An interesting read
+9
socal1976
LuvSports!
Haddie-nuff
lags72
JuliusHMarx
User 774433
bogbrush
The Special Juan
lydian
13 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Tennis
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
An interesting read
Looking at the character displayed by Federer, Nadal and Djokovic in embracing winning or losing.
http://www.sbnation.com/longform/2012/11/9/3605420/roger-federer-rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic
L.
http://www.sbnation.com/longform/2012/11/9/3605420/roger-federer-rafael-nadal-novak-djokovic
L.
lydian- Posts : 9178
Join date : 2011-04-30
Re: An interesting read
Awful article that's really biased. The author states that he's/she's a massive Nadal fan before kicking Federer and Djokovic repeatedly. Was it a BBC article?
The Special Juan- Posts : 20900
Join date : 2011-02-14
Location : Twatt
Re: An interesting read
She seems a bit confused over Federer, moaning like mad then turning soft toward him.
She obviously loves Nadal, which is nice but hardly conducive to good journalism. A bit fangirly. She doesn't mention the time wasting, psyche out stuff does she? I started to think it might be wooffie in disguise.
Clearly hates Djokovic, although the examples she cites don't reflect we'll on him to be honest.
She obviously loves Nadal, which is nice but hardly conducive to good journalism. A bit fangirly. She doesn't mention the time wasting, psyche out stuff does she? I started to think it might be wooffie in disguise.
Clearly hates Djokovic, although the examples she cites don't reflect we'll on him to be honest.
Last edited by bogbrush on Sat 10 Nov 2012, 5:22 pm; edited 2 times in total
bogbrush- Posts : 11169
Join date : 2011-04-13
Re: An interesting read
Cracking article.
Lol it's very biased, but we've seen many Federer fans try to do the same against Nadal, no?
Lol it's very biased, but we've seen many Federer fans try to do the same against Nadal, no?
User 774433- Posts : 5067
Join date : 2012-05-18
Re: An interesting read
Fans are supposed to be biased, journalists aren't, no?
(Why do we have to speak like Nadal? Surely we are English, no?)
(Why do we have to speak like Nadal? Surely we are English, no?)
JuliusHMarx- julius
- Posts : 22578
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park
Re: An interesting read
For sure, we have to try our best in every moment to talk like Rafa, no?
As for your first point: NO.
Journalists can be as biased as they like while writing opinion pieces, but it has to be well explained.
If it's a news report or something, then yes they shouldn't' be biased.
As for your first point: NO.
Journalists can be as biased as they like while writing opinion pieces, but it has to be well explained.
If it's a news report or something, then yes they shouldn't' be biased.
User 774433- Posts : 5067
Join date : 2012-05-18
Re: An interesting read
Depends who the author is writing for. I expect a piece on the BBC/Sky/Newspaper (unless it's someone's column) to be unbiased but it's up to people to write what they want on the internet. Every player has something people can use against them; it's no surprise. In the case of that article though, there's no attempt to even mention the good things.
The Special Juan- Posts : 20900
Join date : 2011-02-14
Location : Twatt
Re: An interesting read
I think it's ok in this case, she makes clear she's a fangirl.
The only mistake is then to treat her piece as journalism rather than a wordy piece from wooffiesrafaramblings (no discredit to wooffie, she's eminently honest about the purpose of her blog).
The only mistake is then to treat her piece as journalism rather than a wordy piece from wooffiesrafaramblings (no discredit to wooffie, she's eminently honest about the purpose of her blog).
bogbrush- Posts : 11169
Join date : 2011-04-13
Re: An interesting read
That link doesn't read so much as an opinion piece as a poor attempt at pseudo-psychology by someone who doesn't understand the subject. It's a fan-girl article disguising itself as journalism.
JuliusHMarx- julius
- Posts : 22578
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park
Re: An interesting read
Lol, I didn't say it was well written...just interesting!
This one is more so... http://www.tennis.com/news/2012/11/fifth-wheel/40063/#.UJ6OknwgGK0
Discussing the importance of WTF.
This one is more so... http://www.tennis.com/news/2012/11/fifth-wheel/40063/#.UJ6OknwgGK0
Discussing the importance of WTF.
Last edited by lydian on Sat 10 Nov 2012, 5:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
lydian- Posts : 9178
Join date : 2011-04-30
Re: An interesting read
The author writes well, and has a flowing style of prose - even if at times she appears to have swallowed a dictionary.
I have no problem at all with anyone producing a glowing eulogy of their favourite player (although I agree, it quickly becomes way more fan-girly than objectively journalistic) ; but when it's done with the underlying motive of denigrating other fellow players by the use of highly selective quotes and historical evidence, then the content itself will always be tainted.
She begins by implying that we are about to learn something deep and meaningful about character and emotion. But by the end I was left with the distinct feeling that she could have saved herself a lot of time & effort with something more simple..... perhaps something along the lines of :
I think Nadal is truly wonderful, and even when he loses he's the best ; but as for those Federer and Djokovic guys, they really are dodgy you know, with personalities and behaviour so flawed that anyone who actually likes them must be a bit of an oddball themselves .....
I have no problem at all with anyone producing a glowing eulogy of their favourite player (although I agree, it quickly becomes way more fan-girly than objectively journalistic) ; but when it's done with the underlying motive of denigrating other fellow players by the use of highly selective quotes and historical evidence, then the content itself will always be tainted.
She begins by implying that we are about to learn something deep and meaningful about character and emotion. But by the end I was left with the distinct feeling that she could have saved herself a lot of time & effort with something more simple..... perhaps something along the lines of :
I think Nadal is truly wonderful, and even when he loses he's the best ; but as for those Federer and Djokovic guys, they really are dodgy you know, with personalities and behaviour so flawed that anyone who actually likes them must be a bit of an oddball themselves .....
lags72- Posts : 5018
Join date : 2011-11-07
Re: An interesting read
Yep lags, especially Djokovic. Lord knows why she went on to highlight Novak's coach doing a humping motion on a car other than to denigrate his team, and hence the guy himself. Given the evidence is patchy and selective I would say it wasn't well written in terms of balance but the article kind of is what it is and she is a self-proclaimed Nadal fan. She once wrote this about Nadal too...
http://archive.mensjournal.com/nadal-the-quiet-fire
When it comes to more journalistic and balanced writing style I much prefer reading Tignor, e.g. as in the link in my reply above, but it's good to read some visual tennis bubblegum from time to time - doesn't always have to be serious or balanced hey, would be pretty boring if everything was written that way.
http://archive.mensjournal.com/nadal-the-quiet-fire
When it comes to more journalistic and balanced writing style I much prefer reading Tignor, e.g. as in the link in my reply above, but it's good to read some visual tennis bubblegum from time to time - doesn't always have to be serious or balanced hey, would be pretty boring if everything was written that way.
lydian- Posts : 9178
Join date : 2011-04-30
Re: An interesting read
That's not true actually.The Special Juan wrote: In the case of that article though, there's no attempt to even mention the good things.
In the article she states:
-Djokovic is a good loser
-Federer is a good winner
User 774433- Posts : 5067
Join date : 2012-05-18
Re: An interesting read
Well I think it was wonderful.. but then you would expect me to wouldnt you.. a bit brutal on Fed and Novak.. (though I have to agree with some of it)
She said all those things I wanted to but wouldn´t dare to especially on this forum
Thanks for posting it Lydian some of us enjoyed it
She said all those things I wanted to but wouldn´t dare to especially on this forum
Thanks for posting it Lydian some of us enjoyed it
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
lydian - really enjoyed the other piece, the one on the WTF linked in your 5.46 post.
It's an excellent look at the conundrum that is the WTF : an event that is without doubt immensely popular with both players and the live audience ..... yet which perhaps still lacks a certain indefinable something by way of profile / image. But ultimately, I'm not sure how much that matters.
Some of the comments that appear below the article are very interesting, and having thoroughly enjoyed my own visit to the WTF at the 02, I can relate in particular to these :
"The atmosphere is truly amazing and, far more than at Wimbledon, you have to be there to appreicate it. It creates a terrific buzz around the players themselves not the murmured reverence for the Centre Court. At Wimbledon even on the opening day when the defending champ walks out - which is not a moment I would miss for the world - half the CC is empty. The O2 is 80-90% full when the players come on to court and for Roger and Rafa's match last year it was 101% full. Spine-tingling".
and .....
"Each and every player at the WTF has claimed numerous times that the WTF is extremely important to them. I have never heard anyone say how much they dream of playing Indian Wells, Miami or another masters event the way they talk about the WTF".
It's an excellent look at the conundrum that is the WTF : an event that is without doubt immensely popular with both players and the live audience ..... yet which perhaps still lacks a certain indefinable something by way of profile / image. But ultimately, I'm not sure how much that matters.
Some of the comments that appear below the article are very interesting, and having thoroughly enjoyed my own visit to the WTF at the 02, I can relate in particular to these :
"The atmosphere is truly amazing and, far more than at Wimbledon, you have to be there to appreicate it. It creates a terrific buzz around the players themselves not the murmured reverence for the Centre Court. At Wimbledon even on the opening day when the defending champ walks out - which is not a moment I would miss for the world - half the CC is empty. The O2 is 80-90% full when the players come on to court and for Roger and Rafa's match last year it was 101% full. Spine-tingling".
and .....
"Each and every player at the WTF has claimed numerous times that the WTF is extremely important to them. I have never heard anyone say how much they dream of playing Indian Wells, Miami or another masters event the way they talk about the WTF".
lags72- Posts : 5018
Join date : 2011-11-07
Re: An interesting read
It Must Be Love wrote:That's not true actually.The Special Juan wrote: In the case of that article though, there's no attempt to even mention the good things.
In the article she states:
-Djokovic is a good loser
-Federer is a good winner
In all honesty, I did give up on it after the first paragraph or 2 of the section on Federer.
The Special Juan- Posts : 20900
Join date : 2011-02-14
Location : Twatt
Re: An interesting read
It Must Be Love wrote:
Journalists can be as biased as they like while writing opinion pieces, but it has to be well explained.
Don't agree with that at all, in fact I have been told the complete opposite.
LuvSports!- Posts : 4701
Join date : 2011-09-18
Re: An interesting read
JuliusHMarx wrote:Fans are supposed to be biased, journalists aren't, no?
(Why do we have to speak like Nadal? Surely we are English, no?)
I am not English, although I like greasy breakfasts, beer and fish chips.
Didn't like the article, but a columnist is paid to have an opinion just seems like a bit selective and pro-Nadal. No worries Novak and his fans are too busy enjoying the reign of King Novak the Great as world #1 to care much for her opinion.
socal1976- Posts : 14212
Join date : 2011-03-18
Location : southern california
Re: An interesting read
"You say it best when you say nothing at all" :
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
King Novak the Great.....haha
The Serbian Sovereign...
The Serbian Sovereign...
lydian- Posts : 9178
Join date : 2011-04-30
Re: An interesting read
socal1976 wrote:JuliusHMarx wrote:Fans are supposed to be biased, journalists aren't, no?
(Why do we have to speak like Nadal? Surely we are English, no?)
I am not English, although I like greasy breakfasts, beer and fish chips.
Didn't like the article, but a columnist is paid to have an opinion just seems like a bit selective and pro-Nadal. No worries Novak and his fans are too busy enjoying the reign of King Novak the Great as world #1 to care much for her opinion.
Obviously still on the whisky King Novak the Great tsk
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
"Character is, in other words, an internal compass with distinctly visible effects that become especially pronounced in a sport that is a zero sum, reactive encounter, in which each player seeks to force the other back behind the baseline"
Can anybody explain what this overexcited lady is talking about?
The impression is she has followed tennis only in the last couple of years to be generous........
I prefer Wooffie to the writer, both as a journalist and as a woman. That says it all......
Can anybody explain what this overexcited lady is talking about?
The impression is she has followed tennis only in the last couple of years to be generous........
I prefer Wooffie to the writer, both as a journalist and as a woman. That says it all......
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
"I liked Nadal for biting his trophies instead of kissing them"
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
"By 2008, Djokovic was No. 3 in the world. At the U.S. Open, he beat Tommy Robredo in the Round of 16, interrupting their five-set contest repeatedly to call the trainer for ailments involving his stomach, ankle, hip and several other body parts and organs. During a press conference after the match, I suggested to the visibly disgusted Robredo that it seemed as if he didn’t trust that Djokovic had actually been injured."
Here is where I really miss Tenez and the lengthy MTO debates. This lady is really shameless......
Here is where I really miss Tenez and the lengthy MTO debates. This lady is really shameless......
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
It does appear she has come only recently to the sport. What an embarrassing set of comments for her to make.
It looks like you're mining it for more gems, a search likely to be fruitful.
It looks like you're mining it for more gems, a search likely to be fruitful.
bogbrush- Posts : 11169
Join date : 2011-04-13
Re: An interesting read
A great read! So nice to see some intelligent writing about tennis with reference to what for me at least has made the last few years so interesting to watch.
The full quote is
Character is, in other words, an internal compass with distinctly visible effects that become especially pronounced in a sport that is a zero sum, reactive encounter, in which each player seeks to force the other back behind the baseline, to get him on the run, make him lunge, scramble, cede the angles, and, in the process, confound him, make him miss, make him look foolish, dominate him, break his will. Tennis is, in other words, a gloriously savage pas de deux in which, by the end of a hard-fought match, players are driven so relentlessly that their defenses are decimated. Character is what remains when that match ends. It is the unwitting residue of competition.
To put it very simply. In a sport where the aim is to destroy your opponent and with the stakes set extremely high players are forced into laying down their defenses and revealing something of their true character to us the viewer.
The author then picks out a few of the most emotionally charged matches between the top three players to illustrate how their characters are reviled. These are all matches that most here on 606v2 are familiar with so there's no manipulation or sleight of hand in her assessment. If some accuse her of being a "Nadal fan" it's something she's admitted and the article is her explaining why.
Federer is pompous is well aware of how good he is, hates to lose but is a gracious winner. Djokovic's mum did tell him he "is the child of god". He can be a very gracious loser but I'm sure I wasn't the only one shocked at the reported Madrid celebrations and that truly dreadful pose with Tipsarvaric. Nadal does have a philosophical way of understanding loss and is a gracious winner. In sport you don't have to be gracious as a winner or after a loss. In fact as the author implies in that first quote true character is revealed so when we see such behavior it is to be admired.
Jeremy_Kyle wrote:"Character is, in other words, an internal compass with distinctly visible effects that become especially pronounced in a sport that is a zero sum, reactive encounter, in which each player seeks to force the other back behind the baseline"
Can anybody explain what this overexcited lady is talking about?
The full quote is
Character is, in other words, an internal compass with distinctly visible effects that become especially pronounced in a sport that is a zero sum, reactive encounter, in which each player seeks to force the other back behind the baseline, to get him on the run, make him lunge, scramble, cede the angles, and, in the process, confound him, make him miss, make him look foolish, dominate him, break his will. Tennis is, in other words, a gloriously savage pas de deux in which, by the end of a hard-fought match, players are driven so relentlessly that their defenses are decimated. Character is what remains when that match ends. It is the unwitting residue of competition.
To put it very simply. In a sport where the aim is to destroy your opponent and with the stakes set extremely high players are forced into laying down their defenses and revealing something of their true character to us the viewer.
The author then picks out a few of the most emotionally charged matches between the top three players to illustrate how their characters are reviled. These are all matches that most here on 606v2 are familiar with so there's no manipulation or sleight of hand in her assessment. If some accuse her of being a "Nadal fan" it's something she's admitted and the article is her explaining why.
Federer is pompous is well aware of how good he is, hates to lose but is a gracious winner. Djokovic's mum did tell him he "is the child of god". He can be a very gracious loser but I'm sure I wasn't the only one shocked at the reported Madrid celebrations and that truly dreadful pose with Tipsarvaric. Nadal does have a philosophical way of understanding loss and is a gracious winner. In sport you don't have to be gracious as a winner or after a loss. In fact as the author implies in that first quote true character is revealed so when we see such behavior it is to be admired.
hawkeye- Posts : 5427
Join date : 2011-06-12
Re: An interesting read
hawkeye wrote:A great read! So nice to see some intelligent writing about tennis with reference to what for me at least has made the last few years so interesting to watch.Jeremy_Kyle wrote:"Character is, in other words, an internal compass with distinctly visible effects that become especially pronounced in a sport that is a zero sum, reactive encounter, in which each player seeks to force the other back behind the baseline"
Can anybody explain what this overexcited lady is talking about?
