Good solid wins that have been diluted
+13
AlexHuckerby
Adam D
KO-KING
TopHat24/7
Diamond in the rough
davidemore
BoxingFan88
ShahenshahG
rIck_dAgless
88Chris05
JabMachineMK2
TRUSSMAN66
Rodney
17 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Good solid wins that have been diluted
Boxing debaters and journalists all have double standards I guess, I'm no different, what wins have kind of been dismissed throughout history in your opinion ?
Mostly i hear many inclined too downgrade Tunneys wins over Dempsey should bear in mind that Dempsey beat Jack Sharkey on the best night he ever had between those two fights.
If that version of Dempsey managed to win one round against Tunney in two fights, then it should at least suggest that Tunney was a lot better than Jack Sharkey (even when his head was screwed on), and probably better than Max Schmeling who had his hands full with the same version of Sharkey.
To give Holyfield his due we would have to consider that even a shot Tyson managed to hand Andrew Gollota his head after he had basicaly beaten Bowe into retirement.
I have always felt that Tyson's win over Holmes is sold short. Holmes beat Ray Mercer who gave Lennox Lewis a close fight. Nobody should have done tht to Holmes past his prime or not. I would even venture to say that if the 45 year old Holmes had fought a prime Lennox Lewis he would've done better.
Any others ?
Cheers Rodders
Mostly i hear many inclined too downgrade Tunneys wins over Dempsey should bear in mind that Dempsey beat Jack Sharkey on the best night he ever had between those two fights.
If that version of Dempsey managed to win one round against Tunney in two fights, then it should at least suggest that Tunney was a lot better than Jack Sharkey (even when his head was screwed on), and probably better than Max Schmeling who had his hands full with the same version of Sharkey.
To give Holyfield his due we would have to consider that even a shot Tyson managed to hand Andrew Gollota his head after he had basicaly beaten Bowe into retirement.
I have always felt that Tyson's win over Holmes is sold short. Holmes beat Ray Mercer who gave Lennox Lewis a close fight. Nobody should have done tht to Holmes past his prime or not. I would even venture to say that if the 45 year old Holmes had fought a prime Lennox Lewis he would've done better.
Any others ?
Cheers Rodders
Rodney- Posts : 1974
Join date : 2011-02-15
Age : 46
Location : Thirsk
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
spinks beat an old Larry..........Bonecrusher Smith and Williams gave Larry great problems........
Ray Mercer lost to Jesse Ferguson!!!.........
Forgive me If I'm wrong but wasn't Sharkey handing Dempsey his backside when he turned to complain and got cheap-shotted to the deck...
Or am I thinking of another fight!!
Ray Mercer lost to Jesse Ferguson!!!.........
Forgive me If I'm wrong but wasn't Sharkey handing Dempsey his backside when he turned to complain and got cheap-shotted to the deck...
Or am I thinking of another fight!!
![Rolling Eyes](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_rolleyes.gif)
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
I place Tunney over Dempsey due to his wins, I often get lambasted for it ![Sad](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_sad.gif)
I think Lewis' win over Vitali is picked apart, even in some corners described as a loss which adds credence to the heavyweights before him to rank higher in ATG lists which I'm afraid simply can't be the case. Vitali lost the fight, Lewis wasn't his usual self but bear in mind he did what hasn't been done before or since and that was have Vitali looking shaky and on the verge of being knocked out in the next 4/5 rounds in my view.
I'd agree about Tysons win over a "past it" Holmes is pulled apart needlessly too.
![Sad](https://2img.net/i/fa/i/smiles/icon_sad.gif)
I think Lewis' win over Vitali is picked apart, even in some corners described as a loss which adds credence to the heavyweights before him to rank higher in ATG lists which I'm afraid simply can't be the case. Vitali lost the fight, Lewis wasn't his usual self but bear in mind he did what hasn't been done before or since and that was have Vitali looking shaky and on the verge of being knocked out in the next 4/5 rounds in my view.
I'd agree about Tysons win over a "past it" Holmes is pulled apart needlessly too.
JabMachineMK2- Posts : 2383
Join date : 2012-02-09
Age : 104
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
JabMachineMK2 wrote:I place Tunney over Dempsey due to his wins, I often get lambasted for it.
Rightly so..Let's have Spinks above Holmes............
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Well not really as Spinks didn't have that long a heavyweight career and styles make fights, I don't rank Buster Douglas above Tyson just because he won, there's other factors aswell TRUSS, don't be so picky.
JabMachineMK2- Posts : 2383
Join date : 2012-02-09
Age : 104
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Marlon Starling w12 Simon Brown
------------------------------------------
When Brown, Honey and Starling were champions..A lot of people regarded Brown as the best. Forgetting that Starling who was considered a trialhorse at the time had already given one of the best welters of the day a lesson......
For me this win with Breland twice, Honey, top contender Tommy Ayers, Kevin Howard and the respected Floyd Mayweather twice shows what a good career Moochie had........
Wonderful Boxing performance with a comical interlude when Brown being owned turns southpaw and Starling stops and stares at him as If to say.....As If I haven't seen a southpaw before..
Starling gets little credit for this win.
------------------------------------------
When Brown, Honey and Starling were champions..A lot of people regarded Brown as the best. Forgetting that Starling who was considered a trialhorse at the time had already given one of the best welters of the day a lesson......
For me this win with Breland twice, Honey, top contender Tommy Ayers, Kevin Howard and the respected Floyd Mayweather twice shows what a good career Moochie had........
Wonderful Boxing performance with a comical interlude when Brown being owned turns southpaw and Starling stops and stares at him as If to say.....As If I haven't seen a southpaw before..
Starling gets little credit for this win.
Last edited by TRUSSMAN66 on Tue 14 May 2013, 11:56 am; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : ..)
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
JabMachineMK2 wrote:Well not really as Spinks didn't have that long a heavyweight career and styles make fights, I don't rank Buster Douglas above Tyson just because he won, there's other factors aswell TRUSS, don't be so picky.
Spinks fought Cooney, Tangstad, Tyson, Holmes twice........
Did Tunney have any more fights at heavy than that??
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
More than 6. Closer to 10. Spinks isn't an ATG Light Heavy. Tunney is. Meaning that across 2 weights, he has the better wins.
JabMachineMK2- Posts : 2383
Join date : 2012-02-09
Age : 104
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
If Tommy Gibbons was a light heavy as classed by boxrec.......Then he maybe had one more fight than Spinks at heavy..........
Cooney will rank above Heeney............and an old Holmes above Dempsey in a lot of lists..........
Spinks like Tunney is a great fighter but not a great Heavy..........
Having him above Dempsey is bizarre..
Cooney will rank above Heeney............and an old Holmes above Dempsey in a lot of lists..........
Spinks like Tunney is a great fighter but not a great Heavy..........
Having him above Dempsey is bizarre..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Oddly enough, I think McGuigan sometimes doesn't get enough credit for beating Pedroza. I think the fact that people feel that McGuigan's overall career flattered to deceive in comparison to those who received such little fame and recognition but arguably deserved it more than Barry sometimes leads them to have an overly cynical view of the fight and Pedroza's state at the time.
I agree that it wasn't an absolute peak Pedroza that Barry got hold of, but I've heard lines such as "Pedroza was only there to collect the big pay cheque" and "Pedroza was completely shot" bandied about, which don't sit well with me.
The truth is that Pedroza's performance that night would have been enough to deny many top class Featherweights, that he did in fact give McGuigan plenty of problems right up until the last three rounds or so (which were, admittedly, all McGuigan) and that he showed immense heart, durability and grit, none of which pointed to a man who was more concerned with earining about £1 million (totally unheard of for a Featherweight at the time and still an eye-popping amount now) than keeping hold of a title he'd had for seven years and nineteen successful defences.
There have been some myths which have built around McGuigan's abilities and his career over time, but his win over Pedroza was the real deal, for me.
I agree that it wasn't an absolute peak Pedroza that Barry got hold of, but I've heard lines such as "Pedroza was only there to collect the big pay cheque" and "Pedroza was completely shot" bandied about, which don't sit well with me.
The truth is that Pedroza's performance that night would have been enough to deny many top class Featherweights, that he did in fact give McGuigan plenty of problems right up until the last three rounds or so (which were, admittedly, all McGuigan) and that he showed immense heart, durability and grit, none of which pointed to a man who was more concerned with earining about £1 million (totally unheard of for a Featherweight at the time and still an eye-popping amount now) than keeping hold of a title he'd had for seven years and nineteen successful defences.
There have been some myths which have built around McGuigan's abilities and his career over time, but his win over Pedroza was the real deal, for me.
88Chris05- Moderator
- Posts : 9660
Join date : 2011-02-16
Age : 36
Location : Nottingham
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
I dont think that James Buster Douglas gets the props for his Tyson win
There was a lot of talk about it not being the mythical peak tyson, or that his mind was elsewhere, or JBD got lucky
but the fact remains that JBD fought a near perfect fight that night, that although he never replicated (either before or after) deserves credit as not just being in the right place at the right time and lucking out
There was a lot of talk about it not being the mythical peak tyson, or that his mind was elsewhere, or JBD got lucky
but the fact remains that JBD fought a near perfect fight that night, that although he never replicated (either before or after) deserves credit as not just being in the right place at the right time and lucking out
rIck_dAgless- rik
- Posts : 13174
Join date : 2013-04-29
Location : Chamber of the unmichaelsing fist
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Lewis golota ought to have been a serious win now means little or nothing
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
The majority of Mayweather's fights, because he makes it look so easy.
BoxingFan88- Posts : 3759
Join date : 2011-02-20
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Bowe vs Holy..............Holy was unbeaten......probably in his prime....A wonderful warrior with a great triple jab and a big heart....and Bowe stepped up and out fought him..........
Wonderful win..............much underrated..
Wonderful win..............much underrated..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
beat him at his own game as well, excellent inside fighetr bowe
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Throw in the word 'old' to this article and TRUSS is all over it like a Texan police officer to an 'alien' immigrant.
That simile was for you, Trussy.
That simile was for you, Trussy.
![Yahoo](/users/3014/26/22/82/smiles/479796.gif)
davidemore- Posts : 2693
Join date : 2011-12-21
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Roy jones vs Hopkins the he was green argument doesn't sit well with me as they had roughly same experience at the time
Diamond in the rough- Posts : 420
Join date : 2013-02-06
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Diamond in the rough wrote:Roy jones vs Hopkins the he was green argument doesn't sit well with me as they had roughly same experience at the time
Roughly the same pro experience, not boxing experience.
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Bowe vs Holy..............Holy was unbeaten......probably in his prime....A wonderful warrior with a great triple jab and a big heart....and Bowe stepped up and out fought him..........
Wonderful win..............much underrated..
how, Bowe's whole legacy is pretty much based on that performance - You may be right, but that is a great win - surely most boxing fans know it that is
KO-KING- Posts : 1052
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Bowe beat him twice..............Also beat a lot of unbeaten fighters........Gonzales, Hide..Donald.......Chuck in Tubbs, future world champ Seldon and two wins over Golota and you have a "Fantastic" career.......
to quote a knobhead
to quote a knobhead
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Mosley/Margarito
Most people say Shane only beat him cos his mind was elsewhere having been caught out re the handwraps, but Shane utterly annihilated that fella
Most people say Shane only beat him cos his mind was elsewhere having been caught out re the handwraps, but Shane utterly annihilated that fella
Guest- Guest
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
I dunno. Think that's become common myth only in less boxing-educated circles. Credit is generally given where it's due on that on (I think) and it's rated as Top 3 win on JC's ledger.
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Great win..........Lacy was rated highly just like Canelo is now.........
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
And he'll be pish...just as soon as Floyd beats himTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Great win..........Lacy was rated highly just like Canelo is now.........
Guest- Guest
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
DAVE667 wrote:And he'll be pish...just as soon as Floyd beats himTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Great win..........Lacy was rated highly just like Canelo is now.........
![thumbsup](/users/3014/26/22/82/smiles/732107.gif)
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
He was incredibly limited to be honest, but yeah, possibly a bit underrated nowadays.
AlexHuckerby- Posts : 9201
Join date : 2011-03-31
Age : 32
Location : Leeds, England
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
TopHat24/7 wrote:Diamond in the rough wrote:Roy jones vs Hopkins the he was green argument doesn't sit well with me as they had roughly same experience at the time
Roughly the same pro experience, not boxing experience.
Still doesnt get enough credit
Diamond in the rough- Posts : 420
Join date : 2013-02-06
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
DAVE667 wrote:And he'll be pish...just as soon as Floyd beats himTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Great win..........Lacy was rated highly just like Canelo is now.........
Lacy did subsequently look rubbish though.
sittingringside- Posts : 475
Join date : 2011-04-27
Location : Scotland/Cornwall
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Calzaghe's win over Tocker Pudwill deserves more recognition and respect.
RanjitPatel- Posts : 692
Join date : 2013-02-26
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Dempsey v sharkey is a terrible example. Seeing as by all accounts Dempsey was taking a hiding. And kept throughout in low blows. Sharkey kept complaint to th ref, then in the 7th (I think) while I. The process of complaining gets floored. Dempsey has had Vetter nights than that. Tunney beat an old slow, inactive ring rusty Dempsey I'm afraid. He still had heart and power. But none of that stalking power and speed that made him great. Tunney wins were still great, but they do deserve to have a little of their shine taken away from them.
jimdig- Posts : 1528
Join date : 2011-03-14
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Given the other thread Froch-Bute should probably be added to this list.....
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
sittingringside wrote:DAVE667 wrote:And he'll be pish...just as soon as Floyd beats himTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Adam D wrote:How about the Lacy win for Calzaghe?
Most people now say that Lacy was pish.
Great win..........Lacy was rated highly just like Canelo is now.........
Lacy did subsequently look rubbish though.
Isn't that the point of this thread though!
Wins that were great ( and this one was ) but subsequently people have gone back to rubbish?
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
Randall's win over Chavez gets nothing like the degree of credit that it deserves, for reasons that elude me. For all the talk about Lockridge being unlucky, Taylor being screwed by Steele and Pea being plain robbed, it was The Surgeon who finally beat JCC so convincingly that even the usual, King-inspired, pro-Chavez scorecards couldn't come up with a computation that made Chavez the winner. Floored him too, which underlines that this was more than a mere technical exercise.
Think that Hearns' victory over Benitez gets unnecessarily short shrift from many people as well, possibly because Benitez was not far from his career-ending slide. A win that showcased Hearns' all-round boxing virtuosity, not to mention the ability to think his way through a fight. A great shame that Tommy didn't display this quality against Leonard and Hagler, or we'd be likely talking about the greatest fighter in history.
Think that Hearns' victory over Benitez gets unnecessarily short shrift from many people as well, possibly because Benitez was not far from his career-ending slide. A win that showcased Hearns' all-round boxing virtuosity, not to mention the ability to think his way through a fight. A great shame that Tommy didn't display this quality against Leonard and Hagler, or we'd be likely talking about the greatest fighter in history.
captain carrantuohil- Posts : 2508
Join date : 2011-05-06
Re: Good solid wins that have been diluted
One judge had Hearns-Benitez a draw.............Shocking!!
Mccallum vs Julian Jackson
Arguello vs Mancini
Mccallum vs Watson
Spinks vs Qawi
Benitez vs Cervantes
Taylor vs Mcgirt
Mccallum vs Julian Jackson
Arguello vs Mancini
Mccallum vs Watson
Spinks vs Qawi
Benitez vs Cervantes
Taylor vs Mcgirt
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40654
Join date : 2011-02-02
![-](https://2img.net/i/empty.gif)
» Murray Wins. Who Is It Good For?
» WRU Take Note... Friday night Internationals - Good or Not Good
» Golovkin vs Pirog: How Good Are These Fighters and How Good is the Fight?
» Which Was The Best Metal Gear Solid???
» Metal Gear Solid V
» WRU Take Note... Friday night Internationals - Good or Not Good
» Golovkin vs Pirog: How Good Are These Fighters and How Good is the Fight?
» Which Was The Best Metal Gear Solid???
» Metal Gear Solid V
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|