MEP Elections

First topic message reminder :

Derbymanc wrote:I'm baffled by all this too Skye, can anyone tell me what the actual problem is with CONTROLLED immigration ???

Aye Dm, you mentioned a while back about MP's not wanting to live in their consticuency.

Margaret Hodge of Barking. Where does she live  

Think you've upset him, better watch it Rowley he'll set the youtube police on you for watching videos without a permit

Rowley wrote:Would love some but am too busy setting up an imaginary you tube channel.

You should probably head to the sperm bank as well to replace all those blanks you will be firing.....

A fat middle aged man trying to mock me      What ever next haha

OMG. The embarrassment. CS certainly has one big set of gonads for staying around.  

I really shouldn't mock, we are obviously dealing with a superior intellect here. Anyone who sets up a youtube channel, which one would assume is monetised based on the volume of traffic it receives but then takes active steps to discourage traffic is clearly operating to a business plan so cunning in its complexity it will always be beyond the likes of ourselves.

Rowley wrote:Would love some but am too busy setting up an imaginary you tube channel.

Should have a look at mine when you have time

https://www.youtube.com/user/KatyPerryVEVO?

Champagne_Socialist wrote:

Rowley wrote:Would love some but am too busy setting up an imaginary you tube channel.

You should probably head to the sperm bank as well to replace all those blanks you will be firing.....

A fat middle aged man trying to mock me      What ever next haha

Why would you mock someone's age? Ageing is a process we all go through (you included). I was once your age, and in a certain amount of time you will be my age. As for my physical shape I am perfectly happy with my shape. Feel absolutely fine health wise and have managed to find and marry a woman I love dearly. As I have no children or any particular desire to ever have children whether I do or do not fire blanks is of zero concern to be either way.

Rowley wrote:I really shouldn't mock, we are obviously dealing with a superior intellect here. Anyone who sets up a youtube channel, which one would assume is monetised based on the volume of traffic it receives but then takes active steps to discourage traffic is clearly operating to a business plan so cunning in its complexity it will always be beyond the likes of ourselves.

This is the only link you need Rowley

www.virginactive.co.uk

don't drop your donut on the way

I reckon he saw this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crosjxD4XaI and took it as the best business plan ever.

P.S please don't tell youtube I copy and pasted a link without going through their rigorous checks to allow me access to that 'sensitive' information

Rowley wrote:

Champagne_Socialist wrote:

Rowley wrote:Would love some but am too busy setting up an imaginary you tube channel.

You should probably head to the sperm bank as well to replace all those blanks you will be firing.....

A fat middle aged man trying to mock me      What ever next haha

Why would you mock someone's age? Ageing is a process we all go through (you included). I was once your age, and in a certain amount of time you will be my age. As for my physical shape I am perfectly happy with my shape. Feel absolutely fine health wise and have managed to find and marry a woman I love dearly. As I have no children or any particular desire to ever have children whether I do or do not fire blanks is of zero concern to be either way.

You are a middle aged man who is over weight who is sat in front of his computer with a donut in one hand and doing something else with the other....

We need a fishing rod smiley, does anyone get the feeling the CS is describing himself when trying to wind Rowley up???

Derbymanc wrote:We need a fishing rod smiley, does anyone get the feeling the CS is describing himself when trying to wind Rowley up???

My main worry is I am being groomed on the back of Duty spurning his advances the other week.

bwahahahaha,   

I do wonder how long Champagne baits a mod before he talks himself into a suspension. Makes for riveting viewing

kingraf wrote:I do wonder how long Champagne baits a mod before he talks himself into a suspension. Makes for riveting viewing

I was thinking the same.

Maybe he wants to provoke a ban instead of just disappearing  

Champagne_Socialist wrote:

TopHat24/7 wrote:

I don't know what to laugh more about, you calling that your 'part-time business' or that you have equated it to posting one's home address......

That's about as stupid as Charlize Theron equating being pap'd to being r@ped.

And this is why people mock you on here, because you regail us with all these boasts all the time but never back them up. As far as anyone knows, you're talking out your backside re your Youtube channel/'part-time business'.

Why would I need to back up I have a youtube channel    do you want to back up you have a home address??? They are both sensitive pieces of information... And of course it is a part-time business just making £5 a day is about an extra £2000 a year.

I won't post my youtube channel but please continue to ask   I enjoy the attention

How is it sensitive information? You're broadcasting to billions of people across the planet??!

kingraf wrote:I do wonder how long Champagne baits a mod before he talks himself into a suspension. Makes for riveting viewing

What, and deny us all these business tips? This is like having an audience with Bill Gates and not bothering to ask him any questions.

Rowley wrote:

Derbymanc wrote:We need a fishing rod smiley, does anyone get the feeling the CS is describing himself when trying to wind Rowley up???

My main worry is I am being groomed on the back of Duty spurning his advances the other week.

Duty meets all his boyfriends in the library...

Think it's time CS started reading more...  

Well this thread has certainly brightened up my Friday, roll on 5.30pm.......!¬!¬

Mine too, made me laugh  

Rowley wrote:

kingraf wrote:I do wonder how long Champagne baits a mod before he talks himself into a suspension. Makes for riveting viewing

What, and deny us all these business tips? This is like having an audience with Bill Gates and not bothering to ask him any questions.

Mighty kind of you Geoff. The world needs more discerning men

How is a Youtube channel sensitive information? It contains your username (which doesn't have to be your real name) and...nothing else.

And yes TopHat, C_S didn't know when to use "beyond reasonable doubt" and "on the balance of probability"...something I would have thought someone with a Law degree would know, as you're taught that at AS level - and AS levels are basic education, aren't they, C_S?

C_S will now go on to exaplain how he is also a qualified teacher and that in his experience........blah blah blah......

Well this got out of hand quickly.

 @duty, he does keep digging them holes bigger don't he

Ent wrote:Well this got out of hand quickly.

 

But at least it had nothing to do with politics  

Well, apart from the spin  

TopHat24/7 wrote:

Champagne_Socialist wrote:

TopHat24/7 wrote:

I don't know what to laugh more about, you calling that your 'part-time business' or that you have equated it to posting one's home address......

That's about as stupid as Charlize Theron equating being pap'd to being r@ped.

And this is why people mock you on here, because you regail us with all these boasts all the time but never back them up. As far as anyone knows, you're talking out your backside re your Youtube channel/'part-time business'.

Why would I need to back up I have a youtube channel    do you want to back up you have a home address??? They are both sensitive pieces of information... And of course it is a part-time business just making £5 a day is about an extra £2000 a year.

I won't post my youtube channel but please continue to ask   I enjoy the attention

How is it sensitive information? You're broadcasting to billions of people across the planet??!

It ithe videos, not all are about boxing and some contain my family members and some are filmed in public where I live. I do not wish for people who I have political debates with to see those videos.

Rowley wrote:

Derbymanc wrote:We need a fishing rod smiley, does anyone get the feeling the CS is describing himself when trying to wind Rowley up???

My main worry is I am being groomed on the back of Duty spurning his advances the other week.

Why would I groom someone who has to spend 20 minutes shaking his willy to try and get a hard on?

Just seen that Question Time episode; utterly embarrassing and really scraping the barrel.

Two faceless, anonymous politicians from Labour and Conservative.

Piers Morgan, a truly ignorant man. I found it amusing when he referenced at UKIP being xenophobic - wasn't he the editor of that pathetic rag, the Mirror, during Euro 96, when he made a digusting and shameful reference to the Second World War before the Germany-England game?

Joey Barton...just why was he on there? He admitted straight away that he knew little about politics...too true.

Didn't really like the UKIP MEP, far too hyperactive and shouty, but she was being ganged up on; like Daniel being thrown to the Lions.

And then you had the classic Question Time audience: the majority were the sort of eternally-offended, politically correct people that any reasonable person must loathe.

Just an hour long orgy of UKIP-bashing.

And Dimbleby's horrendous tie.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQJWWhx23dE

Found it

@CS - Liar liar pants on fire

@GSC :-D

Stopped watching question time a few years back when I realised every question/answer got a massive round of applause regardless of what it was about and if it was against what they'd been clapping about before.

I'll share my twitter account with you guys if you post your bank details. (Don't look to the right)

Derbymanc wrote:@CS - Liar liar pants on fire

@GSC :-D

Stopped watching question time a few years back when I realised every question/answer got a massive round of applause regardless of what it was about and if it was against what they'd been clapping about before.

  

GSC wrote:I'll share my twitter account with you guys if you post your bank details. (Don't look to the right)

if I want to see a picture of a half-named camp man I would look at duty's twitter.

I would do it but you'd donate it to Forest ;-)

I may be camp, but I'm certainly not half named

Derbymanc wrote:@CS - Liar liar pants on fire

@GSC :-D

Stopped watching question time a few years back when I realised every question/answer got a massive round of applause regardless of what it was about and if it was against what they'd been clapping about before.

That is so true. But Barton mentioned four ugly women as a reference. The audience did not like that  

GSC wrote:I may be camp, but I'm certainly not half named

seriously you need to stop cutting your own hair..........

I'm getting pretty good at it though.

How dare you call me half-named!

(says Joshua, trying not to do a camp voice)

Duty can you cut my hair?

GSC wrote:I'm getting pretty good at it though.

I can probably cut my pubic hair better than your haircut

I'd leave C_S to do that, GSC!

He is an expert on everything after all...

You'll have to prove that good sir.

Duty281 wrote:I'd leave C_S to do that, GSC!

He is an expert on everything after all...

nah I'm alrite I don't want to catch nits

Did you not know CS is Vidal Sassoon, he has the proof but it's too sensitive

I figured it out.

C_S' youtube channel is a pubic grooming guide.

GSC wrote:You'll have to prove that good sir.

I know based on your picture you probably don't see much action but it is a bit desperate of you to try and have a look at my genitals.

Now is that grooming as in dog grooming, or grooming as in what he tried to do to Duty?

GSC wrote:I figured it out.

C_S' youtube channel is a pubic grooming guide.

Please tell me that the reason your facial hair looks as bad as it does is because your shaver broke???? Don't tell you you 'styled' it like that on purpose???

Woah, you can leave a few mms of hair to preserve your modesty.