Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
+22
skidd1
Scottrf
manos de piedra
Rowley
88Chris05
compelling and rich
oxring
paperbag_puncher
zx1234
fearlessBamber
Gentleman01
John Bloody Wayne
Lumbering_Jack
Imperial Ghosty
Union Cane
The genius of PBF
BALTIMORA
Super D Boon
HumanWindmill
SugarRayRussell (PBK)
coxy0001
GaryMabbuttYidLegend
26 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
This is not based on legacy, but who beats who. Size is a major issue in compiling my list,
Muhammad Ali
Larry Holmes
Lennox Lewis
George Foreman
Joe Louis
Joe Frasier
Riddick Bowe
Evander Holyfield
Mike Tyson
Vitali Klitshcko
Obviously some big names missing that would always make my top 10 all time heavy greats, i.e. Johnson, Tunney, Marciano and Dempsey, but I believe all 10 of the above would have beaten them.
Muhammad Ali
Larry Holmes
Lennox Lewis
George Foreman
Joe Louis
Joe Frasier
Riddick Bowe
Evander Holyfield
Mike Tyson
Vitali Klitshcko
Obviously some big names missing that would always make my top 10 all time heavy greats, i.e. Johnson, Tunney, Marciano and Dempsey, but I believe all 10 of the above would have beaten them.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
What you mean to say is:
"I'm blindly ignorant and don't actually know much about boxing prior to 1970. I have limited knowledge of even the modern era."
Lets just let this drift down the page where it belongs lads.
"I'm blindly ignorant and don't actually know much about boxing prior to 1970. I have limited knowledge of even the modern era."
Lets just let this drift down the page where it belongs lads.
coxy0001- Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
I can accept that Ali, Holmes and Louis would have beat Jack Johnson but I don't see how you can make a case for even a 'prime' Tyson.
Marciano would would walk through that bottom 4 for fun.
Marciano would would walk through that bottom 4 for fun.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
After reading some of your posts, I have a lot more knowledge than you, I can tell you that. I think maybe I have Joe Louis too high. Size is a huge issue, what do you not agree with?
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
As always, much depends on the prevailing conditions.
Over twenty five rounds, under a baking Sun, with small gloves and old school refereeing, Jeffries beats many on that list, in my opinion. Put him in a twelve rounder and most decent boxers stage a shutout against him.
Not entirely sure that Holyfield is worth a place at the expense of Dempsey and Tunney. Jack and Gene are often dismissed on the basis of size, but Holy is a converted cruiser who was, in most measurements of the ' tale of the tape, ' almost exactly the same size as Dempsey before he bulked up to heavy. Assuming that Tunney and Dempsey could come in around 205 - 10lb., I'd fancy them against some guys on the list.
Never easy with the heavies, though, and it will always come down to opinions.
Over twenty five rounds, under a baking Sun, with small gloves and old school refereeing, Jeffries beats many on that list, in my opinion. Put him in a twelve rounder and most decent boxers stage a shutout against him.
Not entirely sure that Holyfield is worth a place at the expense of Dempsey and Tunney. Jack and Gene are often dismissed on the basis of size, but Holy is a converted cruiser who was, in most measurements of the ' tale of the tape, ' almost exactly the same size as Dempsey before he bulked up to heavy. Assuming that Tunney and Dempsey could come in around 205 - 10lb., I'd fancy them against some guys on the list.
Never easy with the heavies, though, and it will always come down to opinions.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
prettyboykev wrote:I can accept that Ali, Holmes and Louis would have beat Jack Johnson but I don't see how you can make a case for even a 'prime' Tyson.
Marciano would would walk through that bottom 4 for fun.
Would he though? It took him 13 rounds to walk down a 40 something Walcott and he struggled badly with Roland LaStarza, and according to most reports was lucky to get the win. Remember Rocky was around 13 stone mate
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
I am a massive Holyfield fan, and I agree that I maybe have him a touch too high. Dempsey Holyyfield over 15 would have been a great fightHumanWindmill wrote:As always, much depends on the prevailing conditions.
Over twenty five rounds, under a baking Sun, with small gloves and old school refereeing, Jeffries beats many on that list, in my opinion. Put him in a twelve rounder and most decent boxers stage a shutout against him.
Not entirely sure that Holyfield is worth a place at the expense of Dempsey and Tunney. Jack and Gene are often dismissed on the basis of size, but Holy is a converted cruiser who was, in most measurements of the ' tale of the tape, ' almost exactly the same size as Dempsey before he bulked up to heavy. Assuming that Tunney and Dempsey could come in around 205 - 10lb., I'd fancy them against some guys on the list.
Never easy with the heavies, though, and it will always come down to opinions.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
I agree, mate.
I'm a huge Dempsey fan, and would obviously be tipping him but, as I say, it all comes down to opinions.
I'm a huge Dempsey fan, and would obviously be tipping him but, as I say, it all comes down to opinions.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
coxy0001 wrote:What you mean to say is:
"I'm blindly ignorant and don't actually know much about boxing prior to 1970. I have limited knowledge of even the modern era."
Lets just let this drift down the page where it belongs lads.
Oh dear! You have incurred the wrath of the black and white fan boy! Not good.
Super D Boon- Posts : 2078
Join date : 2011-07-03
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Marciano would have terrified Bowe the minute Bowe felt his power and Marciano was unrelenting. Bowe could have worked the jab all he wanted Marciano could take his best Bowe couldn't take Marciano's.
Holyfield was a cruiserweight so wouldn't have a size advantage. Power and chin on the side of Marciano along with the amount of punches coming Evanders way easy wn for Marciano.
As for Tyson he was to easy to hit Marciano would have had fun with that.
As for Klitshcko he may have coped well but I don't see him being able to out box Marciano at range for 12 rounds. He may have a good chin but I'm doubtful he could have taken Marciano's best shots.
Walcott may have been 40 but he always had an excellent defence and although I have never seen the fight I have read that Walcott was their survive and that was about it.
Holyfield was a cruiserweight so wouldn't have a size advantage. Power and chin on the side of Marciano along with the amount of punches coming Evanders way easy wn for Marciano.
As for Tyson he was to easy to hit Marciano would have had fun with that.
As for Klitshcko he may have coped well but I don't see him being able to out box Marciano at range for 12 rounds. He may have a good chin but I'm doubtful he could have taken Marciano's best shots.
Walcott may have been 40 but he always had an excellent defence and although I have never seen the fight I have read that Walcott was their survive and that was about it.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend wrote:After reading some of your posts, I have a lot more knowledge than you, I can tell you that. I think maybe I have Joe Louis too high. Size is a huge issue, what do you not agree with?
'Course you do.
Size is a huge issue yet Jimmy Wilde would walk through and knock out guys he'd be given away over 15lbs against.
Tyson was exposed as a chinless wonder yet you think Marciano wouldn't get to him.
Lewis was knocked out by two guys around the 6'2 mark, Marciano (correct me if i'm wrong) was 5'11. Not to mention Tyson was smaller.
Weight tends to only make a difference when you've got 2 guys on an equal level, in most cases a very good "smaller" guy will always beat the heavier "big guy".
Back to the football forums please.
coxy0001- Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
prettyboykev wrote:I can accept that Ali, Holmes and Louis would have beat Jack Johnson but I don't see how you can make a case for even a 'prime' Tyson.
Marciano would would walk through that bottom 4 for fun.
I think Tyson in his prime would have been way too much for Marciano. A 13 stoner against a 15/16 stone monster in Tyson! Marciano fought as a light cruiserweight by today's standards.
Marciano's pressure style would never work against a fighter much bigger and stronger. Stylistically an awful matchup for Marciano who'd have no adavantages against Tyson whatsoever.
Tyson all day every day!
Super D Boon- Posts : 2078
Join date : 2011-07-03
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Before this goes any further, can I appeal to everybody to debate the issues ( as passionately as you like, ) but stop short of the personal stuff ?
Thank you.
Thank you.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Walcott was winning. What about La Starza? he took all Marciano had and more.prettyboykev wrote:Marciano would have terrified Bowe the minute Bowe felt his power and Marciano was unrelenting. Bowe could have worked the jab all he wanted Marciano could take his best Bowe couldn't take Marciano's.
Holyfield was a cruiserweight so wouldn't have a size advantage. Power and chin on the side of Marciano along with the amount of punches coming Evanders way easy wn for Marciano.
As for Tyson he was to easy to hit Marciano would have had fun with that.
As for Klitshcko he may have coped well but I don't see him being able to out box Marciano at range for 12 rounds. He may have a good chin but I'm doubtful he could have taken Marciano's best shots.
Walcott may have been 40 but he always had an excellent defence and although I have never seen the fight I have read that Walcott was their survive and that was about it.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Marciano's pressure style would never work against a fighter much bigger and stronger.
It would against one who had no heart and an even worse chin.
coxy0001- Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Kev I think you're blowing a bit of smoke up Marciano's bottom there mate. Easy to say he would've beaten x, y & z, but to say he'd walk through those guys 'for fun' is stretching credulity. For all his formidable attributes, he's still a cruiser by today's standards and someone like the big Klit would hardly he a walkover.
Same thing with Tyson being easy to hit-the same can be levelled at Rocky, and Tyson was a fast, quick-starter.
As per usual, this thread will no doubt descend into list hell, so I'm off.
Same thing with Tyson being easy to hit-the same can be levelled at Rocky, and Tyson was a fast, quick-starter.
As per usual, this thread will no doubt descend into list hell, so I'm off.
BALTIMORA- Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend wrote:Walcott was winning. What about La Starza? he took all Marciano had and more.prettyboykev wrote:Marciano would have terrified Bowe the minute Bowe felt his power and Marciano was unrelenting. Bowe could have worked the jab all he wanted Marciano could take his best Bowe couldn't take Marciano's.
Holyfield was a cruiserweight so wouldn't have a size advantage. Power and chin on the side of Marciano along with the amount of punches coming Evanders way easy wn for Marciano.
As for Tyson he was to easy to hit Marciano would have had fun with that.
As for Klitshcko he may have coped well but I don't see him being able to out box Marciano at range for 12 rounds. He may have a good chin but I'm doubtful he could have taken Marciano's best shots.
Walcott may have been 40 but he always had an excellent defence and although I have never seen the fight I have read that Walcott was their survive and that was about it.
Like I said mate I have never seen that fight just read a few reports about it. Walcott was a very skilled and clever guy although he was 40. La Starza went the distance and good for him but Marciano could punch did stop him in a rematch and La Starza had a very good chin. The same can't be said for Tyson.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
BALTIMORA wrote:Kev I think you're blowing a bit of smoke up Marciano's bottom there mate. Easy to say he would've beaten x, y & z, but to say he'd walk through those guys 'for fun' is stretching credulity. For all his formidable attributes, he's still a cruiser by today's standards and someone like the big Klit would hardly he a walkover.
Same thing with Tyson being easy to hit-the same can be levelled at Rocky, and Tyson was a fast, quick-starter.
As per usual, this thread will no doubt descend into list hell, so I'm off.
Balti the problem I see with especially Tyson is if he couldn't stop Marciano early he would have got discouraged and Marciano had the far stronger chin.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
coxy0001 wrote:Marciano's pressure style would never work against a fighter much bigger and stronger.
It would against one who had no heart and an even worse chin.
Before we get into a 'peak/prime' Tyson discussion AGAIN and I'm compelled to neck whatever I can find underneath the sink, Tyson wasn't as chinny as you're making out there coxy. He's hardly Enzo.
BALTIMORA- Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
coxy0001 wrote:GaryMabbuttYidLegend wrote:After reading some of your posts, I have a lot more knowledge than you, I can tell you that. I think maybe I have Joe Louis too high. Size is a huge issue, what do you not agree with?
'Course you do.
Size is a huge issue yet Jimmy Wilde would walk through and knock out guys he'd be given away over 15lbs against.
Tyson was exposed as a chinless wonder yet you think Marciano wouldn't get to him.
Lewis was knocked out by two guys around the 6'2 mark, Marciano (correct me if i'm wrong) was 5'11. Not to mention Tyson was smaller.
Weight tends to only make a difference when you've got 2 guys on an equal level, in most cases a very good "smaller" guy will always beat the heavier "big guy".
Back to the football forums please.
Both McCall and Rahman were monsters in size compared to Marciano. Marciano was 5'10 and 13stone, Lewis would have been a joke fight. Lewis would have knocked him out within 2 rounds. 'Marcianos chin is the greatest!', Walcott had him down and hurt, LaStarza almost stopped him in the 5th (I think it was the 5th). Marciano was in wars with men his own size, a man a foot taller and 5 stone bigger may not nessasarily win, but a man that size with Lewis' talent would blow him out.
Jimmy Wilde was a great great flyweight, beat bigger men, yes, but no one north of featherweight who was ever really that good.
Boxing has weight divisions for a reason.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Kev, it's a fair point you make about Tyson and the 'stopping him early' thing, but saying Rocky would march through them all every day of the week and twice on Sundays is just a bit too rose-tinted for my liking.
BALTIMORA- Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Just occurred to me that Sonny Liston isn't on the list.
Head - to - head he'd be a tough night for anybody on his best night. Sound technician, vicious puncher, authoritative jabber, with a reach the equal of Lennox Lewis' and a very strong chin.
The Liston who twice dismantled a peak Cleveland Williams was an awesome heavyweight.
Head - to - head he'd be a tough night for anybody on his best night. Sound technician, vicious puncher, authoritative jabber, with a reach the equal of Lennox Lewis' and a very strong chin.
The Liston who twice dismantled a peak Cleveland Williams was an awesome heavyweight.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
BALTIMORA wrote:coxy0001 wrote:Marciano's pressure style would never work against a fighter much bigger and stronger.
It would against one who had no heart and an even worse chin.
Before we get into a 'peak/prime' Tyson discussion AGAIN and I'm compelled to neck whatever I can find underneath the sink, Tyson wasn't as chinny as you're making out there coxy. He's hardly Enzo.
He said worse chin then Marciano...No mention of being chinny BALTI...Disagree with him though on the no heart issue
Tyson has more heart than coxy, has the heart to step in and face the likes of Lewis...Something I doubt you would have the heart to do.
The genius of PBF- Posts : 1552
Join date : 2011-06-03
Age : 47
Location : Las Vegas
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
If its 'who beats who' then SURELY Holmes should be above Ali, seeing as Holmes beat Ali.
Union Cane- Moderator
- Posts : 11328
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 48
Location : Whatever truculent means, if that's good, I'm that.
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Just ask Walcott and La Starza how they felt after their fights with Marciano, one was on the receiving end of the most brutal KO in boxing history while the other had broken arms caused by punches, a small man yes and most likely beaten comfortably by the likes of Lewis, Holmes, Ali, Liston and Foreman but against anyone else he has every chance of knocking them out.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
HumanWindmill wrote:Just occurred to me that Sonny Liston isn't on the list.
Head - to - head he'd be a tough night for anybody on his best night. Sound technician, vicious puncher, authoritative jabber, with a reach the equal of Lennox Lewis' and a very strong chin.
The Liston who twice dismantled a peak Cleveland Williams was an awesome heavyweight.
Along with Tyson, Dempsey and Foreman...the most feared heavyweights ever
The genius of PBF- Posts : 1552
Join date : 2011-06-03
Age : 47
Location : Las Vegas
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Good point. I was thinking of him. I would tip Liston to beat Marciano.HumanWindmill wrote:Just occurred to me that Sonny Liston isn't on the list.
Head - to - head he'd be a tough night for anybody on his best night. Sound technician, vicious puncher, authoritative jabber, with a reach the equal of Lennox Lewis' and a very strong chin.
The Liston who twice dismantled a peak Cleveland Williams was an awesome heavyweight.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
The genius of PBF wrote:BALTIMORA wrote:coxy0001 wrote:Marciano's pressure style would never work against a fighter much bigger and stronger.
It would against one who had no heart and an even worse chin.
Before we get into a 'peak/prime' Tyson discussion AGAIN and I'm compelled to neck whatever I can find underneath the sink, Tyson wasn't as chinny as you're making out there coxy. He's hardly Enzo.
He said worse chin then Marciano...No mention of being chinny BALTI...Disagree with him though on the no heart issue
Tyson has more heart than coxy, has the heart to step in and face the likes of Lewis...Something I doubt you would have the heart to do.
Do yourself a favour and check your facts before posting simply to 'have a go'. Coxy said:
Tyson was exposed as a chinless wonder
Thanks.
BALTIMORA- Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Harrison beat Williams
Williams beat Tyson
Tyson beats Holmes
Holmes beats Ali
Harrison the greatest
Williams beat Tyson
Tyson beats Holmes
Holmes beats Ali
Harrison the greatest
The genius of PBF- Posts : 1552
Join date : 2011-06-03
Age : 47
Location : Las Vegas
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
HumanWindmill wrote:Just occurred to me that Sonny Liston isn't on the list.
Head - to - head he'd be a tough night for anybody on his best night. Sound technician, vicious puncher, authoritative jabber, with a reach the equal of Lennox Lewis' and a very strong chin.
The Liston who twice dismantled a peak Cleveland Williams was an awesome heavyweight.
Agreed Windy, in a head to head basis which doesn't account for style so is largely pointless, can only say that i'd be confident in backing Ali to beat him, against Lewis and Holmes think his superior snappy jab could win the day
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Imperial Ghosty wrote:Just ask Walcott and La Starza how they felt after their fights with Marciano, one was on the receiving end of the most brutal KO in boxing history while the other had broken arms caused by punches, a small man yes and most likely beaten comfortably by the likes of Lewis, Holmes, Ali, Liston and Foreman but against anyone else he has every chance of knocking them out.
Riddick Bowe?
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Tyson had a brilliant chin, even at 35 well past his best he took 8 rounds of punishment from Lewis, not an easy thing to do
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
BALTIMORA wrote:The genius of PBF wrote:BALTIMORA wrote:coxy0001 wrote:Marciano's pressure style would never work against a fighter much bigger and stronger.
It would against one who had no heart and an even worse chin.
Before we get into a 'peak/prime' Tyson discussion AGAIN and I'm compelled to neck whatever I can find underneath the sink, Tyson wasn't as chinny as you're making out there coxy. He's hardly Enzo.
He said worse chin then Marciano...No mention of being chinny BALTI...Disagree with him though on the no heart issue
Tyson has more heart than coxy, has the heart to step in and face the likes of Lewis...Something I doubt you would have the heart to do.
Do yourself a favour and check your facts before posting simply to 'have a go'. Coxy said:Tyson was exposed as a chinless wonder
Thanks.
Do yourself a favour and quote it then!
Thanks
The genius of PBF- Posts : 1552
Join date : 2011-06-03
Age : 47
Location : Las Vegas
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Ignore Coxy. He's just upset because he is a low skilled worker.... A web designer, pretty easy stuff. A very respected colleague of mine once compared the skill of a road sweeper to a web designer.
"A broom is more difficult than java" he exclaimed!
"A broom is more difficult than java" he exclaimed!
Lumbering_Jack- Posts : 4341
Join date : 2011-03-07
Location : Newcastle
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend wrote:Imperial Ghosty wrote:Just ask Walcott and La Starza how they felt after their fights with Marciano, one was on the receiving end of the most brutal KO in boxing history while the other had broken arms caused by punches, a small man yes and most likely beaten comfortably by the likes of Lewis, Holmes, Ali, Liston and Foreman but against anyone else he has every chance of knocking them out.
Riddick Bowe?
Think he beats Bowe 8 times out of 10
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Imperial Ghosty wrote:HumanWindmill wrote:Just occurred to me that Sonny Liston isn't on the list.
Head - to - head he'd be a tough night for anybody on his best night. Sound technician, vicious puncher, authoritative jabber, with a reach the equal of Lennox Lewis' and a very strong chin.
The Liston who twice dismantled a peak Cleveland Williams was an awesome heavyweight.
Agreed Windy, in a head to head basis which doesn't account for style so is largely pointless, can only say that i'd be confident in backing Ali to beat him, against Lewis and Holmes think his superior snappy jab could win the day
Certainly agree about the styles thing, Ghosty.
The old adage : ' Boxer beats slugger beats swarmer beats boxer ' isn't always apt, but it's not a bad guideline. We need only think of the Ali / Frazier / Foreman round robin to see the underlying point.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Jimmy Wilde was a great great flyweight, beat bigger men, yes, but no one north of featherweight who was ever really that good.
He was a natural and small flyweight, why should he go upto feather? Dear me. And i guess we shouldn't give him any credit for beating Lynch @ Bantamweight then.
Tyson has more heart than coxy, has the heart to step in and face the likes of Lewis...Something I doubt you would have the heart to do.
Amusing comment of the day. Yup, i'm always going to have a chance to get in with a hw world champion because i've earnt the right to be there. Great comparison. Trot on please.
coxy0001- Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Pbf: you're the one trying to belittle me, the onus is on YOU to do your research.
BALTIMORA- Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
The first 'Super sized' heavyweight Liston fought he quit. Saying that he was probably in his 50's!
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
I asked everybody nicely to cut the personal stuff.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
coxy0001 wrote:Jimmy Wilde was a great great flyweight, beat bigger men, yes, but no one north of featherweight who was ever really that good.
He was a natural and small flyweight, why should he go upto feather? Dear me. And i guess we shouldn't give him any credit for beating Lynch @ Bantamweight then.Tyson has more heart than coxy, has the heart to step in and face the likes of Lewis...Something I doubt you would have the heart to do.
Amusing comment of the day. Yup, i'm always going to have a chance to get in with a hw world champion because i've earnt the right to be there. Great comparison. Trot on please.
No the most amusing comment when you said Tyson was chinless wonder...Always thought you looked at boxrec
Tyson proved many times in his career he had a chin
Last edited by The genius of PBF on Thu 14 Jul 2011, 4:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
The genius of PBF- Posts : 1552
Join date : 2011-06-03
Age : 47
Location : Las Vegas
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Give him credit, yes, but thats only a few pounds north. Lewis would out weight Marciano by 5 STONEcoxy0001 wrote:Jimmy Wilde was a great great flyweight, beat bigger men, yes, but no one north of featherweight who was ever really that good.
He was a natural and small flyweight, why should he go upto feather? Dear me. And i guess we shouldn't give him any credit for beating Lynch @ Bantamweight then.Tyson has more heart than coxy, has the heart to step in and face the likes of Lewis...Something I doubt you would have the heart to do.
Amusing comment of the day. Yup, i'm always going to have a chance to get in with a hw world champion because i've earnt the right to be there. Great comparison. Trot on please.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Lumbering_Jack wrote:Ignore Coxy. He's just upset because he is a low skilled worker.... A web designer, pretty easy stuff. A very respected colleague of mine once compared the skill of a road sweeper to a web designer.
"A broom is more difficult than java" he exclaimed!
Bearing in mind yesterday you were on about javascript and now you're saying java leads me to believe you don't actually know what you're on about. Mainly because java would never be used by a pure web designer as an application developer (which is what java inherently is) would be in charge of using such a programming language.
And you claim to be an IT manager? Thank god i'm not working under you
coxy0001- Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend wrote:The first 'Super sized' heavyweight Liston fought he quit. Saying that he was probably in his 50's!
Unfair.
Ali was a phenomenon. Liston chopped down the large and dangerous Cleveland Williams like an old tree. Don't see Liston losing to Moorer and don't see him nearly coming a cropper against Bert Cooper.
HumanWindmill- VIP
- Posts : 10945
Join date : 2011-02-18
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Tyson proved many times in his career he had a chin
Apart from getting wobbled by Bruno, knocked out by a journeyman, knocked out by a supposedly shot Holyfield.... lets not mention the rest shall we.
Funny how they didn't want any part of Lewis until he needed the money eh?
coxy0001- Posts : 4250
Join date : 2011-01-28
Location : Tory country
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Would give Tyson a chance against Lewis for instance who I think beats Foreman but Tyson stands little chance against Foreman
A beats B and B beats C doesn't mean A beats C
A beats B and B beats C doesn't mean A beats C
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
If this article has achieved anything then it's to establish the fact that Tyson was far from the "chinless wonder" that Coxy is making out.
He took an almighty beating against Lennox beofre going over in eight, a thorough beating against Douglas who bar the "long count" won pretty much every round. Took a vicious shots early in Holyfield 1 before bowing out in the eleventh and survived hefty bangs againt Bonecrusher and (don't laugh) Bruno as well. Hardly a chinless wonder and despite his failings as a person outside of the ring you can't say he lacked heart inside it.
He took an almighty beating against Lennox beofre going over in eight, a thorough beating against Douglas who bar the "long count" won pretty much every round. Took a vicious shots early in Holyfield 1 before bowing out in the eleventh and survived hefty bangs againt Bonecrusher and (don't laugh) Bruno as well. Hardly a chinless wonder and despite his failings as a person outside of the ring you can't say he lacked heart inside it.
Super D Boon- Posts : 2078
Join date : 2011-07-03
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
Imperial Ghosty wrote:Would give Tyson a chance against Lewis for instance who I think beats Foreman but Tyson stands little chance against Foreman
A beats B and B beats C doesn't mean A beats C
Spot on, thats the problem I had with this list. Foreman would slaughter Tyson due to styles, but I could see him struggling against Holyfields movement and boxing ability for example.
GaryMabbuttYidLegend- Posts : 41
Join date : 2011-07-12
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
coxy0001 wrote:Tyson proved many times in his career he had a chin
Apart from getting wobbled by Bruno, knocked out by a journeyman, knocked out by a supposedly shot Holyfield.... lets not mention the rest shall we.
Funny how they didn't want any part of Lewis until he needed the money eh?
Ali got decked by Henry Cooper did he not have a chin...No shame in getting stopped by a great in Holyfield
If you cant see that Tyson did have a chin then I feel very sorry for you.
Last edited by The genius of PBF on Thu 14 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
The genius of PBF- Posts : 1552
Join date : 2011-06-03
Age : 47
Location : Las Vegas
Re: Top 10 heavyweights on a who beats who basis.
coxy0001 wrote:Lumbering_Jack wrote:Ignore Coxy. He's just upset because he is a low skilled worker.... A web designer, pretty easy stuff. A very respected colleague of mine once compared the skill of a road sweeper to a web designer.
"A broom is more difficult than java" he exclaimed!
Bearing in mind yesterday you were on about javascript and now you're saying java leads me to believe you don't actually know what you're on about. Mainly because java would never be used by a pure web designer as an application developer (which is what java inherently is) would be in charge of using such a programming language.
And you claim to be an IT manager? Thank god i'm not working under you
We've got a nibble on the line... Reel him in guys.
Lumbering_Jack- Posts : 4341
Join date : 2011-03-07
Location : Newcastle
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Similar topics
» Top 10 Heavyweights...again
» The Gloves are Off - Heavyweights
» Boxer beats puncher, puncher beats swarmer, swarmer beats boxer
» My take on the Light-Heavyweights
» The most Underappreciated Heavyweights of alltime !!
» The Gloves are Off - Heavyweights
» Boxer beats puncher, puncher beats swarmer, swarmer beats boxer
» My take on the Light-Heavyweights
» The most Underappreciated Heavyweights of alltime !!
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum