5 Ways to make boxing more exciting and appeal to a younger audience

Contender for worst article of all time. Up there with the spinning back fist, this one!

NOTE TO THE MODERATORS.........

Several weeks ago, I suggested you may be well advised to ban Steffan from the boards given his previous posting history on 606. I recall saying that, should he be allowed to post on this forum then "no good will come of it"

Surely this article is proof, if proof were needed, that I was correct all along. Now, I don't want an apology from you or even credit for recognising the danger several weeks ago, I just want you to ban/remove any of Steffan's articles that veer of wildly into the realms of pointlessness and/or stupidity (thus effectively banning him outright I suppose)

Fists of Fury wrote:Contender for worst article of all time. Up there with the spinning back fist, this one!

Sorry, FoF, can't agree there; the musical chairs bit actually made me smile a wee bit, much to my shame!

Five star stuff as ever, Steffan.

Chris, COME BACK CHRIS, CHRIS!!! NOOOOOOOO

Dave, I think we've lost him...

Great article...

DAVE667 wrote:NOTE TO THE MODERATORS.........

Several weeks ago, I suggested you may be well advised to ban Steffan from the boards given his previous posting history on 606. I recall saying that, should he be allowed to post on this forum then "no good will come of it"

Surely this article is proof, if proof were needed, that I was correct all along. Now, I don't want an apology from you or even credit for recognising the danger several weeks ago, I just want you to ban/remove any of Steffan's articles that veer of wildly into the realms of pointlessness and/or stupidity (thus effectively banning him outright I suppose)

Yet Union Stain does the humourous 'The Inverse Ducking Hamed, 37, Reverse Linear (Backward / Forward) P4P Championship Title Theory' article (which made me laugh to be fair do) and you dont say a word but just because you dont like me you call for me to be removed. Oh well there we are then...

Yet Union Stain does the humourous
___________________________________________________

Did you not have a pop at people and question their maturaity for calling you Steffy and Stephanie the other day but come back with the hilarious Stain instead of Cane, odd that.

* If declared a draw at the end the fighters must engage in a game of paper scissors stone to decide the winner like men
************************************************************
Do they get to take thier gloves off first...otherwise it could go on a while...a bit like your unending stream of stupidity!

Steffan, I don't dislike you (I don't even know you) however, I do believe that if was to take the time to get to know you, I would probably dislike you immensely. Maybe you should consider these comments as positive as I'm confident they could be so much worse if I gave full vent to my frustrations vis a vis you and you role in the great scheme of things

rowley wrote:Yet Union Stain does the humourous
___________________________________________________

Did you not have a pop at people and question their maturaity for calling you Steffy and Stephanie the other day but come back with the hilarious Stain instead of Cane, odd that.

Yes but thats a private joke between me and Stain. He can give as good as he gets. Its only a user name anyway is Union Cane. Steffan is my real name

He can give as good as he gets
____________________________________________________________
Well, if 'Union Stain' is the best you can come up with then I believe Union wins hands down in the "amusing" comeback stakes

DAVE667 wrote:He can give as good as he gets
____________________________________________________________
Well, if 'Union Stain' is the best you can come up with then I believe Union wins hands down in the "amusing" comeback stakes

Stain is a funny guy so yeah you are probably right Dave

I though Steph was your real name because you use Girl50 as your username elsewhere?

Scottrf wrote:I though Steph was your real name because you use Girl50 as your username elsewhere?

Isn't that a sequel to a Spike Lee film (one for the film buffs out there)

Scottrf wrote:I though Steph was your real name because you use Girl50 as your username elsewhere?

That was my ex Mrs Urban Dictionary account that I typed it on

Scottrf wrote:I though Steph was your real name because you use Girl50 as your username elsewhere?

Missed this day on the old 606, please enlighten as i know it's a running jibe.

I'm a bit disturbed he'd pose as a young girl online, in all seriousness shall we get the mods to report his IP number to the relevant authorities as i'm pretty sure they'd like to knnow why a grown man is pretending to be a young girl in order to talk to young boys..........................

rowley wrote:

Scottrf wrote:I though Steph was your real name because you use Girl50 as your username elsewhere?

Isn't that a sequel to a Spike Lee film (one for the film buffs out there)

"Girl50" was never the sequel to "Crooklyn", "Jungle Fever" Do the Right Thing", "Son of Sam" or any other Spike Lee vehicle. Yo're just talking rot now, Rowley!

Steffan was trying to be clever on a topic, posted something as though he'd written it himself. It was found on Urbandictionary and he tried to claim that post, but the username was Girl50.

Wasn't it ONETWO that actually pretended to be a teenage girl? Don't remember that one though.

Just do what showtime did and get a couple of pieces with nice bristols waving a card during the breaks. Did it for me on Sunday but there was one old trout who had an annoying face.

Scott was indeed Onetwo. He had a spell of leaving the boards and then returning but announcing his combeack with threads solely about his return and how he wanted to talk boxing etc. However after a while one of these appeared from a 15 year old girl who had joined the forum. Based on the style, appaling spelling and god awful grammar took people about five seconds to realise it was onetwo. Suffice to say "she" did not post much after that.

Don't wish to be a killjoy, fellas, but the admin team received a report about this one - no names, no pack drill - so somebody has to jump in to steady the ship.

What began as a tongue - in - cheek subject is in danger of going belly up, which seems a bit daft. Can we all play nicely, please ?

Thanks.

Stephanie you little snitch.

Byd am Abertawe!!!!

Scottrf wrote:Stephanie you little snitch.

????????

I reiterate - please play nicely.

This is a tongue in cheek article - yet half the board seems to be taking it in deadly earnest.

Stop abusing other posters - or the debate will be locked.

oxring wrote:I reiterate - please play nicely.

This is a tongue in cheek article - yet half the board seems to be taking it in deadly earnest.

Stop abusing other posters - or the debate will be locked.

Sod off.

oxring wrote:I reiterate - please play nicely.

This is a tongue in cheek article - yet half the board seems to be taking it in deadly earnest.

Stop abusing other posters - or the debate will be locked.

Thanks Oxring. Dont lock the thread though that allows the bullies to win im sick of the insults I get on here but dont worry fellas I aint going anywhere

Union Cane - tongue in cheek or not, that deserves a warning.