Inexcusable acts in the ring
+21
horizontalhero
oxring
OasisBFC
BallchinianMuffwig
bhb001
John Bloody Wayne
Reborn-DeeMcK-Reborn
milkyboy
ONETWOFOREVER
Nico the gman
TopHat24/7
Champagne_Socialist
kingraf
Lance
Rowley
mobilemaster8
BoxingFan88
STC
Mind the windows Tino.
Strongback
Valero's Conscience
25 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Inexcusable acts in the ring
First topic message reminder :
What moments in the ring should never be forgiven.
The most famous are Tyson's ear munching and Duran no mas.
Without wanting to mention all the obvious ones I would like to add Montell Griffin in the first Jones Jr fight. He took the easy way out when being hit lightly by Jones when down and won on a DQ. Luckily Jones Jr ran through him in a round in a rematch.
What moments in the ring should never be forgiven.
The most famous are Tyson's ear munching and Duran no mas.
Without wanting to mention all the obvious ones I would like to add Montell Griffin in the first Jones Jr fight. He took the easy way out when being hit lightly by Jones when down and won on a DQ. Luckily Jones Jr ran through him in a round in a rematch.
Valero's Conscience- Posts : 2096
Join date : 2011-02-21
Age : 39
Location : Kent/London
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
Depends how you look at it really. To me it felt like Broner did enough to win the fight, but technically he should've had points deducted which could/would have changed things.mobilemaster8 wrote:Fair point Toppy haha.
Saying that he is away for the next week if memory serves so fire away.
So a draw would have been a more appropriate score? Wouldn't have thought so given Broners post fight interviews etc.
It's a bit like Martinez-Murray. If the second kd had been correctly scored he'd have won, but it wasn't, so......
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
i think a more reliable source would be duran himself. in the no mas documentary, entirely about him quitting, no where does he say he didn;t like him clowning around. he blamed it on stomach cramps due to drinking hot coffee. in other conversation he said a 'very hot steak'. he couldn't make his mind up.DAVE667 wrote:I believe it may be an opinion offered in "Four Kings" which, although doesn't automatically "make it so", would suggest it comes from a more reliable source that just me spouting off.ONETWOFOREVER wrote:This absolute TOSHDAVE667 wrote:My reading of the NO MAS incident is that Duran's sense of machismo was so offended by Leonard's fooling around and showboating that he said "I don't want to fight this clown no more" not that he quit through being humiliated.
Duran was a fighter and didn't think there was a place in the ring for that sort of stuff.
So I'd also vote for excessive clowning, showboating, preening and efforts to humiliate an opponent by a fighter.
Duran quit because he was getting jabbed time and time again without being able to land ANYTHING of his own. It has nothing to do with his machismo, he was out boxed pure and simple....
...and thats that.
I thought TRUSS and I had put this naughty baby to bed already.
i say he was out of shape, got down from WAAAAAY over the weight limit and was embarrassed in the ring. of course leonard would toy with him. Duran insulted him AND his wife, and handed him his first defeat.
OasisBFC- Posts : 1050
Join date : 2011-02-24
Location : Manchester
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
The point being Duran felt that, having done all that in the build-up, Ray should have fought "like a man" instead of clowning around and it offended Duran's macho sensibilities. Ray had fought him before and felt he should do it again.OasisBFC wrote:i think a more reliable source would be duran himself. in the no mas documentary, entirely about him quitting, no where does he say he didn;t like him clowning around. he blamed it on stomach cramps due to drinking hot coffee. in other conversation he said a 'very hot steak'. he couldn't make his mind up.DAVE667 wrote:I believe it may be an opinion offered in "Four Kings" which, although doesn't automatically "make it so", would suggest it comes from a more reliable source that just me spouting off.ONETWOFOREVER wrote:This absolute TOSHDAVE667 wrote:My reading of the NO MAS incident is that Duran's sense of machismo was so offended by Leonard's fooling around and showboating that he said "I don't want to fight this clown no more" not that he quit through being humiliated.
Duran was a fighter and didn't think there was a place in the ring for that sort of stuff.
So I'd also vote for excessive clowning, showboating, preening and efforts to humiliate an opponent by a fighter.
Duran quit because he was getting jabbed time and time again without being able to land ANYTHING of his own. It has nothing to do with his machismo, he was out boxed pure and simple....
...and thats that.
I thought TRUSS and I had put this naughty baby to bed already.
i say he was out of shape, got down from WAAAAAY over the weight limit and was embarrassed in the ring. of course leonard would toy with him. Duran insulted him AND his wife, and handed him his first defeat.
Maybe Duran knew he was never going to beat Ray at his own game and quit before he had his pants pulled down but that explaination is one that's been offered up too.
Guest- Guest
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
Collins-Resto
Margarito-Mosley (alright - he didn't quite make it into the ring but still).
Every time Wyatt Earp refereed a fight. (or almost every time at least)
Margarito-Mosley (alright - he didn't quite make it into the ring but still).
Every time Wyatt Earp refereed a fight. (or almost every time at least)
oxring- Moderator
- Posts : 3782
Join date : 2011-01-26
Location : Oxford
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
I may well be wrong, but was Duran only a couple of rounds behind when he quit? Haven't watched it in ages, but I'm not sure that it was as one sided as some of your comments in this thread suggest. As I said I may be wrong , can anyone enlighten us as to what the scores were after round seven?
horizontalhero- Posts : 938
Join date : 2011-05-27
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
5 - 2.............But he obviously thought he was behind and looking like a man sausage..
He quit...........In fairness he didn't dog it.........Just didn't like looking a prat....
Which is forgiveable.........The Hearns fight isn't.
He quit...........In fairness he didn't dog it.........Just didn't like looking a prat....
Which is forgiveable.........The Hearns fight isn't.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
Thanks Truss, Leonard was more ahead than I thought then, but in a fifteen round fight three rounds wasn't insurmountable. To me this fight was one of those controversial episodes that's forever going to be debated, it most adds to Duran's legacy in strange way - it adds a it of mystery if you get what I mean- people love controversy and conspiracy.
As for the Hearns fight, didn't he lose that because Hearns was bigger than him?
As for the Hearns fight, didn't he lose that because Hearns was bigger than him?
horizontalhero- Posts : 938
Join date : 2011-05-27
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
Fury singing was as inexcusable as it gets
hogey- Posts : 1367
Join date : 2011-02-24
Location : London
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
Derrick Gainer versus Freddie Norwood. An absolutely filthy, foul-filled fight all the way through.
The second title fight between Billy Papke and Stanley Ketchel is an interesting one, too, albeit there is confusion and debate about exactly how it all unfolded. Papke gave Ketchel an absolutely merciless hammering but many reported that he'd clobbered Ketchel with a huge, unexpected cheap shot while the referee (Jim Jeffries, as it goes) gave pre-fight instructions, and that Ketchel just never recovered. Others claim the blow landed when the fight had started as Ketchel went to touch gloves before engaging, which would have made it very unsporting of Papke, but not necessarily a rule breaker. Some argue there never was a foul or unsporting blow at all, too. But whatever the truth, Ketchel was floored three times in the opener and never came close to turning it around.
The second title fight between Billy Papke and Stanley Ketchel is an interesting one, too, albeit there is confusion and debate about exactly how it all unfolded. Papke gave Ketchel an absolutely merciless hammering but many reported that he'd clobbered Ketchel with a huge, unexpected cheap shot while the referee (Jim Jeffries, as it goes) gave pre-fight instructions, and that Ketchel just never recovered. Others claim the blow landed when the fight had started as Ketchel went to touch gloves before engaging, which would have made it very unsporting of Papke, but not necessarily a rule breaker. Some argue there never was a foul or unsporting blow at all, too. But whatever the truth, Ketchel was floored three times in the opener and never came close to turning it around.
88Chris05- Moderator
- Posts : 9661
Join date : 2011-02-16
Age : 36
Location : Nottingham
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
Eddie Hearn jumping in the ring while Froch v Bute was still going on
Steffan- Posts : 7856
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 43
Re: Inexcusable acts in the ring
The ref giving Bute a count rather than stopping it outright.
John Bloody Wayne- Posts : 4460
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : behind you
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Top 10 acts of sportsmanship in football
» Leaving it all in the ring?
» Ring P4p rankings ......
» Well known dick-head acts like a dick
» Ring ratings
» Leaving it all in the ring?
» Ring P4p rankings ......
» Well known dick-head acts like a dick
» Ring ratings
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum