606v2 2012 awards - category suggestions please!

First topic message reminder :

Hey all

With the end of the year coming up, I thought it would be nice to show some appreciation to my fellow board members.
So, I think we should have an end of year awards ceremony! There will be ten categories and all who wish to participate will PM me their nominees (listed in single file like when we did for sheep quiz) and I will tally them up and declare winners around Xmas.
The expiry date for entry will be December 10th, shall we say, which will give me plenty of time to tally and reveal winners before Chrimbo.

What I need from you guys is categories to include. Offer them up today, tomorrow and over the weekend and I will pick the best ten questions and post them on Monday or Tuesday.

Only rule will be that you can't nominate yourself. When I post the questions next week you WILL be able to nominate Windy for any category you see fit. It’s only right after all he did for this forum.

So, I need categories men!
So far I have one

Who is the funniest poster on 606v2?

Improve on this, please!

Let's keep the questions uplifting, too

Haye beating Foreman was a complete joke but for every Haye comparison there's a library of Gordyisms - it doesn't just stop with Lewis, I mean you only have to mention "Sky" to him and then he'll go on about Froch being a hype job and such.

Haye beating Foreman was a belter but I fear even that has to bow down to the sheer majesty that was the first McCall fight should be considered a points win for Lewis, it is rare in ones life you can genuinely say you were present for such a moment.

JabMachineMK2 wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

JabMachineMK2 wrote:

just wanted to let Rowley know his topics are appreciated.

I see his desperate need for attention has finally rubbed off on you, Jabmeister.

Or did you just feel a sense of unity with a kindred spirit?

Great banter

I think the only rubbing off around here nowadays is Gordy over pictures of Lennox Lewis though....

You know just as well as I jab that gordy is just a manifestation of yourself without all the moderately tolerable things to balance it out . I'm sure there was Lewis nuthuggery from you in the past.

Il Gialloblu wrote:I liked his ones about who currently holds old Olympic gold medals too.

Which reminds me, Chad Dawson ended up with a lot of them, but he has since lost to Andre Ward.

Might have to start again...

I'm old school, the reverse linear heavyweight title was still your finest hour union. Although if we are discussing general manifestations of your borderline autism I enjoyed your how many Joe Gans' are there thread.

rowley wrote:I'm old school, the reverse linear heavyweight title was still your finest hour union. Although if we are discussing general manifestations of your borderline autism I enjoyed your how many Joe Gans' are there thread.

I considered changing my username to Mansfield Joe Gans on the strength of that thread.

That is a belting idea, Il, Rotherham Joe Gans does have a certain ring to it.

ShahenshahG wrote:
You know just as well as I jab that gordy is just a manifestation of yourself without all the moderately tolerable things to balance it out . I'm sure there was Lewis nuthuggery from you in the past.

Oh I don't deny that i rate Lewis much higher than most people here in all likelihood, however I don't claim he'd beat every other heavyweight other than Ali, I had him at #3 in my Heavyweight ATG list, which moved to #4 after I reassessed Larry Holmes, and still think there are a few within the top 20 that give Lewis fits on their night. I've got a soft spot for him, but it doesn't reach right through to claiming even a quarter of what that tool Gordy comes out with....

Biggest lie of the year award.

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Biggest lie of the year award.

I wonder who jogged your memory for that one...

Not sure if this has been mentioned yet but what about a 'Dedication to hating fighter' award?

Which reminds me that a Carl Froch article is overdue

Welshman of the Week?

Union Cane wrote:Welshman of the Week?

That'll be the chip on the shoulder / inferiority complex award will it not?

Union Cane wrote:Welshman of the Week?

Certainly not a member of their rugby team from last week. Wooden spoon showdown with Italy in the 6Nations in Feb/Mar it is then!

seanmichaels wrote:

Union Cane wrote:Welshman of the Week?

That'll be the chip on the shoulder / inferiority complex award will it not?

Iv eaten my chip and the complex has gone so button it Michaels

Plus my new woman is from Bristol (last one was from Cambridge as well) although lets be honest its so close to Wales it hardly defines Englishness

Lovely accent she got though. 'Oi droives a traaaaaaaactor oi do loik'

coxy0001 wrote:Certainly not a member of their rugby team from last week. Wooden spoon showdown with Italy in the 6Nations in Feb/Mar it is then!

Probably. Im more concerned with Cardiff Citys inabilty to get promoted if im honest Cox

Byd am Abertawe!!

Hywl!!

Union Cane wrote:Byd am Abertawe!!

Hywl!!

Dont even go there. One of my mates is a Jack and the amount of gloating I put up with is beyond

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Biggest lie of the year award.

Lamont Petersons team?

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Biggest lie of the year award.

TIMC

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Biggest lie of the year award.

TIMC

One horse race Tina

rowley wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Biggest lie of the year award.

TIMC

One horse race Tina

Aye, I did consider TSMR but I am now convinced she does actually exist.

Union has this one in the bag.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

Lumbering_Jack wrote:Biggest lie of the year award.

TIMC

Are you suggesting UC plays one of those online alternate reality games?

No. I am suggesting he is single.

Il Gialloblu wrote:

rowley wrote:I'm old school, the reverse linear heavyweight title was still your finest hour union. Although if we are discussing general manifestations of your borderline autism I enjoyed your how many Joe Gans' are there thread.

I considered changing my username to Mansfield Joe Gans on the strength of that thread.

Have done mine, took me ages to work out how to do that.

I often imagine I'm married to someone else - does that count?

superflyweight wrote:I often imagine I'm married to someone else - does that count?

You're already a contender for biggest liar, superfly.

A lawyer? Scottish?

Suspicious.

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

superflyweight wrote:I often imagine I'm married to someone else - does that count?

You're already a contender for biggest liar, superfly.

A lawyer? Scottish?

Suspicious.

I expect it's a dumbed down version up there. A bit like their professional footballers.

""606v2 2012 awards - category suggestions please!"

Sean Son..........

What About........... Best Poster Impression!!!

A Real Beefsters Award.................

NO-MAS

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

superflyweight wrote:I often imagine I'm married to someone else - does that count?

You're already a contender for biggest liar, superfly.

A lawyer? Scottish?

Suspicious.

I expect it's a dumbed down version up there. A bit like their professional footballers.

Indeed - given that the official currency up here is the sheep (steady Steffan) the mechanics of commercial law are fairly simple. Even an idiot like Tina could pick it up after a few years.

superflyweight wrote:

seanmichaels wrote:

Mind the windows Tino. wrote:

superflyweight wrote:I often imagine I'm married to someone else - does that count?

You're already a contender for biggest liar, superfly.

A lawyer? Scottish?

Suspicious.

I expect it's a dumbed down version up there. A bit like their professional footballers.

Even an idiot like Tina could pick it up after a few years.

well......

Tina has bigger fish to fry like sending the global economy into meltdown and kicking pensioners who default on their mortgages out of their homes.

Rotherham Joe Gans wrote:Tina has bigger fish to fry like sending the global economy into meltdown and kicking pensioners who default on their mortgages out of their homes.

Plus he is one of those self-serving parents who has lots of children as he likes more and more versions of himself which is very egotistical

Steffan wrote:

Rotherham Joe Gans wrote:Tina has bigger fish to fry like sending the global economy into meltdown and kicking pensioners who default on their mortgages out of their homes.

Plus he is one of those self-serving parents who has lots of children as he likes more and more versions of himself which is very egotistical

Always thought that sort of person was insecure about being a failure and would have as many kids as possible in the hope one makes a success of themselves thus cancelling out his failings.

Either that or he's mentally special and can't figure out how to use a condom.

Or he needs the child benefit monies.

Or he's Joseph Fritzel.

You two are just jealous because Tina's four kids mean he has had sex with a real woman at least four times.

Rotherham Joe Gans wrote:You two are just jealous because Tina's four kids mean he has had sex with a real woman at least four times.

I'm just going to assume his missus goes elsewhere for her needs.

Probably daft enough not to realise having 2 drunken nights with her doesn't produce 4 kids (no twins, triplettes or quadlettes/whatever it's called)

Or he's a virgin and they're adopted.

Don't be so assuming Rowley.

I wouldn't be jealous guys, she's a bit of a rotten apple from what I hear. You 2 are better off as virgins.

Rotherham Joe Gans wrote:You two are just jealous because Tina's four kids mean he has had sex with a real woman at least four times.

What have they got to be jealous about? Steffans had sex with fictional girls who are malleable to his needs and know him like the front of his hands and coxy has had multiple sexual encounters with a 9 iron.

coxy0001 wrote:Or he's a virgin and they're adopted.

Don't be so assuming Rowley.

You seem to have this a figured out. Must be speaking from experience, it's the only explanation.

Rotherham Joe Gans wrote:You two are just jealous because Tina's four kids mean he has had sex with a real woman at least four times.

Au contraire Jeff...I regularly borrow a pelvic bone belonging to a medieval woman from our Osteology lab in Uni. That counts as a real woman......right?

And its 3 times for Tina by the way he was away on business the 3rd time she got pregnant

Lumbering_Jack wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:Or he's a virgin and they're adopted.

Don't be so assuming Rowley.

You seem to have this a figured out. Must be speaking from experience, it's the only explanation.

'Seem to have figured it out'...? You make it sound like it's beyond the realms of what a brain can handle. Only explanation is that you were so dumfounded by it you assume that rather than having the ability to use ones brain you think it's from personal experience.

ShahenshahG wrote:Steffans had sex with fictional girls who are malleable to his needs and know him like the front of his hands

They are not fictional Sha. Jenna Jameson is real. My laptop screen doesnt lie

Steffan wrote:

ShahenshahG wrote:Steffans had sex with fictional girls who are malleable to his needs and know him like the front of his hands

They are not fictional Sha. Jenna Jameson is real. My laptop screen doesnt lie

Jenna Jameson? Have you no class at all Steffie..?!

coxy0001 wrote:

Steffan wrote:

ShahenshahG wrote:Steffans had sex with fictional girls who are malleable to his needs and know him like the front of his hands

They are not fictional Sha. Jenna Jameson is real. My laptop screen doesnt lie

Jenna Jameson? Have you no class at all Steffie..?!

Its Steffan so get it right Cocksy. I prefere others to be honest. But nah I do lack class anyway

Steffan wrote:

ShahenshahG wrote:Steffans had sex with fictional girls who are malleable to his needs and know him like the front of his hands

They are not fictional Sha. Jenna Jameson is real. My laptop screen doesnt lie

Judging by her age and her bust size she must be at least partially fictional

coxy0001 wrote:

Lumbering_Jack wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:Or he's a virgin and they're adopted.

Don't be so assuming Rowley.

You seem to have this a figured out. Must be speaking from experience, it's the only explanation.

'Seem to have figured it out'...? You make it sound like it's beyond the realms of what a brain can handle. Only explanation is that you were so dumfounded by it you assume that rather than having the ability to use ones brain you think it's from personal experience.

Settle down flower. Only really small people have such anger issues. How tall are you, hard to tell from your picture.

Lumbering_Jack wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:

Lumbering_Jack wrote:

coxy0001 wrote:Or he's a virgin and they're adopted.

Don't be so assuming Rowley.

You seem to have this a figured out. Must be speaking from experience, it's the only explanation.

'Seem to have figured it out'...? You make it sound like it's beyond the realms of what a brain can handle. Only explanation is that you were so dumfounded by it you assume that rather than having the ability to use ones brain you think it's from personal experience.

Settle down flower. Only really small people have such anger issues. How tall are you, hard to tell from your picture.

Rotherham Joe Gans wrote:

Il Gialloblu wrote:

rowley wrote:I'm old school, the reverse linear heavyweight title was still your finest hour union. Although if we are discussing general manifestations of your borderline autism I enjoyed your how many Joe Gans' are there thread.

I considered changing my username to Mansfield Joe Gans on the strength of that thread.

Have done mine, took me ages to work out how to do that.

Ha! Brilliant!