The difinitrate historical social aspect of pugilism!

Does the current social demo graphic nature of pugilistic recompensation, evaluate the sysmastic reguvinate technicalities of fundemental capacities? This is a question asked over the years by many boxing experts. Is it too soon to investigate the devolution of asbestocated lucid thought on the over whelming pre determined saturised nature of pugilistic tendencies?

discuss.

Yes?

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:Does the current social demo graphic nature of pugilistic recompensation, evaluate the sysmastic reguvinate technicalities of fundemental capacities? This is a question asked over the years by many boxing experts.

Quite so.

Bert Sugar is always saying it.

I'd say yes

HumanWindmill wrote:

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:Does the current social demo graphic nature of pugilistic recompensation, evaluate the sysmastic reguvinate technicalities of fundemental capacities? This is a question asked over the years by many boxing experts.

Quite so.

Bert Sugar is always saying it.

I would love to hear Bert say that mouthful. The guy struggles with his own name at times. May be down to his reluctance to remove the cigar from his mouth though. Has anyone ever seen him smoke a lit cigar?

prettyboykev wrote:Has anyone ever seen him smoke a lit cigar?

I saw him do it once, kev.

It was while he was contemplating the age old problem of the socio economic demographic of combustible vegetables and the effect on the technicalities of the rejuvenation of the capacities of systematic lung tissues.

HumanWindmill wrote:

prettyboykev wrote:Has anyone ever seen him smoke a lit cigar?

I saw him do it once, kev.

It was while he was contemplating the age old problem of the socio economic demographic of combustible vegetables and the effect on the technicalities of the rejuvenation of the capacities of systematic lung tissues.

Haha. I've got one of his books and he actually used the word bejabbers!

prettyboykev wrote:

HumanWindmill wrote:

prettyboykev wrote:Has anyone ever seen him smoke a lit cigar?

I saw him do it once, kev.

It was while he was contemplating the age old problem of the socio economic demographic of combustible vegetables and the effect on the technicalities of the rejuvenation of the capacities of systematic lung tissues.

Haha. I've got one of his books and he actually used the word bejabbers!

Let me guess :

" Rocky Marciano and Joe Frazier be sluggers and Larry Holmes and Ken Norton be jabbers ! "

Close ?

HumanWindmill wrote:

prettyboykev wrote:

HumanWindmill wrote:

prettyboykev wrote:Has anyone ever seen him smoke a lit cigar?

I saw him do it once, kev.

It was while he was contemplating the age old problem of the socio economic demographic of combustible vegetables and the effect on the technicalities of the rejuvenation of the capacities of systematic lung tissues.

Haha. I've got one of his books and he actually used the word bejabbers!

Let me guess :

" Rocky Marciano and Joe Frazier be sluggers and Larry Holmes and Ken Norton be jabbers ! "

Close ?

Right on the money. Full points to you Windy. How that man has over 10 books is astounding.

Someone had better check the ESB forum to see where he got this latest claptrap from.

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:Does the current social demo graphic nature of pugilistic recompensation, evaluate the sysmastic reguvinate technicalities of fundemental capacities? This is a question asked over the years by many boxing experts. Is it too soon to investigate the devolution of asbestocated lucid thought on the over whelming pre determined saturised nature of pugilistic tendencies?

discuss.

Are you Chris Eubank?

prettyboykev wrote:How that man has over 10 books is astounding.

Some of his opinions are a bit left field, too, kev. Classic case of style over substance, I'd say.

Read something else today which was all style and no substance, though I'm darned if I can remember where..........................................................................................

Hero wrote:

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:Does the current social demo graphic nature of pugilistic recompensation, evaluate the sysmastic reguvinate technicalities of fundemental capacities? This is a question asked over the years by many boxing experts. Is it too soon to investigate the devolution of asbestocated lucid thought on the over whelming pre determined saturised nature of pugilistic tendencies?

discuss.

Are you Chris Eubank?

Cwis*

http://media-cards.theotaku.com/537852-20080914105006.jpg

You taking the p**s out of my American decline article windy.........

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:You taking the p**s out of my American decline article windy.........

You know I'd never do that, mate.

Well, not today, anyway.

Onetwo makes me wish I'd studied Human psychology instead....

Bet I could write several books on an author that produces a thread like this!!

Hate to state the obvious but the thread doesn't make sense.

It's grammatically woeful. How can a characteristic evaluate anything?

HumanWindmill wrote:http://media-cards.theotaku.com/537852-20080914105006.jpg

First time I've ever seen a Otaku website referenced, which leads me to ask what obsessive addiction anime/manga our resident administrator has?.