The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

5 posters

Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by SugarRayRussell (PBK) Sun May 01, 2011 6:06 pm

Source: Dan Rafael ESPN Boxing
The Super Six World Boxing Classic semifinal bout between super middleweight titlist Andre Ward and Arthur Abraham is in jeopardy because Abraham's camp is upset with the selection of officials for the bout.

Ward, of Oakland, Calif., and Germany's Abraham are due to meet May 14 (Showtime) at the Home Depot Center in Carson, Calif. However, Sauerland Event promoter Wilfried Sauerland, Abraham's promoter, said Tuesday that Abraham would pull out of the fight if the California State Athletic Commission refuses to appoint neutral officials to the bout.

Sauerland claims there was a pre-existing agreement that the fight would be handled by neutral officials.

"Contrary to what has been previously agreed on, the California commission all of a sudden insists on installing a Californian judge as well as a Californian referee," Sauerland said. "That is totally unacceptable. This turnaround comes as a huge and unpleasant surprise.

"Two months ago, everybody involved agreed that this tremendous fight would be served by neutral officials. We agreed to have one judge from California, one from Europe and one from neither Europe nor the U.S. The referee is supposed to be neither American nor European either. Unless this issue is sorted, King Arthur will not leave the country. We have put his flights on hold."

Abraham, who is training on a German island in the Baltic sea, was due to leave for Los Angeles this weekend.

Sauerland, who also promotes former titleholder Mikkel Kessler, took issue with the performance of a California referee in Kessler's lopsided technical decision loss to Ward in the opening round of the tournament, prompting his insistence on a neutral set of officials if Abraham were to also face Ward in California.

"King Arthur is more than happy to challenge Ward in his backyard, but we demand neutral officials as agreed on," Sauerland said. "We have learned our lesson from the Kessler-Ward fight. Back then the California commission insisted on having a Californian referee. His performance was, to put it mildly, a joke.

"This is not some beach bar brawl but the semifinal of the Super Six World Boxing Classic, a sensational tournament that has captured global attention. It's a shame that the clash is jeopardized just because a local commission refuses to honor existing agreements and basic rules of fair play."

Dan Goossen, Ward's promoter, denied there had been such an agreement, but said every effort was made to have neutral officials.

"Their accusation that California insisted on a California referee [for Ward-Abraham] is 100 percent inaccurate and, as far as I know, we have agreed to have one California official of the four officials, which is unusual to do. I don't know how much more neutral the commission can be."

Goossen said one judge would be from California while the two other judges and referee would not be from Ward's home state.

Whether the issue would force the fight to be called off, Goossen said, was going to be up to Sauerland and Abraham.

"I felt the California commission bent over backward to accommodate the parties," Goossen said. "It is out of my hands. It's going to be up to them."
SugarRayRussell (PBK)
SugarRayRussell (PBK)

Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by BALTIMORA Sun May 01, 2011 6:16 pm

"...we have agreed to have one California official of the four officials, which is unusual to do. I don't know how much more neutral the commission can be."

Um...by having no Californian officials?

I don't really like Sauerland, but fair play to him for kicking up a stink. Seemed like no-one else had the balls to pipe up and say what everyone's thinking.

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by manos de piedra Sun May 01, 2011 6:18 pm

This kind of thing has occured all to frequently in the Super 6 and is really bad for boxing.

If Sauerland and Abraham had agreed to the neutral judges and refs then why havent they got this on paper and can enforce the contract? What are they being paid as promoters for?

I dont know who to believe in these things but I dont have much sympathy for any of the parties concerned. Abraham is lucky to have this opportunity at all after being beaten by Dirrell and Froch. Is he really in a position to turn his nose up at it? If all these various issues have been agreed with as we are constantly told then surely they are enforceable.

Seems to be more evidence that promoters cant be trusted and boxing contracts arent worth the paper they are written on.


manos de piedra

Posts : 5274
Join date : 2011-02-21

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by BALTIMORA Sun May 01, 2011 6:21 pm

All sorted now apparently:

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/news.php?p=27885&more=1

"King Arthur Abraham will travel to the US on Sunday morning after the referee row has been resolved."

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by Jukebox Timebomb Sun May 01, 2011 6:29 pm

The ref in the Kessler Ward fight was terrible. Can you really have 5 accidental head clashes.

Jukebox Timebomb

Posts : 609
Join date : 2011-03-23

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by Wright Hook Sun May 01, 2011 7:11 pm

Anybody actually looking forward to this fight? Ward and Abraham are 2 of the most boring fighters going, it's going to be an absolute stinker!!

Ward to win a UD on scores of 120-108 in typically boring Ward fashion!

Wright Hook

Posts : 29
Join date : 2011-04-04
Location : Sheffield

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by SugarRayRussell (PBK) Sun May 01, 2011 7:20 pm

Got to agree with Wright Hook looks an awful fight and if it wasn't for free live streams I wouldn't be watching it.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)
SugarRayRussell (PBK)

Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39

Back to top Go down

Abraham v Ward may be in doubt Empty Re: Abraham v Ward may be in doubt

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum