The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

So was it a try or not?

5 posters

Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty So was it a try or not?

Post by TightHEAD Mon 15 Feb 2016, 3:06 pm

As an old prop I'm a little confused!

Many times whilst trying to play the game hindered by a excessive body weight I failed to get back behind the ball only for the ball to make its merry way back to me, time and time again many different Refs have said I'm offside, yet in a International it was deemed onside? Erm
TightHEAD
TightHEAD

Posts : 6192
Join date : 2014-09-25
Age : 62
Location : Brexit Island.

Back to top Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty Re: So was it a try or not?

Post by LordDowlais Mon 15 Feb 2016, 3:28 pm

Yes it was a try. haven't you read the papers ? It say Wales won with tries from GARETH DAVIES, Jamie Roberts and George North. OK

Now moving on.....

LordDowlais

Posts : 15419
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Merthyr Tydfil

Back to top Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty Re: So was it a try or not?

Post by offload Mon 15 Feb 2016, 3:32 pm

Of course it was not a try. Cueto's foot was in touch!

Move on.
offload
offload

Posts : 2292
Join date : 2011-02-14
Age : 107
Location : On t'internet

Back to top Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty Re: So was it a try or not?

Post by TrailApe Mon 15 Feb 2016, 3:34 pm

Rule 19.2d of the IRB regulations makes it very clear, stating: 'For a quick throw-in, the player must use the ball that went into touch.

A quick throw in is not permitted if another person has touched the ball apart from the player throwing it in and an opponent who carried it into touch.

In this case a different ball was thrown to Rees by a ball boy, which broke the rule twice.

TrailApe
TrailApe

Posts : 885
Join date : 2011-06-09
Location : Newcastle upon Tyne

Back to top Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty Re: So was it a try or not?

Post by dummy_half Mon 15 Feb 2016, 3:48 pm

offload wrote:Of course it was not a try. Cueto's foot was in touch!

Move on.

Wasn't boxing

(actually, I think his foot did touch the line before he lifted it, but it was a pretty tight call)

dummy_half

Posts : 6497
Join date : 2011-03-11
Age : 52
Location : East Hertfordshire

Back to top Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty Re: So was it a try or not?

Post by offload Mon 15 Feb 2016, 3:53 pm

dummy_half wrote:
offload wrote:Of course it was not a try. Cueto's foot was in touch!

Move on.

Wasn't boxing

(actually, I think his foot did touch the line before he lifted it, but it was a pretty tight call)

Yes - had the pitch been wider it would have been a good finish Very Happy
offload
offload

Posts : 2292
Join date : 2011-02-14
Age : 107
Location : On t'internet

Back to top Go down

So was it a try or not? Empty Re: So was it a try or not?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum