins. To be fair Leicster had a though group but won against two of the semi finalist even if they took a battering away. Good young players who are staying.
Negatives - wrong gameplan. Poor coaching. lack of desire to change.

France
Positives - Lots of Money. Will have seven teams next year. Cleamount finally living up to their ability.
Negatives - Lots of poor showings. No real challage for for 1/4 except the big two.

Italy
Postive - Who would of thought Treviso would have been within ten minutes of getting three home wins. Aronini didn't git up bp in every game
Negatives - Aronini were still the weakest team by some margin even if leinster schooled others aswell

I didn't relook at the tables but I would love someone to do a table of points for each country out of possible.
Each team can get 30 points so Ireland could have got 120 but ended with around 70 or so so that is about 58%.
This is ups and downs as we have had five French teams and they were going to rule the world etc.
Keep it clean and wums get lost. If its going to cause prolbems have facts.

Feel free to disacgree with anything i've said but think I am close to the truth

For any team you do a positive on you must do a negative.
Try do at least two countries before you comment

Can we leave money and league bashing out of it.