The v2 Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

+9
Adam D
coxy0001
Young_Towzer
azania
Imperial Ghosty
D4thincarnation
SugarRayRussell (PBK)
BALTIMORA
MickeyGoldmill
13 posters

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by MickeyGoldmill Thu 05 May 2011, 11:47 pm

First topic message reminder :


Why has manny (or at least his management) stipulated weight for his last few fights?

Margarito - 150/1
Cotto -145
DLH - 147

Also why DIDN'T they stipulate a weight for the Clottey fight?

I'm a massive fan of manny's attacking style, I think all the fights would have gone the same way at the full weight but maybe he'd had a bit of harder nights work or less stoppage results.

Thoughts?

MickeyGoldmill

Posts : 21
Join date : 2011-03-01

Back to top Go down


Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by MickeyGoldmill Fri 06 May 2011, 10:46 am

Blimey, what has any of the last page got to do with the original question.

A debates a debate, you're never going to convince a die hard fan their guy would get beat. They're not going to read a sentence from someone they've never met and say "actually you've changed my mind he would get beat." You'll never know till FMJ and MP get in the ring.

Back on topic; If a few pounds makes no difference why stipulate it? Cotto was asked outright if the weight had an affect (after press comments after the DLH) fight. Naturally he'd say it has no effect.

Don't detract from the debate, OK MP has more pull on the $$$ side of things but surely any die hard MP fan would agree his his achievements would have been more impressive at the full weight?


MickeyGoldmill

Posts : 21
Join date : 2011-03-01

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by azania Fri 06 May 2011, 10:51 am

Welcome aboard Mickey. Excellent and succint post which answers the OP. But suffice to say MP fans will clutch at straws to say the weight of Cotto had zero effect. The bottom line is we will never know. As such I put an asterix next to many of Pac's wins.

azania

Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by BALTIMORA Fri 06 May 2011, 10:58 am

coxy0001 wrote:Steven

FACT:

Why, if it didn't matter one iota, did team Manny enforce a catchweight stip for the fight?

This was exactly my point when I asked D4 the question originally, four times. I doubt anyone really thinks an extra couple of pounds made a difference, but when someone like D4 tries to discredit another boxer's win due to the other guy struggling by a pound or two, then the argument is equally valid in this instance.

The point isn't that the weight stip was why Cotto lost, but rather that if it WAS so ineffectual why have it at all?

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by BALTIMORA Fri 06 May 2011, 10:59 am

azania wrote:Welcome aboard Mickey. Excellent and succint post which answers the OP. But suffice to say MP fans will clutch at straws to say the weight of Cotto had zero effect. The bottom line is we will never know. As such I put an asterix next to many of Pac's wins.

Wasn't it his OP?

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by azania Fri 06 May 2011, 11:11 am

BALTIMORA wrote:
azania wrote:Welcome aboard Mickey. Excellent and succint post which answers the OP. But suffice to say MP fans will clutch at straws to say the weight of Cotto had zero effect. The bottom line is we will never know. As such I put an asterix next to many of Pac's wins.

Wasn't it his OP?

Indeed it was. He answered his own question. Bloomin eck, it took him 100 posts and some P taking on here to get there.

azania

Posts : 19471
Join date : 2011-01-29
Age : 112

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by wow_junky Fri 06 May 2011, 11:15 am

It's not rocket science, IMO.

His team weren't sure how the progession through the weights would work so they opted for 135lb -> 140lb -> 145lb -> 147lb -> 150lb

As it turns out Pac could probably have gone 135lb -> 140lb -> 147lb, but it was obviously a risk that his team didn't want to take.

And I am aware that the Oscar fight was between Pacs 135lb and 140lb fights, but that was a win-win fight and too good to turn down - Pac was a massive, massive underdog so losing wouldn't have been too much of a setback.

Personally, I think fighting Hatton at 140lb then Cotto at 145lb is better than fighting Hatton at 140lb, followed by a weak tune up at 147lb and then Cotto at 147lb. I don't really care about the Margo fight, it was pointless and there was no need for it to be for a title.

wow_junky

Posts : 358
Join date : 2011-03-08
Location : Bristol

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by BALTIMORA Fri 06 May 2011, 11:54 am

wow_junky wrote:It's not rocket science, IMO.

His team weren't sure how the progession through the weights would work so they opted for 135lb -> 140lb -> 145lb -> 147lb -> 150lb

As it turns out Pac could probably have gone 135lb -> 140lb -> 147lb, but it was obviously a risk that his team didn't want to take.

And I am aware that the Oscar fight was between Pacs 135lb and 140lb fights, but that was a win-win fight and too good to turn down - Pac was a massive, massive underdog so losing wouldn't have been too much of a setback.

Personally, I think fighting Hatton at 140lb then Cotto at 145lb is better than fighting Hatton at 140lb, followed by a weak tune up at 147lb and then Cotto at 147lb. I don't really care about the Margo fight, it was pointless and there was no need for it to be for a title.

I think everyone thinks the same on that, the main issue is that if it made no difference then it wouldn't have been in place. The logical inference therefore is that that 145lb stip DID make a difference.

BALTIMORA

Posts : 5566
Join date : 2011-02-18
Age : 44
Location : This user is no longer active.

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by OasisBFC Fri 06 May 2011, 11:56 am

if d4 is fighting manny's corner he will never back down - to the point where he is answering blindly without any consideration that there may be 2 sides to the story.

the fact is he was happy to fight oscar at 147 and clottey but not cotto for a reason.

the same with marg at light middle. yes he is beating these big guys, but apart from cotto, none have been any good by the time he fights them.

his win over hatton was fantastic though, no excuses for that one - even if his training wasnt supposed to be so good. ricky was blown away plain and simple, something that bigger fighters couldnt do

OasisBFC

Posts : 1050
Join date : 2011-02-24
Location : Manchester

Back to top Go down

Why does manny's management stipulate weight? - Page 3 Empty Re: Why does manny's management stipulate weight?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum