The Worst arguments you've ever heard on 606 ??

First topic message reminder :

1. "Duran lost to Hearns because he was much bigger at 154 !!"........Barkley was 6ft 1 and 160...........Hagler 160 and he lost by a point !!

2. "Mayweather isn't top 10 because he didn't beat anyone decent...But Louis is at 6"...............No rebuttal needed there..

3. "Hearns didn't deserve a rematch with Marvin"..Despite the Fight of the decade and knocking out the number one contender of both wbc and WBA.....love to know what you have to do for one.....

4. "Leon Spinks is better than Muhammad Ali"........

5. "Fury would knock out both Klits who are both duckers"......Have a suspicion this guy was an alias........

6. "Roach says Mayweather is overrated and he knows his stuff"...........Not that he'd be biased in anyway...

7 "Oscar isn't a great because he lost his biggest fights".........Whittaker, Chavez, Mayorga etc...........

8 "Leonard is an easy night for Hagler"..........Vito gets a draw, Duran loses by one point.......Roldan and Hamsho make Marv struggle....

9. " Robinson plays with Jones Jr".......Like he did with Turpin twice.........

10. "Truss has 9 aliases on here"............I don't like odd numbers.

hogey wrote:Sorry Truss but your "Like it or not Sven Ottke is great!!" thread was among the worst in this category. I give you the benefit of the doubt it was a thread started with your tongue firmly in cheek.

Anybody that seriously thinks of Ottke as a great, deserves to have his pants pulled down and his botty spanked

I was once directed to an old 606 thread in which LRR claimed that, in contrast to what everyone else was saying, Tyson actually fought a prime Larry Holmes, and that if anyone was over the hill and disadvantaged in that fight, it was Tyson, not Larry. He justified this on the basis of Holmes going 21-3 in his career after that fight, whereas Tyson went 17-6-2NC.

Strange one!

88Chris05 wrote:I was once directed to an old 606 thread in which LRR claimed that, in contrast to what everyone else was saying, Tyson actually fought a prime Larry Holmes, and that if anyone was over the hill and disadvantaged in that fight, it was Tyson, not Larry. He justified this on the basis of Holmes going 21-3 in his career after that fight, whereas Tyson went 17-6-2NC.

Strange one!

Another pair of bum cheeks that need spanking

Seanusarrilius wrote:

hogey wrote:Sorry Truss but your "Like it or not Sven Ottke is great!!" thread was among the worst in this category. I give you the benefit of the doubt it was a thread started with your tongue firmly in cheek.

Anybody that seriously thinks of Ottke as a great, deserves to have his pants pulled down and his botty spanked

Read the article............I said his record suggests he's great.............But feel free to distort.......

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

Seanusarrilius wrote:

hogey wrote:Sorry Truss but your "Like it or not Sven Ottke is great!!" thread was among the worst in this category. I give you the benefit of the doubt it was a thread started with your tongue firmly in cheek.

Anybody that seriously thinks of Ottke as a great, deserves to have his pants pulled down and his botty spanked

Read the article............I said his record suggests he's great.............But feel free to distort.......

Sounds like the daily mail defence for "the man who hated Britain" to me. Stay classy, big guy.

Sounds like and is........Can be two different things........I'm always classy.

i quite liked how union always got sucked in with audley and his predictions that he was going to beat haye

compelling and rich wrote:i quite liked how union always got sucked in with audley and his predictions that he was going to beat haye

Ah yes, and Alvarez stoppage vs Mayweather.

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:

10. "Truss has 9 aliases on here"............I don't like odd numbers.

Without wishing to join in the trend of giving Truss a kicking on his own thread, this is a pretty rubbish argument. How can you claim not to like odd numbers, when you used to go by the moniker Trussman55?

As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Scottrf wrote:As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Haha of course. I only ever set my tv volume to even numbers or multiples of 5. Odd numbers are just wrong. First time I've ever heard any one else say the same thing.

Boxtthis wrote:

Scottrf wrote:As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Haha of course. I only ever set my tv volume to even numbers or multiples of 5. Odd numbers are just wrong. First time I've ever heard any one else say the same thing.

TSMR gets annoyed if I have the car stereo volume on an odd number. Almost inevitably I set it on an odd number on purpose.

Rowley wrote:

Boxtthis wrote:

Scottrf wrote:As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Haha of course. I only ever set my tv volume to even numbers or multiples of 5. Odd numbers are just wrong. First time I've ever heard any one else say the same thing.

TSMR gets annoyed if I have the car stereo volume on an odd number. Almost inevitably I set it on an odd number on purpose.

People do this to me.

Rowley wrote:

Boxtthis wrote:

Scottrf wrote:As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Haha of course. I only ever set my tv volume to even numbers or multiples of 5. Odd numbers are just wrong. First time I've ever heard any one else say the same thing.

TSMR gets annoyed if I have the car stereo volume on an odd number. Almost inevitably I set it on an odd number on purpose.

Mrs667 loses her rag when I put the stereo on and put my music on which (keeping with numbers motif) I find rather odd.

all the people who think haye
will knock fury out and win.

Hi Tyson Fury

DAVE667 wrote:

Rowley wrote:

Boxtthis wrote:

Scottrf wrote:As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Haha of course. I only ever set my tv volume to even numbers or multiples of 5. Odd numbers are just wrong. First time I've ever heard any one else say the same thing.

TSMR gets annoyed if I have the car stereo volume on an odd number. Almost inevitably I set it on an odd number on purpose.

Mrs667 loses her rag when I put the stereo on and put my music on which (keeping with numbers motif) I find rather odd.

ghosty/terror/hammersmith aside, i think most of us are sympathetic to Mrs 667 on that front, dave. Infact on many fronts;)

Rowley wrote:

Boxtthis wrote:

Scottrf wrote:As a former odd number OCDer, multiples of 5 don't really count as odd because of how round they are.

Haha of course. I only ever set my tv volume to even numbers or multiples of 5. Odd numbers are just wrong. First time I've ever heard any one else say the same thing.

TSMR gets annoyed if I have the car stereo volume on an odd number. Almost inevitably I set it on an odd number on purpose.

 
 

david lee wrote:all the people who think haye
will knock fury out and win.

Given that Fury has a poor defence,no great boxing skills and a chin that doesn't look that clever,(decked by a light hitting cruiserweight),I think haye's fans are deluded thinking he'll knock Fury out.

Trying to convince fellow posters that the Kitschko brothers are indeed two different people has proven to be a fruitless labour of love

kingraf wrote:Trying to convince fellow posters that the Kitschko brothers are indeed two different people has proven to be a fruitless labour of love

I think you'll find a legendary poster called waingro cleared that one up for us, a while back.

milkyboy wrote:

kingraf wrote:Trying to convince fellow posters that the Kitschko brothers are indeed two different people has proven to be a fruitless labour of love

I think you'll find a legendary poster called waingro cleared that one up for us, a while back.

Still arguably the finest post on here, ever.

Probably before my time - seems many have since then forgotten.

Rowley wrote:

milkyboy wrote:

kingraf wrote:Trying to convince fellow posters that the Kitschko brothers are indeed two different people has proven to be a fruitless labour of love

I think you'll find a legendary poster called waingro cleared that one up for us, a while back.

Still arguably the finest post on here, ever.

Clear, succinct, relevant, informative.

Without parallel, I'd say Jeff.

"Lennox Lewis was chinny"

Got knocked out by two massive punches (doesn't matter who threw them, they were huge punches)

Doesn't even matter if the guys who KO'd him were garbage/fringe/great fighters. Doesn't even matter if Lewis should have been smart enough to get out of the way of the shots, the fact is, he was hit with very good shots that, I would wager, would have troubled a great number of decent HW had they landed flush.

There's more than enough footage of Lewis being hit by big punches and taking them with very little trouble but, we're supposed to believe that Lewis had a chin of finest Royal Doulton and would have shattered if a butterfly had passed with sixteen miles of him

Then there is the idiot who was possibly the first incarnation of Winchester who did not acknowledge Lewis losing these fights!

Oscar is the greatest Mexican fighter since 1980 - narrowly edging Robert Guerrero and Humberto Sota (whoever he is) -- Trussman

Well your opinion is more than welcome.........If very predictable.

'David Haye is good for boxing'

He's good for British boxing........

True. His bashings of Monte Barrett, Audley Harrison and Dereck Chisora really put this little island on the map...

"Top 10 thread" -
-----------------

Trussy says - "31 out of 35 posters didn't have Duran in their list..........."

Poster with no name - "Bob Mee has him in and he's a historian and his opinion counts "

"Leonard Hagler 160 thread"
--------------------------

Trussy says - " Overall consensus has Leonard 60/40 winning it"

Poster with no name - "Consensus on here has Hagler nicking it"

Trussy says how do you debate with a wally like that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:"Top 10 thread" -
-----------------

Trussy says - "31 out of 35 posters didn't have Duran in their list..........."

Poster with no name - "Bob Mee has him in and he's a historian and his opinion counts "

"Leonard Hagler 160 thread"
--------------------------

Trussy says - " Overall consensus has Leonard 60/40 winning it"

Poster with no name - "Consensus on here has Hagler nicking it"

Trussy says how do you debate with a wally like that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   

"Trussy" was incorrect in declaring a consensus on the second thread.

I don't think that first statement is correct at all.

Full of spin and rubbish.

1. I said poster with no name...........

2. It's close enough........

3. Start putting your points across a bit more maturely.......

Poster with no name - "Joe Louis had some great wins too...Braddock, Sharkey, Baer".......   

Don't forget Schmeling, known for...beating Joe Louis.

In excel that would be called a circular reference.

I don't care how references come as long as they are good............

Ring Magazine Greatest Heavyweights (1998)
1.Muhammad Ali
2.Joe Louis
3.Evander Holyfield
4.George Foreman
5.Larry Holmes
6.Rocky Marciano
7.Sonny Liston
8.Joe Frazier
9.Jack Johnson
10.Jack Dempsey
11.Ezzard Charles
12.Jim Jeffries
13.Jersey Joe Walcott
14.Mike Tyson
15.Gene Tunney
16.Harry Wills
17.Sam Langford
18.John L. Sullivan
19.Max Schmeling
20.Max Baer

There's a good one clever dick.

Louis is second on my list too...........    

Pointless list............Lennox Lewis ????..........Riddick Bowe ?????????? The Klitsys ????????

Holy at 3......... 

     

Shove your stupid lists up your.............They mean nothing..........

Poster with no name - "Mayweather beat Hatton and Marquez so what!!......They'd hardly ever fought at 147!!!"........

Poster with no name - "Hearns was Hagler's best win!!!!" ..  

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Louis is second on my list too...........    

Pointless list............Lennox Lewis ????..........Riddick Bowe ?????????? The Klitsys ????????

Holy at 3......... 

     

Shove your stupid lists up your.............They mean nothing..........

They're worth more than your love letters to Floyd and Oscar.

Now stop being a silly billy.

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Poster with no name - "Mayweather beat Hatton and Marquez so what!!......They'd hardly ever fought at 147!!!"........

Poster with no name - "Hearns was Hagler's best win!!!!" ..  

Out of context again (I worry you're either 13 or slightly slow ).

You suggested Hatton and Guerrero were good wins as they were P4P (as if that means anything). I pointed out that was misleading as neither achieved anything at welterweight before or since.

Hearns hadn't campaigned at middleweight prior to Hagler but he did afterwards and proved he was world class at the weight.

Keep rolling your eyes.

Just go away Mate..........You bore me s**tless.............

Patronise someone who is interested on preferably someone elses thread.......

and stop following me around..........

I said poster with no name............and yet you seem to recognise the quotes !!

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Just go away Mate..........You bore me s**tless.............

Patronise someone who is interested on preferably someone elses thread.......

and stop following me around..........

I said poster with no name............and yet you seem to recognise the quotes !!

I can't resist putting you in your place - you think you know it all.

Thinking about this made me think about the worst arguments I've tried to pull off in the past. I remember seriously trying to convince people that Hatton would beat Pacquiao, which seems ridiculous now. People shouldn't be embarrassed about bad predictions I don't think, as long as they can see their flaws in hindsight.

Anonymous posters who run to the mods and complain when they are called naughty names, yet fill their posts with expletive filled rants.

The Worst arguments you've ever heard on 606 ??

Take your pick:
https://www.606v2.com/spa/D4thincarnation

Y I Man wrote:The Worst arguments you've ever heard on 606 ??

Take your pick:
https://www.606v2.com/spa/D4thincarnation

Always going to be hard to overlook that loaded gloves makes boxing safer.

sohotnot wrote:

Y I Man wrote:The Worst arguments you've ever heard on 606 ??

Take your pick:
https://www.606v2.com/spa/D4thincarnation

Always going to be hard to overlook that loaded gloves makes boxing safer.

"Manny doesn't want to be tested because he's scared of needles"......Was a good one.