The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

The reason that England didn't get Farrell

Go down

The reason that England didn't get Farrell Empty The reason that England didn't get Farrell

Post by Guest Fri Apr 20, 2012 4:34 pm

Apparently Saracens were offered only £60k for the remaining 2 years on his contract. Perhaps England didn't really want him in the first place?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/article-2132498/Andy-Farrell--Saracens-offered-just-60-000-RFU.html

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

The reason that England didn't get Farrell Empty Re: The reason that England didn't get Farrell

Post by Portnoy Fri Apr 20, 2012 6:50 pm

I am more than pleased that Farrell was not selected. After all the £60,000 was just a payoff to the Saracens before they started negotiating a personal salary.

This is the attack coach that has generated very little in terms of tries for club or country.

In fact I think that he is more interested in keeping his own whitewash unsullied than dirtying the opposition's.

Not a bad stop-gap backs coach, but a totally uninspiring one looking forward.

A £60k expenditure just to get down to a nominal zero seems more than generous. Let the Sarries keep him...
Portnoy
Portnoy

Posts : 4396
Join date : 2011-06-06
Age : 74
Location : Felixstowe, Tigers, England

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum