Edinburgh being left behind?
+20
EST
nganboy
Imperialbigdave
Majestic83
tigertattie
funnyExiledScot
alive555
caz
George Carlin
RDW
21st Century Schizoid Man
UlstermaninGlasgow
Kingshu
Manky-Flanker
Pat_Mustard
Scot Abroad
TJ1
cp10
Artful_Dodger
RuggerRadge2611
24 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: Club Rugby
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Edinburgh being left behind?
First topic message reminder :
This quote got me thinking.
Now I don't want this to become a Weagie vs. Burgh bashing thread (Schiz Take note please you nutter ). But I can't help but think Edinburgh are now being thouroughly left behind.
I think it's anyones guess how the SRU control funding to the pro clubs. Do they combine thier funds and split it 50-50? Do the Franchises get to keep their profits? Are they autonimous in their own finances?
Anyway to cut a long story short are Edinburgh being left behind? Or have they made a rod for their own back by signing useless guys like Atiga or giving Ford such a lucrative contract or papping Ryan Grant without giving the lad a chance?
All I'm seeing is the likes of Maitland coming to Glasgow, Bennet returning to Glasgow, and thinking, why aren't Edinburgh getting some of these guys? The Glasgow back division now is getting promptly saturated with Talent. Couple that with a glorious new stadium and you can see why us Edinburgh fans are feeling ever so slightly neglected. The Strength in depth in the Glasgow Back division is phenomenal now and compare it to Edinburgh, where a couple of untimely injuries could see Houston and King back in the squad.
I'm genuinly not bitter about it, Jealous would be a better terminology that RDW has used in various threads. I'm not blind to the fact that what's good for Glasgow will also be good for Scottish rugby as a whole, but after the success of last seasons HC for Edinburgh I can't help we are falling behind, and falling behind rapidly.
What happened to all that money we got from doing so well in the HC? If some of it has been used to get Maitland playing for the Warriors would I be ok to say that it has made me a bit ?
Or has Bradley blown it on players he should have avoided like you would avoid a kiss from your great great grand mother?
Or are Glasgow reaping the benefits with their brand new intimate stadium and X-Factor players and creating an enviroment where players want to play for the club?
Compare a packed Scotstoun to 10000 people in Murrayfield..... go figure.
A lot of points to discuss but I'm opening the floor to you guys.
Kingshu wrote:I'd say there would have been a relegration clause, or if not Sale may want him off the books if then went into championship, If Glasgow want him back, they should hope Sales form continues.Dlasgow have some depth now even Troy Nathan isn't getting a game!
Glasgow build good squad get some really good Players, move to Scotstoun Stadium, some exciting players as well, just look at the players in this season
Angus Macdonald
Tim Swinson
Viliami Ma'afu
Sean Lamont
Taylor Paris
Nikola Matawalu
Josh Strauss
Sean Maitland
The Lamont's back and Maitland are big pluses, if Glasgow can fill Scotstoun now they will be th ecomplete team, ready to push up to among the best in Europe
13th in Euro table but should break into top 10.
It would be an exciting time to be a Glasgow fan, things are finally being put in place by the SRU
This quote got me thinking.
Now I don't want this to become a Weagie vs. Burgh bashing thread (Schiz Take note please you nutter ). But I can't help but think Edinburgh are now being thouroughly left behind.
I think it's anyones guess how the SRU control funding to the pro clubs. Do they combine thier funds and split it 50-50? Do the Franchises get to keep their profits? Are they autonimous in their own finances?
Anyway to cut a long story short are Edinburgh being left behind? Or have they made a rod for their own back by signing useless guys like Atiga or giving Ford such a lucrative contract or papping Ryan Grant without giving the lad a chance?
All I'm seeing is the likes of Maitland coming to Glasgow, Bennet returning to Glasgow, and thinking, why aren't Edinburgh getting some of these guys? The Glasgow back division now is getting promptly saturated with Talent. Couple that with a glorious new stadium and you can see why us Edinburgh fans are feeling ever so slightly neglected. The Strength in depth in the Glasgow Back division is phenomenal now and compare it to Edinburgh, where a couple of untimely injuries could see Houston and King back in the squad.
I'm genuinly not bitter about it, Jealous would be a better terminology that RDW has used in various threads. I'm not blind to the fact that what's good for Glasgow will also be good for Scottish rugby as a whole, but after the success of last seasons HC for Edinburgh I can't help we are falling behind, and falling behind rapidly.
What happened to all that money we got from doing so well in the HC? If some of it has been used to get Maitland playing for the Warriors would I be ok to say that it has made me a bit ?
Or has Bradley blown it on players he should have avoided like you would avoid a kiss from your great great grand mother?
Or are Glasgow reaping the benefits with their brand new intimate stadium and X-Factor players and creating an enviroment where players want to play for the club?
Compare a packed Scotstoun to 10000 people in Murrayfield..... go figure.
A lot of points to discuss but I'm opening the floor to you guys.
Last edited by RuggerRadge2611 on Tue 13 Nov - 16:49; edited 2 times in total
RuggerRadge2611- Posts : 7194
Join date : 2011-03-04
Age : 39
Location : The North, The REAL North (Beyond the Wall)
Re: Edinburgh being left behind?
That's kinda what I was meaning by a 3rd team being a Connacht style team - it would have to be basically al the academy players in Scotland plus some old boys. You couldn't take many of the Edinburgh or Glasgow regulars away.
And I can't see there being much interest in young pups and old boys!
And I can't see there being much interest in young pups and old boys!
RDW- Founder
- Posts : 33129
Join date : 2011-06-01
Location : Sydney
Re: Edinburgh being left behind?
Get out the wrong side of the bed this morning, fES?!
AsLongAsBut100ofUs- Posts : 14129
Join date : 2011-03-26
Age : 112
Location : Devon/London
Re: Edinburgh being left behind?
You could argue that both Scottish teams are punching above thier weight, Teams with both teams recieving average crowds of 4000, you could argue they are around Connacht/Zebre level and as such are both going better than you would expect?
Kingshu- Posts : 4124
Join date : 2011-05-30
Re: Edinburgh being left behind?
The new people at the SRU said they'd give the pro clubs more autonomy and if that is the case then it could be Edinburgh's fault, also you cannot tell a player where to go if a player wants to go to Glasgow you'd probably have to say OK, and quite frankly Glasgow seem to be in a much better place.
123456789- Posts : 1841
Join date : 2011-11-13
Re: Edinburgh being left behind?
Kingshu wrote:You could argue that both Scottish teams are punching above thier weight, Teams with both teams recieving average crowds of 4000, you could argue they are around Connacht/Zebre level and as such are both going better than you would expect?
You should work for the SRU press office!!
funnyExiledScot- Posts : 17072
Join date : 2011-05-31
Age : 43
Location : Edinburgh
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» Edinburgh vs Glasgow The 1872 Cup - Edinburgh's annual slaughtering of the new effeminate ones
» BBC should've been left to rot by SAF.
» England's Winter of Cricket 2023/24
» Flutey likely to be left out?
» Left 4 Dead
» BBC should've been left to rot by SAF.
» England's Winter of Cricket 2023/24
» Flutey likely to be left out?
» Left 4 Dead
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: Club Rugby
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum