are the WWE being dishonest?
4 posters
The v2 Forum :: Wrestling :: Wrestling
Page 1 of 1
are the WWE being dishonest?
The Rock v Cena this year at Mania 28 is being billed as the once in a lifetime encounter between the two and yet there are rumours in circulation that the two will face off again after Mania (presumably SummerSlam); if these rumours are true then I feel WWE are being dishonest in their promotion and advertisement of this year's Mania.
Also HHH v Taker has been billed as the end of an era and yet there are rumours of of a HHH v HBK for WM 29; again if true (and I sincerely hope this one isn't) how is this match an end of an era if it is bringing HBK out of retirement? I appreciate that the era refers to the Streak but if Taker beats HHH, through interference by HBK or not, then what is the betting that WWE won't be tempted to wheel Taker out next year as well!?
So does this year's Mania have any integrity?
Also HHH v Taker has been billed as the end of an era and yet there are rumours of of a HHH v HBK for WM 29; again if true (and I sincerely hope this one isn't) how is this match an end of an era if it is bringing HBK out of retirement? I appreciate that the era refers to the Streak but if Taker beats HHH, through interference by HBK or not, then what is the betting that WWE won't be tempted to wheel Taker out next year as well!?
So does this year's Mania have any integrity?
talkingpoint- Posts : 1605
Join date : 2011-02-20
Location : Essex Made Punk
Re: are the WWE being dishonest?
In regards to Rock v Cena, they aren't being dishonest as it is a once in a lifetime encounter as it stands at the moment. If the Summerslam match goes ahead, then obviously they cannot bill it as such.
Undertaker v HHH is a difficult one, because it all depends on the ending of the match. If HHH v HBK is true for the next WM, then I suppose thats leads us to believe that they will be a screwy finish on Sunday which gets Taker the win.
Undertaker v HHH is a difficult one, because it all depends on the ending of the match. If HHH v HBK is true for the next WM, then I suppose thats leads us to believe that they will be a screwy finish on Sunday which gets Taker the win.
TwisT- Posts : 17835
Join date : 2011-05-23
Age : 40
Location : Kent
Re: are the WWE being dishonest?
TwisT wrote:Undertaker v HHH is a difficult one, because it all depends on the ending of the match. If HHH v HBK is true for the next WM, then I suppose thats leads us to believe that they will be a screwy finish on Sunday which gets Taker the win.
I'm starting to imagine that the match will be dominated by HHH, with the end coming by HBK hitting Sweet Chin Music on HHH but was aiming for Taker (possibly goading into doing so). Then having to reluctantly count 3.
This would lead us into next year's wrestlemania. Probably apology attempt on Raw monday after WM.
Guest- Guest
Re: are the WWE being dishonest?
the thing I really hate about the prospect of a HBK v HHH for WM29 is that means one of them is going to have to lose at Mania three times on the trot!
talkingpoint- Posts : 1605
Join date : 2011-02-20
Location : Essex Made Punk
Re: are the WWE being dishonest?
I think it'll be a trip threat match with Taker.
Hero- Founder
- Posts : 28291
Join date : 2012-03-02
Age : 48
Location : Work toilet
Re: are the WWE being dishonest?
Teddy is going to win control of both brands and as a celebration he's going to add Kane to the mix and make it a tag match playa!
MIG- Sheep Champ
- Posts : 1299
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 42
Similar topics
» Bad/Dishonest Judging is a reflection of the times !!
» Springbok camp are disillusioned and dishonest
» Springbok camp are disillusioned and dishonest
The v2 Forum :: Wrestling :: Wrestling
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum