Are the WRU increasing the funds for NDC's ?

First topic message reminder :

I was reading the following article on Friday:-

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/leigh-halfpenny-could-set-sensational-11518932

And this bit got me intrigued:-


"The WRU has an extra £500,000 to spend on National Dual Contracts after agreeing to increase the pot with the regions, and it’s understood the prolific points-scorer is a prime target."

I cannot find any other news of this elsewhere, and I am surprised nobody has alluded to it on here, especially the way Phil goes on about funding and paying the right prices for players. So we could see some activity with more Welsh players coming back over the summer, or keeping players here for longer.

Does anybody else know of this news ?

LordDowlais wrote:
No I expected things to be right when the regions went to war with the WRU and won. They got what they wanted, yet they are STILL harping on at the WRU, whta do you suggest, another war ?

They didn't get what they wanted. This has been shown to you many times before. Why do you continue to spin this lie?

Yeah, of course they did not get what they wanted:-

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/60m-peace-deal-welsh-rugby-7685871

Full of lies me.

LordDowlais wrote:Yeah, of course they did not get what they wanted:-

http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-news/60m-peace-deal-welsh-rugby-7685871

Full of lies me.

How on earth have you interpreted the agreement as PRW getting all that they wanted?

Because they would not have agreed to it otherwise.

LordDowlais wrote:Because they would not have agreed to it otherwise.

I guess the word 'compromise' is missing from your vocabulary.

PhilBB wrote:

LordDowlais wrote:Because they would not have agreed to it otherwise.

I guess the word 'compromise' is missing from your vocabulary.

Told by two people on this thread alone. He has been told elsewhere by others about how it was a compromise, but again we come to Dowellais is right and everybody else is the problem.

That's why this was so funny earlier;

LordDowlais wrote:It's not worth debating it with him, his arrogance is astounding.

Pot kettle black.

RiscaGame wrote:

LordDowlais wrote:It's not worth debating it with him, his arrogance is astounding.

Pot kettle black.

Well, in his defence, he's spent the afternoon simultaneously agreeing with me whilst trying to backtrack from the agreement, whilst making wildly absolute comments that he knows are wrong, as though the purpose here is not to be accurate, true or honest but to antagonise with a series of more and more absurd claims that he doesn't believe himself.

But that's just my arrogant take on his postings here. I don't think that he believes a quarter of what he writes.