Just when you thought the WBA could not get anymore confusing.....

http://www.boxingscene.com/wba-explains-chris-eubank-jr-interim-title-situation--96765

Please use the and see if you can understand the WBA ruling on Eubank's interim title situation.

I sure as hell don't get it

I can help you, it's quite easy;

The regular champion is Danny Jacobs and he faces Peter Quillin on December 5th. The WBA's "super champion" at the weight is Gennady "GGG" Golovkin and he takes on IBF king David Lemieux in a unification on October 17th.

Interim champ is currently Chris Eubank Jr. He will be stripped of his title on the 25th October after defending it against Jeeta on the 24th October due to inactivity and a promotional change. This title will be given to the winner of another fight.

As clear as mud, you strip a guy a day after defending the title its ridiculous

It only really becomes a farce if Eubank loses

Interim titles does anybody really care about them, I wouldn't give a monkey's if I was Eubank, wont effect him at all, a BS title that means nowt.

Eubank cares enough to taunt BJS about not being a world champion ad nauseum

Completely irrelevant because we all know the world champion is GGG. Nobody else. Unless you beat the man your not the man.

Unless Eubank beats GGG Canelo Cotto Lemiuex or Jacobs......then he ain't no world champion. Far from it. He got out worked by BJS

So Tyson was only the champ when he beat Spinks...

Disagree.

It's up and down these days though mate.

I agree with what your saying to an extent.....

But Alvarez won his title against Matthew Hatton when it was vacant?

Pacquiao won the 154lbs title against Margarito

Just a couple of examples but you know yourself there are loads out there.