Aussie view???
4 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
Aussie view???
Did he really just say that Gatland has picked 37 of the biggest guys he could find???
Is this crazy view an general Aussie view or just a misguided view who knows little of NH players?
Is this crazy view an general Aussie view or just a misguided view who knows little of NH players?
thebluesmancometh- Posts : 8358
Join date : 2011-05-04
Re: Aussie view???
Tindall also mentioning that the Force have been split in 2, the team to play lions and the best options on the other side of the park to train to play Tah's!!
thebluesmancometh- Posts : 8358
Join date : 2011-05-04
Re: Aussie view???
thebluesmancometh wrote:Did he really just say that Gatland has picked 37 of the biggest guys he could find???
Is this crazy view an general Aussie view or just a misguided view who knows little of NH players?
Who said that? Deans?
GunsGerms- Posts : 12542
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 44
Location : Ireland
Re: Aussie view???
GunsGerms wrote:thebluesmancometh wrote:Did he really just say that Gatland has picked 37 of the biggest guys he could find???
Is this crazy view an general Aussie view or just a misguided view who knows little of NH players?
Who said that? Deans?
Whats his chops Aussie sky pundit on the pitch at Force! forget his name. Just said he made a scale of biggest to smallest and selected the biggest 37
thebluesmancometh- Posts : 8358
Join date : 2011-05-04
Re: Aussie view???
sounds like something Phil Kearns would say. Aussie pundits tend to be remarkably ignorant when it comes to NH rugby.
GunsGerms- Posts : 12542
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 44
Location : Ireland
Re: Aussie view???
To be fair though Gatts does favour size and power over guile and invention.
Obviously the guy is exaggerating though.
Obviously the guy is exaggerating though.
Cyril- Posts : 7162
Join date : 2012-11-16
Re: Aussie view???
Cyril on 606v2 wrote:To be fair though Gatts does favour size and power over guile and invention.
Obviously the guy is exaggerating though.
Yeah if that was the completly the case he would have taken Barrett in place of Drico or Robshaw etc. in place of Croft. Also 1/2p isnt particularly big nor is Heaslip for an 8 or Healy for a loose head prop.
GunsGerms- Posts : 12542
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 44
Location : Ireland
Re: Aussie view???
GunsGerms wrote:Cyril on 606v2 wrote:To be fair though Gatts does favour size and power over guile and invention.
Obviously the guy is exaggerating though.
Yeah if that was the completly the case he would have taken Barrett in place of Drico or Robshaw etc. in place of Croft. Also 1/2p isnt particularly big nor is Heaslip for an 8 or Healy for a loose head prop.
Gatland favours quality and effectiveness, the backline is there through being better than other players, not bigger.
And the pack has been selected with mobility in mind, many larger players have been left at home, so he is 100% wrong, it's just a view of the backlines weight stats and jumping to a conclusion
thebluesmancometh- Posts : 8358
Join date : 2011-05-04
Re: Aussie view???
Who I think would be best side to play Wallabies in first test from the form of two matches so far...
1. Vunipola
2. Best
3. Jones
4. POC
5. Gray
6. SOB
7. Tipuric
8. Heaslip
9. Phillips
10. Sexton
11. North
12. Roberts
13. BOD
14. Maitland
15. Hogg
16. Healy (if available)
17. Youngs
18. Cole
19. AWJ
20. Faletau
21. Youngs
22. Farrell
23. Halfpenny
1. Vunipola
2. Best
3. Jones
4. POC
5. Gray
6. SOB
7. Tipuric
8. Heaslip
9. Phillips
10. Sexton
11. North
12. Roberts
13. BOD
14. Maitland
15. Hogg
16. Healy (if available)
17. Youngs
18. Cole
19. AWJ
20. Faletau
21. Youngs
22. Farrell
23. Halfpenny
bsando- Posts : 4649
Join date : 2011-11-27
Age : 36
Location : Inverness
Re: Aussie view???
bsando wrote:Who I think would be best side to play Wallabies in first test from the form of two matches so far...
1. Vunipola
2. Best (HIbbard if not for the set peice alone)
3. Jones
4. POC
5. Gray (AWJ for his superior ability in the tight)
6. SOB
7. Tipuric
8. Heaslip
9. Phillips
10. Sexton
11. North
12. Roberts
13. BOD
14. Maitland (CUthbert far better)
15. Hogg
16. Healy (if available)
17. Youngs
18. Cole
19. AWJ
20. Faletau
21. Youngs
22. Farrell
23. Halfpenny
There are some players who havn't had a shot yet, Jenkins, Parling, B Youngs, Warburton, and Kearney are all to feature, and IMO all have an honest shot at test rugby.
thebluesmancometh- Posts : 8358
Join date : 2011-05-04
Similar topics
» Aussie's get their own way again
» Aussie Barbarians 38 - 14 Canada
» Aussie PR - 3, England PR - 0
» New Aussie call-ups
» Aussie rules
» Aussie Barbarians 38 - 14 Canada
» Aussie PR - 3, England PR - 0
» New Aussie call-ups
» Aussie rules
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum