Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
+14
Champagne_Socialist
YDKSAB
Adam D
hazharrison
TopHat24/7
Lance
Lumbering_Jack
Rodney
Rowley
OasisBFC
paperbag_puncher
Seanusarrilius
mobilemaster8
TRUSSMAN66
18 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
First topic message reminder :
Haye is a part time boxer that is 33 years old and prefers the acting profession to the noble art these days.....He is also a classless jerk If we are honest..........Not much mileage in a Haye victory!! He has been found out at the highest level and the chances of fighting Vitali are slim and none because of his ego and the fact he thinks he's still a Superfighter....
He'll get 5 million for Fury but less than half for Vitali and it won't happen !!
However ingratiating or irritating Fury is to the fan.............He is charismatic...unbeaten and with the future ahead of him...........Have no doubts fights could be made with either Klit brother or... he has the time to wait each of them out and as there is little talent about take over the Heavyweight title..No one better than these two out there..
Price is a non starter............Haye will always be sullied by toe-gate and his non-effort against Wlad....
Fury should he beat Haye has a real prospect of putting Britain on the map and ruling at least one alphabet title If not more !!!
Timing is everything.........and If I was British I'd be really pulling for Fury...
Could have the World and Haye at his feet............I hope so for one..
Haye is a part time boxer that is 33 years old and prefers the acting profession to the noble art these days.....He is also a classless jerk If we are honest..........Not much mileage in a Haye victory!! He has been found out at the highest level and the chances of fighting Vitali are slim and none because of his ego and the fact he thinks he's still a Superfighter....
He'll get 5 million for Fury but less than half for Vitali and it won't happen !!
However ingratiating or irritating Fury is to the fan.............He is charismatic...unbeaten and with the future ahead of him...........Have no doubts fights could be made with either Klit brother or... he has the time to wait each of them out and as there is little talent about take over the Heavyweight title..No one better than these two out there..
Price is a non starter............Haye will always be sullied by toe-gate and his non-effort against Wlad....
Fury should he beat Haye has a real prospect of putting Britain on the map and ruling at least one alphabet title If not more !!!
Timing is everything.........and If I was British I'd be really pulling for Fury...
Could have the World and Haye at his feet............I hope so for one..
Last edited by TRUSSMAN66 on Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:02 pm; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : ..)
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Is this why Winchester ain't on here? Has everyone foed him so that he is talking to himself? Haha!
mobilemaster8- Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 38
Location : Stoke on Trent
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Wish people to stick to serious debate instead of resorting to petty mud slinging and arguing.
Classless oafs the lot of ya!
Classless oafs the lot of ya!
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Does this mean you now hold me in the same esteem as SLAYER Dave?DAVE667 wrote:ROWLEY is forever praising Wlad for his willingness to take on his mandatories.
Rowley- Admin
- Posts : 22053
Join date : 2011-02-17
Age : 51
Location : I'm just a symptom of the modern decay that's gnawing at the heart of this country.
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I'd love too..even about bradley pryce..DAVE667 wrote:Wish people to stick to serious debate instead of resorting to petty mud slinging and arguing.
Classless oafs the lot of ya!
This guy is obsessed..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Calm down Dave. Your such an Oaf.
No seriously, where is Winchester?
No seriously, where is Winchester?
mobilemaster8- Posts : 4302
Join date : 2012-05-10
Age : 38
Location : Stoke on Trent
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I'm starting to miss him ...Mate.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Just f**k offTopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Is someone going to do something about this T**T or what..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
It may seem that way but the truth is, I'm simply unwilling to risk your moderator wrath by witing SLAYER in 72 point typeface.....but if I could I would.Rowley wrote:Does this mean you now hold me in the same esteem as SLAYER Dave?DAVE667 wrote:ROWLEY is forever praising Wlad for his willingness to take on his mandatories.
I may compromise and refer to you as RoWLeY therefore affording you something approaching the respect you deserve to fail to receive from this bunch of miscreants whilst not putting you on a par with SLAYER.
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
don't you have something better to do?TopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
Lance- Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Can we please get a "Meltdown alert" smiley for TRuSS? (See RoWLeY, this could work)
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years??Lance wrote:don't you have something better to do?TopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
How sad is he..Lance ??
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
He's certainly a throwback to the 80s mateOasisBFC wrote:did you all see haye's message to fury? https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SFKE3Yo-CwU
look how small he looks compared to the other 3. he looks like a super middle compared to those 3.
if you were looking as a non fan you'd expect them to crush haye with ease, it's crazy. it's also impressive that haye hits much harder than wach and towers. all about timing, speed and explosiveness.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
DAVE667 wrote:Haye stood up to Wlad's punches when nearly every man and his dog was betting that he'd go as soon as Wlad landed so why should Fury, a man with a fraction of the ability, be able to do any better?
Someone, not dissimilar to yourself, claimed that ring rust and inactivity could be the undoing of Mayweather and yet we've seen precious little of it over the years.
No, Haye doesn't have the natural ability that Mayweather has but let's face it, if we're being honest and all things being equal, Fury will only win if he gets a lucky shot in and, with a possible World title shot on the line and only a few fights left before he retires properly, I can't see Haye being sloppy enough to allow the big lad that opportunity.
Horses for course but I don't believe Fury should be representative of British HW boxing...we've had enough jokes/jokers in the past and he's simply the next clown in line. You talk about Haye being classless and yet you seem to find Fury endearing.
Strange world we live in eh?
Just a fanboy tribute this Dave......Fury keeps him at arms reach he has a chance.......Won't be luck that
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I have a masters degree in law!!!!!TopHat24/7 wrote:wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Stick to shoulder pressingChampagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I thinkTopHat24/7 wrote:like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years??Lance wrote:don't you have something better to do?TopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
Lance- Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
It will be as he's rarely used his jab to it's fullest potential and I simply can't seem him having made the necessary improvements in a few short weeks.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Just a fanboy tribute this Dave......Fury keeps him at arms reach he has a chance.......Won't be luck thatDAVE667 wrote:Haye stood up to Wlad's punches when nearly every man and his dog was betting that he'd go as soon as Wlad landed so why should Fury, a man with a fraction of the ability, be able to do any better?
Someone, not dissimilar to yourself, claimed that ring rust and inactivity could be the undoing of Mayweather and yet we've seen precious little of it over the years.
No, Haye doesn't have the natural ability that Mayweather has but let's face it, if we're being honest and all things being equal, Fury will only win if he gets a lucky shot in and, with a possible World title shot on the line and only a few fights left before he retires properly, I can't see Haye being sloppy enough to allow the big lad that opportunity.
Horses for course but I don't believe Fury should be representative of British HW boxing...we've had enough jokes/jokers in the past and he's simply the next clown in line. You talk about Haye being classless and yet you seem to find Fury endearing.
Strange world we live in eh?
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I just want everyone to be friendsTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Stick to shoulder pressingChampagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Surely he knows thats the only way he can win..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
You're nothing but a wide eyed dreamerChampagne_Socialist wrote:I just want everyone to be friendsTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Stick to shoulder pressingChampagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.Champagne_Socialist wrote:I have a masters degree in law!!!!!TopHat24/7 wrote:wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
bored, not insecure.Lance wrote:whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I thinkTopHat24/7 wrote:like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years??Lance wrote:don't you have something better to do?TopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Maybe but I dreamed Haye would bottle it against Wlad..DAVE667 wrote:You're nothing but a wide eyed dreamerChampagne_Socialist wrote:I just want everyone to be friendsTRUSSMAN66 wrote:Stick to shoulder pressingChampagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) and an LLM (masters) in Housing law.TopHat24/7 wrote:seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.Champagne_Socialist wrote:I have a masters degree in law!!!!!TopHat24/7 wrote:wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Don't encourage him CS... keep it on topic..
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Who would want Haye to win the guy's a tosspot?
When Haye stated boxing the first exercise Adam Booth taught him was auto-fellatio.
When Haye stated boxing the first exercise Adam Booth taught him was auto-fellatio.
Last edited by Strongback on Mon Sep 16, 2013 4:45 pm; edited 1 time in total
Strongback- Posts : 6529
Join date : 2011-07-01
Location : Matchroom Sports Head Office
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
hit a nerve there did I! some people be nice when they are bored, some people resort to infantile attempts at bullying and mocking others in order to try and justify their low self esteem. I hope it makes you feel better whatever your problems areTopHat24/7 wrote:bored, not insecure.Lance wrote:whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I thinkTopHat24/7 wrote:like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years??Lance wrote:don't you have something better to do?TopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
Lance- Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
had to complete a 15,000 word dissertation on whether the Localism Act had given local authorities more power in managing their social housing stock and what changes to social housing the Act would create.Champagne_Socialist wrote:I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) and an LLM (masters) in Housing law.TopHat24/7 wrote:seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.Champagne_Socialist wrote:I have a masters degree in law!!!!!TopHat24/7 wrote:wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Baffling....Champagne_Socialist wrote:I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) and an LLM (masters) in Housing law.TopHat24/7 wrote:seriously doubt that, and you said before you'd only gone to bachelors level.Champagne_Socialist wrote:I have a masters degree in law!!!!!TopHat24/7 wrote:wheres a yawn smiley when you need one..........??Champagne_Socialist wrote:If this petty bickering continues then bans will be handed out by the mods!!!
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
sorry you are right I won't post anymore off topic posts.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Don't encourage him CS... keep it on topic..
Champagne_Socialist- Posts : 4961
Join date : 2012-10-20
Age : 37
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Whilst I agree with every word..Lance.......I think people know what this guy is about and lets get it back to Fury.......Lance wrote:hit a nerve there did I! some people be nice when they are bored, some people resort to infantile attempts at bullying and mocking others in order to try and justify their low self esteem. I hope it makes you feel better whatever your problems areTopHat24/7 wrote:bored, not insecure.Lance wrote:whats funnier...im biased to my favourite fighter who happens to be a friend of mine, or that you come on here in the middle of the day with nothing better to do than ...laugh at people....? just a little insecure I thinkTopHat24/7 wrote:like what? laugh at your lame reasoning for having Hoppo as the greatest fighter of the last 30 years??Lance wrote:don't you have something better to do?TopHat24/7 wrote:The funny irony you seem to be missing is that I'm saying the same thing every time because your post the same threads every time. You come up with something original and I'll actually put some thought into what I post on your threads.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:I'm asking the mods ...to tell him to stop stalking and abusing me..beyond a jokeTopHat24/7 wrote:Hahahahahaha thank-you for proving my point.
So much easier when you commit hari-kari.
I had this with fightnews....who knew something about the sport..
Because at the moment I'm putting no effort into cracking up about how easy it is to turn the screw on you even though I know barely a fraction of what you do about the actual sport.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
heres one...I really think Fury has a solid chin. granted hes been on his backside a couple of times, but that was more to do with overconfidence and balancing himself incorrectly. he didn't look at all hurt either time. Im not sure its gonna be as easy for Haye to hurt Fury as some people seem to believe. and Haye will not be taking chances, he hasn't for a long time, not even against Audley. this fight will not be over quickly
Lance- Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
This is the same Haye that opens his gym once a month to the fans and spends the day there?TRUSSMAN66 wrote:DAVe you watched a different fight to me...He had a t-shirt with both their heads in his hands and then ran like a thief...
I don't know how anybody could dislike Tyson..........Just a lovable clown for me.......
I imagine If you met them in the street..Fury would take the pee but still stand for a photo or give an autograph etc etc If that is what you desired..
Haye would be too busy I reckon..
hampo17- Admin
- Posts : 9108
Join date : 2011-02-24
Age : 36
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I agree Mate........Haye didn't engage much with the bigger Valuev or Wlad..........
My guess is he finds size intimidating just like the rest of us..
Hopefully Fury has been getting a jab sorted out over the last two months.
My guess is he finds size intimidating just like the rest of us..
Hopefully Fury has been getting a jab sorted out over the last two months.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
I'm sure he does know it but there's the big difference being knowing it and being able to put it into practice.TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Surely he knows thats the only way he can win..
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
good recovery, poor chin. watched the Cunnigham fight again the other day, and a clip of the other kd, and way to much is being made of things like 'balance' and 'square on'. He was clocked and dropped, simple as that. Wasn't like he tripped over feet and was hit when already on his way down or clipped as he back peddaled.
TopHat24/7- Posts : 17008
Join date : 2011-07-01
Age : 40
Location : London
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Haye is a nice bloke. hes just a businessman and a celebrity before a boxer these dayshampo171 wrote:This is the same Haye that opens his gym once a month to the fans and spends the day there?TRUSSMAN66 wrote:DAVe you watched a different fight to me...He had a t-shirt with both their heads in his hands and then ran like a thief...
I don't know how anybody could dislike Tyson..........Just a lovable clown for me.......
I imagine If you met them in the street..Fury would take the pee but still stand for a photo or give an autograph etc etc If that is what you desired..
Haye would be too busy I reckon..
Lance- Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
His 16 month layoff may tell too.............
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Haye can put him over and can keep him down however, he doesn't have to keep him down. Fury goes over a couple of times in one round and it won't take much for the ref to wave it off. Maybe instead of the jab, Fury should be working on his balance....especially given he only ever gets floored when he's off balanceTopHat24/7 wrote:good recovery, poor chin. watched the Cunnigham fight again the other day, and a clip of the other kd, and way to much is being made of things like 'balance' and 'square on'. He was clocked and dropped, simple as that. Wasn't like he tripped over feet and was hit when already on his way down or clipped as he back peddaled.
Guest- Guest
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Not much chance of Haye being genuinely floored off Wlad was there....
Never in punching range
Never in punching range
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
maybe, but it depends how you define chin I guess. recovery is part of it as far as im concerned. I think its gonna be pretty tough for Haye to stop him. At least as tough as it was against Chisora. not saying he cant do it because if Fury opens up to him enough Haye will do it. But I don't think he will KO him from pot shotting. I think Haye is preparing for a long fight and that we will see him try and get some rounds in the bankTopHat24/7 wrote:good recovery, poor chin. watched the Cunnigham fight again the other day, and a clip of the other kd, and way to much is being made of things like 'balance' and 'square on'. He was clocked and dropped, simple as that. Wasn't like he tripped over feet and was hit when already on his way down or clipped as he back peddaled.
Lance- Posts : 1712
Join date : 2011-10-29
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Fury got NO CHANCE. Haye is PLAYING you people ONCE AGAIN! BUM fight for Haye to get rich off fools who DKSAB. Harrison, Chisora, Fury are BUMS. Haye picks these fights to HUSTLE. Fury got NOTHING but a BIG MOUTH.
YDKSAB- Posts : 131
Join date : 2013-05-20
Re: Wouldn't a Fury win be better for British Boxing ???
Be interesting when you're kicked off and your IP address goes......Which other regular poster goes too.YDKSAB wrote:Fury got NO CHANCE. Haye is PLAYING you people ONCE AGAIN! BUM fight for Haye to get rich off fools who DKSAB. Harrison, Chisora, Fury are BUMS. Haye picks these fights to HUSTLE. Fury got NOTHING but a BIG MOUTH.
TRUSSMAN66- Posts : 40687
Join date : 2011-02-02
Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Will Haye v Fury Be A Breakthrough Fight For British Boxing
» Fury/Eubank/Bellew winning - Be best for British Boxing ??
» Boxing, boxing everywhere - British boxing in 1930 compare with now...
» Is anybody wanting Fury to win because he's British ???
» Is Tyson Fury The Best Known British Fighter Currently Active?
» Fury/Eubank/Bellew winning - Be best for British Boxing ??
» Boxing, boxing everywhere - British boxing in 1930 compare with now...
» Is anybody wanting Fury to win because he's British ???
» Is Tyson Fury The Best Known British Fighter Currently Active?
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum