V2 WCC- The Quarter Finals- Match Up 3

The Competition has now reached the Quarter Finals and 9 wrestlers remain in the race to become 606V2 Wrestling Competition Champion! The last 16 Knockout stages saw some big names progress and fall by the wayside including Randy Orton, AJ Styles, Chris Jericho, Batista, Bully Ray, Jack Swagger and Samoa Joe all eliminated!

Due to a draw between HHH and Cody Rhodes in their last 16 match up both have progressed into this round and will face off in a triple threat match in match up 1.

Match up 2 saw Kurt Angle defeat the John Cena to progress to the semi finals

As always please try to leave a comment as to why you voted.

Undertaker has had some draw hasnt he.

N.B The End of the V2 WCC is nigh, the final will take place in seven days time on 28/11/11

This is how the final week of the competition looks:

Today- Quarter Final Match Up 3
Tuesday- Quarter Final Match Up 4
Wednesday- Semi Final Match 1
Thursday- Semi Final Match 2
Friday- Third/Forth Play Off
Next Monday- Grand Final

Can I announce punk as the winner now?

Undertakers Path to the Quarter Finals:

Round 1

1.The Undertaker 47% [ 22 ]
2.Daniel Bryan 28% [ 13 ]
3.Christopher Daniels 10% [ 5 ]
4.Drew McIntyre 10% [ 5 ]
5.Trent Barretta 0% [ 0 ]
6.Roderick Strong 2% [ 1 ]

Round 2

1. Matt Morgan 5% [ 3 ]
2. AJ Styles 30% [ 16 ]
3. The Undertaker 53% [ 28 ]
4. Davey Richards 9% [ 5 ]

Last 16

The Undertaker 60% [ 35 ]
Rand Orton 39% [ 23 ]

Just for you Ent! And we can also announce barcelona the winners of the champions league and Spain the Euro 2012 winners while we at it.

Just for you Ent! And we can also announce barcelona the winners of the champions league and Spain the Euro 2012 winners while we at it.

Whilst they are strong favourites their odds would be nothing compared to punks chances of winning a wrestling forums poll! Unless slater is involved and ed creates 50 accounts

Good point!!!! Punk is the big favorite of course and is likely to go on and win the whole thing, but i guess we'll have to wait and see, there maybe a few surprises to come yet

Based on Survivor Series;

Spoiler:

Going with R-Truth.

I have a smeaky feeling that Kurt Angle might win this ya know. If he's still in it that is.

Although Truth has had an outstanding year i cant vote against The Undertaker. He's just better.

That is all.

Undertaker every day. Yes people have different criteria for voting but mine is simply what the questions asks. " Please vote for the wrestler you rate the highest". Therefore, Undertaker has to win this.

I have to agree as I rate undertaker the highest. If the question was 'whose had the better year?' then I'd have voted for Truth.

R Truth for the same reason I have voted against Taker, HHH, Batista etc. all competition, I am not voting for guys who have wrestled a few matches this year in HHH's case, 1 in Takers case and 0 for Batista

Stonee21 wrote:R Truth for the same reason I have voted against Taker, HHH, Batista etc. all competition, I am not voting for guys who have wrestled a few matches this year in HHH's case, 1 in Takers case and 0 for Batista

This. Seeing guys like Truth, Rhodes, Ziggler and Orton go out to guys who have had a total of 4 matches combined this year is shocking.

Just because HHH has only had 3 matches this year doesnt mean R-Truth is better than him. The question is 'who do you rate the highest' not 'who has had a better 2011'.

But this is the thing Mr H I am judging it by the here and now and for that reason I just can't vote for guys who are not active or in semi retirement.

Voting in the here and now so Truth

same a voting for dolph over triple h, i can not vote for someone who has had 1 match all year. Also R truth has improved a lot since turning

So the team who has the biggest fan base should win the Premier League?

The country who has the biggest population should win the World Cup?

No. The winner should be who is currently the best at the time of the competition. Which isnt a guy whos had 1 match in nearly a full 12 months.

I voted for Truth, simple really, I voted for who I want to watch and Taker for me hasn't been interesting in years, his last title run was absolutely garbage

Crap analogy im afraid Samo. Greece won Euro 2004 but were they immediately the number 1 European side in the Fifa rankings? No, because they werent the best team in Europe. Which suggests that past achievements obviously count for something.

You can cast your vote on the 'here and now' but im casting my votes on who i actually rate the highest, regardless of how many matches they've had this year.

Thats the problem with Opinion polls, everyones is different haha.

I think a good way to look at it is if Taker or Truth where to win the WHC at SD this week, what one of them would you like to see as champ

Thats a terrible way to look at it gaffer. The obvious pick would be R-Truth because Taker doesnt need the title to remain relevant. But that doesnt mean i rate R-Truth higher than The Undertaker.

On the flip side, if Brock Lesnar came back for one more match at Wrestlemania would you rather he faced R-Truth or The Undertaker?

Truth. And Im not just saying that for the sake of the arguement.

You'd get a better match out of Truth, and could you really believe Taker, in the state he's in these days, would go over Lesnar at ANY point, let alone Wrestlemania?

If the Deadman was in his prime then It would be Taker no question.

How is that terrible? Is it because it goes against your choice?

WrestleMania is a one shot deal, I'd rather have a great product all year round and a poor Mania than have a poor product and a great Mania

I wouldn't want to see Brock/Taker, they would never better their previous matches and Taker's body couldn't live with the raw force Brock is famed for, if he is booked as a paranoid freak who thinks they're all out to get him, Truth/Brock would be better, it wouldn't draw better though but that's already moot since Rock will take care of that side of things

I've already said Taker doesn't interest me and hasn't for years

No, i dont care that it goes against my choice, its just a poor way of looking at it.

Its like asking who would you prefer to win the WHC next, Sheamus or Randy Orton, the popular answer would probably be Sheamus but does that mean he's better than Randy Orton? No.

Of course id like to see R-Truth win the title ahead of Taker, i'd also like to see Wade Barrett win the title ahead of Taker but that doesnt mean i rate him higher.

hmmmm I don't really get your rant

Why is it a poor way of looking at it, surely if you prefer someone as champ over another that means you prefer them??? No?

I'd take (heel) HHH as WWE Champ over Del Rio

I'd take Taker as Champ over Barrett (which shows you how much I rate dumbo)

I'd take Sheamus over Orton as champ

So How is that a poor way of looking at it? If I'm given two guys I'll ask myself who do i want to see as the champ, poor way of looking at it? Maybe in your world

It'd be so much easier if we were having this conversation face to face!

You said 'I think a good way to look at it is if Taker or Truth where to win the WHC at SD this week, what one of them would you like to see as champ' From that i guessed you were implying that if your answer is R-Truth then you should vote for him in this poll. Is that not what you were getting at?

Yes

but that doesn't mean I'd like to see Barrett win it over Taker, if this was Barrett/Taker I'd choose Taker

Taker is only one more vote from victory

Ok, so if in a previous round you had to vote between Sheamus or Orton, who would you have voted for? Because judging by your theory above of who you'd want to see win the WHC on SD next week, i'd guess you'd vote for Sheamus?

No, but that's a very different situation for me, we're talking about two active wrestles who have changed so much over the course of the year, it's for me an entirely different situation to a guy on the run of his life and an innactive member of the roster.

I like Sheamus better and would rather he was champ over Orton but going by the year Orton has had I've found it impossible not to vote for him, my objectivity wins here.

If Undertaker had a similar year my vote would go to him, the reason I'd choose him over Barrett is because Barrett has had a pretty forgetable year

Thats fair enough then i suppose.

But i still think asking who you'd prefer to win the WHC title out of Truth or Taker isnt a very good way to determine who you rate the highest out of the two.

It's a World Cup style competition though so it's who you rate higher in 2011, I wouldn't fancy picking France to win the Euro's over Croatia just because they've won it a few times in the past and have been better historically, same with the Rugby World Cup, England where the best team in the world 8 years ago and got to the final four years ago but in 2011 they weren't the same beast

Who said its who you rate higher in 2011? Was that the rule from the beginning? If so then all of my votes have been false.

It's how I'd rate any current World Cup to be honest, logic surely tells us that the World Cup would mean the here and now, if not then surely Hogan, Flair, Savage, Hart, Andre and all the other great names would be involved

You don't need to argue about who is right. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and they can vote for who they want.

Undertaker

No Mr H it was never said it was to find the best of this current year but the format was taken from old 606 where it was to find who was the best at the given time and that coupled with the fact only active wrestlers were included lead many to believe myself included that we were voting on who we thought were the best right now, just like last time and since I started like that I have just decided to keep using that thought to make my choices.

TopoftheChops wrote:You don't need to argue about who is right. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and they can vote for who they want.

Who's arguing? It's two posters who have known each other for a couple of years having a discussion

DRAMA QUEEN MUCH!?!

the-gaffer wrote:

TopoftheChops wrote:You don't need to argue about who is right. Everyone is entitled to an opinion and they can vote for who they want.

Who's arguing? It's two posters who have known each other for a couple of years having a discussion

DRAMA QUEEN MUCH!?!

Exactly.

One of them is a highly respected poster, with a depth of knowledge on all major and minor wrestling promotions, with a bit of background knowledge of the industry, his opinion is always appreciated, even if he isn't always right.....

The other is Gaffer.

where have you been KB? Part timer.

Looks like 34 people rate Taker's 2011 better than R-Truth's then!

yeah they also thought he had a better 2011 than Orton

Whattamanouver

Sorry mate, work is busy.

We'll have a Twitter catch up soon. Saw your epic performance at Football didn't go down well, you still playing Wednesdays?

went with truth has impressed me since his heel turn

Haha yeah I was told not to bother coming back if I carry on playing like that! Was all tongue in cheek though, I probably have a shocker this week. Play every Thursday mate, its a decent standard but I can't play too full blooded as I'm sure it wouldn't go down too well if I broke a leg seeing as the Mrs is 34wks pregnant!

999 posts, I'll save the 1000th for a good one!

congrats mate, you looking forward to it?

Cheers buddy, yep certainly am, Little H will be dropping pipe bombs and i'll be cleaning up the debris (If you catch my drift)

Get some sleep now.
And get the Mrs to breast feed, not because it benefits the little un, more that you can't do it so don't have to get up in the night then