Abraham v Stieglitz II
+14
eddyfightfan
OasisBFC
Imperial Ghosty
Adam D
AlexHuckerby
Strongback
BoxingFan88
azania
Union Cane
School Project
Seanusarrilius
WHU_Champo_League_in_7Yrs
tomfinneywalksonwater
John Bloody Wayne
18 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Abraham v Stieglitz II
The super middleweight rematch.
Also featuring St George v someone
Sprott v Helenious
Who's watching?
Also featuring St George v someone
Sprott v Helenious
Who's watching?
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Groves has already fought, he was opening the show. Pointless fight , just one to keep him busy.
tomfinneywalksonwater- Posts : 225
Join date : 2011-02-24
Age : 43
Location : Wiltshire
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Groves beat up a tiny journeyman without too much problem
Might watch the main event, didn't watch it first time around so might as well catching it
Is there a reason they are fighting again? Was it close/controversial a last time or is it because both are german
Think that Helenius shouldn't have too much problem with sprott
Might watch the main event, didn't watch it first time around so might as well catching it
Is there a reason they are fighting again? Was it close/controversial a last time or is it because both are german
Think that Helenius shouldn't have too much problem with sprott
WHU_Champo_League_in_7Yrs- Posts : 3136
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
It was a good fight first time around, entertaining and close.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Gerber being saved by the ref here.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Absolute joke refereeing. The bloke brought in for Gerber to beat was smashing him around in the second to last round prompting the ref to step in and warn the opponent for no reason then stand between them waiting for Gerber to recover enough to hang on. At one point Gerber actually turned away and crouched so the ref jumped in and warned the opponent again for no reason.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
It wouldn't be a German fight card though without it, it's become the norm for the home favourite to get a little assistance.
tomfinneywalksonwater- Posts : 225
Join date : 2011-02-24
Age : 43
Location : Wiltshire
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
John Bloody Wayne wrote:Absolute joke refereeing. The bloke brought in for Gerber to beat was smashing him around in the second to last round prompting the ref to step in and warn the opponent for no reason then stand between them waiting for Gerber to recover enough to hang on. At one point Gerber actually turned away and crouched so the ref jumped in and warned the opponent again for no reason.
Laughable. Typical German corruption.
Seanusarrilius- Moderator
- Posts : 5145
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Buncey's on an insane rant about women fighting strippers 17 years ago while he tries to big up women's boxing...
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
John Bloody Wayne wrote:Buncey's on an insane rant about women fighting strippers 17 years ago while he tries to big up women's boxing...
Buncey probably knew the strippers
Seanusarrilius- Moderator
- Posts : 5145
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Women's boxing on a main card is disgusting. What ever next? man sausage fighting?!
Ban this sick filth.
Ban this sick filth.
School Project- Posts : 1503
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 39
Location : South Wales
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
School Project wrote:Women's boxing on a main card is disgusting. What ever next? man sausage fighting?!
Ban this sick filth.
Haha.
Seanusarrilius- Moderator
- Posts : 5145
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
I chose reading about Nietzsche over watching the lasses. How did they do if anyone watched?
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
I gave Stieglitz the first fight by a couple of rounds, would be good to see him get revenge tonight.
Union Cane- Moderator
- Posts : 11328
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 48
Location : Whatever truculent means, if that's good, I'm that.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Women boxers should dress like the men.
Well it worked for darts.
Well it worked for darts.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Sprott took a bad beating from his cornerman there...
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Abraham having a nice, humble ring walk...
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Smart start for Stieglitz. Abe was panting in the last couple of rounds of their last fight so Stieglitz should force a high workrate right from the start.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Union Cane wrote:I gave Stieglitz the first fight by a couple of rounds, would be good to see him get revenge tonight.
Got what you wanted.
Shame to see what was hotting up to be a little war end that way though.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
That was the right decision, I would back Groves to beat Stieglitz though.
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Groves v this version of Stieglitz could be a real fire cracker of a fight. Lots of speed, power and activity. Arthur's face has been rearranged tonight.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
If he comes at Groves that recklessly he might not be standing upright.
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Abraham seemed clueless in there when Stieglitz piled on the pressure. He doesn't seem to deal with pressure fighters very well. He was always a bit one dimensional with his high guard and sporadic punching but tonight he was really shown up as having no answers and no other game plan. Froch provided the blueprint for beating Abraham.
I had no problem with the retirement as Abraham looked like he didn't want to be in there. He was looking at the ref and his corner for help. He just had no way of dealing with the onslaught of punches.
I had no problem with the retirement as Abraham looked like he didn't want to be in there. He was looking at the ref and his corner for help. He just had no way of dealing with the onslaught of punches.
