RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
+8
LondonTiger
SecretFly
hugehandoff
Pot Hale
munkian
WELL-PAST-IT
marty2086
robbo277
12 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
A lot to take in, but the key things for me:
A lot of the World Cup squad will miss the 2020 Summer tour.
England's 2021 Lions will be better looked after by club and country.
Fairly positive, not sure if the reforms will go far enough however.
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
It had to come sooner or later, I take it there will be some extra credits in the salary cap or extra cash for the clubs with this agreement?
marty2086- Posts : 11208
Join date : 2011-05-13
Age : 38
Location : Belfast
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
The domestic season has been extended, with 2019-20 running from 21 September to 20 June, although a "mandatory five-week post-season rest" period is also in place.
Guaranteed in-season breaks for players in each of the three seasons.
Mandatory five-week post-season rest for all players, which includes two weeks' absolute rest and three weeks' active rest.
Minimum 10 weeks off/pre-season for players in the England Senior Elite Player Squad.
Minimum 12 weeks between the Premiership final and round one of the following league season.
Maximum 35 match involvements (more than 20 minutes) in any one season for all players.
Maximum 30 full game equivalents (reduced from 32) in any one season for all players.
England players to have a mandatory rest week if playing all international matches and more than 65% of total minutes (reduced from 80%).
Not sure what is the current set up, but mandatory 10 week off/preseason sounds a lot better than we currently have, reduction in game time and in season breaks, although it does not say for how long and if they can be continuous. How does down time due to injury work? is it considered a break?
WELL-PAST-IT- Posts : 3739
Join date : 2011-06-01
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
What are they going to blame their poor European form on then ?
munkian- Posts : 8456
Join date : 2011-04-01
Age : 43
Location : Bristol/The Port
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
First thing I looked at was the dates of the Premiership finals for the three years 2020-2022.
The dates for the 3 seasons are:
2019/20 - Oct 20th - June 20th - starts latest and finishes 6 days earlier
2020/21 - Sep 12th - June 26th - starts earliest and finishes latest
2021/22 - Sep 18th - June 18th - Starts later and finishes 8 days earlier.
The dates for the 3 seasons are:
2019/20 - Oct 20th - June 20th - starts latest and finishes 6 days earlier
2020/21 - Sep 12th - June 26th - starts earliest and finishes latest
2021/22 - Sep 18th - June 18th - Starts later and finishes 8 days earlier.
Pot Hale- Posts : 7781
Join date : 2011-06-05
Age : 62
Location : North East
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Papers are all full of how the new rugby calendar diminishes the Lions tours. They are reduced to 5 weeks from 6 and there will now be no break between the premiership final and the start of the tour. All the Celtic players will have had their domestic season end earlier and will be available to join the Lions training camps earlier putting the English players at a huge disadvantage. A real shame they could not end the domestic season 1 week earlier in Lions years.
hugehandoff- Posts : 1336
Join date : 2011-06-02
Location : London
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Two weeks absolute rest and three weeks active rest?
Yeah, I agree, we should all get that. Five weeks summer holidays!
Yeah, I agree, we should all get that. Five weeks summer holidays!
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Now the players are saying they're not happy with these proposals as they'll miss out on test match fees.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c2b0524c-de16-11e8-8469-be4fc9fcee5f
I only read the preview, not behind the paywall, but the gist of it is the players will miss out on revenue - I guess relating to the 2020 summer tour they won't play.
This in addition to the 10 month season getting a lot of criticism for the mental toll it will take.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c2b0524c-de16-11e8-8469-be4fc9fcee5f
I only read the preview, not behind the paywall, but the gist of it is the players will miss out on revenue - I guess relating to the 2020 summer tour they won't play.
This in addition to the 10 month season getting a lot of criticism for the mental toll it will take.
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Senior England players are angry that a new deal designed to protect their welfare could cost them up to £75,000 each in lost income because they will have to miss lucrative Test matches.
Damian Hopley, chief executive of the Rugby Players’ Association (RPA), was confronted over the issue during a heated meeting at the England training base in Portugal.
The RPA endorsed the extension of the club season to ten months after negotiating the inclusion of guaranteed in-season rest weeks, with specific player-welfare arrangements put in place for the national team.
The World Cup squad will not be selected for the 2020 summer tour to Japan, where England will play two Tests, and those who go on the 2021 British & Irish Lions tour to South Africa will have to miss one international that November. England players receive about £25,000 per Test from the RFU, which is divided into training money, appearance fee and image rights. The squad who tour Japan would receive a flat fee.
Players also harbour concerns about being forced to hand over their jersey to a rival — but Mark Lambert, the Harlequins prop and RPA chairman, told The Times that player welfare had to be the main consideration. “I do understand there is a financial element now but I look at the bigger picture — we want these players to be fit and healthy and playing as much as possible for their country,” he said.
With England’s squad depleted by injuries, Eddie Jones said he had selected “probably the most inexperienced pack England have had for a long time” for tomorrow’s game against South Africa at Twickenham. The back row of Brad Shields, Tom Curry and Mark Wilson have ten caps between them, while the power-packed Springbok trio of Siya Kolisi, Duane Vermeulen and Warren Whiteley boast 100.
In a change of direction for the team, Jones, the head coach, selected Owen Farrell, whom he described as the side’s “spiritual leader”, at fly half with Ben Te’o at inside centre.
Dylan Hartley, England’s co-captain with Farrell, confirmed that he had spoken to Hopley but did not want to discuss the new-season deal with four autumn Tests looming.
The players are believed to be frustrated that the RPA agreed to the arrangement without consulting them.
“I understand as a one-off it would be something a player would potentially question because of the financial element,” Lambert said. “When those two specific [rest] proposals were made, we saw them as a really positive point from the RFU attempting to look after the highest-profile players in the country, thinking about their long-term welfare.
“If this is an opportunity to get a meaningful rest, I see that as a massive positive. They [the players] may say, ‘Can I not miss games for my club to play for England?’ But the clubs employ the players so there has to be a balance.”
If they want to play less games, then they need to accept they will probably get less money.
LondonTiger- Moderator
- Posts : 23485
Join date : 2011-02-10
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
LondonTiger wrote:
If they want to play less games, then they need to accept they will probably get less money.
Hmmmm...not really in the spirit of the whole debate though, is it? It's more like telling an employee who works long hours at a computer screen, that because of health concerns for their eye strain, their work week will be shortened by a day but they'll forfeit the day in their wages. So we're being nice to you but you have to pay for the niceness.
I know full well that player fatigue was a player concern, so they can't claim it hasn't been an issue they've brought up themselves - but in the end, players don't organise their work year. The admin people do, and the 'player welfare' changes has obviously been a strategic tactic too from rugby admin people to force feed this 'global season' proposal. Players kinda have a right to say: 'you're cutting our work week for your own interests as much if not more so than ours.... so why should we lose income when forced (not advised) to play less rugby?
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Do you reckon England players may form a union and go on strike? It seems awfully unfair that they may get paid less.
Guest- Guest
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
They should go on strike. It’s a terrible situation. Poor rugby players losing out on £25,000 a game.
Guest- Guest
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
ebop wrote:They should go on strike. It’s a terrible situation. Poor rugby players losing out on £25,000 a game.
If they don't get it, someone does though. So................... let's cut players some slack, at least they bleed or crunch bones for their efforts.
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Do you reckon some players would take the field on crutches for £25,000? Crutches may be a stretch. What about fatigue? Or even minor fatigue? Would a senior England player that is minor fatigued take the field for £25,000? Big call. Hope the English players get what they deserve.SecretFly wrote:ebop wrote:They should go on strike. It’s a terrible situation. Poor rugby players losing out on £25,000 a game.
If they don't get it, someone does though. So................... let's cut players some slack, at least they bleed or crunch bones for their efforts.
Guest- Guest
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
They'll in the end get an offer and have to weigh up the options. Sh shows if you don't pay players their worth they'll move on.
No 7&1/2- Posts : 31374
Join date : 2012-10-20
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
The status quo looks pretty good at £25,000 a pop. Maybe the players will think they’re not so tired after all. No wonder Brad Shields wanted to be English. Good on him making $NZD50k every time he struggles to pull that white jersey over his head.
Guest- Guest
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
ebop wrote:Do you reckon some players would take the field on crutches for £25,000? Crutches may be a stretch. What about fatigue? Or even minor fatigue? Would a senior England player that is minor fatigued take the field for £25,000? Big call. Hope the English players get what they deserve.SecretFly wrote:ebop wrote:They should go on strike. It’s a terrible situation. Poor rugby players losing out on £25,000 a game.
If they don't get it, someone does though. So................... let's cut players some slack, at least they bleed or crunch bones for their efforts.
7 has a point, ebop. Maybe finally the beginning of New Zealand becoming a net importer of players???
If all the good Kiwis go up north for the money, then there might appear gaps for English players to move into who wouldn't get out of bed for 25,000 a game? 25,100 offered and they're on the plane down South.....
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Players take the field injured all the time. Some might do so for cash, the love of the shirt, or the fear of missing out on playing opprtunities. Richie McCaw played a World Cup with a broken foot. Johnny Sexton took the field for the third Lions test with a broken wrist.ebop wrote:Do you reckon some players would take the field on crutches for £25,000?
Billy Vunipola said he'd give up some of his salary to play fewer games, and Alex Corbisiero said he had actually asked to do the same. Joe Marler will take a financial hit for putting his family first but these three players are probably the exception. David Flatman said he played too many games sometimes but wouldn't have hesitated to take money to play more.
Rugby Fan- Moderator
- Posts : 8155
Join date : 2012-09-14
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
That’s a great idea SecretFly, let me just think of all the England players that NZR would pay £25,100 a game for. I’ll get back to you on that a little bit later.....SecretFly wrote:ebop wrote:Do you reckon some players would take the field on crutches for £25,000? Crutches may be a stretch. What about fatigue? Or even minor fatigue? Would a senior England player that is minor fatigued take the field for £25,000? Big call. Hope the English players get what they deserve.SecretFly wrote:ebop wrote:They should go on strike. It’s a terrible situation. Poor rugby players losing out on £25,000 a game.
If they don't get it, someone does though. So................... let's cut players some slack, at least they bleed or crunch bones for their efforts.
7 has a point, ebop. Maybe finally the beginning of New Zealand becoming a net importer of players???
If all the good Kiwis go up north for the money, then there might appear gaps for English players to move into who wouldn't get out of bed for 25,000 a game? 25,100 offered and they're on the plane down South.....
Guest- Guest
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Players also harbour concerns about being forced to hand over their jersey to a rival
This point was largely ignored in the article and the subsequent comments.
“They [the players] may say, ‘Can I not miss games for my club to play for England?’ But the clubs employ the players so there has to be a balance.”
And this is important as well I feel. The money and the prestige (and the money that comes with increased prestige, I guess) is concentrated at international level. Would players sacrifice club games for tests? Most probably. The players, it appear, want to reduce their total rugby but preserve their test rugby - therefore it can only follow that they want to play less club rugby.
The clubs will obviously dig their heels in to resist this, as they pay quite a large amount over the players' lifecycle, from academy to retirement.
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
Rugby Fan wrote:Players take the field injured all the time. Some might do so for cash, the love of the shirt, or the fear of missing out on playing opprtunities. Richie McCaw played a World Cup with a broken foot. Johnny Sexton took the field for the third Lions test with a broken wrist.ebop wrote:Do you reckon some players would take the field on crutches for £25,000?
Billy Vunipola said he'd give up some of his salary to play fewer games, and Alex Corbisiero said he had actually asked to do the same. Joe Marler will take a financial hit for putting his family first but these three players are probably the exception. David Flatman said he played too many games sometimes but wouldn't have hesitated to take money to play more.
Most top Irish players take pay cuts to stay in Ireland and fight it out to make the Ireland team. They nearly always get offered bigger contracts in France but most (not Zebo, Ryan and Sexton) turn them down.
GunsGermsV2- Posts : 2550
Join date : 2016-11-15
Re: RFU and clubs agree player welfare reform
SecretFly wrote:ebop wrote:Do you reckon some players would take the field on crutches for £25,000? Crutches may be a stretch. What about fatigue? Or even minor fatigue? Would a senior England player that is minor fatigued take the field for £25,000? Big call. Hope the English players get what they deserve.SecretFly wrote:ebop wrote:They should go on strike. It’s a terrible situation. Poor rugby players losing out on £25,000 a game.
If they don't get it, someone does though. So................... let's cut players some slack, at least they bleed or crunch bones for their efforts.
7 has a point, ebop. Maybe finally the beginning of New Zealand becoming a net importer of players???
If all the good Kiwis go up north for the money, then there might appear gaps for English players to move into who wouldn't get out of bed for 25,000 a game? 25,100 offered and they're on the plane down South.....
Ha ha, good one. Mitre 10 you mean? Can just imagine Super rugby sides all flocking to hire burnt out English rugby players. But seriously, the thought of having to watch soneone that you always get one over on in club rugby in your jersey because you have formally declared but perhaps not actually ‘burnt out’ cant be good for morale. Handing over £25k because of a blanket rule would be tough.
Taylorman- Posts : 12343
Join date : 2011-02-02
Location : Wellington NZ
Similar topics
» World Rugby Player Welfare and Law Symposium - 8 Recommendations
» Premiership clubs likely to agree £200m sale of stake to former F1 owners CVC
» Golf clubs for an older player
» Player Signing for Clubs Before The Seasons are Half Over
» Saraquins vs Northampton Tigers - top 2 "London" clubs vs 2 top midland clubs - who would win?
» Premiership clubs likely to agree £200m sale of stake to former F1 owners CVC
» Golf clubs for an older player
» Player Signing for Clubs Before The Seasons are Half Over
» Saraquins vs Northampton Tigers - top 2 "London" clubs vs 2 top midland clubs - who would win?
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum