Wales can win if.....

1) They double up in the tackle and put there shoulders in and not arm tackle.
2) They commit players to the breakdown to slow NZ ball.
3) They utilise middle and back line-out ball to launch attacks.
4) They kick for line-outs and challenge NZ Ball.
5) They shift the point of attack, vary their recievers, angles and passes.
6) They must attack in the 10/12 channel with forwards and split the field to have options both sides.
7) They show desire, commitment and aggression and be prepared to go to hell and bac!
8) They must fight for every inch and take no backward steps.

anything ive missed......oh.....

9) Carter to have a shocker
10) McCaw to have a shocker
11) Warburton to be king at the breakdown
12) Faletau to carry monsterously
13) Priestland to play with intelligence and accuracy
14) Wales must shut down NZ attacks quickly and keep their width to avoid cross kick specials.
15) They can gain parity in the scrum

Heres to be hopeful!

16) Hotel ABs are staying in hire a new waitress called Suzie

haha thats a low one Tiger!

They could play Suzie in the centre they'd still win with Priestland there.

1) Disagree, doubling up in the tackle will commit more players to the breakdown who are unable to compete for the ball. Theres a time and a place for the double tackle!!
2) Disagree. If we commit players to the breakdown gaps around the fringes will appear, we need to be smarter at the breakdown not more numbers!
3) Disagree. Attempting back lineout with Matthew Rees is asking for disaster!
4) Kicking dead won't do that much, if you try to kick long they take the quick one and if short your giving up territory. Chasers will occasionally get confused and miss time the chase.
5) Partly agree. Changing the point of attack is all well and good but avoiding contact shouldn't be the reason!
6) Disagree. Going down the 10/12 channell too often gives our forwards more work to do to get the and gives Mccaw the edge!
7) Part agree. Techniacally aggression is ilegal, assertion is the better phrasing. Also when talking agression we tend to use it in the way of frenzy, and wild, which will inevitably give penalties away, Evans and Davies need to keep their heads not get agressive!
8)Given.

9) - 15) Disagree!!!

17) If Howley kidnaps and disguises himself as Steve Hansen and implements the gameplan for NZ for this weekend.

Permian1988 wrote:17) If Howley kidnaps and disguises himself as Steve Hansen and implements the gameplan for NZ for this weekend.

Too late...we wont get caught on that one twice...Deans already did that in Brisbane...

2 men to a ruck and recycle as fast as NZ do. EASY!

As taylorman runs off.....i agree roger!

On that though its about how close the supporters are and how dynamic the ball carrier is.

The ball carrier must go forward in contact otherwise the support players will be caught on their heels.

As taylorman runs off.....i agree roger!

On that though its about how close the supporters are and how dynamic the ball carrier is.

The ball carrier must go forward in contact otherwise the support players will be caught on their heels.

If NZ only play with 10 men. Wales ( MIGHT) have a chance.

Or, If Wales dont give NZ too much respect and play heads up rugby, they might pull it off. A shock win that is.

BBC1 Tonight - Looks at how to beat the All Blacks

It's called "We Beat The All Blacks".

Here's the link - should be worth a look.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nzbn2

majesticimperialman wrote:If NZ only play with 10 men. Wales ( MIGHT) have a chance.

Or, If Wales dont give NZ too much respect and play heads up rugby, they might pull it off. A shock win that is.

That's disrespectful. Of course Wales would win with 5 more players.