Who benifits the most from beating Mayweather?

Imo Money has fights left.

3 possible contenders are...

Manny
Khan
Garcia

Manny is already a superstar. Apart from making a shedload of bread, I am not sure fame would last.

Khan would obviously become a house hold name but with current world events as they are a possible backlash could occur. He already has a lot of haters so its 50/50 for me.

Garcia could become a HUGE star. He has charisma and can carry the sport post Mayweather.

Khan is already household name...in the Khan household.

Garcia will never beat Mayweather and as for having charisma...please!

Manny would benefit most....

Top 15 or 10 even with that win as they are both past it so the win is valid..

Algy beats Pac or Khan beats May.....Critics will say fathertime came to visit

Manny benifits with his ranking but not sure if his star factor would get off the ground.

Whoever beats Floyd WILL become the biggest name in sport and I don't think Manny and his very limited English can carry the limelight.

No they won't.....

Bradley was still a no name after getting the win over Manny...Deserved or not...

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:No they won't.....

Bradley was still a no name after getting the win over Manny...Deserved or not...

Manny is hardly a superstar on par with Mayweather tho.

Mayweather is the highest paid sportsman in the world. To most he is boxing so whoever can take his O is going to be known the world over. Career wise I think Garcia has the X factor. He can box when he needs to but can also finish an opponent just watch what he did to Salka. With his PR fan base and good looks his career will really take off plus unlike Khan he has a lot of respect amongst boxing fans.

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:Manny benifits with his ranking but not sure if his star factor would get off the ground.

Whoever beats Floyd WILL become the biggest name in sport and I don't think Manny and his very limited English can carry the limelight.

So it's gays and foreigners you don't like now. Must kill you that God made them in his own image...wish it would to be honest!

Garcia doesn't have charisma. His dad's an @rse, that's all. Floyd's dad's an @rse AND he has the charisma - hence the $$$.

I'd also give him the smallest chance of the 3 against Floyd who I think would school him in one of his finest performances to date. Floyd can't stop him (not even Ortiz style) but would tee-off on him all night long.

Yep Garcia is one of Boxing's big overachievers..

I love the racial overtones of the OP, is it not time he was banned for this garbage.

As for Pacquiao he's a huge global star hence why he's amongst the highest paid sportsmen, wasn't he second behind Mayweather a couple of years ago?

Hammersmith harrier wrote:I love the racial overtones of the OP, is it not time he was banned for this garbage.

As for Pacquiao he's a huge global star hence why he's amongst the highest paid sportsmen, wasn't he second behind Mayweather a couple of years ago?

Hey, if Amir won, ISIS might view it as the first step towards the downfall of the West (whilst conveniently forgetting where Amir resides) and, thinking that things were trundling on nicely, actually DECREASE their nefarious activities. Amir could be the savior of civilization as we know it.

Racial Overtones........Didn't they support SLAYER on their last tour !!

No, they did a song called "Teenage Kicks ( to the faces of all non-whites)"

Should point out that Slayer aren't a white band, they have a Chilean vocalist and had a Cuban drummer.

NO, it's fine, this is TRUSSY being a bit silly as opposed to STRONGY talking out of his ar$e

Only a bit of fun................

Have a good weekend..

No offence taken dear chap, look forward to the massive amounts of post-fight drivel on Monday

Hammersmith harrier wrote:I love the racial overtones of the OP, is it not time he was banned for this garbage.

As for Pacquiao he's a huge global star hence why he's amongst the highest paid sportsmen, wasn't he second behind Mayweather a couple of years ago?

What racial overtones????????????????????????

Stop talking out your a*** looking for trouble. I have not made ANY reference to anyones race here and I take offence to this fraudulent accusation.

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:

Khan would obviously become a house hold name but with current world events as they are a possible backlash could occur. He already has a lot of haters so its 50/50 for me.

What exactly does that mean if it's not a reference to his Islamic faith?

The word you're looking for is libellous not fraudulent.

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:

Hammersmith harrier wrote:I love the racial overtones of the OP, is it not time he was banned for this garbage.

As for Pacquiao he's a huge global star hence why he's amongst the highest paid sportsmen, wasn't he second behind Mayweather a couple of years ago?

What racial overtones????????????????????????

Stop talking out your a*** looking for trouble. I have not made ANY reference to anyones race here and I take offence to this fraudulent accusation.

So we've narrowed it down to you being a liar or, as I suspect given the overwhelming supporting evidence, you being a c*nt!

TSMR is out tonight, can assure you all there are countless websites I would rather be looking at than this one so try to either discuss the topic or ignore the thread.

Hammersmith harrier wrote:

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:

Khan would obviously become a house hold name but with current world events as they are a possible backlash could occur. He already has a lot of haters so its 50/50 for me.

What exactly does that mean if it's not a reference to his Islamic faith?

The word you're looking for is libellous not fraudulent.

It highlights the prejudice of certain people who would paint Khan with the same brush as it were. Thinking of the England Cricketer Ali who got terrible treatment by certain sections of the British crowd when playing against India.

The point of the thread was to see the effect on the careers of the 3 fighters mentioned should they beat Mayweather obviously current events have a part to play sometimes. It was not a crack at his religion in any way. Stop trying to look for things that are not there so you can play Mr rightious on a forum.

Suggestion for Christmas, purchase a dictionary for yourself.

So in short it was a direct reference to his religion or rather his heritage because I doubt you would say such a thing about Mosley or Hopkins.

Hammersmith harrier wrote:Suggestion for christmas, purchase a dictionary.

So in short it was a direct reference to his religion or rather his heritage because I doubt you would say such a thing about Mosley or Hopkins.

It was a reference to current world events and in no way a slight or a dig at anyones ethnicity or faith. Again you are looking for something that is not there, the thread was not about this when I wrote it.

Thanks for the xmas suggestion very womanly of you.

I would offer my suggestion but would most prob get banned if I did.

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:

Hammersmith harrier wrote:

ONETWOFOREVER wrote:

Khan would obviously become a house hold name but with current world events as they are a possible backlash could occur. He already has a lot of haters so its 50/50 for me.

What exactly does that mean if it's not a reference to his Islamic faith?

The word you're looking for is libellous not fraudulent.

It highlights the prejudice of certain people who would paint Khan with the same brush as it were. Thinking of the England Cricketer Ali who got terrible treatment by certain sections of the British crowd when playing against India.

The point of the thread was to see the effect on the careers of the 3 fighters mentioned should they beat Mayweather obviously current events have a part to play sometimes. It was not a crack at his religion in any way. Stop trying to look for things that are not there so you can play Mr rightious on a forum.

Bollox, course it is. You suggest (none to intelligently) that because he's Muslim and the current issues surrounding the activities of ISIS and other such groups that people would suddenly be anti Khan by virtue of his faith. The people who are anti-Khan will continue to be anti-Khan irrespective of what he wins in the boxing. The rest of us are smart enough not to even try and make any connection. Shame you aren't one of the smart ones and have had to settle for being one of the smartar$e ones.

You idiocy is exceeded only by your arrogance