World Cup 2019
5 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
World Cup 2019
The automatic qualifiers include Japan (on merit as well as as hosts) and Georgia (on merit) for the first time, and exclude all 3 of Samoa, Fiji and Tonga.
Accordingly, there is no automatic qualifier from Asia, instead Oceania has been given an extra spot. Europe have also gone from two automatic spots to one automatic spot and one play-off against Oceania. There will also be a Repechage.
The 12 qualifiers are:
Japan, South Africa, Argentina, England, France, Georgia, Ireland, Italy, Scotland, Wales, Austrlia New Zealand
With 8 more from
Africa 1 (most likely Namibia)
Americas 1 and 2 (out of USA, Canada and Uruguay)
Europe 1 (most likely Romania or Russia)
Oceania 1 and 2 (probably Fiji along with Samoa or Tonga)
Europe or Oceania (the winner of the loser of Romania/Russia vs the loser of Samoa/Tonga)
Repechage (most likely the winner of the loser of Europe or Ocenaia and the Americas team that doesn't make it, although Asia 1 and Africa 2 will also be in a qualification competition with these 2).
All in all, it will be the same 20 teams, albeit with Russia probably facing off against Uruguay for their spot.
I read today on Twitter that the draw would be May 2017, which sounds good as it is 6 months later in the cycle than last time, but that's only a 6 Nations (and European Nations Cup) later in terms of the rugby calendar. Although it does mitigate against Home Nations losing to traditionally weaker countries when touring without their Lions a month later.
The 2015 draw was done on the basis of the automatic qualifiers taking the top 3 seedings. Accordingly, looking at the World Rugby Rankings at current, the bands would be as so:
Band 1: NZ, SA, Australia, England
Band 2: Wales, Argentina, Ireland, France
Band 3: Scotland, Japan, Georgia, Italy
Band 4, made up of Oceania 1, Europe 1, Oceania 2 and Americas 1 (predicted: Fiji, Romania, Samoa, USA)
Band 5, made up of Africa 1, Europe/Oceania, Americas 2 and play-off winner (predicted: Namibia, Tonga, Canada, Uruguay)
Scotland and Japan in particular look dangerous in Band 3 (and indeed will be looking to move up to Band 2 before the draw), as do Fiji and Samoa in band 4.
From an English perspective, even if we held our ranking, we could end up with Wales, either Scotland or the hosts and Fiji. Although it wouldn't be as bad as last time out, it would still be a potentially tricky pool to navigate, especially compared to a pool like: France, Georgia, Europe 2 and Repechage.
From a non-English perspective, I'm also guessing that a lot of Band 2 countries would rather get England if the draw was made now, rather than any of the other 3 Band 1s.
What do you make of the qualifying system in place? Is it right that it has been adjusted so that Tier 2 nations (Fiji, Samoa and Tonga) are still favoured to qualify, as opposed to a tier 3 European or Asian team benefiting from Georgia and Japan's automatic qualification?
What do you think about the draw being moved? Is it in the right place now?
Who would you want to avoid if the draw was made now? Who would you like to get?
Accordingly, there is no automatic qualifier from Asia, instead Oceania has been given an extra spot. Europe have also gone from two automatic spots to one automatic spot and one play-off against Oceania. There will also be a Repechage.
The 12 qualifiers are:
Japan, South Africa, Argentina, England, France, Georgia, Ireland, Italy, Scotland, Wales, Austrlia New Zealand
With 8 more from
Africa 1 (most likely Namibia)
Americas 1 and 2 (out of USA, Canada and Uruguay)
Europe 1 (most likely Romania or Russia)
Oceania 1 and 2 (probably Fiji along with Samoa or Tonga)
Europe or Oceania (the winner of the loser of Romania/Russia vs the loser of Samoa/Tonga)
Repechage (most likely the winner of the loser of Europe or Ocenaia and the Americas team that doesn't make it, although Asia 1 and Africa 2 will also be in a qualification competition with these 2).
All in all, it will be the same 20 teams, albeit with Russia probably facing off against Uruguay for their spot.
I read today on Twitter that the draw would be May 2017, which sounds good as it is 6 months later in the cycle than last time, but that's only a 6 Nations (and European Nations Cup) later in terms of the rugby calendar. Although it does mitigate against Home Nations losing to traditionally weaker countries when touring without their Lions a month later.
The 2015 draw was done on the basis of the automatic qualifiers taking the top 3 seedings. Accordingly, looking at the World Rugby Rankings at current, the bands would be as so:
Band 1: NZ, SA, Australia, England
Band 2: Wales, Argentina, Ireland, France
Band 3: Scotland, Japan, Georgia, Italy
Band 4, made up of Oceania 1, Europe 1, Oceania 2 and Americas 1 (predicted: Fiji, Romania, Samoa, USA)
Band 5, made up of Africa 1, Europe/Oceania, Americas 2 and play-off winner (predicted: Namibia, Tonga, Canada, Uruguay)
Scotland and Japan in particular look dangerous in Band 3 (and indeed will be looking to move up to Band 2 before the draw), as do Fiji and Samoa in band 4.
From an English perspective, even if we held our ranking, we could end up with Wales, either Scotland or the hosts and Fiji. Although it wouldn't be as bad as last time out, it would still be a potentially tricky pool to navigate, especially compared to a pool like: France, Georgia, Europe 2 and Repechage.
