tyson fury verses frank bruno?

i think tyson fury would of knocked severn bells out of frank,an easy knockout for fury the fight would have lasted 3 rounds.

frank beat an awful champ izzi are you havin a laugh?

Seen nothing from Fury to suggest that he ever stops anyone at world level in 3 rounds.

Entertaining character but he won't go any further than where he is now without getting knocked out.

The only man who ever swatted Bruno with the kind of contempt and ease you reckon Fury would was Iron Mike, mate. I think your take on this fight is fanciful at best, maybe something a little harsher if I wasn't such a nice bloke!

Cunningham's right hand down the pipe and over the top had Fury in a world of trouble, two or three times over - imagine what Bruno's would have done if he'd have been landing it with that kind of regularity instead of a man who was never that much of a puncher at Cruiser, never mind Heavy?

Fury's story isn't close to being finished yet, but so far in his career I don't think he has a single performance to his name which suggest he can deal with Bruno.

Frank's straight left was world class. I couldn't see Fury taking too many of them.

Are you kidding me?? Bruno would take a crap on Fury. Bruno was a decent boxer when he had his marbles together. He would be world champion if he was around with the turd heavyweights of today.

not mocking frank he his a good boxer loved by millions i really thing fury is a surperior athlete who will become champion in 2016 beating wilder the great usa hope to become undisputed heavyweight champ.

Let me get this right...are you suggesting that Widler and Fury will somehow end up holding all three or the major belts between them by 2016? That's almost as laughable as your suggestion that Fury could beat Bruno inside three rounds.

david lee wrote:not mocking frank he his a good boxer loved by millions i really thing fury is a surperior athlete who will become champion in 2016 beating wilder the great usa hope to become undisputed heavyweight champ.

I admire your beliefs... As moronic as they may be

its divided the fourum i enjoyed this debate still think fury the best

tyson fury wuold of beat mike tyson too

WUM.

catchweight wrote:Are you kidding me?? Bruno would take a crap on Fury. Bruno was a decent boxer when he had his marbles together. He would be world champion if he was around with the turd heavyweights of today.

No way Bruno beats either Klitschko, so couldn't see him as a world champ today. However the fact Bruno WAS a world champ back in the 90's gives a little perspective.

no one has conviced me yet that bruno would have bet tyson fury

Who will step forward, which pillar of persuasion will show david lee the light?

I've fashioned a bat symbol out of a plastic fork (just snap the middle two veins off) and am shining a torch at it to create a silhouette on the neighbour's wall. He will be hear soon to save the day.

I'd still give Bruno and Tyson a chance against Fury right now despite their advancing age and years of retirement, that's how bad he is.

The problems with Wums is they eventually go too far and stop being taken seriously... Everyone cared when David said Bruno would lose to Fury... but he gave the game up the second he brought up the real Tyson... As Clint Eastwood didn't say, "a Wums gotta know his limitations"

Agreed Hammersmith. I say both knock Fury out in 3 right now!! It would be an easy night for any big punching heavyweight (old or young). Name me a big punching heavy that Fury's fought. I can't think of any...

fury beat chisora who has 13 knockouts on record got the facts to back my article!

You're classing Chisora as a big puncher?

Stats don't always tell the story. Chisora throws a LOT of punches and his stoppage victories are often against guys still on their feet, occasionally "british stoppages".

Bruno, for example, put them down hard.

You can't argue with his logic. Wait a minute, he hasn't used any. He hasn't even said FACT. Amateur.

fury is undeafeated he never been beat.
he his top 5 in various rankings

Everyone is unbeaten at some point and it doesn't mean a great deal if you've never fought at world level either.

As bad as Bruno was, he'd be favourite over Fury.

Didn't Tyson Fury say he posts in forums.

think tyson fury would of knocked severn bells out of frank,an easy knockout for fury the fight would have lasted 3 rounds

Okay.Let's get all John Cleese on yo a55.Either use the word 'have' correctly or not.I know you're no F.R.Leavis but this is ,like,just random laziness.

Apart from that you argue your case with all the power and forceful vigour of a peak Laurence Olivier.Encore.

Also I have to pacifically inform you that 'Severn' is a river and not a number.Apart from that you construct an argument with all the guile and wit of A.A.Gill or Will Self.Superb stuff.

Mayweathers cellmate wrote:

catchweight wrote:Are you kidding me?? Bruno would take a crap on Fury. Bruno was a decent boxer when he had his marbles together. He would be world champion if he was around with the turd heavyweights of today.

No way Bruno beats either Klitschko, so couldn't see him as a world champ today. However the fact Bruno WAS a world champ back in the 90's gives a little perspective.

Bruno would have a great chance of beating the Klitschkos if he had his wits together. He fought in a miles stronger era of heavyweights than todays junk.

I'd like to see Bruno take a crack at Vitali's jaw. Six world championships across two forms of martial arts, and the only thing known to be powerful enough is a freaking spinning heel kick flush on the jaw..

I couldn't see Frank allowing Wlad to climb all over him and lean on top of him.

Frank had the strength to throw Wlad around like a rag doll. For a couple of rounds anyway until his tank emptied.

oh dear, the looney house has let out.

twit.

rose tinted glasses people use when they look back at bruno carreer

Dave Lee ,that is a Travisty of a thing to say

stop entertaining the pleb

tyson fury will keep on winning there no doubt in my mind he his a future hall of fame member

david lee wrote:rose tinted glasses people use when they look back at bruno carreer

Are you Yoda?

Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.

David Lee, are you a gambling man? I admire someone with a level of conviction in their beliefs and I really like to do my betting against idiots.

I have a feeling this is Tyson Fury.........

Bruno for me has a great chance of beating both Klits.........Had a top heavy jab and he has three or four rounds to land the right........and Wlad goes !!.......Vit too probably.....After all a left hook sent Tyson spinning...

After that the Klits all night long........

Same applies to Fury.............Bruno lands he goes.........BUT and a big but Bruno was so stiff he could never take a breather.......

Fury somehow gets through 5 I'd pick him to win..........Not sure he has the guile though to do it...

Bruno for me..

enjoyed your reply trussman you the best

enjoyed your reply trussman you the best

If you are Tyson Fury.........PM me and we can talk about cut price tickets for your next fight....and things like the front row..

Fury could be a good shout, his English is certainly equally bad.

The best thing Fury has ever done was uppercut himself and knock himself down when he was fighting a few years back.  

LordDowlais wrote:The best thing Fury has ever done was uppercut himself and knock himself down when he was fighting a few years back.  

Sadly he didn't knock himself down but most Fury fans will say that's because he's got such a great chin whilst those who watched him get floored by Steve Cunningham will say that's b*ll*cks.

Such are the fine margins when discussing Tyson Fury. I'm conflicted too....can't decided if he's a useless t*ssbag or a useless c***

david lee wrote:fury is undeafeated he never been beat.
he his top 5 in various rankings

As sad indictment of the state of heavy weight boxing as you could wish to find.

Fury's a sucker for an overhand right. Those were Bruno's meat and drink - short night.

DAVE667 wrote:

LordDowlais wrote:The best thing Fury has ever done was uppercut himself and knock himself down when he was fighting a few years back.  

Sadly he didn't knock himself down but most Fury fans will say that's because he's got such a great chin whilst those who watched him get floored by Steve Cunningham will say that's b*ll*cks.

Such are the fine margins when discussing Tyson Fury. I'm conflicted too....can't decided if he's a useless t*ssbag or a useless c***

It does tend to suggest that Fury doesn't hit as hard as Cunningham. Cunningham suceeded where Fury failed and managed to knock down Fury. Unless Fury was pulling his punches when smacking himself in the coupon, which is the equivalent of Lescargo commenting on how great one of Truss' articles are.

If anything I think Bruno is underrated. He was by no means the best in his own time but there were some top heavyweights around then compared to the crap around today. The way he crapped himself against Tyson second time around really damaged his reputation as a boxer but he gave some of the top heavyweights a good fight. Witherspoon, Lewis, he even had his moment against Tyson. He would wipe his ass with Tyson Fury.