The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Tim Clark and anchoring

+19
dummy_half
twoeightnine
George1507
lorus59
beninho
Roller_Coaster
Skydriver
1GrumpyGolfer
kwinigolfer
pedro
SmithersJones
Bob_the_Job
Shotrock
golfermartin
super_realist
puligny
McLaren
navyblueshorts
gaelgowfer
23 posters

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:03 am

Is anyone else struggling to understand Tim Clark's case against the banning of anchoring?

http://www.pga.com/news/pga-tour/tim-clark-speaks-softly-makes-forceful-points-when-discussing-anchor-ban

If you look as his putting style in the following video, I don't understand why he can't putt the same way but without anchoring. I could understand him having more of a problem swinging a golf club which does require a certain amount of turning in of the forearms and wrists but I just to get the problem with the putting.

It certainly has stopped him accruing the thick end of $23m in career earnings!

http://www.titleist.com/my-game/videos/152/goals.aspx

gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by navyblueshorts Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:24 am

I don't understand it but that's probably as it's not actually given in the article and his fellow pros aren't speaking. If he was making the point about rotation of arms/wrists etc then it's pretty much hogwash I would think given what you rightly say gael re. swinging a club.

Had to laugh at the comments of Lucas Glover. Gee whizz Lucas, you don't mean he actually paid his own way to the meeting? Holy smoke! Have to respect that multi-millionaire for being able to do that picard.
navyblueshorts
navyblueshorts
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 11488
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Off with the pixies...

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:56 am

navyblue ... re the swinging of a golf club, I would certainly like him to explain how he can do that but not swing a putter unless it's anchored, particularly given he advocates using his shoulders to make a putting stroke.

If indeed more pros are becoming more sympathetic to his cause then I would have to wonder if they're looking to a time when their hands might not be so steady and the availability of an anchored putting method might come in quite handy ... or am I just being too cynical? Laugh


gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by McLaren Wed Jan 30, 2013 6:56 pm

Are there paralympic golf events?

I don't mean to sound harsh but what other sports change rules to accommodate people with disabilities?

It is not even like he has a serious condition, so he should just get on with using a normal putting stroke. In any case he must be using some forearm rotation before impact or he would be flicking at the ball or leaving the clubface open. Neither of which allow you to win the Players.
McLaren
McLaren

Posts : 17630
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by puligny Thu Jan 31, 2013 3:28 am

Mac - we've hosted a blind golfers event, and a pals dad played his last one armed golfers comp aged 90. I am sure there are many more examples.

puligny

Posts : 1159
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by McLaren Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:09 am

I guess Tim clarke will have to set up forearm rotation issue golf.
McLaren
McLaren

Posts : 17630
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by super_realist Thu Jan 31, 2013 4:47 am

I really can't believe people have so much difficulty putting.

super_realist

Posts : 29075
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Stavanger, Norway

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by puligny Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:23 am

News just in - a negotiated settlement involving UN has resulted in agreement to increase the size of the hole. As yet no indication as to how big it will be, or indeed if all countries will opt for the same size.

puligny

Posts : 1159
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by golfermartin Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:43 am

I've always thought it would be a great idea if all greens were constructed like great big funnels with the hole at the bottom. All you'd have to do is hit the green and the ball would find its way into the cup! We'd no longer need a putter at all. Anyone see any disadvantages???

golfermartin

Posts : 696
Join date : 2011-01-28
Age : 67
Location : Sidcup, Kent

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by navyblueshorts Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:27 am

golfermartin wrote:I've always thought it would be a great idea if all greens were constructed like great big funnels with the hole at the bottom. All you'd have to do is hit the green and the ball would find its way into the cup! We'd no longer need a putter at all. Anyone see any disadvantages???
Might be the answer to the increasingly irksome slow play these days if nothing else.
navyblueshorts
navyblueshorts
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 11488
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Off with the pixies...

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by Shotrock Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:54 am

Does anyone else find it ironic that the powers-that-be don't seem to have the you-know-whats to take on the equipment issue directly, they have resorted to "how it's used" instead?

Shotrock

Posts : 3924
Join date : 2011-05-10
Location : Philadelphia

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by super_realist Thu Jan 31, 2013 10:55 am

How it's used is precisely the reason though, you can anchor a standard putter if you were fat enough.

YOu could still put a stroke on a 5 foot putter.

super_realist

Posts : 29075
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Stavanger, Norway

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by Shotrock Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:01 am

Very true ... (got a good laugh out of the mental image)

My point is lots of folks will be "busy" wrestling this issue to the ground, while the ball and clubs continue to make some of the classic courses obsolete for the professional. I suspect a lot are tired of my Merion commentary ... but just wait and see how much of the course will play like a pitch and putt.

Shotrock

Posts : 3924
Join date : 2011-05-10
Location : Philadelphia

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by super_realist Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:14 am

Ach, who cares about clubs/balls. No one is saying new football boots, skis, racing cars, tennis rackets, balls etc are ruining those sports.
I think people are simply looking for an excuse because they have rose tinted glasses on. THe problem isn't so much the game but the dreadful coverage, which makes it look boring.

super_realist

Posts : 29075
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Stavanger, Norway

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by Bob_the_Job Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:33 am

1. Equipment manufacturers will through natural competition increase the distance a ball goes with better design, up to a point when it will become either technically or economically impossible to go futher within the regulations. If that theoretical limit means a high percentage of courses are overpowered, then the regulations should be dialed back accordingly. I would imagine the easiest way to do this is actually the ball - afterall it is more of a low cost consumable item so the impact to club golfers would be lower.

2. Players will through natural competition strive to find ways to get the ball in the hole in the fewest number of shots. There are already rules about how the clubs should be used, and they are changed from time to time to cope with a use of the club that wasn't originally envisaged. However this is always going to be more subjective - what was originally envisaged and by whom? Where was it written down and if was written down why wasn't it enforced. For me the issue with anchoring was left to fester too long. I suspect that the "powers that be" originally thought it was a crutch for golfers who had lost their putting mojo, and would be a temporary fad. Allowing that latitude just delayed the inevitable.

Bob_the_Job
Bob_the_Job

Posts : 1344
Join date : 2011-02-09
Location : NI

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by navyblueshorts Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:35 am

Not sure about other sports but Wee weeing around with tennis balls was a mistake (IMO) and F1 is pathetic. As for golf kit, drivers I can just about accept being messed around with but they need to clamp down on fairway woods/hybrids/irons CoR now, not in 10 years time.
navyblueshorts
navyblueshorts
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 11488
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Off with the pixies...

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by navyblueshorts Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:36 am

Bob_the_Job wrote:1. Equipment manufacturers will through natural competition increase the distance a ball goes with better design, up to a point when it will become either technically or economically impossible to go futher within the regulations. If that theoretical limit means a high percentage of courses are overpowered, then the regulations should be dialed back accordingly. I would imagine the easiest way to do this is actually the ball - afterall it is more of a low cost consumable item so the impact to club golfers would be lower.

2. Players will through natural competition strive to find ways to get the ball in the hole in the fewest number of shots. There are already rules about how the clubs should be used, and they are changed from time to time to cope with a use of the club that wasn't originally envisaged. However this is always going to be more subjective - what was originally envisaged and by whom? Where was it written down and if was written down why wasn't it enforced. For me the issue with anchoring was left to fester too long. I suspect that the "powers that be" originally thought it was a crutch for golfers who had lost their putting mojo, and would be a temporary fad. Allowing that latitude just delayed the inevitable.

OK
navyblueshorts
navyblueshorts
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 11488
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Off with the pixies...

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by SmithersJones Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:45 am

I've said it before and I'll keep saying it. If they're worried about the ball going too far, all they need to do is grow rough across the fairways from 280 to 350+ yards.
SmithersJones
SmithersJones

Posts : 2094
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by navyblueshorts Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:55 am

SmithersJones wrote:I've said it before and I'll keep saying it. If they're worried about the ball going too far, all they need to do is grow rough across the fairways from 280 to 350+ yards.
Yup. That would work!
navyblueshorts
navyblueshorts
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 11488
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Off with the pixies...

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by Bob_the_Job Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:57 am

SmithersJones wrote:I've said it before and I'll keep saying it. If they're worried about the ball going too far, all they need to do is grow rough across the fairways from 280 to 350+ yards.

Or a minefield.... "Well you can play it as it lies in there, or call it unplayable and drop back here - they're your legs"

Seriously though I'm personally not keen on the idea of the rough - I wouldn't want to see drivers die off because of that. For me a Par 5 should be a good dig with a driver, a fairway wood or long iron, then a short iron or a pitch. The bulk of the courses that are going to be around for the next twenty years are already built, so making the ball not go as far for the same amount of engery transfered seems more logical to me than cultivating hazards that make a driver unsuable.
Bob_the_Job
Bob_the_Job

Posts : 1344
Join date : 2011-02-09
Location : NI

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by McLaren Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:22 pm

navyblueshorts wrote:
SmithersJones wrote:I've said it before and I'll keep saying it. If they're worried about the ball going too far, all they need to do is grow rough across the fairways from 280 to 350+ yards.
Yup. That would work!

If by "work" you mean create the most boring architecture ever seen.

McLaren
McLaren

Posts : 17630
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by SmithersJones Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:29 pm

How is it boring? If we're talking about classic old courses, it would mean they play the way they were designed. Are you suggesting classic old courses are boring?
SmithersJones
SmithersJones

Posts : 2094
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by McLaren Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:46 pm

smithers, in no way were classic courses designed to play with a cross hazard in the driving zone.
McLaren
McLaren

Posts : 17630
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by SmithersJones Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:56 pm

In the driving zone? How long ago do you suppose 280 was classed as in the driving zone? And since when is rough a hazard?
SmithersJones
SmithersJones

Posts : 2094
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by McLaren Thu Jan 31, 2013 5:59 pm

Just to be clear. Are you really suggesting it would be a good idea to split holes in two with a strip of rough across the fairway from the 280 to 300 yard mark?

McLaren
McLaren

Posts : 17630
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by SmithersJones Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:03 pm

If a hole no longer plays as it was designed, and can be overpowered, then yes. Why not?
SmithersJones
SmithersJones

Posts : 2094
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by super_realist Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:17 pm

Golf does not get easier because you can hit the ball farther off the tee.
The further you can hit a ball, the more difficult it is to keep straight.
If the rankings were:

1: Garrigus,
2: Quiros
3. Dustin Johnson
4. John Daly

then i might believe you , but they arent


super_realist

Posts : 29075
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Stavanger, Norway

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by SmithersJones Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:34 pm

I don't necessarily think it's a problem, but while people are talking about changing the ball in order to reign in the distances then this is an easier, cheaper solution.
SmithersJones
SmithersJones

Posts : 2094
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by pedro Thu Jan 31, 2013 6:47 pm

Super. All things equal, length gives you an advantage. But I agree it's harder to keep it in the fairway then. But that doesn't discard my first argument.

pedro

Posts : 7353
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:14 pm

There's talk the pga tour might bring in the ban before 2014. Makes sense really.

gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by pedro Fri Feb 01, 2013 4:48 pm

gaelgowfer wrote:There's talk the pga tour might bring in the ban before 2014. Makes sense really.
Definitely. But I think they'd need to clear it with the manufacturers. Don't know what they say.

pedro

Posts : 7353
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by puligny Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:28 am

I see reports today suggesting Timmy has won this argument within the PGA Tour? Anyone heard more?

puligny

Posts : 1159
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by puligny Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:28 am

I see reports today suggesting Timmy has won this argument within the PGA Tour? Anyone heard more?

puligny

Posts : 1159
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:34 am

Any chance of you elaborating on this puligny?

gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:45 am

Here's one link to this subject ...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/golf/europeantour/9890445/Golf-set-for-showdown-over-proposed-ban-on-long-putters.html

Up to recently, I thought the majority of pga tour players were in support of the ban. What's changed? Sponsors applying pressure to players or wee Timmy protecting a couple of his marquee players or .... both?!

gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by kwinigolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:55 am

Manufacturers more like . . . . .

We've been mentioning for a while now that this wasn't a done deal.

kwinigolfer

Posts : 26476
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Vermont

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:40 am

Well kwini ... Mark King has certainly been indulging himself in a bit of sabre-rattling of late.

Now that the governing bodies have finally done something about this, I really can't see how they could back off now, can you?


gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by kwinigolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:54 am

Conversely, I can't now see the players backing off - even the most rabidly anti-anchoring have started obfuscating and the four parties concerned (more if you include other Tours as well as the PGA Tour) need to start to get together.
Remember, PGA Of America was first out of the gate on this, and most unequivocal.
Special interests staking out their positions.
Nothing from Billy Payne yet; he'll likely consult Condi and will resolve by invading Iraq.

kwinigolfer

Posts : 26476
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Vermont

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:28 am

Seems to me if the pros don't eventually capitulate ... and one has to remember the rule won't become effective until 2016 ... then we're going to end up with two sets of rules for it surely won't stop at anchoring.

Nevertheless, at the end of the day, it's the punters who keep the manufacturers in business but it will be the punters who will be playing the governing bodies rules.

Just as well the USGA has a nice pot of cash stashed away!

gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by 1GrumpyGolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:54 pm

As expected Finchem has announced the Tour's opposition to the proposed ban. This was already communicated to the ruling bodies rather than flexing his muscles.

1GrumpyGolfer

Posts : 3314
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:45 pm

Hey Grumpy, what about those stats he quoted? Rolling Eyes What an idiot.

Apparently 13 out 15 on the players ctte voted to oppose the ban. Shocked


gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by 1GrumpyGolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:11 pm

I wasn't really listening to the windbag Gael so I didn't catch his bs. I did hear the one about the almost all the committee voting against. You have to wonder whether it was put to a vote of the whole membership or is it just a small, vocal percentage against the ban.

1GrumpyGolfer

Posts : 3314
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by kwinigolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:18 pm

It's the Players Advisory Committee (think that's what it's called), but it's definitely not just made up of anchorers. A motley crew in fact.

kwinigolfer

Posts : 26476
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Vermont

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by gaelgowfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:38 pm

For what it's worth I think the pga tour (who cares what the pga of america thinks) has scored a massive own goal.

Going to be very interesting to see how the fans treat the anchorers henceforth.

Grumpy, up to the last 24 hours or so, the word was that the vast majority of pga tour players supported the ban.

gaelgowfer

Posts : 1304
Join date : 2011-06-14

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by 1GrumpyGolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:52 pm

I thought there was an about turn by the pros but not quite sure what caused it.

Not sure who said it but I thought I heard someone say in today's tv coverage that every player out there had used a long putter at one point or another!

1GrumpyGolfer

Posts : 3314
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by kwinigolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:34 pm

gael, Grumpy,
Not sure what you think the PGA Tour has actually done.
At this stage all they've said is that the USGA/R&A invited comments and the PGA Tour have provided theirs - nothing more, nothing less.
They certainly haven't said they wouldn't abide by the anchoring ban . . . . .
And, remember, the PGA Of America voted something like 65% against the ban. To me they're the most important constituency of all.

Still be interested to hear what the European Tour has to say, if indeed that have anything to say.

Much twisting of the knickers, but there's a long way to go.

Grumps - the "every player out there" has used/practiced with a long putter came down Finchem's sleeve. But I certainly don't doubt it.

kwinigolfer

Posts : 26476
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Vermont

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by 1GrumpyGolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:35 pm

Kwini,

I thought initially the majority of the PGA Tour pros were for, or ambivalent towards, the ban and then their viewpoint changed.

I don't think they have done anything yet other than voice their opposition to the proposed ban, which is what I stated in my first comment this afternoon. There's still plenty of time for comments to be made to both the R&A and USGA. There's a lot more life left in this situation.

You think Faxon or Donald has messed around with a long putter? Westwood probably should...


Last edited by 1GrumpyGolfer on Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:36 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Changed a word)

1GrumpyGolfer

Posts : 3314
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Pennsylvania

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by McLaren Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:46 pm

If the PGA tour are arguing there is no advantage to using the anchoring method then why worry if it is banned?
McLaren
McLaren

Posts : 17630
Join date : 2011-01-27

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by kwinigolfer Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:58 pm

I know Faxon and Westwood have and sure I've heard Donald talking about test-driving one.

Mac,
That's like saying if there is no advantage to slow play, let's encourage everyone to dawdle.

kwinigolfer

Posts : 26476
Join date : 2011-05-18
Location : Vermont

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by super_realist Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:45 am

McLaren wrote:If the PGA tour are arguing there is no advantage to using the anchoring method then why worry if it is banned?

Just the same to say why not allow people to use it.

It's a bit like the existence of God, there is no proof at all there is one, and there is no proof that anchoring improves your putting.

I have better things to do on a golf course than worry how someone chooses to putt so I Couldn't care less if they get on the ground and putt with a snooker cue.

super_realist

Posts : 29075
Join date : 2011-01-29
Location : Stavanger, Norway

Back to top Go down

Tim Clark and anchoring Empty Re: Tim Clark and anchoring

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 3 1, 2, 3  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum