Federer admits to tennis Golden Era

First topic message reminder :

It must be hard for the very honest Roger Federer who doesn't like people having opinions to admit but the Swiss has called this current era a " Golden Era" for tennis. This further reafirms praises of the quality of the mens game and echoes the same sentiments shared by tennis luminaries like Borg, McEnroe etc who have compared this era of tennis to the Golden years of the 80s.

Sadly though, this just also confirms the era 2003-2007 as a weak era as Federer implied.
Now if only he could be this truthful about his interest as the president of the players council, all will be good again.




"I thought we’re going in a good
direction,” he said. “I thought the
game was healthy. We’re in a golden
era right now. Everybody is happy,
talking positive.”


www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/australianopen/9018227/Australian-Open-2012-Nikolay-Davydenko-blasts-perfect-Roger-Federer-as-row-rumbles-on.html

laverfan wrote:

@Amritia3ee - Also, becoming a member of 606v2 to antagonise other posters on 606v2 is also not helpful. (hint hint...).

OK, who have I antagonised? Apart from you

Tenez wrote:

We love him here!

Aww... Thanks mate

amritia3ee wrote:

laverfan wrote:

@Amritia3ee - Also, becoming a member of 606v2 to antagonise other posters on 606v2 is also not helpful. (hint hint...).

OK, who have I antagonised? Apart from you

Remember 'other posters' is plural and includes posters other than me.

BTW, you have not antagonised me, yet...

laverfan wrote:

Becoming a member of 606v2 to antagonise other posters on 606v2

Where did you get that from?
I recognise you might hate me or agree with Tenez that I'm just a useless cheerleader, who is like Laurel from Laurel and Hardy and is a waste of space Nadal fan who is just here to dilute (and even try to respond?) to what Tenez and his friends say, but I don't know where you've got that idea from.

Why dont we just stick to debating tennis

Y I Man wrote:Why dont we just stick to debating tennis

To be fair this debate is more interesting than the:
'ITS A WEAK ERA'
'BAGHDATIS IS AMAZING'
'BAGHDATIS IS TERRIBLE'
debate we were having earlier.

Y I Man wrote:Why dont we just stick to debating tennis

I wholeheartedly agree.

amritia3ee wrote:

Y I Man wrote:Why dont we just stick to debating tennis

To be fair this debate is more interesting than the:
'ITS A WEAK ERA'
'BAGHDATIS IS AMAZING'
'BAGHDATIS IS TERRIBLE'
debate we were having earlier.

Hilarious, given the number of era threads you've started.

bogbrush wrote:

amritia3ee wrote:
To be fair this debate is more interesting than the:
'ITS A WEAK ERA'
'BAGHDATIS IS AMAZING'
'BAGHDATIS IS TERRIBLE'
debate we were having earlier.

Hilarious, given the number of era threads you've started.