Texas Scramble Rule
+4
LondonJonnyO
McLaren
SetupDeterminesTheMotion
nixonuae
8 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Golf
Page 1 of 1
Texas Scramble Rule
If you decide to select a ball in a bunker do the other players get to place the ball or do they have to drop?
nixonuae- Posts : 47
Join date : 2011-01-30
Location : Abu Dhabi
SetupDeterminesTheMotion- Posts : 780
Join date : 2011-02-01
Location : Airdrie
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
The main rule I follow regarding Texas Scramble's is never to play one.
McLaren- Posts : 17620
Join date : 2011-01-27
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
McLaren wrote:The main rule I follow regarding Texas Scramble's is never to play one.
A ball from the bunker or the event!
nixonuae- Posts : 47
Join date : 2011-01-30
Location : Abu Dhabi
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
why drop?
That's unfair as you are likely to plug thus giving you a lie which is not representative of the lie the orginal player had.
Although... why take a ball in a bunker anyway? It's like choosing to play a 10 foot downhiller breaking left to right instead of a 12 foot uphiller with a right to left on it.
That's unfair as you are likely to plug thus giving you a lie which is not representative of the lie the orginal player had.
Although... why take a ball in a bunker anyway? It's like choosing to play a 10 foot downhiller breaking left to right instead of a 12 foot uphiller with a right to left on it.
LondonJonnyO- Posts : 1885
Join date : 2011-01-28
Age : 48
Location : Epping
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
LondonJonnyO wrote:why drop?
That's unfair as you are likely to plug thus giving you a lie which is not representative of the lie the orginal player had.
Although... why take a ball in a bunker anyway? It's like choosing to play a 10 foot downhiller breaking left to right instead of a 12 foot uphiller with a right to left on it.
LJ
maybe the other balls are in water or trees?
McLaren- Posts : 17620
Join date : 2011-01-27
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
McLaren wrote:LondonJonnyO wrote:why drop?
That's unfair as you are likely to plug thus giving you a lie which is not representative of the lie the orginal player had.
Although... why take a ball in a bunker anyway? It's like choosing to play a 10 foot downhiller breaking left to right instead of a 12 foot uphiller with a right to left on it.
LJ
maybe the other balls are in water or trees?
That's why I asked. does seem a little unfair
nixonuae- Posts : 47
Join date : 2011-01-30
Location : Abu Dhabi
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
McLaren wrote:LondonJonnyO wrote:why drop?
That's unfair as you are likely to plug thus giving you a lie which is not representative of the lie the orginal player had.
Although... why take a ball in a bunker anyway? It's like choosing to play a 10 foot downhiller breaking left to right instead of a 12 foot uphiller with a right to left on it.
LJ
maybe the other balls are in water or trees?
What a bunch of choppers that scramble grouping must be then!
Nixon. I think that most places that hold scrambles have a rule that they play for things like that if I'm honest.
LondonJonnyO- Posts : 1885
Join date : 2011-01-28
Age : 48
Location : Epping
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
Maybe it was a tee shot near the end of the round where it was necessary to take one player's shot to fulfill his quota of tee shots
Davie- Posts : 7821
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 64
Location : Berkshire
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
A bunker is a hazard, you can't place in a hazard.
It is very unfair, but surely you could have decided to play one of the other balls.
It is very unfair, but surely you could have decided to play one of the other balls.
SetupDeterminesTheMotion- Posts : 780
Join date : 2011-02-01
Location : Airdrie
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
Davie wrote:Maybe it was a tee shot near the end of the round where it was necessary to take one player's shot to fulfill his quota of tee shots
It's a potential theory... but I prefer the chopper version.
LondonJonnyO- Posts : 1885
Join date : 2011-01-28
Age : 48
Location : Epping
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
LondonJonnyO wrote:Davie wrote:Maybe it was a tee shot near the end of the round where it was necessary to take one player's shot to fulfill his quota of tee shots
It's a potential theory... but I prefer the chopper version.
With the groups I'm talking about the chopper version is the most likely
nixonuae- Posts : 47
Join date : 2011-01-30
Location : Abu Dhabi
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
SetupDeterminesTheMotion wrote:A bunker is a hazard, you can't place in a hazard.
It is very unfair, but surely you could have decided to play one of the other balls.
It's not unfair at all. As you say, it is a hazard. If you landed in a water hazard, the likelihood is that your Texas Scramble team wouldn't want to drop in there and would probably take a drop outside of the hazard with a shot penalty. You have the same option with a bunker. If you don't want to play in a bunker take a drop outside and a penalty.
A normal hazard is far more forgiving than a water-hazard but they're both hazards which you shouldn't be in so it's not right to call one unfair when, in fact, it's more than fair.
Mercurio- Posts : 851
Join date : 2011-02-01
Age : 48
Location : Sussex/Vaud
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
There's no rule as such, the organiser should just explain how you deal with balls to be played from rough, or hazards etc.
George1507- Posts : 1336
Join date : 2011-01-27
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
played a team scramble recently - painful indeed. Anyway, bunker rule was written and posted on our locker room borads for all to read. Went something like this...
If team select to play out of a a bunker - the first player plays as it lies (obviously). He can then rake the bunker (no other player can rake it until they have played shot) - player 2 can then place the ball as near to the original spot as possible in a newly raked bunker. Rinse and repeat for the last guy. Always place and player before can rake. Idea being that the hazard play is enough of a test without having huge footprints and a plugged ball.
If team select to play out of a a bunker - the first player plays as it lies (obviously). He can then rake the bunker (no other player can rake it until they have played shot) - player 2 can then place the ball as near to the original spot as possible in a newly raked bunker. Rinse and repeat for the last guy. Always place and player before can rake. Idea being that the hazard play is enough of a test without having huge footprints and a plugged ball.
Onetoanother- Posts : 79
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : NW England
Re: Texas Scramble Rule
Onetoanother wrote:played a team scramble recently - painful indeed. Anyway, bunker rule was written and posted on our locker room borads for all to read. Went something like this...
If team select to play out of a a bunker - the first player plays as it lies (obviously). He can then rake the bunker (no other player can rake it until they have played shot) - player 2 can then place the ball as near to the original spot as possible in a newly raked bunker. Rinse and repeat for the last guy. Always place and player before can rake. Idea being that the hazard play is enough of a test without having huge footprints and a plugged ball.
That seems fair
Cheers
nixonuae- Posts : 47
Join date : 2011-01-30
Location : Abu Dhabi
Similar topics
» If there was a Texas scramble international event..
» EmmDee's Texas Scramble Rules Question
» Tuck rule eliminated , leading with crown rule enacted
» A Scramble for Position: Who is the Next Star?
» Baltimore v Texas
» EmmDee's Texas Scramble Rules Question
» Tuck rule eliminated , leading with crown rule enacted
» A Scramble for Position: Who is the Next Star?
» Baltimore v Texas
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Golf
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|