Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
+5
BoxingFan88
milkyboy
Mr Bounce
TRUSSMAN66
Herman Jaeger
9 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
http://www.boxingscene.com/golovkins-coach-we-never-asked-andre-ward-164-weight--106038
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Six years as champ and he still hasn't fought anybody....He wants to though..... Bless him !!..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Truss do you genuinely think that if there was a Super 6 in middleweight that Golovkin would turn it down? Get real. He wants to fight anyone at HIS OWN WEIGHT. So does Ward. Ward cleans out SMW, beats the man at 175 (at 168 at the heavier man's whim) & is now at 175, presumably because he is struggling to make 168 now and there's no challenge there anymore.
Golovkin is trying hard to clear out 160. Should he go higher? No - because a) he wants to unify (no shame in that) & b) he isn't the biggest middleweight. It doesn't matter if the fight was mooted or not. It didn't happen. And I would bet my house that one of the reasons was that at the time (several years ago now) Golovkin wasn't a big enough name. Let's also not forget Ward's well-documented promotional issues so it was unlikely that the fight would have gone ahead anyway.
Let's let these two carve their own niche in their own divisions. They're both big achievers. Do they have to fight? Not now. It's like Calzaghe vs Jones back in 97. Was never gonna happen at the time.
Golovkin is trying hard to clear out 160. Should he go higher? No - because a) he wants to unify (no shame in that) & b) he isn't the biggest middleweight. It doesn't matter if the fight was mooted or not. It didn't happen. And I would bet my house that one of the reasons was that at the time (several years ago now) Golovkin wasn't a big enough name. Let's also not forget Ward's well-documented promotional issues so it was unlikely that the fight would have gone ahead anyway.
Let's let these two carve their own niche in their own divisions. They're both big achievers. Do they have to fight? Not now. It's like Calzaghe vs Jones back in 97. Was never gonna happen at the time.
Mr Bounce- Posts : 3513
Join date : 2011-03-18
Location : East of Florida, West of Felixstowe
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Golovkin doesn't have to go to a higher weight... Unless he wants really big fights for legacy.
GGG himself has said he'd fight anyone from 154-168. I believe him.
The problem is when you have a big mouthed trainer who obviously doesn't remember stating they'd only fight ward at catchweight. It impacts on his fighter's credibility.
GGG himself has said he'd fight anyone from 154-168. I believe him.
The problem is when you have a big mouthed trainer who obviously doesn't remember stating they'd only fight ward at catchweight. It impacts on his fighter's credibility.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
If I don't get reports in on time...No matter if I say Steve and Gerry were late supplying their findings or the data collected was insufficient..It's still my responsibility...
He's fought average fighters for six years and that is all she wrote..
His record he's responsible for it..
He's fought average fighters for six years and that is all she wrote..
His record he's responsible for it..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Why did Ward need some tune ups? Golovkin was ready, I don't see why Ward wasn't ready.
I've said it before, not sure if Ward really fancied the fight.
I've said it before, not sure if Ward really fancied the fight.
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Herman Jaeger wrote:Why did Ward need some tune ups? Golovkin was ready, I don't see why Ward wasn't ready.
I've said it before, not sure if Ward really fancied the fight.
Personally I don't think Ward could have made 168
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
That's true, could have just been a weight thing, I suppose.
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Gents.
1. GGG's team on turning down ward... Last year. Note ward apparently asking for 1 tune up and a fight in 2016. Golovkin's team saying maybe 2017.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-andre-ward-boxing-gennady-golovkin-hbo-tom-loeffler-20150915-story.html
2. Sanchez, stating he'd only be interested in a fight 'half way'.
youtu.be/sgh-lkgDpYg
Draw your own conclusions but I'd advise against basing your judgement on who did or didn't want this fight on the words of Abel Sanchez.
1. GGG's team on turning down ward... Last year. Note ward apparently asking for 1 tune up and a fight in 2016. Golovkin's team saying maybe 2017.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-andre-ward-boxing-gennady-golovkin-hbo-tom-loeffler-20150915-story.html
2. Sanchez, stating he'd only be interested in a fight 'half way'.
youtu.be/sgh-lkgDpYg
Draw your own conclusions but I'd advise against basing your judgement on who did or didn't want this fight on the words of Abel Sanchez.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
I guess Truss blames Golovkin for Canelo relinquishing
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
He does appear to have gone quiet on that particular subject.
Guest- Guest
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
milkyboy wrote:Gents.
