Fury License suspended until anti-doping hearing

Apparently Ukad are citing a bad back picked up in sparring.

Let's hope Joshua does not hang around waiting for this to all get sorted.

Which Fury?

Also, how are UKAD citing a bad back, is that not for Fury to cite??

Don't see how a bad back prevents appearance at a anti-doping court hearing, he's not being asked to show he's fit & able to get his licence back is here?

Sounds a bit fishy....

Not sure what this had to do with Joshua?

It is all to do with Tyson Fury. Ukad have postponed the hearing until October. Source is below.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/39946566

The "bad back" is humour; seems that whenever a Fury doesn't want to fight they cite a back injury. The thought of an organisation pulling the same trick tickled me. Sue me for having a strange sense of humour.

One of Joshua options is to fight Fury next. I don't think he should as he could be waiting a long time for the fight to be made given the position above. Fight Wlad, Wilder or even Parker. Just keep on fighting.

Sorry, missed the joke

I like Warren though - "he's entitled to make a living". Wasn't it Frank that was involved in getting a certain unlicenced British boxer fight via a Luxembourg Board of Boxing Control.....??

or the one that has constantly tried to stop boxers fighting for Eddie (think off the top of my head, Bellew and Burns)

I hope the anti doping panel show restraint and compassion with the ruling.....Maybe cut the proposed sentence in half if he promises to shut up and disappear for a while.

Still trying to see the fight in which he schooled Wlad..Seen the one which he won 120-118..With 10 even.

Not a Fury fan then?