Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
+2
Liam_Main
CJB
6 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
After the success of Imperial Ghosty's all time rankings I think a ranking of current boxers would be enjoyable to see. Are people up for doing this?
If so we will start with heavyweight
1 Wladimir Klitschko
2 Vitali Klitschko
3 Tomasz Adamek
4 David Haye
5 Alexander Povetkin
6 Odlander Solis
7 Robert Helenius
8 Eddie Chambers
9 Alexander Dimitrenko
10 Denis Boytsov
11 Chris Arreola
12 Jean Marc Mormeck
13 Mike Perez
14 Tyson Fury
15 Luis Ortiz
If so we will start with heavyweight
1 Wladimir Klitschko
2 Vitali Klitschko
3 Tomasz Adamek
4 David Haye
5 Alexander Povetkin
6 Odlander Solis
7 Robert Helenius
8 Eddie Chambers
9 Alexander Dimitrenko
10 Denis Boytsov
11 Chris Arreola
12 Jean Marc Mormeck
13 Mike Perez
14 Tyson Fury
15 Luis Ortiz
CJB- Posts : 5762
Join date : 2011-04-24
Age : 30
Location : Croydon
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
1) Wladamir Klitschko
2) Vitali Klitschko
3) Tomasz Adamek
4) David Haye
5) Alexander Povetkin
6) Robert Helenius
7) Eddie Chambers
8) Odlanier Solis
9) Alexander Dimitrenko
10) Tony Thompson
11) Chris Arreola
12) Tyson Fury
13) Denis Boystov
14) Mike Perez
15) Ruslan Chagaev
2) Vitali Klitschko
3) Tomasz Adamek
4) David Haye
5) Alexander Povetkin
6) Robert Helenius
7) Eddie Chambers
8) Odlanier Solis
9) Alexander Dimitrenko
10) Tony Thompson
11) Chris Arreola
12) Tyson Fury
13) Denis Boystov
14) Mike Perez
15) Ruslan Chagaev
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
I think these kind of lists will require an awful lot of maintenance to keep updated as there will be new results coming on on an almost weekly basis which are sure to affect the rankings.
1. Wlad Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Povetkin
4. Solis
5. Adamek
6. Haye
7. Helenius
8. Boytsov
9. Dmitrenko
10. Chambers
11. Arreola
12. Chagaev
13. Ortiz
14. Thompson
15. Johnson
1. Wlad Klitschko
2. Vitali Klitschko
3. Povetkin
4. Solis
5. Adamek
6. Haye
7. Helenius
8. Boytsov
9. Dmitrenko
10. Chambers
11. Arreola
12. Chagaev
13. Ortiz
14. Thompson
15. Johnson
Colonial Lion- Posts : 689
Join date : 2011-03-01
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Lion if they are updated every 2/3 months I don't see it being an issue
CJB- Posts : 5762
Join date : 2011-04-24
Age : 30
Location : Croydon
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Well I admire your work ethic! I dont think I would have it in me to process of all the results and update 15 odd lists even on a yearly basis nevermind every 2/3 months!
Colonial Lion- Posts : 689
Join date : 2011-03-01
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
I don't think you need to repeat the list just see if people suggest changes and vote on them. Along them lines
CJB- Posts : 5762
Join date : 2011-04-24
Age : 30
Location : Croydon
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Is it really worth doing 15 fighters most weights don't have 10 fighters of note to rank.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Trying get some British fighters in the list
At the lower weights I will struggle with 15 but until at least Super bantam I can name 15 top fighters..
At the lower weights I will struggle with 15 but until at least Super bantam I can name 15 top fighters..
CJB- Posts : 5762
Join date : 2011-04-24
Age : 30
Location : Croydon
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Top fighters?
Theirs only two on the list your doing just now.
Theirs only two on the list your doing just now.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Ok well not top but decent. Ademak, Haye and Mormeck are top just at a different weight.
CJB- Posts : 5762
Join date : 2011-04-24
Age : 30
Location : Croydon
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Not sure about Mormeck but I'll give you the other two. I'll post my list up soon mate.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
I liked Mormeck, he kind of fell to pieces though, Haye's best win at cruiser for me at the time.
The Galveston Giant- Posts : 5333
Join date : 2011-02-23
Age : 39
Location : Scotland
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
To be fair he didn't have many good ones never fought Adamek, Cunningham or Huck but still called himself the number one cruiserweight in the World.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Not sure what's happened to him, he took two years off after Haye but came back wins over Oquendo, Maddalone and Ibragimov, hasn't fought since December.
The Galveston Giant- Posts : 5333
Join date : 2011-02-23
Age : 39
Location : Scotland
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Well he won 3 belts within 2 fights and moved up to HW after so wouldn't hold that against him or blame him for not sticking around.. Also Adamek had only had 2 fights at CW when Haye was beating Mormeck and had lost to Dawson at LHW the same year so don't see why Haye would have fought him.
paperbag_puncher- Posts : 2516
Join date : 2011-02-25
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Only 4 fights in nearly 4 years he looks done. I seen the Oquendo fight he was pretty lucky to get the decision that night a bit of home fighter favouritism in that one.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
I think Haye established himself as the number 1 cruiserweight by beating Mormeck but for me never really cemented much of a legacy in the division in terms of dominance or longetivity. Cunningham, Wlodarczyk, Banks, Bell, Huck and so on were all names missing and better than anything he beat outside Mormeck. Dont particularly blame him for moving up to heavyweight (although I think he could have made a better fist of it) but it came at the expense of really being able to say he dominated cruiserweight for any period of time.
Colonial Lion- Posts : 689
Join date : 2011-03-01
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
It sort of depends how you rate Cunningham and Adamek in comparison to Mormeck. Personally I think both would have probably beat Mormeck I say it about Cunningham with a bit more conviction tbh.
SugarRayRussell (PBK)- Posts : 6716
Join date : 2011-03-19
Age : 39
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Depends when they fought I think. Mormeck was ageing even when Haye faced him so anytime after that he would have been in his late 30s.
I dont think there was a great deal seperating most of those cruisers anyway. Haye, possibly, could have set himself out from the group with a couple of other wins as I suspect he was probably better than the others but I dont think there was a huge amount seperating about 4/5 of the other contenders.
I dont think there was a great deal seperating most of those cruisers anyway. Haye, possibly, could have set himself out from the group with a couple of other wins as I suspect he was probably better than the others but I dont think there was a huge amount seperating about 4/5 of the other contenders.
Colonial Lion- Posts : 689
Join date : 2011-03-01
Re: Official 606v2 Current Divisional rankings
Anyone going to do a ranking
CJB- Posts : 5762
Join date : 2011-04-24
Age : 30
Location : Croydon
Similar topics
» Official 606v2 Pound for Pound Rankings: RESULTS (2012 year-end)
» 606v2's official British top 10 rankings
» Official 606v2 British Pound for Pound Rankings: RESULTS
» ::Divisional Rankings:: - (Weight Class Rankings, Heavyweigh-Bantamweight) UPDATED
» 606V2 BRITISH POUND FOR POUND Top 10 rankings (please submit your current top 10)
» 606v2's official British top 10 rankings
» Official 606v2 British Pound for Pound Rankings: RESULTS
» ::Divisional Rankings:: - (Weight Class Rankings, Heavyweigh-Bantamweight) UPDATED
» 606V2 BRITISH POUND FOR POUND Top 10 rankings (please submit your current top 10)
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum