Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
+2
azania
Adam D
6 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
"Amir Khan will not defend his WBA light-welterweight title against Paul McCloskey after negotiations between the two camps broke down on Thursday.
It was believed that the two had previously agreed in principle to fight in Manchester's MEN Arena on 16 April.
A statement from McCloskey's promoter Barry Hearn branded Khan's offer to his fighter as "totally derisory".
"The deals placed on the table were an insult to Paul, an undefeated fighter and a European champion," said Hearn.
"You have to pay your opponents to step in the ring with you, and pay them fairly," he added.
The percentage share of ticket sales commission and pay-per-view revenue appear to have been the major sticking points between the two parties."
Source: BBC website
Is Khan asking for two much in this fight or is he reasonable in his offer.
Thoughts?
It was believed that the two had previously agreed in principle to fight in Manchester's MEN Arena on 16 April.
A statement from McCloskey's promoter Barry Hearn branded Khan's offer to his fighter as "totally derisory".
"The deals placed on the table were an insult to Paul, an undefeated fighter and a European champion," said Hearn.
"You have to pay your opponents to step in the ring with you, and pay them fairly," he added.
The percentage share of ticket sales commission and pay-per-view revenue appear to have been the major sticking points between the two parties."
Source: BBC website
Is Khan asking for two much in this fight or is he reasonable in his offer.
Thoughts?
Re: Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
Hobo wrote:"Amir Khan will not defend his WBA light-welterweight title against Paul McCloskey after negotiations between the two camps broke down on Thursday.
It was believed that the two had previously agreed in principle to fight in Manchester's MEN Arena on 16 April.
A statement from McCloskey's promoter Barry Hearn branded Khan's offer to his fighter as "totally derisory".
"The deals placed on the table were an insult to Paul, an undefeated fighter and a European champion," said Hearn.
"You have to pay your opponents to step in the ring with you, and pay them fairly," he added.
The percentage share of ticket sales commission and pay-per-view revenue appear to have been the major sticking points between the two parties."
Source: BBC website
Is Khan asking for two much in this fight or is he reasonable in his offer.
Thoughts?
Thoughts? Hearn is a jackass. Its an honour to fight for a world title. So what if he isn't getting near the same amount as Khan. Mc couldn't fill a phone booth. It he fought and won, then he can dictate terms. I reckon the issue if that the contract stipulates that Khan would have promo rights on Mc should he win and BH wouldn't have that.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
He shouldn't be getting the same amount as Khan.If the fight did happen,and it was on PPV,Amir Khan is the world champion-he'd be the one drawing the tickets and PPV sales.He's in the driving seat when dictating terms because he's world champion!
Re: Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
Mat wrote:He shouldn't be getting the same amount as Khan.If the fight did happen,and it was on PPV,Amir Khan is the world champion-he'd be the one drawing the tickets and PPV sales.He's in the driving seat when dictating terms because he's world champion!
Apparently he was offered 3x his highest purse. What an eejit for turning the opportunity. If he wins, his life changes for the better. I reckon its more to do with BH than Mc.
azania- Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112
Re: Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
Bump for comedic effect.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
You almost had me for a second there Scott, you git you!
88Chris05- Moderator
- Posts : 9661
Join date : 2011-02-16
Age : 36
Location : Nottingham
Re: Amir Khan will not defend title against Paul McCloskey
Has the fight broke down a second time?
The Galveston Giant- Posts : 5333
Join date : 2011-02-23
Age : 39
Location : Scotland
Similar topics
» Amir Khan vs Paul McCloskey
» Amir Khan vs Paul Mccloskey undercard
» Danny Garcia vs Robert Guerrero for vacant WBC welterweight title - Amir Khan made mandatory for the winner.
» Amir Khan vs Julio Diaz- Post Fight - Khan on the Decline?
» Paul McCloskey vs Julio Diaz
» Amir Khan vs Paul Mccloskey undercard
» Danny Garcia vs Robert Guerrero for vacant WBC welterweight title - Amir Khan made mandatory for the winner.
» Amir Khan vs Julio Diaz- Post Fight - Khan on the Decline?
» Paul McCloskey vs Julio Diaz
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|