1. GGG's team on turning down ward... Last year. Note ward apparently asking for 1 tune up and a fight in 2016. Golovkin's team saying maybe 2017.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-andre-ward-boxing-gennady-golovkin-hbo-tom-loeffler-20150915-story.html
2. Sanchez, stating he'd only be interested in a fight 'half way'.
youtu.be/sgh-lkgDpYg
Draw your own conclusions but I'd advise against basing your judgement on who did or didn't want this fight on the words of Abel Sanchez.
"Loeffler said the Roc Nation email was received hours after he’d already announced Golovkin’s fight with Lemieux at Madison Square Garden, with Roc Nation aware the World Boxing Council designated Golovkin (33-0, 30 knockouts) the mandatory challenger to a then-pending Miguel Cotto-Saul “Canelo” Alvarez title bout that will be fought Nov. 21. Roc Nation promotes Cotto."
Doing a BJS
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:If I don't get reports in on time...No matter if I say Steve and Gerry were late supplying their findings or the data collected was insufficient..It's still my responsibility...
He's fought average fighters for six years and that is all she wrote..
His record he's responsible for it..
Lay off the kid!!
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
BoxingFan88 wrote:milkyboy wrote:Gents.
1. GGG's team on turning down ward... Last year. Note ward apparently asking for 1 tune up and a fight in 2016. Golovkin's team saying maybe 2017.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-andre-ward-boxing-gennady-golovkin-hbo-tom-loeffler-20150915-story.html
2. Sanchez, stating he'd only be interested in a fight 'half way'.
youtu.be/sgh-lkgDpYg
Draw your own conclusions but I'd advise against basing your judgement on who did or didn't want this fight on the words of Abel Sanchez.
"Loeffler said the Roc Nation email was received hours after he’d already announced Golovkin’s fight with Lemieux at Madison Square Garden, with Roc Nation aware the World Boxing Council designated Golovkin (33-0, 30 knockouts) the mandatory challenger to a then-pending Miguel Cotto-Saul “Canelo” Alvarez title bout that will be fought Nov. 21. Roc Nation promotes Cotto."
Doing a BJS
Fine work... Selecting the one piece that suits your narrative! In amongst all the he said she said stuff the only thing not disputed is that ward offered a fight and Golovkin's team turned it down.
The only other thing that can be picked out as fact from what I posted is that Sanchez is 'forgetful'
So we're clear, Golovkin would be right to chase the potential cotto/Alvarez fight before ward, so no beef with him declining ward at that time.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Ward subsequently signing to fight the bigger and more dangerous fight for him in Kovalev sort of poo poos on any suggestion he was ducking/avoiding GGG.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Dempsey had more problems with Tommy Gibbons whom he outweighed by 13 odd pounds, than he did with behemoth Willard.
Ward might, just might view Kovalev as the lesser of two evils, though they are both freaky hitters which he'll no doubt soon enough find out.
Reports that Golovkin put Sergey down in sparring too.
Ward might, just might view Kovalev as the lesser of two evils, though they are both freaky hitters which he'll no doubt soon enough find out.
Reports that Golovkin put Sergey down in sparring too.
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Don't poo poo it just yet, we don't know the truth just yet but that's what we're trying to find out.
Until you can definitively prove it one way or the other, I won't poo poo it.
Until you can definitively prove it one way or the other, I won't poo poo it.
Herman Jaeger- Posts : 3532
Join date : 2011-11-10
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Kovalev himself admits he went down to a bodyshot, hermy.
Although hammy described it as tougher, I don't think the point is really whether kovalev is a tougher assignment. Both would be tough assignments. The real point is it's golovkin who is still to meet a top rated fighter, but some in here are happy to trash ward as a ducker... When he's the one who went on to take a high-risk tough fight.
Believe me, I really like golovkin and I think ward is a smug arrogant jerk, but you started this thread off with a piece from Abel Sanchez butchering ward and you treated it as gospel. I've posted pieces showing sanchez to be talking out of his behind, on this very subject... And Golovkin's promoter saying ward can come back in 2017... but it seems the GGG monster story still outweighs any evidence to the contrary.
Although hammy described it as tougher, I don't think the point is really whether kovalev is a tougher assignment. Both would be tough assignments. The real point is it's golovkin who is still to meet a top rated fighter, but some in here are happy to trash ward as a ducker... When he's the one who went on to take a high-risk tough fight.