The full quote is
Character is, in other words, an internal compass with distinctly visible effects that become especially pronounced in a sport that is a zero sum, reactive encounter, in which each player seeks to force the other back behind the baseline, to get him on the run, make him lunge, scramble, cede the angles, and, in the process, confound him, make him miss, make him look foolish, dominate him, break his will. Tennis is, in other words, a gloriously savage pas de deux in which, by the end of a hard-fought match, players are driven so relentlessly that their defenses are decimated. Character is what remains when that match ends. It is the unwitting residue of competition.
To put it very simply. In a sport where the aim is to destroy your opponent and with the stakes set extremely high players are forced into laying down their defenses and revealing something of their true character to us the viewer.
The author then picks out a few of the most emotionally charged matches between the top three players to illustrate how their characters are reviled. These are all matches that most here on 606v2 are familiar with so there's no manipulation or sleight of hand in her assessment. If some accuse her of being a "Nadal fan" it's something she's admitted and the article is her explaining why.
Federer is pompous is well aware of how good he is, hates to lose but is a gracious winner. Djokovic's mum did tell him he "is the child of god". He can be a very gracious loser but I'm sure I wasn't the only one shocked at the reported Madrid celebrations and that truly dreadful pose with Tipsarvaric. Nadal does have a philosophical way of understanding loss and is a gracious winner. In sport you don't have to be gracious as a winner or after a loss. In fact as the author implies in that first quote true character is revealed so when we see such behavior it is to be admired.
Thanks for your help Hawky, now is all clear.......
The point I would make regarding to the whole gracious/ungracious debate is that, yes Nadal is usually very gracious before and after the match (i.e. when it doesn't matter).
On the contrary, during the matches he can get very nasty, by complaining to the umpire for trivial reasons, by displaying aggressive attitudes towards his opponents (the aberrant Rosol case for example) and in general by adopting all sort of unsportmanlike conducts to disturb his opponents, that here and in other forum have been debated at nouseam.
If those aren't currently object of debate, it doesn't certainly mean Nadal has improved or remedied his actions in any sort of way.
Federer and Djokovic are, instead, both examples of impeccable behaviour during their matches, i.e. when it matters, when, using to the coloured language of the writer "players are driven so relentlessly that their defenses are decimated".
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
Jeremy Kyle
Well IMHO Nadal, Federer and Djokovic all behave very professionally during their matches. They are all human but I find it difficult to think of an occasion when I could call any of them out for poor behaviour or bad sportsmanship during a match. Maybe you just dislike Nadal?
The article is talking more about how these three great players deal with the results of competition. For example she contrasts Djokovic's reaction to winning that brutal AO final to Nadal's reaction to winning the equally brutal AO semi. Neither player did anything "wrong" but their reactions certainly reveal very different characters and perhaps their different views of competition.
Well IMHO Nadal, Federer and Djokovic all behave very professionally during their matches. They are all human but I find it difficult to think of an occasion when I could call any of them out for poor behaviour or bad sportsmanship during a match. Maybe you just dislike Nadal?
The article is talking more about how these three great players deal with the results of competition. For example she contrasts Djokovic's reaction to winning that brutal AO final to Nadal's reaction to winning the equally brutal AO semi. Neither player did anything "wrong" but their reactions certainly reveal very different characters and perhaps their different views of competition.
hawkeye- Posts : 5427
Join date : 2011-06-12
Re: An interesting read
I suppose apart from various misdemeanours such as ranting at the umpire for no justifiable reason ; constantly flouting the time-between-points rule and thus keeping opponents waiting ; suddenly deciding to tape his fingers just as a match is ready to begin (ie. rather than in the locker room) ; shouldering an opponent at changeover ; requesting MTO's at highly dubious moments ...... then yes Rafa is indeed immaculately behaved.
Great champion ? Yes, no question.
Role model for on-court sportsmanlike conduct ? Methinks not.
Great champion ? Yes, no question.
Role model for on-court sportsmanlike conduct ? Methinks not.
lags72- Posts : 5018
Join date : 2011-11-07
Re: An interesting read
Personally I agree with the article
Of course others may think differently, and they are entitled to that.
Of course others may think differently, and they are entitled to that.
User 774433- Posts : 5067
Join date : 2012-05-18
Re: An interesting read
O Lydian what a hornets nest you have stirred up... out come the Rafa haters
Had this article been about the Lord Almighty we wouldn´t have a word of complaint... of course not I hear you say... Mr Smugly is so squeeky clean..and so is the King of Serbia
It was a good article and I dont care if I am a Nadal fan.
Well Rafa at least you dont smash your rackets, throw water bottles at ball giirls and get fined for swearing at the umpire...Bounce the ball twenty times before you serve and tear your shirt off when you win.. BUT hey all adds to the fun doesnt it.???
Hey Lydian find an article telling us how wonderful Federer is and then see how many you get disagree... (Nadal fans wouldn´t dare)
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
I don't consider myself a Rafa hater by any means, but the artcile was a load of pseudo-psychological tosh, which failed to consider any of the 3 players in a balanced manner.
JuliusHMarx- julius
- Posts : 22578
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Paisley Park
Re: An interesting read
Yep Tosh it was to you JM ... but I agreed with 99% of it. There has been plenty of pseudo-psychological tosh spoken of Federer over the years as there was about Sampras and there will be much more written about other players yet to come.
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
Looks like this woman is such a morbid Nadal fan girl to put Wooffie herself into shame.
Check out this other Nadal hagiography that she wrote: further food for thoughts (or is it for laughter?)
http://www.nadalnews.com/2009/05/24/the-quiet-fire/
Check out this other Nadal hagiography that she wrote: further food for thoughts (or is it for laughter?)
http://www.nadalnews.com/2009/05/24/the-quiet-fire/
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
OMG I suspect she gets *satisfaction* writing these 'articles'.
bogbrush- Posts : 11169
Join date : 2011-04-13
Re: An interesting read
Amongst many other (there's also a touching anecdotal evidence of the author playing table tennis with Nadal and Lopez) , the following gem is my favourite:
"There are many things to like about Nadal, among them that [b]he bites his newly acquired trophies rather than kissing them, that he never throws his racket in anger, and that, when his shirt gets so sweat-soaked that he needs to change it during a match, he does so sitting down, ignoring the ensuing wolf whistles instead of abetting them. These particulars may seem insignificant and would be, if they didn’t reflect the larger truth that he is not, and has never been, your classic spoiled narcissistic athlete"
Incredible she did consider it was a possibillity!
"There are many things to like about Nadal, among them that [b]he bites his newly acquired trophies rather than kissing them, that he never throws his racket in anger, and that, when his shirt gets so sweat-soaked that he needs to change it during a match, he does so sitting down, ignoring the ensuing wolf whistles instead of abetting them. These particulars may seem insignificant and would be, if they didn’t reflect the larger truth that he is not, and has never been, your classic spoiled narcissistic athlete"
Incredible she did consider it was a possibillity!
Last edited by Jeremy_Kyle on Sun 11 Nov 2012, 12:35 pm; edited 2 times in total
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
bogbrush wrote:OMG I suspect she gets *satisfaction* writing these 'articles'.
Jeremy_Kyle- Posts : 1536
Join date : 2011-06-20
Re: An interesting read
Haddie-nuff wrote:Yep Tosh it was to you JM ... but I agreed with 99% of it. There has been plenty of pseudo-psychological tosh spoken of Federer over the years as there was about Sampras and there will be much more written about other players yet to come.
H-n : For me, and perhaps many others, the problem here is not that the article is a homage to Rafa (that's fine in itself) BUT that it is accompanied by unbalanced negativity targetted directly at two of his finest peers ; so much so that one could be forgiven for thinking that this was the primary objective.
I normally wouldn't quote my own words but wonder whether you see any merit in these comments I posted earlier :
I have no problem at all with anyone producing a glowing eulogy of their favourite player (although I agree, it quickly becomes way more fan-girly than objectively journalistic) ; but when it's done with the underlying motive of denigrating other fellow players by the use of highly selective quotes and historical evidence, then the content itself will always be tainted.
lags72- Posts : 5018
Join date : 2011-11-07
Re: An interesting read
Lags, you are a fine poster
It was a biased article (imo) with cherry picking (imo), but I agreed with a lot of it.
It's a shame she couldn't give a more balanced picture though, so it's not as biased as it is
It was a biased article (imo) with cherry picking (imo), but I agreed with a lot of it.
It's a shame she couldn't give a more balanced picture though, so it's not as biased as it is
User 774433- Posts : 5067
Join date : 2012-05-18
Re: An interesting read
mmmmmm but would you honestly go looking for articles like this, read them, criticise and ridicule them if they were about anyone but Nadal.
Its the thing that grabs me most, the real "hatred" is not for Nadal but for the fan base that he seems to attract mostly young women, who some I would agree may not have the best tennis knowledge in the world,( though you cannot say that about Wooffie or her forum friends they are very knowledgeable tennis lovers who just happen to be Nadal followers.)
Federer and Djokovic do not have this kind of fan base (albeit plenty of fans) but not in the same way that Nadal.. and indeed the Spanish boys do. I can find no logic in the extremes of emotion that Nadal seems to evoke in tennis enthusiasts. The love/hate for a tennis player whose ability and achievements cannot be denied, I have never witnessed with any other player, in all my years of watching the sport. Like yes or not, yes which has been the norm.. but if only for this alone Nadal is unique so what is it about this young man that stirs up such controversey amongst tennis lovers ???
Its the thing that grabs me most, the real "hatred" is not for Nadal but for the fan base that he seems to attract mostly young women, who some I would agree may not have the best tennis knowledge in the world,( though you cannot say that about Wooffie or her forum friends they are very knowledgeable tennis lovers who just happen to be Nadal followers.)
Federer and Djokovic do not have this kind of fan base (albeit plenty of fans) but not in the same way that Nadal.. and indeed the Spanish boys do. I can find no logic in the extremes of emotion that Nadal seems to evoke in tennis enthusiasts. The love/hate for a tennis player whose ability and achievements cannot be denied, I have never witnessed with any other player, in all my years of watching the sport. Like yes or not, yes which has been the norm.. but if only for this alone Nadal is unique so what is it about this young man that stirs up such controversey amongst tennis lovers ???
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
lags72 wrote:Haddie-nuff wrote:Yep Tosh it was to you JM ... but I agreed with 99% of it. There has been plenty of pseudo-psychological tosh spoken of Federer over the years as there was about Sampras and there will be much more written about other players yet to come.
H-n : For me, and perhaps many others, the problem here is not that the article is a homage to Rafa (that's fine in itself) BUT that it is accompanied by unbalanced negativity targetted directly at two of his finest peers ; so much so that one could be forgiven for thinking that this was the primary objective.
I normally wouldn't quote my own words but wonder whether you see any merit in these comments I posted earlier :
I have no problem at all with anyone producing a glowing eulogy of their favourite player (although I agree, it quickly becomes way more fan-girly than objectively journalistic) ; but when it's done with the underlying motive of denigrating other fellow players by the use of highly selective quotes and historical evidence, then the content itself will always be tainted.
Lags
I think you would well remember some of my heated debates with Tenez and NITB was on the very subject of the denigration of ANY player.,. no matter whether I like that player or no.. The answer to your question is no I do not agree with that. However to write about some facts or incidences which have occurred cannot be classed as denegrating a player. True its obvious she unashamedly a fan girl.. and her enthusiastic praise may well be seen as going OTT:
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
It's interesting that despite being one of the best tennis players ever anyone who writes anything positive about Nadal is often accused of doing so because he's cute. I think I've said before IMO being "cute" is not necessarily an asset for a sports star especially if it's combined like it is with Rafa with a personality that isn't all out macho. Ha ha! Best if your a male not to admit to being a fan. People might get the wrong idea.
As for the article. Of course it was written by a fan. But I found it interesting as it at least attempted to explain the irrational reasons any of us may have for wanting one particular multi millionaire sport star to win rather than another.
For those that say it was less than flattering in it's description of Federer and Djokovic. I have to say I found the descriptions fair. For example Federer is pompous. Some may see this as a negative thing but I have to admit I like it. Somehow he can get away with it. Similarly Djokovics macho, over the top celebrations are part of his personality. Like them or loath them. Admit it or not but I suspect things like this play a part in who people chose to support or not.
As for the article. Of course it was written by a fan. But I found it interesting as it at least attempted to explain the irrational reasons any of us may have for wanting one particular multi millionaire sport star to win rather than another.
For those that say it was less than flattering in it's description of Federer and Djokovic. I have to say I found the descriptions fair. For example Federer is pompous. Some may see this as a negative thing but I have to admit I like it. Somehow he can get away with it. Similarly Djokovics macho, over the top celebrations are part of his personality. Like them or loath them. Admit it or not but I suspect things like this play a part in who people chose to support or not.
hawkeye- Posts : 5427
Join date : 2011-06-12
Re: An interesting read
hawkeye does nadal have any flaws at all?
LuvSports!- Posts : 4701
Join date : 2011-09-18
Re: An interesting read
Yes of course he has.. he has dodgy knees
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
Because he is a genuinely nice person he is viewed with suspicion and considered to be insincere.. so if you want to call that a flaw yes. he has.
Sad fact of life. But love him or no what you see is what you get.
But even his fans, unlike those of others, do not believe he walks on water he is first and foremost a human being that happens to play tennis for a living..
Sad fact of life. But love him or no what you see is what you get.
But even his fans, unlike those of others, do not believe he walks on water he is first and foremost a human being that happens to play tennis for a living..
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Re: An interesting read
I'm sorry but your first line is just a load of drivel.
I think people don't warm to him as much for his on court demeanor, which at times is riddled with gamesmanship.
Im a feds fan and openly admit his flaws such as I believe at times feds is arrogant, churlish and a bit tactless with some of his comments.
Are you willing to say specifically what nadal's flaws are, because it seems to me you think he is ... flawless.
I think people don't warm to him as much for his on court demeanor, which at times is riddled with gamesmanship.
Im a feds fan and openly admit his flaws such as I believe at times feds is arrogant, churlish and a bit tactless with some of his comments.
Are you willing to say specifically what nadal's flaws are, because it seems to me you think he is ... flawless.
LuvSports!- Posts : 4701
Join date : 2011-09-18
Re: An interesting read
Its a load of drivel because you dont agree with it. so dont be so rude. That´s your opinion and I dont agree with you ok ??
Im sure the King of Spain would not entertain him at the Palace as oten as he does neither would he spend time with him in Mallorca if it were not the case but then thats what I mean you see .. nobody is allowed to be nice are they if they are then there has to be something wrong with him. Gamesmanship.. dont single Nadal out on that score.. all players have ways of using gamesmanship some more obvious than others.
Fed is not arrogant at times.. Fed is arrogant all the time.
Of course he has flaws he is a human being for God´s sake.. taking too much time between serves .. but time him now he has improved and you will find there are others that are equally as bad.. Jumping up and down at the net.. but then I notice Fed did that yesterday.... so there you go And it may come as a surprise to you to know that Andy Murray, Delpotro and even Federer himself have said how much they have missed him in his absence.. so he must be pretty bad eh???
Im sure the King of Spain would not entertain him at the Palace as oten as he does neither would he spend time with him in Mallorca if it were not the case but then thats what I mean you see .. nobody is allowed to be nice are they if they are then there has to be something wrong with him. Gamesmanship.. dont single Nadal out on that score.. all players have ways of using gamesmanship some more obvious than others.
Fed is not arrogant at times.. Fed is arrogant all the time.
Of course he has flaws he is a human being for God´s sake.. taking too much time between serves .. but time him now he has improved and you will find there are others that are equally as bad.. Jumping up and down at the net.. but then I notice Fed did that yesterday.... so there you go And it may come as a surprise to you to know that Andy Murray, Delpotro and even Federer himself have said how much they have missed him in his absence.. so he must be pretty bad eh???
Haddie-nuff- Posts : 6936
Join date : 2011-02-27
Location : Returned to Spain
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Novak Djokovic - an interesting read
» Interesting read on the BBC
» Very Interesting CM Punk read.....
» Interesting read for NG Dragons Fans
» Ivan Lendl - an interesting read
» Interesting read on the BBC
» Very Interesting CM Punk read.....
» Interesting read for NG Dragons Fans
» Ivan Lendl - an interesting read
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Tennis
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|