Strongback- Posts : 6529
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Matchroom Sports Head Office
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pg4NU62xUnE
For those who want to watch it
For those who want to watch it
School Project- Posts : 1503
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 39
Location : South Wales
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
How Boxrec have Stieglitz as the no. 3 Super Middleweight on the planet I'll never know. Surely out of every division, it's pretty much a nailed on 3 in the SMW Division right? Ward, Froch and Kessler the latter 2 being alternative in which way you see fit.
AlexHuckerby- Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
AAs eye was a right mess.
I thought that Stieglitz was very clumsy and leading with the head.
I know the commentators said it was a punch but I am not so sure. Stieglitz only impressed me with work rate, however, I reckon that a more talented fighter than AA will knock him out easily.
I thought that Stieglitz was very clumsy and leading with the head.
I know the commentators said it was a punch but I am not so sure. Stieglitz only impressed me with work rate, however, I reckon that a more talented fighter than AA will knock him out easily.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Think Groves has a very good chance to beat him in all honesty, just wonder with Groves though, I think we'll find out a few things as to whether he can handle someone coming at him with decent power. He's certain to get hit and put in a few difficult situations by Stieglitz so is a really good test. Sadly, it's for a world title, which I don't quite think it warrants.
AlexHuckerby- Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Very difficult to tell with foreign commentary but I get the impression that Abraham and his corner thought the fight would be ruled a no contest, definitely looks like it was caused by a clash of heads to me.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
The commentators on boxnation stated it was a punch.
Still personally think it was a head clash - Stieglitz was wild and wreckless.
Still personally think it was a head clash - Stieglitz was wild and wreckless.
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
OasisBFC- Posts : 1050
Join date : 2011-02-24
Location : Manchester
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
it was a clear punch that did the damage, the replay between rounds showed it as such, and the commentators on box nation pointed out that the head clash/butt shown on the reply immediately after wasn't were the damage to the eye was done.
groves could do with beating another contender before he tries for a belt, glen johnson is his best win so for and he was getting on a fair bit when they fought.
andrade has offered him the chance (stieglitz) a chance to revenge his earlier loss, and i would persue that fight if i were him.
groves could do with beating another contender before he tries for a belt, glen johnson is his best win so for and he was getting on a fair bit when they fought.
andrade has offered him the chance (stieglitz) a chance to revenge his earlier loss, and i would persue that fight if i were him.
eddyfightfan- Posts : 2925
Join date : 2011-02-24
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
OasisBFC wrote:groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
If Groves wins I hope he doesn't call himself world champion in the same division as Froch let alone Ward.
A unification with Froch will be a money spinner though.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
azania wrote:OasisBFC wrote:groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
If Groves wins I hope he doesn't call himself world champion in the same division as Froch let alone Ward.
A unification with Froch will be a money spinner though.
So what would you call him then if he is holding the WBO World Championship?
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Adam D wrote:azania wrote:OasisBFC wrote:groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
If Groves wins I hope he doesn't call himself world champion in the same division as Froch let alone Ward.
A unification with Froch will be a money spinner though.
So what would you call him then if he is holding the WBO World Championship?
A strap-on
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Adam D wrote:azania wrote:OasisBFC wrote:groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
If Groves wins I hope he doesn't call himself world champion in the same division as Froch let alone Ward.
A unification with Froch will be a money spinner though.
So what would you call him then if he is holding the WBO World Championship?
The WBO champion. The title World Champion belongs to Ward.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
ShahenshahG wrote:Adam D wrote:azania wrote:OasisBFC wrote:groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
If Groves wins I hope he doesn't call himself world champion in the same division as Froch let alone Ward.
A unification with Froch will be a money spinner though.
So what would you call him then if he is holding the WBO World Championship?
A strap-on
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Watching it live you could see that right hand Stieglitz landed when Abe was in the corner shook him right to his boots. I don't think I've ever seen Abraham so hurt by a punch, thought it was pretty clearly the punch that did the damage too personally.
It's frustrating to watch a guy gifted with Abraham's power stand there and not nail somebody as reckless as Stieglitz on the way in. He needs to be taught how to roll with a punch. He's physically tough but stands so straight up he takes the fullest of each shot.
It's frustrating to watch a guy gifted with Abraham's power stand there and not nail somebody as reckless as Stieglitz on the way in. He needs to be taught how to roll with a punch. He's physically tough but stands so straight up he takes the fullest of each shot.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Just rewatched the fight, it was definitely the right hand that caught the eye of Abraham. The heads didn't help...
There was 2 points in the corner where Abraham didn't want the ice on his eye, I'd have to question if Abraham wanted this to be stopped by his corner?
There was 2 points in the corner where Abraham didn't want the ice on his eye, I'd have to question if Abraham wanted this to be stopped by his corner?
School Project- Posts : 1503
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 39
Location : South Wales
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
School Project wrote:Just rewatched the fight, it was definitely the right hand that caught the eye of Abraham. The heads didn't help...
There was 2 points in the corner where Abraham didn't want the ice on his eye, I'd have to question if Abraham wanted this to be stopped by his corner?
He looked sulky like he did v Froch. Re the ice, might have just been the agony of having it pressed against his eye?
Seanusarrilius- Moderator
- Posts : 5145
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Watched this last night, Stieglitz could be reckless against AA, he knew it was unlikely he'd get countered.
The right hand definately did the initial damage to the eye, the clash of heads afterwards wouldn't have helped though.
The right hand definately did the initial damage to the eye, the clash of heads afterwards wouldn't have helped though.
hampo17- Admin
- Posts : 9108
Join date : 2011-02-24
Age : 36
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Seanusarrilius wrote:School Project wrote:Just rewatched the fight, it was definitely the right hand that caught the eye of Abraham. The heads didn't help...
There was 2 points in the corner where Abraham didn't want the ice on his eye, I'd have to question if Abraham wanted this to be stopped by his corner?
He looked sulky like he did v Froch. Re the ice, might have just been the agony of having it pressed against his eye?
As Buncey said post fight 'what were they doing only having a bag of ice, they should have had an enswell.'
Strongback- Posts : 6529
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Matchroom Sports Head Office
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
I don't think it really matters whether ice or the enswell is used, they both do the same thing... one thing that always confuses me though is how some corners actually use the enswell (applying pressure and then dragging it across the swelling?).
I thought it was my effective to hold in one spot rather than spread the haemotoma?
Anyways, you're right Sean, Abraham was looking very sorry for himself and didn't like being pushed back to the ropes. Thus highlighting my "Swarmers cause counterpunchers/boxerpunchers problems"
I thought it was my effective to hold in one spot rather than spread the haemotoma?
Anyways, you're right Sean, Abraham was looking very sorry for himself and didn't like being pushed back to the ropes. Thus highlighting my "Swarmers cause counterpunchers/boxerpunchers problems"
School Project- Posts : 1503
Join date : 2011-06-13
Age : 39
Location : South Wales
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
azania wrote:Adam D wrote:azania wrote:OasisBFC wrote:groves reckon stieglitz promised him a fight if he won the title.
id pick groves.
how ironic that he could get a wbo shot AFTER ditching warren.
If Groves wins I hope he doesn't call himself world champion in the same division as Froch let alone Ward.
A unification with Froch will be a money spinner though.
So what would you call him then if he is holding the WBO World Championship?
The WBO champion. The title World Champion belongs to Ward.
i'd call vitali a heavyweight champion as well as his brother. win a world title you're a world champ. not the number one in the division, but a world champ still.
OasisBFC- Posts : 1050
Join date : 2011-02-24
Location : Manchester
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Wlad is the world champ. Vitali is a belt holder. With a clear divisional No 1 its an insult to call any supermid a world champ.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
That clear divisional number one is injured though Az so it gets to a point when he can no longer live off past glories, he has to keep stepping into the ring and proving he's the best.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
In that case the consensus next best should be called the champ or that there isn't a world champ. Would you call Paulie Malinaggi world champion at WW? Its absurd.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Under the current system he is a world champ. It would be like a British champion not being able to call himself that because another British fighter has a world title.
Lumbering_Jack- Posts : 4341
Join date : 2011-03-07
Location : Newcastle
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Nothing of the sort. There is only one British champ.
Where there is a clear divisional number 1 its ridiculous to call anyone else a world champ. World champ should signify being the best in the world. Ward has proven that. Stig is nothing but a belt holder. Ditto Froch albeit a damn good one.
Where there is a clear divisional number 1 its ridiculous to call anyone else a world champ. World champ should signify being the best in the world. Ward has proven that. Stig is nothing but a belt holder. Ditto Froch albeit a damn good one.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Abraham v Stieglitz II
Using that logic how can a British champion call himself that if there is a higher rated fighter?
Lumbering_Jack- Posts : 4341
Join date : 2011-03-07
Location : Newcastle
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Stieglitz v Abraham III
» Abraham v Ward: Has Abraham Really Learned His Lesson?
» Groves vs Stieglitz OFF
» Groves v Stieglitz set May 5th in Germay
» Abraham vs Smith II
» Abraham v Ward: Has Abraham Really Learned His Lesson?
» Groves vs Stieglitz OFF
» Groves v Stieglitz set May 5th in Germay
» Abraham vs Smith II
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum