The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Khans record v Hattons record

+23
JDandfries
Scottrf
Rowley
coxy0001
Atila
paperbag_puncher
NoMasDinero
Lumbering_Jack
J.Benson II
WelshDevilRob
Imperial Ghosty
captain carrantuohil
zx1234
KO-KING
Bob
BALTIMORA
AlexHuckerby
eddyfightfan
Day V Lately
88Chris05
Jimmy Moz
Jukebox Timebomb
Steffan
27 posters

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Steffan Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:02

Amir Khans last 10 victories

Zab Judah
Paul McCloskey
Marcos Maidana
Paulie Malignaggi
Dmitry Salita
Andreas Kotelnik
Marco Antonio Barrera
Oisin Fagan
Michael Gomez
Martin Kristjansen

Ricky Hattons last 10 victories

Paulie Malignaggi
Juan Lazcano
José Luis Castillo
Juan Urango
Luis Collazo
Carlos Maussa
Kostya Tszyu
Ray Oliveira
Michael Stewart
Carlos Vilchés

Whos record is the best?


Regards

Steffan

Steffan

Posts : 7856
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 43

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:04

Hatton's

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jimmy Moz Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:06

Khan's

Jimmy Moz

Posts : 498
Join date : 2011-06-27

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by 88Chris05 Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:08

Hatton's by a narrow margin, for me. Khan is one win (Bradley) away from surpassing Hatton, though.
88Chris05
88Chris05
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 9661
Join date : 2011-02-16
Age : 36
Location : Nottingham

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Day V Lately Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:16

Still Hatton's, Bradley might make me think otherwise, Morales would have no affect other that to Khan's bank balance.

Day V Lately

Posts : 182
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 40
Location : Merseyside

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by eddyfightfan Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:18

about the same, but as mentioned, khan is set to far suprass hatton, in terms of skill and acheivement if not popularity

eddyfightfan

Posts : 2925
Join date : 2011-02-24

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:20

Hatton's but to be fair it is just marginal and that shows how good Khan is I suppose considering he's only 24...

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by eddyfightfan Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:21

khans defeats....... prescott

hattons defeats....... pac man and mayweather

life from another angle

eddyfightfan

Posts : 2925
Join date : 2011-02-24

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Day V Lately Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:22

Good point Eddy, we seem to going just on wins, Hatton never lost below elite level. Though Khan's a very different fighter now, we have to be fair and look at the whole picture.

Day V Lately

Posts : 182
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 40
Location : Merseyside

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by BALTIMORA Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:23

It'd be better to compare Hatton's last ten opponents when he'd had the same number of fights as Khan. Hatton's 27th opponent was one Justin Rowsell.

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Day V Lately Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:24

Or maybe compare there last 10 when managed by Frank Warren, just to be really cruel on ol' fish eyes!

Day V Lately

Posts : 182
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 40
Location : Merseyside

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:29

To be fair Khan hasn't reach the elite level yet and clearly the Prescott was when he was green but you know still only 24... I reckon he may have a couple more fights left in him me thinks.

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:32

Khan's best win....Andreas Kotelnik?
Hatton's best win....Kostya Tszyu.

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:37

At this moment in time however, and I think Judah was perhaps a better win than Kotelnik, and with how he compoletely 100% schooled both of them very easily it shows he's on a different level to normal world class operators. imo.

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:47

Khan was good last night, but Judah has done nothing for years. What else have we got to go on? Khan's life or death struggle with Maidana, his pitter-patter run show against Kotelnik? At this moment in time Khan would still be the underdog v Bradley.

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by eddyfightfan Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:49

i'd say the bookies would have khan favourite

eddyfightfan

Posts : 2925
Join date : 2011-02-24

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:50

Not on my money you can bet on Bradley if you like but I'm very confident I would come out laughing, Bradley doesn't beat Khan and I don't see how he could overcome Khan really...

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by eddyfightfan Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:52

no i'd put khan favourite too, he would spend all night chasing khan and eating jabs/lossing rounds.

eddyfightfan

Posts : 2925
Join date : 2011-02-24

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:54

Khan would land far too many punches and seeing as Bradley couldn't pin down Alexander he has no chance for Khan who can do so much more, and is probably quicker, that jab looks better everytime I see him and he looks faster everytime aswell.

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:55

Over here Khan maybe favourite, but didn't some make Haye favourite over WK - ridiculous.

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:57

I think stateside he would be aswell HBO rate him VERY highly. I think you're massively underating how good the Americans think he is now and the fact he's trained by "The God" Freddy Roach.

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 16:58

Khan fights more off the front foot since being with Roach which would suit Bradley. Bradley is still number 1 in the division and quite rightly so.

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by AlexHuckerby Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:00

Jukebox seriously, you not think it would be gameplans? They would devise particular game plans against particular opponents going at Judah was the correct thing to do and moving in and out of range and using the combinations and speed against Kotelnik was also the right thing to do.

AlexHuckerby

Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:07

AlexHuckerby wrote:Jukebox seriously, you not think it would be gameplans? They would devise particular game plans against particular opponents going at Judah was the correct thing to do and moving in and out of range and using the combinations and speed against Kotelnik was also the right thing to do.

.......and against Maidana?

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Bob Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:11

Jukebox Timebomb wrote:Khan fights more off the front foot since being with Roach which would suit Bradley. Bradley is still number 1 in the division and quite rightly so.

Not quite sure Bradley deserves the number one slot. Khan has beaten three of the Ring top six at 140lbs. Only Bradley and the hugely overrated Alexander remain. Bradley has one fight this year, an uninspired technical decision over Alexander, and he didn't fight at all in 2010 at 140lbs.

Bob

Posts : 356
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Barnsley

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by KO-KING Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:13

Luis Collazo - Makes the Difference in my opinion,
Hatton by a tiny margin

KO-KING

Posts : 1052
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by zx1234 Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:16

what's interesting is khan has already beaten the number 3 light welter maidana and a number 2 vs number ranked fighter makes a ring champion, unfortunately for khan at the time of the fight maidana was ranked 4 or 5

zx1234

Posts : 275
Join date : 2011-02-25

http://www.footballbetting365.blogspot.com/

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:27

Bradley is number 1 at 140 because he beat Alexander when they were considered the best two in the division. What has Khan done to deserve top spot?


Last edited by Jukebox Timebomb on Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:31; edited 1 time in total

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by BALTIMORA Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:30

Jukebox Timebomb wrote:Maidana is number 1 at 140 because he beat Alexander when they were considered the best two in the division. What has Khan done to deserve top spot?

Care to re-word that..?

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by KO-KING Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 17:31

Jukebox Timebomb wrote:Maidana is number 1 at 140 because he beat Alexander when they were considered the best two in the division. What has Khan done to deserve top spot?

Bradley beat Alexander.

Khan was number 2 when Bradley and Alexander fought

KO-KING

Posts : 1052
Join date : 2011-02-02

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by captain carrantuohil Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 20:13

I've thought a bit about this, and would now have to have Khan slightly ahead of Hatton on the lists. For me, if he beats Bradley, he would go ahead of Berg as the greatest British light-welter ever.

captain carrantuohil

Posts : 2508
Join date : 2011-05-06

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Imperial Ghosty Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 20:31

Khan was rated higher than Alexander at the time of the Bradley fight hence why he's not the ring magazine champion, would have to have Khan has the premier fighter in the division now, beaten 5 top ten ranked fighters in the space of 6 fights.

Imperial Ghosty

Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by WelshDevilRob Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 21:30

Not been a fan of either fighter but Hatton has the better names. I'd take an old Castillo over an old Zab anyday.
Maidana is likely to look worse and worse with every fight as Morales proved.

Great performance by Khan last night but Judah has seen better days.

WelshDevilRob

Posts : 621
Join date : 2011-04-04
Location : Cardiff, Wales

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 21:53

OK. Bradley was ranked as #1 and Alexander as #3 at the time they fought. By beating Alexander, Bradley cemented his position at the top of 140 lbs. Khan beating #6 ranked Judah is no where near enough to displace Bradley.

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Imperial Ghosty Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 21:58

It's close between the pair his win over Maidana tips it in his favour for me

Imperial Ghosty

Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by J.Benson II Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 22:01

There's not much in it.

Currently, Hatton's win over a faded but still strong Tszyu probably gives him the edge overall.

Other than that, I think Khan has the better quality. Both men have Paulie on their records but Khan's victories over Kotelnik, Maidana and Judah are more impressive than Urango, Maussa and Castillo.

The Collazo win was at 147 so I guess that needs to be taken into consideration, even though I thought Hatton lost that fight.

A unification win over Bradley will surely seal Khan's position above Hatton.

J.Benson II

Posts : 1258
Join date : 2011-02-26

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Lumbering_Jack Sun 24 Jul 2011 - 22:12

Hatton for me. You cant rate a fighter on his wins only. Khan was polaxed by a heavy handed plodder. Hatton lost to the two best fighters of his generation.

Khan will overtake Hatton, but just not yet.

Lumbering_Jack

Posts : 4341
Join date : 2011-03-07
Location : Newcastle

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by NoMasDinero Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 1:25

Hatton's is better but if you compare their acccomplishments at this same stage of their careers, Khan is ahead. And barring any major hiccups, Khan will surpass Hatton's overall record.

NoMasDinero

Posts : 7
Join date : 2011-02-18

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by paperbag_puncher Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 5:34

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Hatton for me. You cant rate a fighter on his wins only. Khan was polaxed by a heavy handed plodder. Hatton lost to the two best fighters of his generation.

Khan will overtake Hatton, but just not yet.

Surely Hatton cant be given credit for being dominated by both? The losses weren't even close. He deserves massive credit for fighting them but the fact he lost to them comprehensively is hardly a reason to rate him higher?

paperbag_puncher

Posts : 2516
Join date : 2011-02-25

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Atila Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 6:07

paperbag_puncher wrote:
Lumbering_Jack wrote:Hatton for me. You cant rate a fighter on his wins only. Khan was polaxed by a heavy handed plodder. Hatton lost to the two best fighters of his generation.

Khan will overtake Hatton, but just not yet.

Surely Hatton cant be given credit for being dominated by both? The losses weren't even close. He deserves massive credit for fighting them but the fact he lost to them comprehensively is hardly a reason to rate him higher?
Hatton doesn't even deserve massive credit for fighting Mayweather or Pacquiao. If he won he got to say that he beat the best, when he lost at least he was well paid. Hardly much of a risk was it?

A risk would have been fighting Witter, something he didn't have the balls to do.

Atila

Posts : 1711
Join date : 2011-06-03

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by paperbag_puncher Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 8:55

What? Of course it was a risk fighting the 2 best fighters of his generation. Manny nearly decapitated him and i'm sure those 2 losses combined with his lifestyle shortened his career. He was so popular he could have gotten a decent pay day no matter who he fought. From listening to Hatton seems like he genuinely wanted to test himself against the best, and in an era where boxers are happy to hide away at home making meaningless defences of titles that were handed to them he deserves much credit.

Perhaps he should have fought Witter but to say he has no balls after he gets in the ring with people vastly superior to him is nonsense.

paperbag_puncher

Posts : 2516
Join date : 2011-02-25

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by coxy0001 Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 8:57

A risk would have been fighting Witter, something he didn't have the balls to do.

The same Witter who got smacked around by the horribly average Alexander and Judah? Who never beat an elite fighter of the division?

I guess we should also be saying Khan has no balls as he won't fight Kell Brook. Fact of the matter is that they're simply on 2 different levels, much like Hatton and Witter were and the latter bought absolutely nothing to the table for the former.

coxy0001

Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Rowley Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 9:02

Coxy don't really want to revisit the debate but Witter bought as much to the table as Urango, Paulie or Maussa all of whom were accomodated at various points. Even going back to his WBU days guys like Vilchers, Smith or countless others all of who were faced rather than the British Euro and Commonwealth champion witter. Ultimately Ricky has had his career and it is more than decent with or without Witter but there were plenty times the fight could and should have happened and Ricky chose not to take it.

Never really bought into this Witter brings nothing to the table because when you can shift 50,000+ tickets against Lazcano your opponents ability to sell tickets becomes largely academic.

Rowley
Admin
Admin

Posts : 22053
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 51
Location : I'm just a symptom of the modern decay that's gnawing at the heart of this country.

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Scottrf Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 9:02

Khan isn't in the same division as Brook and Brook hasn't been his top contender for years like Witter was. Hardly comparable.

Scottrf

Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by JDandfries Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 9:35

Asking Hatton to fight Witter, was like expecting Calzaghe to fight Froch.

JDandfries

Posts : 1231
Join date : 2011-03-28

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by captain carrantuohil Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 10:03

No it wasn't JD, Froch was not a world champion until Calzaghe had virtually retired, and even then, they were in different divisions; there was neither a unification imperative nor any other compelling reason for Froch-Calzaghe, other than Froch's highly understandable desire to unseat the old lion, or at least have a go at it. Completely different from a situation where two fighters from the same country hold world belts in the same division at the same time, and one of them chooses to fight world contenders with many fewer credentials than his co-belt holder.

It was nothing to do with cowardice, I should emphasise for the millionth time. I remain convinced that Witter had annoyed Hatton to the point that Ricky was going to give him a payday over his dead body, but the fight should still have happened, whoever you think might have won it. As far as that is concerned, I think that Ricky would have had a horrible evening but would probably have found a way of winning somehow.

captain carrantuohil

Posts : 2508
Join date : 2011-05-06

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Rowley Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 10:10

Captain. I met Hatton some time ago and was discussing this at some length with a friend of his and you are pretty much spot on in your analysis. He basically said that Hatton was more than aware of the negative press he was receiving on this from fans and certain elements of the press but did not care because Witter had peed him off that much he was willing to take this because the thought of giving Junior a career high payday and a moment in the spotlight was far worse to his mind.

Ultimately for me when a guy has faced the likes of Manny, Kostya and Floyd as well as a number of belt holders at the weight such as Urango, Maussa and Paulie the lack of Witter on the ledger does not hurt him too greatly but there were plenty of times going back to the WBU days when Junior should have and probably could have been accomodated.

Rowley
Admin
Admin

Posts : 22053
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 51
Location : I'm just a symptom of the modern decay that's gnawing at the heart of this country.

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by captain carrantuohil Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 10:19

Very interesting, Jeff, and I'm not remotely surprised, nor do I blame Hatton for his entirely human response. People like Witter (and Froch, until he saw the light) need to understand that a little humility can go a long way in getting the sort of fights that you really want. By all means shout the odds, but if you are not a boxer who generates ticket sales or publicity, the likelihood is that you end up defending your hard-earned WBC belt in a leisure centre in Doncaster, or somewhere similar. And you're certainly not facing anyone who is going to help you change that fact.

Witter was his own worst enemy (apart, perhaps, from Ricky) and has had to reap what he has sown.

captain carrantuohil

Posts : 2508
Join date : 2011-05-06

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by kevchadders Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 12:37

The best chance Witter had of getting Hatton in the ring was when Hatton had just been beaten by Mayweather and Witter had just won the WBC belt.

At that point there was a huge amount of interest in that fight. All witter had to do was to get past his mandatory in Bradley and i honestly beleive the pressure from the public would have made Hatton take the fight.

But Witter blew it.

kevchadders

Posts : 246
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 49
Location : Liverpool

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by OasisBFC Mon 25 Jul 2011 - 14:57

kevchadders wrote:The best chance Witter had of getting Hatton in the ring was when Hatton had just been beaten by Mayweather and Witter had just won the WBC belt.

At that point there was a huge amount of interest in that fight. All witter had to do was to get past his mandatory in Bradley and i honestly beleive the pressure from the public would have made Hatton take the fight.

But Witter blew it.

witter didnt blow it, he was simply never good enough.


OasisBFC

Posts : 1050
Join date : 2011-02-24
Location : Manchester

Back to top Go down

Khans record v Hattons record Empty Re: Khans record v Hattons record

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 2 1, 2  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum