Earning Respect

First topic message reminder :

"All Blacks didn't respect us - Dusautoir"

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=10820191

Seems some odd thing for Dusautoir to talking about. Since everybody know that (a) NZ fear nothing more than meet France in the knock out phase of RWC! and second you have to earning respect, not repeatedly show up with a weak combinator to take a 50 point hammering, lose to Tonga struggle past ENG and then demand respect from the world.

Am I right?

You enjoying this as well EBOP?

caoimhincentre wrote:

anotherworldofpain wrote:Caiomhincenter, do you understand that the video you post comes from a sort of parody show in Australia? And is a little bit tongue in cheek about pundit to the game? and is a WUM to try to annoy NZ fans in some kind of joke? Did you realise that? or not? These are the same people that make the "Aussie Haka" and "Invade NZ" movies. And there was some jibe across the Tasman sea about Quade Cooper and how he get treated and so was a bit of playful bantering on these rival rugby shows.

If you don't realisate that then is some joke on you...

its irish rugby show!!!

It's wrong to make Irish Jokes these days Caoimhincentre.

If only Ireland had put up this much of a fight in the 3rd test!

Hope you don't have anything pressing to do mate. Our friend AWOP can go longer than the Duracell bunny.

kiakahaaotearoa wrote:If only Ireland had put up this much of a fight in the 3rd test!

Hope you don't have anything pressing to do mate. Our friend AWOP can go longer than the Duracell bunny.

think you have a point. better off leaving it at that.

Craig Joubert is the best rugby union referee in the World...

kiakahaaotearoa wrote:If only Ireland had put up this much of a fight in the 3rd test!

Hope you don't have anything pressing to do mate. Our friend AWOP can go longer than the Duracell bunny.

Perfect advertisement to get ladies to the rugby forum

You can't get to the higher ground from where you were Caoimhicentere without backing down on your "argument". (or an argument you borrow from someone else)

Well I don't think bunnies have a reputation for long thingeys so maybe not mate.

More like a dog with a bone then?

anotherworldofpain wrote:You can't get to the higher ground from where you were Caoimhicentere without backing down on your "argument". (or an argument you borrow from someone else)

oh the urge to respond

I wonder if the blue tablets help

I'll take that one then.

AWOP 1 : Caroimnhcenter 0

Although later I'm sure you will be telling people you were robbed and post the same video as proof.

how's the kindergarten going AWOP?
there is already like 1050 threads on the RWC final started a few month ago in 606v2 that you might want to resurrect instead of talking about so-called respect just to stir some c.rap.

Funny thread title. If only anotherworldofpain actually read it and took in on board.

caoimhincentre = Owned!

Well played 606v2

whocares wrote:how's the kindergarten going AWOP?
there is already like 1050 threads on the RWC final started a few month ago in 606v2 that you might want to resurrect instead of talking about so-called respect just to stir some c.rap.

I was comment on a NZ Herald article on the same day I make the post.

This other Caomincenter dredge up the silly old debate about if Joubert "handed the world cup final to NZ" in the manner of a Stephen Jones rant only with sllightly worser spelling.

AWOP: worse spelling ? I guess you would recognise it.

Do you know I got 3 day ban because I call someone "childish"?

So two posters call me childish her one in very patronising term and the other by reference to Kingergartjien.

So I imagine the consistent moderation team will issue the bans similarly.

If i call myself 'childish and a WUM' will i get a ban?

anotherworldofpain wrote:

whocares wrote:how's the kindergarten going AWOP?
there is already like 1050 threads on the RWC final started a few month ago in 606v2 that you might want to resurrect instead of talking about so-called respect just to stir some c.rap.

I was comment on a NZ Herald article on the same day I make the post.

This other Caomincenter dredge up the silly old debate about if Joubert "handed the world cup final to NZ" in the manner of a Stephen Jones rant only with sllightly worser spelling.

Never said that. have a look through the posts.

infact i did say i thought NZ were deserving winners.

i'm going to leave it at that. you talk talk rubbish all you want about me. people can make up their own minds about what i have written without you twisting what i have said.

caoimhincentre wrote:

anotherworldofpain wrote:

whocares wrote:how's the kindergarten going AWOP?
there is already like 1050 threads on the RWC final started a few month ago in 606v2 that you might want to resurrect instead of talking about so-called respect just to stir some c.rap.

I was comment on a NZ Herald article on the same day I make the post.

This other Caomincenter dredge up the silly old debate about if Joubert "handed the world cup final to NZ" in the manner of a Stephen Jones rant only with sllightly worser spelling.

Never said that. have a look through the posts.

infact i did say i thought NZ were deserving winners.

i'm going to leave it at that. you talk talk rubbish all you want about me. people can make up their own minds about what i have written without you twisting what i have said.

You said:

1) "if fact many would argue that they should have won that final"
2) "France should have had any number of penalties in the last 10 mins "

Sounds like to me I infer correctly that you think that France deserved to win the final but referee didn't give penalties.

Unless you are feverishly and relentlessly arguing on behalf of these mysterious "many" who believe something different to you...

I give up on this thread, far too serious for this Culchies liking. Need to lighten up and have a laugh lads

anotherworldofpain wrote:Do you know I got 3 day ban because I call someone "childish"?

So two posters call me childish her one in very patronising term and the other by reference to Kingergartjien.

So I imagine the consistent moderation team will issue the bans similarly.

Perhaps you've not earned any respect yet, AWOP. Just a thought.

Yes, not respected in a thread many thought I should have won sugar I have a youtube clip to proving it

anotherworldofpain wrote:Yes, not respected in a thread many thought I should have won sugar I have a youtube clip to proving it

The TMO has just had a look at your argument and apparently one of your points was in touch.

oh so it's about "winning thread" or "my argument is bigger than yours" sort of thing... very constructive and not childish indeed.

No, I was being ironic about the degrading of the argument but using a parody of the points used by caimincenter in order to actually reinforce the point that sugar was making, whocares. It's like saying "I agree" but in a more creativity methods.

eirebilly wrote:I give up on this thread, far too serious for this Culchies liking. Need to lighten up and have a laugh lads

You are correct.



There I feeling better. Caomincenter, how about you?

If we could just somehow harness the energy you use up in responding to all of these threads, we could finally have clean, sustainable energy and not have to worry about all these silly-looking, noisy and expensive windmills scattered round the countryside.

Hey Kia, those 'windmills' make a very tidy living for me.

Well all the more reason then to tear the feckers down.

Nice to see you up and about and around the threads eirebilly! Appreciate your time to drop by and bring some smiling and laughing.

kiakahaaotearoa wrote:Well all the more reason then to tear the feckers down.

┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

Ya cheeky feica

anotherworldofpain wrote:Nice to see you up and about and around the threads eirebilly! Appreciate your time to drop by and bring some smiling and laughing.

Just providing your everyday friendly culchie service

This thread is dedicated to respect of the English language and all its fine spellings.

anotherworldofpain wrote:No, I don't want you to COPY someone else work, I want you to come up with your own argument and express it using logic here to "prove" this heinous crime against France, who you suddenly support.

You didn't give an argument, you paste a link to someone else's argument. We've all seen that and had a laugh about how desperately bitter it is already.

Hey! Your English improves a lot when you get wound up. Look what we have here; the Incredible Hulk of grammar

eirebilly wrote:

anotherworldofpain wrote:Nice to see you up and about and around the threads eirebilly! Appreciate your time to drop by and bring some smiling and laughing.

Just providing your everyday friendly culchie service

The bionic culchie!

Notch, yes I noticed that. I wonder at times about AWOP being a bit of an actor with his 'crazy' style.

Maybe my grammar is look better when you are wound up. When wound up people read more what they want to reading and less what is written.

gregortree wrote:This thread is dedicated to respect of the English language and all its fine spellings.

Waht or ewe talknig abut sily bouy?

Billy, ok you can start a new thead on Gaelic spellings. Might make more sense that AWOP's English spellings.

gregortree wrote:Billy, ok you can start a new thead on Gaelic spellings. Might make more sense that AWOP's English spellings.

Hee hee, sorry that was too easy to resist

oh yes

Gentlemen much as the bickering is entertaining it does`nt answer the question.ANY competent referee could penalize EITHER side at every Breakdown for at least a dozen offences.For every Video showing one side another shot from a different angle could show differently.Journalists arn`t going to say "It was a tight match,not much happened,but one side or other won"That does`nt sell papers.The "WE WUZ ROBBED"bit does to a point, at every match there will be decisions you think the officials got wrong.ALL you can ask for is the Ref is consistent through out the match for both sides for the full 80.He may well have missed penalty chances for BOTH sides that COULD have changed the match.You still have to convert those chances,why Weepu who had strained a groin in the warm up.Was entrusted to the Goal kicks when Crudon or Dagg puzzles me.IF they had kicked they MAY have converted more chances and the All Blacks would have had an easier win.Had France kicked all there points THEY would have won.It`all IF`s and buts the win is in the record book.

Talk about get things wrong...

I thought this thread was about what a sore, pathetic bad loser Dusautoir is, and how the event at Eden park in October last year is still haunting him and giving him nightmares.

I wonder about the timing on the story. It look like a smoke screen to something else.

AWOP

When this came out about 2 weeks ago, I felt that the IRB had nothing going on in the Northern hemisphere to put on "Total Rugby", so they decided lets get the French guys to go and visit Dusautoir, interview him , interpret it back into English and blast it all over the World.

When it hit New Zealand about ten days ago, The staff at the Herald couldnt help but clarify the Issue relating to Sonny Bill and Israel dagg, and did the short explanation.

Dusatoir, cant now change anything that happened in October last year, maybe He should be however looking ahead a couple of months to events at the end of this year. Just a thought.

Surely they could have made an article about the regularity of Wales win the 6N grandslam just after the RWC? Would be more interesting to me.

Its a weekly rugby programme (or its meant to be) not one of those virtual Tv game like programmes.

Strange that a French poster talks about France being poor losers and having sour grapes as well as taking the side of a New Zealand news paper on this.....

Why do people even bother responding to this guy....