From a non-English perspective, I'm also guessing that a lot of Band 2 countries would rather get England if the draw was made now, rather than any of the other 3 Band 1s.
What do you make of the qualifying system in place? Is it right that it has been adjusted so that Tier 2 nations (Fiji, Samoa and Tonga) are still favoured to qualify, as opposed to a tier 3 European or Asian team benefiting from Georgia and Japan's automatic qualification?
What do you think about the draw being moved? Is it in the right place now?
Who would you want to avoid if the draw was made now? Who would you like to get?
Re: World Cup 2019
Im afraid im old school...if you have ambitions of being the best you need to beat whoever is in front of you.
So its irrelevant whos in your group...you need to win.
England possibly expected to get through this WC but were categorically proved wrong on that count.
As to the Regions your probably correct, the only one id question is:
Africa - I think we'll see a new team...Namibias days of being the best are numbered...Kenya in particular, Morocco, Madagascar, Zimbabwe ( seemingly on their way back) etc etc are all progressing strongly and will probably surpass Namibia now.
So its irrelevant whos in your group...you need to win.
England possibly expected to get through this WC but were categorically proved wrong on that count.
As to the Regions your probably correct, the only one id question is:
Africa - I think we'll see a new team...Namibias days of being the best are numbered...Kenya in particular, Morocco, Madagascar, Zimbabwe ( seemingly on their way back) etc etc are all progressing strongly and will probably surpass Namibia now.
Geordie- Posts : 28886
Join date : 2011-03-31
Location : Newcastle
Re: World Cup 2019
How do you get those lovely white division lines?? Possibly more interesting to me than the topic...
Okay, only joking (not about wanting to know the code for those lines!) - I'm with Geordie - I only care about rankings because I like seeing my side at the top of a list rather than the bottom.
But as regards the WC - if you go with the intention of trying to win the thing, then you have to expect to meet the best sides at some point.
Why play coward and say you don't want to meet them too early? I can't see a whole lot of difference in when you meet them other than that it's possibly better to meet them when they aren't fully up-to-battle-hardened-speed in the group stages.
If you lose, you're gone - nice try. If you win, then you go on without possibly having to think about meeting that side at least later on.
Okay, only joking (not about wanting to know the code for those lines!) - I'm with Geordie - I only care about rankings because I like seeing my side at the top of a list rather than the bottom.
But as regards the WC - if you go with the intention of trying to win the thing, then you have to expect to meet the best sides at some point.
Why play coward and say you don't want to meet them too early? I can't see a whole lot of difference in when you meet them other than that it's possibly better to meet them when they aren't fully up-to-battle-hardened-speed in the group stages.
If you lose, you're gone - nice try. If you win, then you go on without possibly having to think about meeting that side at least later on.
SecretFly- Posts : 31800
Join date : 2011-12-12
Re: World Cup 2019
I'd like to see Japan in pot 1. Being the hosts it is important for them to progress to the knockout.
No chance for Brazil to come to the fore in that time?
No chance for Brazil to come to the fore in that time?
TG- Posts : 58
Join date : 2013-10-02
Re: World Cup 2019
Draw is being made after the 2017 6N but before the 2017 summer tours. Not very long to change fortunes.
fa0019- Posts : 8196
Join date : 2011-07-25
Re: World Cup 2019
Fly it's HR in square brackets.
I'd agree to an extent, but I would like to avoid another Group of Death if possible. I can't go through that again. At least with a knockout game it's over in 80 minutes.
Yeah so it's only 1 tournament later. You could theoretically see Australia or South Africa drop out of the top 4 or even Argentina drop out of the top 8 without playing. But then if you do it 4 months later you could have a team bereft of Lions losing ranking places by losing to a lower ranked team.
I'd agree to an extent, but I would like to avoid another Group of Death if possible. I can't go through that again. At least with a knockout game it's over in 80 minutes.
Yeah so it's only 1 tournament later. You could theoretically see Australia or South Africa drop out of the top 4 or even Argentina drop out of the top 8 without playing. But then if you do it 4 months later you could have a team bereft of Lions losing ranking places by losing to a lower ranked team.
Re: World Cup 2019
Makes any gains in this summer tour and the AIs very important now that seedings and draw are made in 12 months time.
Scotland are playing 2 away games to Japan. 2 decent wins will see them get 2.99 ranking point and place them a comfortable 7th. Getting in the 2nd pot for Scotland is so important.
Scotland are playing 2 away games to Japan. 2 decent wins will see them get 2.99 ranking point and place them a comfortable 7th. Getting in the 2nd pot for Scotland is so important.
fa0019- Posts : 8196
Join date : 2011-07-25
Similar topics
» Rugby World Cup 2019: 'Officiating not good enough' - World Rugby
» JAPAN'S PROSPECTS IN THE 2019 WORLD CUP
» 2019 ICC World Cup Tipping Competition
» The Rugby World Cup - Japan 2019
» 2019 Rugby World Cup Pots
» JAPAN'S PROSPECTS IN THE 2019 WORLD CUP
» 2019 ICC World Cup Tipping Competition
» The Rugby World Cup - Japan 2019
» 2019 Rugby World Cup Pots
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Rugby Union :: International
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum