Owen Farrell - the rationale
+6
johnpartle
Tiger/Chief
No 7&1/2
LondonTiger
mbernz
Rugby Fan
10 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
Owen Farrell - the rationale
Austin Healey in the Telegraph has argued George Ford is handicapped by having Farrell outside him. Mick Cleary a few days ago dismissed those who think Andy Farrell has too much influence but Healey openly worries that is the case.
It is very hard to find anyone who thinks selecting Owen Farrell is a good idea, so why is he there?
In another thread, I suggested Lancaster is already looking forward to his World Cup squad and has selected, rightly or wrongly, on that basis.
Lancaster has four centre candidates: Tuilagi, Burrell, Barritt and Twelvetrees. If 36 is out of form, the first three make his World Cup squad. If he is in form, then maybe its a shootout between Burrell and Barritt.
None of the major fly half or back three contenders can play in the centre. Owen Farrell's ability - or inability- to cover inside centre is a key consideration for Lancaster.
Richie McCaw's autobiography said that the All Blacks suffered at two World Cups by playing individuals in the centre who weren't expecting it. Lancaster wants to know if it is a possibility much as he wanted to know if Tuilagi was an option on the wing.
I suspect Lancaster has already rolled his dice. He doesn't need to see Joseph because he can't imagine a circumstance outside major injury where he we will be involved.
That's the only logic I can see behind going with Farrell now.
It is very hard to find anyone who thinks selecting Owen Farrell is a good idea, so why is he there?
In another thread, I suggested Lancaster is already looking forward to his World Cup squad and has selected, rightly or wrongly, on that basis.
Lancaster has four centre candidates: Tuilagi, Burrell, Barritt and Twelvetrees. If 36 is out of form, the first three make his World Cup squad. If he is in form, then maybe its a shootout between Burrell and Barritt.
None of the major fly half or back three contenders can play in the centre. Owen Farrell's ability - or inability- to cover inside centre is a key consideration for Lancaster.
Richie McCaw's autobiography said that the All Blacks suffered at two World Cups by playing individuals in the centre who weren't expecting it. Lancaster wants to know if it is a possibility much as he wanted to know if Tuilagi was an option on the wing.
I suspect Lancaster has already rolled his dice. He doesn't need to see Joseph because he can't imagine a circumstance outside major injury where he we will be involved.
That's the only logic I can see behind going with Farrell now.
Rugby Fan- Moderator
- Posts : 8155
Join date : 2012-09-14
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
I posted this on the match thread. The interview and later discussion in the radio programme are worth a listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04p5qvx
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04p5qvx
mbernz wrote:I'm not a fan of the Farrell position shift, but it's interestingly being backed by possibly the greatest ever IC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/30124669Former Australia centre Tim Horan, who won two World Cups, believes Farrell can thrive in the England number 12 shirt against Samoa on Saturday.
"He's a wonderful player [and] I think it's a good move," Horan told BBC Radio 5 live.
"Owen has a very good kicking game, a good rugby brain, and I think he will adapt really well," he added.
Former England fly-half Charlie Hodgson - who played alongside Farrell at the start of Stuart Lancaster's spell as head coach - has questioned whether his Saracens' club-mate should shift across the backline, a view supported by the former England centre Jeremy Guscott.
But Horan is confident that replacement fly-half George Ford and Farrell can combine to good effect.
"George Ford will take the pressure off Owen Farrell and it will allow Owen to run the ball a bit more, and view the game without trying to dictate," Horan added.
"I think Owen will show that with less responsibilities - playing at number 12 - he will be able to show the real form everyone is waiting to see,. It would be harder moving from 12 to 13 than from 10 to 12."
"The great thing about England now is that if George Ford wants to run himself, he knows that if he gets caught in the breakdown, he has someone else to step in to first receiver."
Horan played in both centre positions during his 80-cap international career, and says the role of the inside centre is every bit as critical as that of the fly-half.
"The number 12 is the link, and the eyes and ears for the nine and the 10. You have to be able to get the ball past the number 12 to ignite the backline," he said. "It's important to have that link player at 12 to create some width in the game."
Ford and Farrell are old friends who played together throughout the age-group levels, helping the England U20s reach the final of the 2011 Junior World Championship.
And Bath stand-off Ford - who will take on the goal-kicking duties at Twickenham - has rejected suggestions the combination will struggle at the highest level.
"We've played a lot together and we've got a good understanding of what we need from each other," the 21-year-old told BBC Radio 5 live.
Hear more from Tim Horan and George Ford on 5 live Rugby with Matt Dawson, Thursday, 20 November from 21:00 GMT.
mbernz- Posts : 225
Join date : 2012-04-14
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
not strictly true that no-one considers it a good idea to put OF at 12.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2803876/SIR-CLIVE-WOODWARD-England-truly-frightening-team-pick-autumn-series.html
Selected bit:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2803876/SIR-CLIVE-WOODWARD-England-truly-frightening-team-pick-autumn-series.html
Selected bit:
MY ENGLAND OPTIONS
Team A is the side I’d pick to play New Zealand from Stuart Lancaster’s squad. Team B is my line-up — excluding injuries – if I had picked the squad. Team C assumes everyone is fit.
(Personnel and positional changes are in CAPITALS)
Team A: Promising
Mike Brown, Semesa Rokoduguni, Luther Burrell, Owen Farrell, Marland Yarde, George Ford, Danny Care, Joe Marler, Dylan Hartley, David Wilson, Joe Launchbury, Courtney Lawes, Tom Wood, Chris Robshaw (captain), James Haskell
Team B: Exciting
Mike Brown, Semesa Rokoduguni, Luther Burrell, Owen Farrell, CHRISTIAN WADE, DANNY CIPRIANI, Danny Care, Joe Marler, Dylan Hartley, David Wilson, Joe Launchbury, Courtney Lawes, CHRIS ROBSHAW (c), STEFFON ARMITAGE, James Haskell
TEAM C: Off the scale
(85,000 fans would be off their seats if this team clicked)
Mike Brown, Semesa Rokoduguni, MANU TUILAGI, Owen Farrell, CHRISTIAN WADE, DANNY CIPRIANI, Danny Care, ALEX CORBISIERO, Dylan Hartley, DAN COLE, Joe Launchbury, Courtney Lawes, CHRIS ROBSHAW (c), STEFFON ARMITAGE, James Haskell.
LondonTiger- Moderator
- Posts : 23485
Join date : 2011-02-10
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
I think Lancaster doesn't see the a reason to play Joseph or an outsider like Slade because he doesn't think they have enough time to establish themselves in the squad and, more importantly, doesn't think they offer enough to demand selection above his other candidates.
If you accept Lancaster's preferred flyhalf is Farrell, and his four main choices are Barritt, Burrell, Tuilagi and Twelvetrees, then his selections make sense if he wants to give maximum game time to his most likely picks.
He want to see Ford/Farrell because that is a likely combination if one of his chosen centres gets injured in a match. When you consider that Lancaster has had to contend with injuries at centre throughout his tenure, it's not surprising he wants to think about scenarios when that might happen at the World Cup.
If you accept Lancaster's preferred flyhalf is Farrell, and his four main choices are Barritt, Burrell, Tuilagi and Twelvetrees, then his selections make sense if he wants to give maximum game time to his most likely picks.
He want to see Ford/Farrell because that is a likely combination if one of his chosen centres gets injured in a match. When you consider that Lancaster has had to contend with injuries at centre throughout his tenure, it's not surprising he wants to think about scenarios when that might happen at the World Cup.
Rugby Fan- Moderator
- Posts : 8155
Join date : 2012-09-14
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
I get the reasons for playing Farrell at 12 for options but his form is utterly dire.
No 7&1/2- Posts : 31374
Join date : 2012-10-20
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
I understand it completely and only time will tell if it is the right move! There is a clear game plan that is preferred and there will be very little deviation from that plan! That plan involves flankers that tackle, Wingers that chase kicks and two distributers in the backs! Anyone who doesn't fit that mould no matter how well they play won't fit!
We miss Tuilagi so much and It's a shame Eastmond is being judged purely on performances versus New Zealand and one v SA! I think he deserves a chance in the 6 nations but I'm not holding my breath.... To be fair we play better with 2 kickers!
We miss Tuilagi so much and It's a shame Eastmond is being judged purely on performances versus New Zealand and one v SA! I think he deserves a chance in the 6 nations but I'm not holding my breath.... To be fair we play better with 2 kickers!
Tiger/Chief- Posts : 250
Join date : 2012-10-24
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
England fly-half Owen Farrell insists the switch to inside centre is stopgap measure as George Ford is given chance to stake No 10 claims against Samoa on Saturday evening
Same name, different position, same attitude, same approach. Owen Farrell is not about to reinvent himself. The Saracens fly-half has been shifted along the England back line to inside centre to make room for his schoolboy pal, George Ford.
Farrell may well be in the No 12 shirt but there is little prospect of him dedicating himself to the role for the rest of his career. This is a stopgap arrangement, a short-term shuffling of the deck to get Ford into the front-line, a reprieve for out-of-sorts Farrell who has to show that what he offers in terms of character, resolve, cussedness, leadership, defence, kicking and organisation can still be of value for England.
Farrell, though, is not for turning. Of course, he is committed to the England cause, selfless in that regard, without ego and without side. He is not the sort to sulk or to whine. Farrell has accepted the move with good grace, even tipping his hat towards the decision to hand over the goal-kicking duties to Ford so that he can learn to deal with the pressure.
Yet there is no sense that Farrell sees his own future at international level as an inside centre. If it comes to pass in England colours, it comes to pass. But he will not be refining his play accordingly, nor head back to Saracens and demand that they throw him the 12 shirt. Not surprising really given that it tends to be worn by the bloke alongside him at Twickenham on Saturday, Brad Barritt.
Farrell remains a fly-half in his own mind and will bring those technical attributes to bear against Samoa.
“I am not an out-and-out classic centre,” said Farrell. “What we are trying to do is get our levels of organisation up and give us a couple of options. The thing is to give George as many options as possible and give him as much clarity as I can. He is going to have his head looking at the speed of ball and looking at what’s in front of him, and I will try to give him the eyes from the outside. I won’t be piping down. It will be a different way of talking, feeding info. I will obviously be playing one pass out but I will still be playing the same way. As far as I see it you have got another 10 playing at 12. [As for the future] it depends how it works, whether you want two 10s in the team or not. I am by no means a 12. And there are some very good 12s around as well.”
Up to a point there are. Billy Twelvetrees appeared to be the anointed one in filling what has been the most troublesome position for England in more than a decade. Many have been tried, few have succeeded with any longevity. The Gloucester playmaker has worked his way back to bench duties for Saturday’s game after servicing the starting role with some aplomb for the duration of the 2014 Six Nations championship with Luther Burrell outside him. Injury has handicapped the Northampton centre in this campaign and he only recently returned to action for his club.
Twelvetrees has been a conundrum, from infuriating to intoxicating, sometimes in the same sequence of play. Inconsistency, mental frailty, a tendency to do rash things at critical times, be it a fluffed pass or kick or tackle, has been the bane of coaches’ lives at club and country.
Twelvetrees has a wonderful array of skills and is far better to suited to the No 12 shirt than Farrell, has more dexterity as well as presence when taking the ball up. But he cannot come anywhere near matching the indomitable will of the Saracens player.
The selection though is curious, a risk even. Ford’s strength lies in his ability to take the ball to the line, draw the defence, delay his pass, and pop players through those half-gaps. Farrell, though, does not have the pace or the bulk to take advantage of that space. He may do so from time to time but he is certainly not a long-term option in the way that Burrell or Twelvetrees might be, with the arrival on the scene at some point of Slammin’ Sam Burgess, the putative ace in the pack. Allied with Manu Tuilagi in the centre, England would go Route One all afternoon, and why not? That is for another day.
Kyle Eastmond, with his jinking footwork, prospers at club level but his lack of a kicking game is precisely why England have turned to Farrell even though he has been terribly out of kilter. When pressed, Farrell acknowledges that there have been “a couple of clear errors”, but has no truck with the notion that his fitness after an injury-afflicted build-up is affecting his form. He certainly did not take his selection for granted.
“I didn’t for one second think that even if things were going brilliantly and we were winning every game, that I was going to start every game from now til whenever,” said Farrell. “I am not naive enough to think that. We have probably not worked as well [as a team] as we did in the Six Nations but we will get back to that quickly. Moving to centre is a chance to try something different. I’m just chuffed to be involved.” The Twickenham jury will reserve judgment. The schoolboy friends face a testing afternoon.
Lancaster's No 12s
Owen Farrell will be the fifth player to start at inside centre under Stuart Lancaster.
1. Brad Barritt: eight games
The 28-year-old Saracens stalwart was Lancaster’s first choice when he took over. Defensively strong but one-dimensional.
2. Manu Tuilagi: two games
Tried on 2012 South Africa tour but soon reverted to favoured outside centre position.
3. Billy Twelvetrees: 12 games
Gloucester playmaker took over at start of 2013 Six Nations. All the talent but questions over temperament.
4. Kyle Eastmond: five games
Given chance on last two summer tours and kept place for this autumn series but let down by kicking game.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/international/england/11246949/England-fly-half-Owen-Farrell-shifted-to-centre-for-Samoa-Test-at-Twickenham-as-George-Ford-fills-his-friends-boots.html
johnpartle- Posts : 318
Join date : 2011-06-08
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
You have to question whether Lancaster is really qualified/experienced enough to make half the calls that England's supporters are querying.
He has never been an international rugby player, he has never won a tournament or league as a coach.
He has never been an international rugby player, he has never won a tournament or league as a coach.
maestegmafia- Posts : 23145
Join date : 2011-03-05
Location : Glyncorrwg
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
The Manu on the wing concept was crazy IMO it was never going to work, I do though think that SL has put all his eggs in the Manu basket and if he's out injured that's when he struggles to know who else to play in the centre.
bedfordwelsh- Moderator
- Posts : 9962
Join date : 2011-05-11
Age : 56
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
mbernz wrote:I posted this on the match thread. The interview and later discussion in the radio programme are worth a listen.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04p5qvxmbernz wrote:I'm not a fan of the Farrell position shift, but it's interestingly being backed by possibly the greatest ever IC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-union/30124669Former Australia centre Tim Horan, who won two World Cups, believes Farrell can thrive in the England number 12 shirt against Samoa on Saturday.
"He's a wonderful player [and] I think it's a good move," Horan told BBC Radio 5 live.
"Owen has a very good kicking game, a good rugby brain, and I think he will adapt really well," he added.
Former England fly-half Charlie Hodgson - who played alongside Farrell at the start of Stuart Lancaster's spell as head coach - has questioned whether his Saracens' club-mate should shift across the backline, a view supported by the former England centre Jeremy Guscott.
But Horan is confident that replacement fly-half George Ford and Farrell can combine to good effect.
"George Ford will take the pressure off Owen Farrell and it will allow Owen to run the ball a bit more, and view the game without trying to dictate," Horan added.
"I think Owen will show that with less responsibilities - playing at number 12 - he will be able to show the real form everyone is waiting to see,. It would be harder moving from 12 to 13 than from 10 to 12."
"The great thing about England now is that if George Ford wants to run himself, he knows that if he gets caught in the breakdown, he has someone else to step in to first receiver."
Horan played in both centre positions during his 80-cap international career, and says the role of the inside centre is every bit as critical as that of the fly-half.
"The number 12 is the link, and the eyes and ears for the nine and the 10. You have to be able to get the ball past the number 12 to ignite the backline," he said. "It's important to have that link player at 12 to create some width in the game."
Ford and Farrell are old friends who played together throughout the age-group levels, helping the England U20s reach the final of the 2011 Junior World Championship.
And Bath stand-off Ford - who will take on the goal-kicking duties at Twickenham - has rejected suggestions the combination will struggle at the highest level.
"We've played a lot together and we've got a good understanding of what we need from each other," the 21-year-old told BBC Radio 5 live.
Hear more from Tim Horan and George Ford on 5 live Rugby with Matt Dawson, Thursday, 20 November from 21:00 GMT.
Has the generally accepted role of the 12 changed since Horan though? It's been a few years since the second 5th eight at 12 has been in vogue
ChequeredJersey- Posts : 18707
Join date : 2011-12-23
Age : 35
Location : London, UK
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
bedfordwelsh wrote:The Manu on the wing concept was crazy IMO it was never going to work, I do though think that SL has put all his eggs in the Manu basket and if he's out injured that's when he struggles to know who else to play in the centre.
Lancaster's thinking seems pretty plain to me. If Manu doesn't make it to the Cup, then Lancaster will choose Barritt, Burrell and Twelvetrees, provided the latter is in good form. If he isn't, then the third man will likely be Eastmond, with an outside chance on Burgess. Lancaster knows what he'd do without Manu, but it's true he would rather have him. Then again, so would any coach.
There was also a fair rationale behind wondering whether Manu could do a job on the wing. In the best case, he'd have presented a threat similiar to Savea. It would also have meant that England could dispense with bench cover for centre, because Manu could be moved there in the event of injury. The would help immensely if Farrell had to be left out of the matchday 23 for form or fitness reasons.
Look again at the back line/subs bench for the first Test against New Zealand on tour this year, when Farrell was unavailable:
Youngs
Burns
May
Eastmond
Tuilagi
Yarde
Brown
Dickson
Cipriani
Pennell
Who do you think would have moved into the centre if Eastmond or Tuilagi had gone down?
Farrell was also out injured for the third Test and the backs/subs line-up looked like this:
Youngs
Burns
Yarde
Eastmond
Tuilagi
Ashton
Brown
Dickson
Cipriani
Burrell
Burrell is the obvious centre cover but we don't look so hot for the back three anymore. Cipriani or Burns would have to go to full back and Brown to the wing. That's not terrible at club level but I wouldn't fancy it for a key match at the World Cup.
That's one of the squad problems Lancaster is trying to think his way around. It's pretty evident that very few people like his solutions but a lot of the alternative selections I see proposed seem to ignore the issue entirely.
I don't think Lancaster has got it right, but mainly because few - if any - of his selection experiments have opened up new options. You would hope he and his coaches would get a better sense in training of whether something is going to work or not, rather than wasting a match finding out it doesn't.
Rugby Fan- Moderator
- Posts : 8155
Join date : 2012-09-14
Re: Owen Farrell - the rationale
Well lets hope Ford has a cracker, and Farrell blends well with his kicking game control in tandem.
And maybe Farrell might take a few hints about playmaking.
And maybe Farrell might take a few hints about playmaking.
Geordie- Posts : 28849
Join date : 2011-03-31
Location : Newcastle
Similar topics
» Owen Farrell
» Owen Farrell - I must be in a minority
» Owen Farrell's defense
» What will England do with Owen Farrell?
» Owen Farrell wants noisy Twickenham
» Owen Farrell - I must be in a minority
» Owen Farrell's defense
» What will England do with Owen Farrell?
» Owen Farrell wants noisy Twickenham
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum