Tagged Classics.
5 posters
The v2 Forum :: Wrestling :: Wrestling
Page 1 of 1
Tagged Classics.
Are the Survivor Series 1999/2000 and King of the Ring 2001/Invasion 2001 tagged classics dvd's worth a fiver each? There is a shop near me that has them for that price. Ill pick them up tomorrow if they are good PPV's
UpsideDownFace- Posts : 622
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 34
Re: Tagged Classics.
Both are great DVD's, both full of great matches and feuds. Definitely worth a fiver each!
AberdeenSteve- Posts : 6520
Join date : 2011-01-24
Age : 33
Location : Guess?
Re: Tagged Classics.
Definatly worth £10, both survivors and invasion are entertaining cards from memory with Angle vs Undertaker from Survivors 00 probably being my pick of the bunch, KOTR is a very good card packed with quality scraps
Dr Gregory House MD- Posts : 3624
Join date : 2011-01-30
Age : 33
Location : Dundee
Re: Tagged Classics.
Cheers guys. I thought they would be decent because that's when WWE was at it's best.
UpsideDownFace- Posts : 622
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 34
Re: Tagged Classics.
UpsideDownFace wrote:Cheers guys. I thought they would be decent because that's when WWE was at it's best.
Id actually argue that WWE hit its peak a couple of years later between 2002-2004, an intresting mesh of old and new and some superb wrestling throughout
Dr Gregory House MD- Posts : 3624
Join date : 2011-01-30
Age : 33
Location : Dundee
Re: Tagged Classics.
The 1999 Survivor Series was poor and the 2000 one wasn't too good. I'd probably just buy KOTR/Invasion one.
I think it's questionable whether WWE was at its best at that time, but the 2000-early 2001 period was very strong.
I think it's questionable whether WWE was at its best at that time, but the 2000-early 2001 period was very strong.
crippledtart- Posts : 1947
Join date : 2011-02-07
Age : 44
Location : WCW Special Forces
Re: Tagged Classics.
Dr Gregory House MD wrote:UpsideDownFace wrote:Cheers guys. I thought they would be decent because that's when WWE was at it's best.
Id actually argue that WWE hit its peak a couple of years later between 2002-2004, an intresting mesh of old and new and some superb wrestling throughout
The ratings wouldn't back you up! 2002 was in my opinion the year WWE completely lost its way, and I don't think it's ever recovered.
crippledtart- Posts : 1947
Join date : 2011-02-07
Age : 44
Location : WCW Special Forces
Re: Tagged Classics.
Wrestling wise there were some excellent guys on the roster, the likes of Angle, Benoit, Jericho, Christian, Lesnar etc but after the withdrawal of Austin and Rock it was bound to suffer.
Similar really to the New Gen era of HBK & Bret taking over for Hogan, better wrestling but just not the ability to break through into the mainstream like their predecessors.
Similar really to the New Gen era of HBK & Bret taking over for Hogan, better wrestling but just not the ability to break through into the mainstream like their predecessors.
The v2 Forum :: Wrestling :: Wrestling
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|