BOXREC and how to use it...
+12
Mind the windows Tino.
skidd1
BALTIMORA
coxy0001
bellchees
Scottrf
Imperial Ghosty
Rowley
AlexHuckerby
manos de piedra
HumanWindmill
oxring
16 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
BOXREC and how to use it...
First topic message reminder :
What value do we accord this august organ of boxing history?
The site certainly has value - I cannot remember fluently (shame I know) the full details of Sam Langford's career - in terms of the precise dates and manners in which he defeated Jeanette. I can check boxrec and note that the key victory was by 7th round stoppage.
The site also has ratings - which are close-to-reasonable for modern day fighters.
However - by their own admission the old-timer records are notoriously inaccurate:
Manos has an interesting - and as far as modern fighters go - an extremely valid method of using the ratings index. Not only does he look at the details of the fight - weights etc, he also checks the ages, future fights, past record, wins and losses of each fighter. As such - rather than just looking at things from a who-beat-who perspective, he builds a slightly more 3 dimensional picture of events.
The only point where this fails, in my opinion, is for old-time contests. Tancy Lee according to boxrec's career record finished with a resume of 12-7-1. This would make him a green novice when Wilde beat him and a green novice who beat Wilde. However - boxrec's own encyclopedia records Tancy as going 48-2-10 over the course of his career.
Somewhere, someone is inaccurate.
My conclusion is that boxrec for pre-war, especially pre-1930 fighters is OK if the rating is there, but more often than not it isn't. Its useful to remind you of fight weights or fight endings, but more conclusions than that can't be drawn. They are really bad at the lighter weights - as there are fewer records for those fighters.
However - post war - the ratings can give a relatively rounded and impartial picture of the events before and during a fight.
What value do we accord this august organ of boxing history?
The site certainly has value - I cannot remember fluently (shame I know) the full details of Sam Langford's career - in terms of the precise dates and manners in which he defeated Jeanette. I can check boxrec and note that the key victory was by 7th round stoppage.
The site also has ratings - which are close-to-reasonable for modern day fighters.
However - by their own admission the old-timer records are notoriously inaccurate:
boxrec wrote:There admittedly are inaccuracies and anomalies, especially in the All-Time ratings, because of incomplete records in the BoxRec database. Although a boxer’s own record may be complete, his opponents’ records may not be complete. Pre-World War II boxers in particular are at somewhat of a disadvantage, vis-à-vis modern boxers. Their opponents’ records often are quite incomplete--because of the scarcity of source material or Editors' time--while the records of opponents of more current boxers often are quite complete. So, for example, while the records of Mike Tyson’s opponents may be quite complete--thereby earning Tyson a certain number of points and giving him a high ranking among the All-Time Heavyweights--the records of Young Stribling’s opponents may be extremely lacking, thereby giving Stribling fewer points and a much-lower All-Time rating. And it may appear to the casual BoxRec visitor that Stribling had fought many boxers making their professional debuts or having had only a handful of career bouts, when the truth is that not all of his opponents’ total career bouts have been entered yet into the database by an Editor. (Too many of those old-time bouts are forever lost in history because they were not reported by a newspaper or similar source, or the source was later destroyed.) But as the BoxRec Editors continue to research older resources and enter “new” historical bouts into the database, the rating of an old-time boxer like Stribling will gradually move up or down, even if his own record is complete--if bouts are added to his opponents’ records, or to his opponents' opponents' records, and so forth. So the BoxRec ratings are continually improving as new bouts are entered into the database. (Presently, some 2,000 current and old-time bouts are entered each week by the BoxRec Editors.)
Manos has an interesting - and as far as modern fighters go - an extremely valid method of using the ratings index. Not only does he look at the details of the fight - weights etc, he also checks the ages, future fights, past record, wins and losses of each fighter. As such - rather than just looking at things from a who-beat-who perspective, he builds a slightly more 3 dimensional picture of events.
The only point where this fails, in my opinion, is for old-time contests. Tancy Lee according to boxrec's career record finished with a resume of 12-7-1. This would make him a green novice when Wilde beat him and a green novice who beat Wilde. However - boxrec's own encyclopedia records Tancy as going 48-2-10 over the course of his career.
Somewhere, someone is inaccurate.
My conclusion is that boxrec for pre-war, especially pre-1930 fighters is OK if the rating is there, but more often than not it isn't. Its useful to remind you of fight weights or fight endings, but more conclusions than that can't be drawn. They are really bad at the lighter weights - as there are fewer records for those fighters.
However - post war - the ratings can give a relatively rounded and impartial picture of the events before and during a fight.
oxring- Moderator
- Posts : 3782
Join date : 2011-01-26
Location : Oxford
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Dawson beat Hopkins though if you do it in a linear sense.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Dawson didn't beat Hopkins though Scott.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
He did, and the commission haven't overturned it.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Hopkins is still the WBC and lineal champion, don't really think you can say he lost that fight based on still having his titles.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Imperial Ghosty wrote:Dawson didn't beat Hopkins though Scott.
This is where Boxrec comes into its own...
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=60393&cat=boxer
Union Cane- Moderator
- Posts : 11328
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 48
Location : Whatever truculent means, if that's good, I'm that.
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
The WBC is just to do with money, he lost it due to the referee not ruling it a foul and Hopkins not being able to continue.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
What relevance has a supposed win have when the sanctioning body don't recognize you as there champion?
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
I doubt you consider Pacquiao a geniune LMW champion.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Imperial Ghosty wrote:What relevance has a supposed win have when the sanctioning body don't recognize you as there champion?
It isn't a supposed win though, Chad Dawson won by TKO in round 2.
Are you saying that Hopkins won then?
Union Cane- Moderator
- Posts : 11328
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 48
Location : Whatever truculent means, if that's good, I'm that.
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
In a world title fight i'm going to take the stance of the sanctioning body and they ruled it a No Contest, in what shape or form did Dawson actually win that fight?
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
I don't think the 'Boxrec and how to use it' thread had the desired effect.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Same way Byrd beat Vitali.Imperial Ghosty wrote:In a world title fight i'm going to take the stance of the sanctioning body and they ruled it a No Contest, in what shape or form did Dawson actually win that fight?
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Byrd became WBO champion after that fight did he not while Hopkins is still the WBC champion.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
So which is correct?Imperial Ghosty wrote:Byrd became WBO champion after that fight did he not while Hopkins is still the WBC champion.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Different circumstances, the WBO recognized Byrd as champion while the WBC don't recognize Dawson as champion, a prime reason why Boxrec doesn't work.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Did Dawson not get the belt after he beat Hopkins?
Union Cane- Moderator
- Posts : 11328
Join date : 2011-01-27
Age : 48
Location : Whatever truculent means, if that's good, I'm that.
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Boxrec relies on the commission, who actually control the contests to decide the winners. Not the belts who merely control the Champions.
Boxrec will recognise Hopkins as Champion, but will recognise it as a loss until the commission decide otherwise.
It works.
Boxrec will recognise Hopkins as Champion, but will recognise it as a loss until the commission decide otherwise.
It works.
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
Directly after but that was fairly swiftly over turned.
Imperial Ghosty- Posts : 10156
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: BOXREC and how to use it...
To be fair ghosty - the sanctioning commission have the final say on who wins a fight and how - not the corrupt *gentlemen, excuse my language - at the WBC.
It wasn't ruled a foul - so by the rules its a TKO. For now. So boxrec is well within their rights to keep Dawson as king until the commission declare he is no longer king.
It wasn't ruled a foul - so by the rules its a TKO. For now. So boxrec is well within their rights to keep Dawson as king until the commission declare he is no longer king.
oxring- Moderator
- Posts : 3782
Join date : 2011-01-26
Location : Oxford
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» What are Boxrec doing?
» boxrec
» "What if" - on Boxrec
» Boxrec Ranking System for those who need to know?
» Boxrec British top 5 is an embarrassment.
» boxrec
» "What if" - on Boxrec
» Boxrec Ranking System for those who need to know?
» Boxrec British top 5 is an embarrassment.
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum