The Correct Interpretation
4 posters
The v2 Forum :: Wrestling :: Wrestling
Page 1 of 1
The Correct Interpretation
I was thinking of an article to do for my 2,000th post, so here i am - going back to my roots in the wrestling section.
We watch wrestling all the time, but do we take some things for granted? For some reason I like to analyse things and ask myself why?
So I started thinking about wrestling moves and why they have the names that they do.
Now, some moves aptly describe what is being done.
Chokeslam – Pretty obvious.
Clothsline – Done correctly it will take your head off.
Sleeper hold – Again, doesn’t take much to work out what happens here.
But some moves have names that have no bearing at all to what is being done.
Piledriver – Sounds like something I get after eating a pizza from Rocketman
Tombstone Pildriver – I don’t think we will go there!
Boston Crab – I haven’t seen many crabs from Boston, but I’m pretty sure they don’t wiggle across the floor on their stomachs with their legs bent backwards over their back.
Full Nelson – Who is Nelson, and what was he full of?
And the list goes on – Irish Whip, Fishermans Suplex, Whisper in the Wind to name but a few.
We know what these moves do, but for a bit of fun, can you come up with new interpretations for our beloved wrestling moves?
We watch wrestling all the time, but do we take some things for granted? For some reason I like to analyse things and ask myself why?
So I started thinking about wrestling moves and why they have the names that they do.
Now, some moves aptly describe what is being done.
Chokeslam – Pretty obvious.
Clothsline – Done correctly it will take your head off.
Sleeper hold – Again, doesn’t take much to work out what happens here.
But some moves have names that have no bearing at all to what is being done.
Piledriver – Sounds like something I get after eating a pizza from Rocketman
Tombstone Pildriver – I don’t think we will go there!
Boston Crab – I haven’t seen many crabs from Boston, but I’m pretty sure they don’t wiggle across the floor on their stomachs with their legs bent backwards over their back.
Full Nelson – Who is Nelson, and what was he full of?
And the list goes on – Irish Whip, Fishermans Suplex, Whisper in the Wind to name but a few.
We know what these moves do, but for a bit of fun, can you come up with new interpretations for our beloved wrestling moves?
Guest- Guest
Re: The Correct Interpretation
you waited 2000 posts for this?
The pedigree - it makes dog meat of its opponents
The pedigree - it makes dog meat of its opponents
Re: The Correct Interpretation
i think this could compete with The Ultimate Worrier given time
Guest- Guest
Re: The Correct Interpretation
Irish Whip - Originally Invented by Hornswoggle and his many mistresses
Jammy31- Posts : 867
Join date : 2011-01-30
Age : 32
Re: The Correct Interpretation
Happy 2000th Post YI Man!
How about...
The Rock Bottom - Said wrestler takes a giant rock and shoves it where the sun dont shine
Rolling Thunder - RVD with oponent on the ground rolls over and lets one rip in their face
How about...
The Rock Bottom - Said wrestler takes a giant rock and shoves it where the sun dont shine
Rolling Thunder - RVD with oponent on the ground rolls over and lets one rip in their face
Y2James- Posts : 132
Join date : 2011-01-27
Location : Macclesfield
Similar topics
» Interpretation or clear obstruction?
» Big Phil Vickey Questions Forward Pass Interpretation
» Maybe Serena Was Correct
» Oh well, looks like my information was correct.
» I think Max Krilitch is correct IMO
» Big Phil Vickey Questions Forward Pass Interpretation
» Maybe Serena Was Correct
» Oh well, looks like my information was correct.
» I think Max Krilitch is correct IMO
The v2 Forum :: Wrestling :: Wrestling
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum