Did Stewart Lancaster put out the wrong team yesterday?

First topic message reminder :

I just thinking about the game yesterday. And thought was Englands loss because of the wrong team selection?

Or did England lose because of wrong decisions taken on the field? Taken a tap and go when they should of taken kicks at goal? Should the decision to tap and go come from the captain, rather than a player make a snap decision on his own?

It is nice for a coach to have consistancy in the team, but does playing the same team every week become a little predicatable?

How many changes should their be this week? And if changes are going to be made, will the players that are changed make England a better team than the one/s that have started both games so far?

England are a young team granted. But if they want to climb the IRB World Rankins shouldn't they bring in one or two, more experienced players. ( Nick Easter Mark Cuato ) to name just two of them.
Or Are England a better team with out these old heads in the team?

DISCUSS.

To be fair though if Lancaster had selected Manu with a gameplan that involved the 13 passing to the wingers then its him that needs sacking.

Wasnt it Goodes job to come into the line and offer that extra creative option? Manu is very much in the side to beat defenders and draw others in.

Englands continued struggles at the breakdown though (combined witha lack of players begging for the offload) reduce the effectiveness of that.

No,
he picked the wrong colour shirts.
It was the purple wot did us in.
We play for the shirt, but not the purple shirt.