Furious Football Association © : HomePage Season 2, Page 16

Well if you look at that message I think it's on page 6 of your Liverpool page I didn't put an ENQ on the offer which means you could have said yes and the deal would go through.

yeah and this week i am not playing in europe so just the 3 injuries for me i guess

Top scorers at this point (not including Nicks league week 2 results)

Top Scorers
Falcao 6
RVP 5
Hulk 4
Adebayor 3
Agbonlahor 3
Cisse 3
Gamiero 3
Milito 3
Soldado 3
Barrios 2
Bastos 2
Defoe 2
Gourcuff 2
Jovetic 2
Nilmar 2
Podolski 2
Suarez 2
Kerzhakov 2
Bale 1
Bojan 1
Borges 1
Dempsey 1
Dzagoev 1
Eriksen 1
Gaitan 1
Gomis 1
Helguson 1
Huntelaar 1
Kanoute 1
Kranjcar 1
Lopez 1
Matri 1
Modric 1
Pirlo 1
Reyes 1
Vargas 1
VDV 1
Lennon 1
Pastore 1
Cardozo 1
Salvio 1
Nene 1
Hazard 1
Kuyt 1

Euro tactics submitted. Can league runners have a look to see if it is ok please.

Length wise it isn't long, but I tend to paragraph my stuff which means the post seems longer than what it actually is.

I will change it, if problems.

Good luck KB

All looks fine to me

It does say on the rule page that you can only have 8 lines for subs and I've counted 14 from you Twist not that I mind but some people might moan.

Makes no odds to me as his opponent.

One sec....I change it

Marchisio-MVila-Vidal

would be a good mid trio?

March and Vidal can both get forward

what you reckon

Unlucky Nay:

Paris Saint Germain sporting director Leonardo has said the French club have ended their interest in Manchester City striker Carlos Tevez after failing to agree a deal

VivaPaulScholes wrote:It does say on the rule page that you can only have 8 lines for subs and I've counted 14 from you Twist not that I mind but some people might moan.

I have it as 7 lines of text?

Macclads wrote:Unlucky Nay:

Paris Saint Germain sporting director Leonardo has said the French club have ended their interest in Manchester City striker Carlos Tevez after failing to agree a deal

I hope he rots in the reserves, peolpe like him who dont know how good they have it make me angry

That should now make 8 sub lines now.

I wouldn't even stick him in the reserves poisoning them.
I'd force him to turn up and play alone in all conditions, if he stays in Argentina playing golf then dock him his wage every week whilst he continues.

As soon as they sell him they are gonna sue him.

He is trouble, and noo one should sign him..but he will sign elsewhere for 6 months before he wants out again..

Seriously whats he all about

Happy with2-2 twist what make of the result?

would you say that was a fairly balanced midfield?

Shud I go 1-3-2 or 2-3-1

Walcott is the weak link for you still, too many people just don't rate him.

Macclads wrote:Walcott is the weak link for you still, too many people just don't rate him.

I have a target in mind but will have to wait now, he will have to do or is Ilicic rated RW?

cherriesfan wrote:Happy with2-2 twist what make of the result?

Not that over joyed cherries lol. The result was fair enough, but some of the reasons given were very suspect. People complaining about Agger and Taylor playing as FB, when they have played these positions for their teams in RL. Plus...Heskey scoring a goal right at the death??? Sorry, but I think that was only given as a joke, as we made a lot of fun about you signing Heskey. No manager on here would be happy with him scoring against your team, given his age, current status and scoring record.

Still...well played Cherries

Ilicic can play wide left, Perotti wide right

Better?

TwisT wrote:

cherriesfan wrote:Happy with2-2 twist what make of the result?

Not that over joyed cherries lol. The result was fair enough, but some of the reasons given were very suspect. People complaining about Agger and Taylor playing as FB, when they have played these positions for their teams in RL. Plus...Heskey scoring a goal right at the death??? Sorry, but I think that was only given as a joke, as we made a lot of fun about you signing Heskey. No manager on here would be happy with him scoring against your team, given his age, current status and scoring record.

Still...well played Cherries

Apparently it was bundled over the line with meant he probably fell over kicking it landed on his arse ball hithisface and goes in

cherriesfan wrote:

TwisT wrote:

cherriesfan wrote:Happy with2-2 twist what make of the result?

Not that over joyed cherries lol. The result was fair enough, but some of the reasons given were very suspect. People complaining about Agger and Taylor playing as FB, when they have played these positions for their teams in RL. Plus...Heskey scoring a goal right at the death??? Sorry, but I think that was only given as a joke, as we made a lot of fun about you signing Heskey. No manager on here would be happy with him scoring against your team, given his age, current status and scoring record.

Still...well played Cherries

Apparently it was bundled over the line with meant he probably fell over kicking it landed on his arse ball hithisface and goes in

That in itself makes it even more laughable if someone has come up with a situation of that happening. Like I said, Heskey was only given a goal because we was ribbing you about signing him. I think I might try and sign Tomas Brolin to combat this way of thinking. Joke players = Joke goals it seems

Is it really a big deal that he scored?

Do people who score against you cost you later on in the season?

One of the votes on my game was that my scorer was Godin.

This was my instruction to Godin:

Expecting Adrian alone up front so if that’s the case Godin is to man mark as he can match him for pace and is excellent at nullifying attackers.

He man marked their lone striker.
Since when did he suddenly maraud up field? Not that I'm complaining over my score I just thought that was an odd choice of scorer when there was so many more likely options.

Doesn't make a big deal anyway as those are the results.

TBH I am more annoyed over the RB/LB situation. Not just because it is wrong, but because I have no way of changing it for the season. Taylor will be my RB, and Agger will be my LB unless in Domestic Cup games. If people on here think they can't play those positions, then there is nothing I can do.

I agree on the full backs, i considered bidding for Taylor as i wanted him as my RB.

Taylor and Agger both can play FB, but there best position and more natural positions are CB, I never took them into account really as both are solid defenders, Agger left footed so dont see the problem him playing FB ditto with Taylor

I think the majority of voters will look at Taylor and Agger at FB and realise they can play there. It might count against you if you try getting to go forward in a Dani Alves style, but defensively it won't count against you for 90% of the managers

My reasoning exactly Fan. Not natural FB's but able to fill that position solidly, and more importantly, have done on numerous occasions for their RL teams.

Look at Arsenal v Man U at the weekend for instance.....Arsenal had a back four of four CB's. Vermaelen played as a LB!

Well done Afro, I think the almost identical game plans were always going to see it your way with your quality.

Not too displeased though, some decent feedback, and Gabby bagged another...

Looking forward to our game on Friday Sodhat?

I agree Afro, and I realised that. That is why I said for both of them to stay back and concentrate on defence. I have two fast wingers, that don't need FB overlapping.

So when you have two managers that put this....

Malaga have centre backs playing full back roles, the unnatural positions and the fact that they have been told to stay tight makes it easy for the wingers to play round them, causing malaga problems

Steven Taylor is the weak link in an otherise good Malaga team. He's not a RB and is easily beaten by the pace of the Spurs winger who sets up an Adebayor brace. Spurs don't have the best defence ever so I can see Malaga nicking a consolation.

......I tend to think wtf! The reasoning is wrong, and that cost me.

Macclads wrote:Looking forward to our game on Friday Sodhat?

Yes and no. In the sense that I get to write long tactics to try and combat your array of stars, yes. In the sense that they probably won't work, no.

Macclads wrote:One of the votes on my game was that my scorer was Godin.

This was my instruction to Godin:

Expecting Adrian alone up front so if that’s the case Godin is to man mark as he can match him for pace and is excellent at nullifying attackers.

He man marked their lone striker.
Since when did he suddenly maraud up field? Not that I'm complaining over my score I just thought that was an odd choice of scorer when there was so many more likely options.

What about from a corner? would make sense

You write cracking tactics mate, always enjoy reading them. Might have to mix up my set up this week to combat what I think you'll do.

fernando wrote:

Macclads wrote:One of the votes on my game was that my scorer was Godin.

This was my instruction to Godin:

Expecting Adrian alone up front so if that’s the case Godin is to man mark as he can match him for pace and is excellent at nullifying attackers.

He man marked their lone striker.
Since when did he suddenly maraud up field? Not that I'm complaining over my score I just thought that was an odd choice of scorer when there was so many more likely options.

What about from a corner? would make sense

But I'd instructed to target Fellaini on corners/fks. Can understand your reasoning but it just seems a very odd choice.

anyway am offski lads, back shift the rest of the week so will be on from 2PM onwards

Have fun

Macclads wrote:You write cracking tactics mate, always enjoy reading them. Might have to mix up my set up this week to combat what I think you'll do.

My problem is I've no idea what I'm going to do!

I might buy Heskey off cherries and watch him destroy Chiellini for a hat-trick.

Hero - I would target Darron Gibson IRL (with a gun). He has played two games and in both games Fellaini has looked a shadow of himself, two really poor games from him

You can buy him off me if you want Afro...then you can do what you want with him.

I wrote the top comment, and I stand by it, the main issue is not the cb and fb tho that does play a part, the main reason I saw it as your weakness was how tight you tod them to get,whixh I detailed. Tight to a cb is slightly differrnt to tight to a fb, and this fact meant the wingers plqyed round ..y.ou. That is the only reaon I commented on cb being payed in full back roles.

Macclads wrote:

fernando wrote:

Macclads wrote:One of the votes on my game was that my scorer was Godin.

This was my instruction to Godin:

Expecting Adrian alone up front so if that’s the case Godin is to man mark as he can match him for pace and is excellent at nullifying attackers.

He man marked their lone striker.
Since when did he suddenly maraud up field? Not that I'm complaining over my score I just thought that was an odd choice of scorer when there was so many more likely options.

What about from a corner? would make sense

But I'd instructed to target Fellaini on corners/fks. Can understand your reasoning but it just seems a very odd choice.

Could of been from a knock down by Fellaini and lets face it corners don't go to plan at the best of times

So you had Godin scoring then?

come on nick your making me nervous now

Nick isn't around today, so Viva's league's results won't be until tomorrow

Well apart from Mertesacker and dominguez athletico aren't a tall side

TwisT wrote:My reasoning exactly Fan. Not natural FB's but able to fill that position solidly, and more importantly, have done on numerous occasions for their RL teams.

Look at Arsenal v Man U at the weekend for instance.....Arsenal had a back four of four CB's. Vermaelen played as a LB!

And Nani, valencia, giggs, evra got round them with ease