MasterChef bucking the trend.
4 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Cricket
Page 1 of 1
MasterChef bucking the trend.
Morning all, here is a blog of mine from yesterday regarding the transformation of Alastair Cook's limited overs career since taking the ODI captaincy. Also, in the process, it appears that Cook has proven to the cricketing world of late that an opening batsman in ODI cricket does not have to clear the infield and/or the rope on a regular basis. What were your thoughts on Cook being made ODI captain, and what are they now in hindsight? Can England find success by adopting the more traditional ODI strategy, as opposed to the new age power hitting philosophy?
I'd be interested to know your thoughts.
I'd be interested to know your thoughts.
Admittedly, the finished product is more beans on toast, perhaps with a sprinkle of Lea & Perrins, than the comparative basque piparade likely to be served up by many of his opposite numbers, but this chef’s dish of choice requires only a small glug of water to help it down before you realise that it satisfies every bit as much.
In the age of the swashbuckling, gun slinging limited overs opening batsman, the appointment of Alastair Cook as England One Day International captain was met with a fair degree of scepticism by a number of fans, members of the media and former players alike. Not only was Cook too much of a plodder himself, at that time averaging a shade over 30 with a ponderous strike rate of 68, but the thought of a mid-powerplay partnership involving he and Jonathan Trott was considered to be akin to a sign of impending apocalypse; the type of dreary bore fest that may even see one Geoffrey Boycott calling for a switch hit.
With significant onus on ‘Chef’ to prove them wrong, the Essex opener has proceeded to do so in a manner that even the most ardent of Cook aficionados could never have envisaged.
Disparate to football, the garb of a cricket captain sees no embellishment of rank, yet the physical and mental changes wrought in Cook’s limited overs batting since presiding over the ODI captaincy have revealed abundantly more than a mere gesture of status ever could. Most importantly, his statistics whilst captain show a far more impressive average of 55.93, with an adventurous strike rate comfortably in excess of 90 runs per 100 balls. Secondly, Cook has shown that the crash bang wallop model of opening batsmanship, a prerequisite for Twenty20 cricket, is not necessarily applicable to the 50 over format. Knowing your strengths, subtly manoeuvring the field and playing risk free strokes can still lead to success, it would seem.
On his way to becoming the first England ODI captain to score successive centuries whilst plundering 102 runs against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi today, a fixture which England won by 20 runs to take an unassailable 2-0 series lead, Alastair Cook must surely now have silenced those rather more vocal doubters. Showing that there is still most definitely room for the more classical opener in ODI cricket, Captain Cook will have pleased a few purists along the way.
Thankfully for England, the side in world cricket most notorious for their failure to clear the ropes inside the first ten overs of an ODI powerplay, that old adage of building a platform before hitting out late on with wickets in hand can perhaps still prove to be a successful strategy, particularly with a batsman of Alastair Cook’s considerable class at the helm.
http://andy-bloxham.blogspot.com
Re: MasterChef bucking the trend.
Cook was made skipper for the wrong reasons in my honest opinion. This being, the ECB see him as the next test skipper when Strauss gets dropped, sorry retires.
That said, he and more importantly the team are doing well winning, so you cannot argue too much.
Regarding having a orthodox opener and number three. I personally see nothing wrong with that and never have. For too long we have been looking for the new Gilchrist and are still looking.
England's present problem is the last 10 overs.
That said, he and more importantly the team are doing well winning, so you cannot argue too much.
Regarding having a orthodox opener and number three. I personally see nothing wrong with that and never have. For too long we have been looking for the new Gilchrist and are still looking.
England's present problem is the last 10 overs.
Stella- Posts : 6671
Join date : 2011-08-01
Re: MasterChef bucking the trend.
Nice blog entry
Well, Cook would never have been my choice to get into the one-day team when the captaincy came up (at that stage I felt England's best batting line-up was Trott, Bell, Pietersen, Morgan, Bopara, Davies).
However, it is clear that he has worked hard on batting in a way which doesn't make it awkward to have both him and Trott in the team. In any case I think England are wrong to use hitters at the top if they are just a 'poor man's' Sehwag or Gilchrist.
The opening pairs in the last 4 World Cup winning teams would show that hitters for hitters sake don't quite do the job - all of those below have been superb Test players as well:
'99 M. Waugh and Gilchrist
'03 Hayden and Gilchrist
'07 Hayden and Gilchrist
'11 Tendulkar and Sehwag
The biggest issue at the moment is that we are not kicking on to make 300 off the back of good starts. Certainly, if Cook is going to open in more helpful conditions for batsmen, the trade-off needs to be some consistent hitters lower down to score at 9 an over in the last 10. For this we need Buttler quickly.
Well, Cook would never have been my choice to get into the one-day team when the captaincy came up (at that stage I felt England's best batting line-up was Trott, Bell, Pietersen, Morgan, Bopara, Davies).
However, it is clear that he has worked hard on batting in a way which doesn't make it awkward to have both him and Trott in the team. In any case I think England are wrong to use hitters at the top if they are just a 'poor man's' Sehwag or Gilchrist.
The opening pairs in the last 4 World Cup winning teams would show that hitters for hitters sake don't quite do the job - all of those below have been superb Test players as well:
'99 M. Waugh and Gilchrist
'03 Hayden and Gilchrist
'07 Hayden and Gilchrist
'11 Tendulkar and Sehwag
The biggest issue at the moment is that we are not kicking on to make 300 off the back of good starts. Certainly, if Cook is going to open in more helpful conditions for batsmen, the trade-off needs to be some consistent hitters lower down to score at 9 an over in the last 10. For this we need Buttler quickly.
Shelsey93- Posts : 3134
Join date : 2011-12-14
Age : 31
Re: MasterChef bucking the trend.
I have always believed that he could make it as a batsman but had doubts over his captaincy abilities.I still have but he is improving.
ShankyCricket- Posts : 4546
Join date : 2011-01-28
Age : 30
Re: MasterChef bucking the trend.
Buttler will, in time, be a very useful addition. I think a few of you have it spot on when saying that Cook's style, along with Trott, are just fine as long as you have the ability lower down the order to consistently hit boundaries and 10 runs per over in the last 10 overs.
Similar topics
» MasterChef bucking the trend...
» 6 Nations Masterchef.
» 6 Nations MasterChef
» Wales. A blip of a trend.
» Mancienne. Start of a trend?
» 6 Nations Masterchef.
» 6 Nations MasterChef
» Wales. A blip of a trend.
» Mancienne. Start of a trend?
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Cricket
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum