Federer's return tactic

First topic message reminder :

Now that Cininnati is over. Maybe this topic should have a thread of it's own?

kingraf wrote:I have a soft spot for HawkEye. Reminds me of my girlfriend a bit. Or a caricature of my girlfriend.

She must be nasty mate.

Was that a Kyrgios?

Jahu wrote:Luv, so does Djokos tone with I have no comment mean it was a dodgy thing?

Your guess is as good as mine mate.
I could be inferring wrong here but maybe it isn't too dissimilar from Temp's view.

legendkillarV2 wrote:Jahu you seem to have a hard spot for everyone!

Hahaha at least I'm not the one going to visit in-laws on big match days and try to convince them to give their daughters hand, like you

But hope they do, you deserve her

Jahu wrote:

legendkillarV2 wrote:Jahu you seem to have a hard spot for everyone!

Hahaha at least I'm not the one going to visit in-laws on big match days and try to convince them to give their daughters hand, like you

But hope they do, you deserve her

Oi!

A ring of fire is much different to a ring of commitment!

Its still a ring either way we can escape it, hope it fits you nicely on a Bahamas honeymoon.

Drop me an invitation when time comes

And to think J-Lo thinks love don't cost a thing!

LuvSports! wrote:

Jahu wrote:Luv, so does Djokos tone with I have no comment mean it was a dodgy thing?

Your guess is as good as mine mate.
I could be inferring wrong here but maybe it isn't too dissimilar from Temp's view.

Djoko did not like that loss on Sunday.

Still even if Feds move is a little distracting, Djokos MTO baits and then a furious comeback, is thee stuff of Legends.

kingraf wrote:I have a soft spot for HawkEye. Reminds me of my girlfriend a bit. Or a caricature of my girlfriend.

Really .....??

Are you sure you want to disclose this to the wider world ....?

I certainly have a very different image of you now. And suffice to say I really don't think you would wish me to elaborate any further.......

legendkillarV2 wrote:And to think J-Lo thinks love don't cost a thing!

So she is in plus? zero cost, not that I would refuse some MILF action

lags72 wrote:

kingraf wrote:I have a soft spot for HawkEye. Reminds me of my girlfriend a bit. Or a caricature of my girlfriend.

Really .....??  

Are you sure you want to disclose this to the wider world ....?

I certainly have a very different image of you now. And suffice to say I really don't think you would wish me to elaborate any further.......

lags, stop being so laggy and elaborate, today it seems is a fun day here

Jahu wrote:

legendkillarV2 wrote:And to think J-Lo thinks love don't cost a thing!

So she is in plus? zero cost, not that I would refuse some MILF action

That would borderline on the Jeremy Kyle criteria!

legendkillarV2 wrote:

Jahu wrote:

legendkillarV2 wrote:And to think J-Lo thinks love don't cost a thing!

So she is in plus? zero cost, not that I would refuse some MILF action

That would borderline on the Jeremy Kyle criteria!

You keep acting the good decent boy here, someone might read your comments

Adam D wrote:Just to clarify - Temp has not been banned or demoted. I dont frequent this section much but I will be keeping my eye on it.


I am asking you all nicely to stop discussing Temp21 who will be online to respond whenever he sees fit. For the time being, stop trying to bait him as otherwise my ban hammer will be coming out.

And 'ban hammer' is Adam's pet name for his c0ck so trust me you don't want that happening.

The mighty purple hammer!

lags72 wrote:

kingraf wrote:I have a soft spot for HawkEye. Reminds me of my girlfriend a bit. Or a caricature of my girlfriend.

Really .....??

Are you sure you want to disclose this to the wider world ....?

I certainly have a very different image of you now. And suffice to say I really don't think you would wish me to elaborate any further.......

She gets an idea in her head and slowly it grows and becomes a pet project. Much like the Time Violation thread. Lesser mortals would have stopped caring.

Ok, think I understand (a little) better now.

Mind you ....'pet project' ....> irrational obsession ....> trotting out the same theories endlessly, expecting a different response > ......

You can't help wonder where it all ends. Or if it has any point at all.......

Jahu wrote:Luv, so does Djokos tone with I have no comment mean it was a dodgy thing?

Where is the "no comment"? Is it in the video?

Also, I can't believe how dim some of these presenters are.

They say to Roger that it's better for him to be #2 because it means he won't have to face both Murray and Djokovic.

But he can. Being #2 just means he can only face Novak in the final. He has just as much chance of being drawn to face both of them whether he's #2 or #3 (or, indeed, #4 or #1)

It's bordering on the Einstein's view of insanity.

Hero wrote:

Adam D wrote:Just to clarify - Temp has not been banned or demoted. I dont frequent this section much but I will be keeping my eye on it.


I am asking you all nicely to stop discussing Temp21 who will be online to respond whenever he sees fit. For the time being, stop trying to bait him as otherwise my ban hammer will be coming out.

And 'ban hammer' is Adam's pet name for his c0ck so trust me you don't want that happening.

2 founders (at least)? Does one outrank the other or do you have to actually agree to get anything done.

We all going tackle out?

HMM, just read it in Luvs post. Not seen any video.

#2 might help to not face Djoko, but last year Cilic crushed him.

If the SF is Andy-Djoko thats no good for either, they will be crushed for the F.

So Hero+Hammer, hero with a hammer, leathal combo

Everyone cool it down

Henman Bill wrote:

Hero wrote:

Adam D wrote:Just to clarify - Temp has not been banned or demoted. I dont frequent this section much but I will be keeping my eye on it.


I am asking you all nicely to stop discussing Temp21 who will be online to respond whenever he sees fit. For the time being, stop trying to bait him as otherwise my ban hammer will be coming out.

And 'ban hammer' is Adam's pet name for his c0ck so trust me you don't want that happening.

2 founders (at least)? Does one outrank the other or do you have to actually agree to get anything done.

We're more Ant & Dec, I've got the big forehead, he's the short one that chases the skirt.

legendkillarV2 wrote:The mighty purple hammer!

Mighty might be stretching it a bit...which Adam has been trying to do for 30 years.

bit of a orgy going on here today, all my fault, keep it up

One minute Jahu is banned. Now he's being indulged as the forum funny guy, albeit not in relation to tennis.

This is all getting very weird.

First class entertainment if I may say so!!!!!!!

Well, certainly preferable to much of the previous petty squabbling and unsupported allegations of unsporting behaviour.

its a weird world mate, important is to all have little fun and little fights )

Jahu wrote:So Hero+Hammer, hero with a hammer, leathal combo  

Thor or Loki, take your pick.

Can't be Thor. Adam hasn't lifted his hammer in years

lags72 wrote:Well, certainly preferable to much of the previous petty squabbling and unsupported allegations of unsporting behaviour.

A Greed.

Isn't writing 'c0ck' a bannable offence?

I want Julius to grow a pair and sort these guys out.

'Cockwomble' is a favourite of mine.

I saw that term on Idiotic Drivers UK!

bogbrush wrote:Isn't writing 'c0ck' a bannable offence?

I want Julius to grow a pair and sort these guys out.

You want Julius to grow a pair of c0cks and sort us out? This is why I don't often tread onto these parts!

Hero wrote:

bogbrush wrote:Isn't writing 'c0ck' a bannable offence?

I want Julius to grow a pair and sort these guys out.

You want Julius to grow a pair of c0cks and sort us out?  This is why I don't often tread onto these parts!

Stick around, this is nothing! You've not lived until you've seen 15 pages of weak era discussion.

I can only think we need to have a 'c0ck weak era' discussion

Jahu seems to have multiplied!! There's 4 of him!

God help us all!

Very interesting this all.

"You've not lived until you've seen 15 pages of weak era discussion."

Fabulous quote.

This thread has been a bit too active for me, I only can justify wasting time perusing the boards about 2 times a days, and that is not enough to keep up with this kind of thing.

Henman Bill wrote:I only can justify wasting time perusing the boards about 2 times a days, and that is not enough to keep up with this kind of thing.

All of it deep stuff too.

I think the online petition that was asking ATP to ignore the rules they have on their books should be expanded to also ask them to enforce the rules they do not have on their books.