Believe me, I really like golovkin and I think ward is a smug arrogant jerk, but you started this thread off with a piece from Abel Sanchez butchering ward and you treated it as gospel. I've posted pieces showing sanchez to be talking out of his behind, on this very subject... And Golovkin's promoter saying ward can come back in 2017... but it seems the GGG monster story still outweighs any evidence to the contrary.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Ward hasn't impressed me for a long long time, anyone who says otherwise is living in the past
He fought the best because he was allowed to because of the super six tournament, in which he got all his fights in his own back yard
AFTER the super six, he has done ABSOLUTELY nothing
IF he fights Kovalev we can start talking about him as relevant and a p4p great, but as soon as the super six finished so did Ward fighting top level fighters
He fought the best because he was allowed to because of the super six tournament, in which he got all his fights in his own back yard
AFTER the super six, he has done ABSOLUTELY nothing
IF he fights Kovalev we can start talking about him as relevant and a p4p great, but as soon as the super six finished so did Ward fighting top level fighters
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Ward doesn't need to do anything...
He's been there and got the T-shirt..
Geez these GGG fans are something...Criticise anybody who's been there and done it and arselick a guy that hasn't. .
He's been there and got the T-shirt..
Geez these GGG fans are something...Criticise anybody who's been there and done it and arselick a guy that hasn't. .
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
BoxingFan88 wrote:Ward hasn't impressed me for a long long time, anyone who says otherwise is living in the past
He fought the best because he was allowed to because of the super six tournament, in which he got all his fights in his own back yard
AFTER the super six, he has done ABSOLUTELY nothing
IF he fights Kovalev we can start talking about him as relevant and a p4p great, but as soon as the super six finished so did Ward fighting top level fighters
He looked very sharp against dawson, a result that looked better at the time than it does in retrospect. It's hard to impress when you're that inactive.
I agree he's looked a step slower since his lay-off. I'm undecided about the kovalev fight but you can't knock the guy for taking it... Quite the opposite. Meanwhile, golovkin lines up eubank.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Few thoughts on this:
1. The idea that Ward offered Golovkin a fight - which he then ducked - is disingenuous. An formal offer appears to have been made after Golovkin was tied into a fight (Lemiuex) with his next bout (theoretically) lined up against Canelo/Cotto. A Cotto/Canelo fight - which Golovkin had doggedly worked his way into position for - was by far Golovkin's best option: a lineal championship, the WBC belt (to complete his set) and a PPV fight. Ward offered none of that.
2. Ward genuinely feels he'd offered Golovkin out and Golovkin has ducked him.
3. Ward has consistently fought the best available opposition, yet his career was in complete stasis during all of the recent posturing.
4. There has been no urgency on Loeffler's part to make a Ward fight. It's a high-risk fight, and one where Golovkin would be giving away physical advantages and his bargaining power at 160 (should he move up and lose).
5. As Milky has highlighted - Sanchez is a bit mixed about what offers (and the nature of them) had been bandied back and forth.
6. Bottom line is that both fighters were at different weights, there wasn't ever a realistic offer made from either side.
1. The idea that Ward offered Golovkin a fight - which he then ducked - is disingenuous. An formal offer appears to have been made after Golovkin was tied into a fight (Lemiuex) with his next bout (theoretically) lined up against Canelo/Cotto. A Cotto/Canelo fight - which Golovkin had doggedly worked his way into position for - was by far Golovkin's best option: a lineal championship, the WBC belt (to complete his set) and a PPV fight. Ward offered none of that.
2. Ward genuinely feels he'd offered Golovkin out and Golovkin has ducked him.
3. Ward has consistently fought the best available opposition, yet his career was in complete stasis during all of the recent posturing.
4. There has been no urgency on Loeffler's part to make a Ward fight. It's a high-risk fight, and one where Golovkin would be giving away physical advantages and his bargaining power at 160 (should he move up and lose).
5. As Milky has highlighted - Sanchez is a bit mixed about what offers (and the nature of them) had been bandied back and forth.
6. Bottom line is that both fighters were at different weights, there wasn't ever a realistic offer made from either side.
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Obviously, points 1,2 & 6 are dependent on who's story you believe.
If Ward did deliberately wait until the Lemieux fight was made, then it doesn't look like he was too serious. If you take his word that offers were made before it, then it takes a different slant.
Truth is we don't know.
Ultimately, the Lemieux followed by cotto/Alvarez option was the obvious route to take for golovkin, and the fact that ward has signed for kovalev doesn't suggest he's shirking challenges, so I'm inclined to lean to ward being serious but the timing simply not being ideal.
Maybe if, and it's a big if, ward comes through kovalev, and ggg is still scratching for middleweights, there might be appetite for this next year. If the weight gap isn't now insurmountable.
If Ward did deliberately wait until the Lemieux fight was made, then it doesn't look like he was too serious. If you take his word that offers were made before it, then it takes a different slant.
Truth is we don't know.
Ultimately, the Lemieux followed by cotto/Alvarez option was the obvious route to take for golovkin, and the fact that ward has signed for kovalev doesn't suggest he's shirking challenges, so I'm inclined to lean to ward being serious but the timing simply not being ideal.
Maybe if, and it's a big if, ward comes through kovalev, and ggg is still scratching for middleweights, there might be appetite for this next year. If the weight gap isn't now insurmountable.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
milkyboy wrote:Obviously, points 1,2 & 6 are dependent on who's story you believe.
If Ward did deliberately wait until the Lemieux fight was made, then it doesn't look like he was too serious. If you take his word that offers were made before it, then it takes a different slant.
Truth is we don't know.
Ultimately, the Lemieux followed by cotto/Alvarez option was the obvious route to take for golovkin, and the fact that ward has signed for kovalev doesn't suggest he's shirking challenges, so I'm inclined to lean to ward being serious but the timing simply not being ideal.
Maybe if, and it's a big if, ward comes through kovalev, and ggg is still scratching for middleweights, there might be appetite for this next year. If the weight gap isn't now insurmountable.
I don't think point 2 is in doubt. Ward genuinely believes that.
I firmly believe Ward's team did make offers to Golovkin; however, they never even made it to the negotiating table. Any fighter could fax something to Loeffler asking for "50-50". A rejection of an offer of that type (that isn't deemed sensible) isn't one side ducking another.
It's a shame Ward was in the garage, stuck in a promotional wrangle and then ended up wrapped up in a series of warm-ups (what's he up to now, three or four?). It's a shame Golovkin is stuck in no-man's land trying to fight star names who don't want to fight him.
Hopefully they can still meet in the next year or so but it almost seems impossible to make big fights these days, in the absence of genuinely mandated number one contenders (rather than Jo Jo Dan types offered up by splinter groups).
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
My point was, if ward really believes he made genuine offers before the Lemieux fight was signed then it questions loeffler's version of events. All he said, she said.
It does look unlikely they'll fight. Would ward come back to 168? Would ggg take it at that weight in the future?
Shame... would be a fascinating fight.
It does look unlikely they'll fight. Would ward come back to 168? Would ggg take it at that weight in the future?
Shame... would be a fascinating fight.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Hammersmith harrier wrote:Ward subsequently signing to fight the bigger and more dangerous fight for him in Kovalev sort of poo poos on any suggestion he was ducking/avoiding GGG.
So by that logic, you can't criticise Khan for fighting Canelo ahead of Brook? That would be a double standard, wouldn't it?
Dipper Brown- Posts : 1315
Join date : 2014-04-05
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Using logic you can't criticise Ward for cleaning up 168 either...
A detail most GGG arselickers forget..
A detail most GGG arselickers forget..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40690
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Yet you can criticise Golovkin for cleaning up 160?
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Dipper Brown wrote:Hammersmith harrier wrote:Ward subsequently signing to fight the bigger and more dangerous fight for him in Kovalev sort of poo poos on any suggestion he was ducking/avoiding GGG.
So by that logic, you can't criticise Khan for fighting Canelo ahead of Brook? That would be a double standard, wouldn't it?
They're two entirely different situations, GGG and Kovalev were the only two options Ward had in divisions either side of him, he's moved up to fight arguably the more dangerous of the two in a fight he can win. Khan however moved up to fight Alvarez for nothing more than money in a fight he couldn't win knowing it wouldn't damage his reputation.
Hammersmith harrier- Posts : 12060
Join date : 2013-09-26
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Hammersmith harrier wrote:Dipper Brown wrote:Hammersmith harrier wrote:Ward subsequently signing to fight the bigger and more dangerous fight for him in Kovalev sort of poo poos on any suggestion he was ducking/avoiding GGG.
So by that logic, you can't criticise Khan for fighting Canelo ahead of Brook? That would be a double standard, wouldn't it?
They're two entirely different situations, GGG and Kovalev were the only two options Ward had in divisions either side of him, he's moved up to fight arguably the more dangerous of the two in a fight he can win. Khan however moved up to fight Alvarez for nothing more than money in a fight he couldn't win knowing it wouldn't damage his reputation.
Yep. Amir's only risk, was taking a huge beating. His reputation was never on the line. If he had of pulled off the miracle and survived, it would have paid off massively. He took the big money fight and every man and his dog knew he would get knocked out. His stock is still the same. He can still fight Brook or whoever for the same money.
On the other hand Ward was the best 168 fighter and possibly the best fighter in the sport. He moves up a division, to face one of the hardest hitting, dangerous fighters in boxing. His reputation is certainly on the line. If Ward wins, he has a massive claim to being the best p4p. If he were to get stopped, his invincibility would be gone, along with immediate pay days/ppv fights. It is definitely a bigger risk, but a risk that could make him into a huge draw if he wins.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Fighters moving up in weight, always have that, 'he was too big' excuse, just like fighters moving down have that 'weak at the weight' excuse.
Hatton had the same excuse lined up, when he fought mayweather... but i've no doubt he went in thinking he could win, but it was a no risk fight. I've no doubt Khan did the same.
Popping up in weight, when its a bounce rather than maturing to a new weight, does generally carry less risk to reputation. If kovalev knocks out ward, it will be interesting to see if Ward continues as a light heavy. There's a feeling he's now matured into the weight, but we'll see.
Hatton had the same excuse lined up, when he fought mayweather... but i've no doubt he went in thinking he could win, but it was a no risk fight. I've no doubt Khan did the same.
Popping up in weight, when its a bounce rather than maturing to a new weight, does generally carry less risk to reputation. If kovalev knocks out ward, it will be interesting to see if Ward continues as a light heavy. There's a feeling he's now matured into the weight, but we'll see.
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
I think Ward might struggle to make 168 now. It's a very dangerous fight for Ward, Kovalev is really good. I still think Ward will win on points, but it will be a tough fight and will most likely warrant a rematch!
Yeah Hatton loves the weight excuse with Floyd. He was probably the same weight as Floyd on the night. Hatton was a bit of a beast against smaller 140 fighters, but would always struggle with the bigger men.
Yeah Hatton loves the weight excuse with Floyd. He was probably the same weight as Floyd on the night. Hatton was a bit of a beast against smaller 140 fighters, but would always struggle with the bigger men.
AdamT- Posts : 6651
Join date : 2014-03-27
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
milkyboy wrote:Fighters moving up in weight, always have that, 'he was too big' excuse, just like fighters moving down have that 'weak at the weight' excuse.
Hatton had the same excuse lined up, when he fought mayweather... but i've no doubt he went in thinking he could win, but it was a no risk fight. I've no doubt Khan did the same.
Popping up in weight, when its a bounce rather than maturing to a new weight, does generally carry less risk to reputation. If kovalev knocks out ward, it will be interesting to see if Ward continues as a light heavy. There's a feeling he's now matured into the weight, but we'll see.
That's why I'm not a fan of catch-weights.
Far better to have two good fighters fight at the same weight - like Thurman vs Porter.
As much as we nail Canelo (well, some of us) as a beneficiary of day before weigh ins, Hatton benefitted just as much from being able to drain down to 140 (with the help of Kerry Kayes).
Ward seems capable at 175. It's just a shame his opposition has been largely poor-average, so we're not definite either way.
hazharrison- Posts : 7540
Join date : 2011-03-26
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
I for one am really looking forward to the Kovalev vs Ward fight. My only concern is if Ward picks up a nasty cut or an injury in his tune-up (s).
Mr Bounce- Posts : 3513
Join date : 2011-03-18
Location : East of Florida, West of Felixstowe
Re: Sanchez: We never asked Ward for catchweight
Mr Bounce wrote:I for one am really looking forward to the Kovalev vs Ward fight. My only concern is if Ward picks up a nasty cut or an injury in his tune-up (s).
OR point blank just pulls out
This fight is the most exciting fight of the entire year, closely followed by Postol vs Crawford
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Similar topics
» Ward Vs. Calzaghe - Ward Has Surpassed Him At SMW
» Is anybody a fan of catchweight??
» Help With a Catchweight Question Wanted
» Did Manny need Catchweight.... and will it matter anyway?????
» Catchweight fights can be great.
» Is anybody a fan of catchweight??
» Help With a Catchweight Question Wanted
» Did Manny need Catchweight.... and will it matter anyway?????
» Catchweight fights can be great.
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum