20 years.....For Hacker who gave ISIS list of 1,300 US Government workers

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm

Ardit Ferazi hacked in to a private company and got Names......Telephone numbers...Private passwords and addresses......of US Government and military personnel and passed them over to the ISIS terrorist network...

ISIS published the names with a threat to attack..

Apparently Ferazi is a misguided individual according to his Defence lawyers...He's only 20 years old and didn't know what he was doing !!..."He doesn't even embrace ISIS ideology !!.."

At his sentencing he struggled to explain his actions....but "I feel so bad for what I did...I am sorry for making people scared!!"

20 years does sound a lot.......But I think it is fair...

Scary enough world without idiots like this kid !!

by **navyblueshorts** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 1:50 pm

No idea who this guy is or the details, but 20 years sounds OTT to me. First offence of any kind?
It is a scary world and there's plenty of idiots in it, including prosecutors and judges/judicial systems that impose sentences which perhaps aren't justified. I imagine he'll appeal.

by SecretFly Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:23 pm

I'd give 20 years each to the technicians who set up multi-million dollar systems that 20 year old kids who "don't know what [they are] doing" can easily hack into.

It's time this joke about 'innocent snot-nosed kids' stumbling onto heavily funded Government security structures, and just turning the key and walking in to take anything the want from the sweet jar, is exposed.

Everywhere you look these days, the smell of a rat isn't far away.

by **ShahenshahG** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:29 pm

Give him two slaps and then put him to work finding holes in your system. Waste of good skills.

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:30 pm

navyblueshorts wrote:No idea who this guy is or the details, but 20 years sounds OTT to me. First offence of any kind?
It is a scary world and there's plenty of idiots in it, including prosecutors and judges/judicial systems that impose sentences which perhaps aren't justified. I imagine he'll appeal.

Got to be a harsh penalty for this kind of crap though..

15 years and regular water boarding would be better..

by Guest Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:32 pm

navyblueshorts wrote:No idea who this guy is or the details, but 20 years sounds OTT to me. First offence of any kind?
It is a scary world and there's plenty of idiots in it, including prosecutors and judges/judicial systems that impose sentences which perhaps aren't justified. I imagine he'll appeal.

FFS I only blew up one busload of orphans, your Honour. Sorry mate but like these guys who get busted for child porn, you don't just stumble upon it. It takes time and effort and at any stage, any reasonable person would stop and think that what they were doing is wrong and put an end to it, but this kid didn't so, TSB!

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:45 pm

DAVE667 wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:No idea who this guy is or the details, but 20 years sounds OTT to me. First offence of any kind?
It is a scary world and there's plenty of idiots in it, including prosecutors and judges/judicial systems that impose sentences which perhaps aren't justified. I imagine he'll appeal.
FFS I only blew up one busload of orphans, your Honour. Sorry mate but like these guys who get busted for child porn, you don't just stumble upon it. It takes time and effort and at any stage, any reasonable person would stop and think that what they were doing is wrong and put an end to it, but this kid didn't so, TSB!

Yes you shouldn't generalise when it comes to first offences...

by SecretFly Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:47 pm

I'm wondering.... if my name was on the list?

Would he just be a cuddly nerd guy that's 'into computers and stuff' then?

No, he'd be dropped into the Gobi desert with a bottle of sand to keep the thirst off.

by dyrewolfe Mon 26 Sep 2016, 2:52 pm

Given the potential consequences I'd have banged him up for life. Although SecretFly's idea works for me too.

20 year old computer hacker...yeah, of course he didn't know what he was doing. Rolling Eyes

Don't care whether he embraces ISIS or not, hacking on that level is not an innocent bit of fun, however you try to paint it.

Absolute BS and a pathetic attempt by his defence counsel to excuse his actions...although its probably about all they had to work with.

by **navyblueshorts** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:04 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:No idea who this guy is or the details, but 20 years sounds OTT to me. First offence of any kind?
It is a scary world and there's plenty of idiots in it, including prosecutors and judges/judicial systems that impose sentences which perhaps aren't justified. I imagine he'll appeal.

Got to be a harsh penalty for this kind of crap though..

15 years and regular water boarding would be better..

Coming to a country near you if/when Trump becomes POTUS.

As I said, don't know details. If as defence claim, 20 years seems harsh albeit I accept that it's often the case that exemplary sentences can make sense sometimes.

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:09 pm

dyrewolfe wrote:Given the potential consequences I'd have banged him up for life. Although SecretFly's idea works for me too.

20 year old computer hacker...yeah, of course he didn't know what he was doing. Don't care whether he embraces ISIS or not, hacking on that level is not an innocent bit of fun, however you try to paint it.

Absolute BS and a pathetic attempt by his defence counsel to excuse his actions...although its probably about all they had to work with.

Just be glad Navy wasn't on the jury.........

by **navyblueshorts** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:11 pm

And the rational, balanced discussion starts....I'll fetch my coat.

by **navyblueshorts** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:12 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
dyrewolfe wrote:Given the potential consequences I'd have banged him up for life. Although SecretFly's idea works for me too.

20 year old computer hacker...yeah, of course he didn't know what he was doing. Don't care whether he embraces ISIS or not, hacking on that level is not an innocent bit of fun, however you try to paint it.

Absolute BS and a pathetic attempt by his defence counsel to excuse his actions...although its probably about all they had to work with.

Just be glad Navy wasn't on the jury.........

by SecretFly Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:12 pm

Put him in a steel cell 1000 feet underground, give him a laptop and tell him if he can hack himself out of it, he gets to be Trump's foreign secretary.

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:19 pm

navyblueshorts wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
dyrewolfe wrote:Given the potential consequences I'd have banged him up for life. Although SecretFly's idea works for me too.

20 year old computer hacker...yeah, of course he didn't know what he was doing. Don't care whether he embraces ISIS or not, hacking on that level is not an innocent bit of fun, however you try to paint it.

Absolute BS and a pathetic attempt by his defence counsel to excuse his actions...although its probably about all they had to work with.

Just be glad Navy wasn't on the jury.........

Not in the mood kid.

You didn't know the case but thought it was harsh...

Now exemplary sentences are a good idea..

Moving on.

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:20 pm

SecretFly wrote:Put him in a steel cell 1000 feet underground, give him a laptop and tell him if he can hack himself out of it, he gets to be Trump's foreign secretary.

Give him a job at wikileaks.....He can have a penthouse in the Ecuadorian embassy..with room service..

by **navyblueshorts** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:34 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
navyblueshorts wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
dyrewolfe wrote:Given the potential consequences I'd have banged him up for life. Although SecretFly's idea works for me too.

20 year old computer hacker...yeah, of course he didn't know what he was doing. Don't care whether he embraces ISIS or not, hacking on that level is not an innocent bit of fun, however you try to paint it.

Absolute BS and a pathetic attempt by his defence counsel to excuse his actions...although its probably about all they had to work with.

Just be glad Navy wasn't on the jury.........

Not in the mood kid.

You didn't know the case but thought it was harsh...

Now exemplary sentences are a good idea..

Moving on.

Grow the **** up. That's your behaviour in any debate of any sort here. Try carrying on with it...

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:37 pm

ShahenshahG wrote:Give him two slaps and then put him to work finding holes in your system.

by **ShahenshahG** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:45 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
ShahenshahG wrote:Give him two slaps and then put him to work finding holes in your system.

If you can put nazis, kgb and various terrorists to use, why not hackers?

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:52 pm

Thinking more about the way you worded your post....Duty would have loved it.

Back to subject..Don't reward criminals who put good people at risk.

by SecretFly Mon 26 Sep 2016, 3:54 pm

Hmm...give a bold Hacker a job of blocking potential hackers?
One would assume for his job he'd need even more clearance than he achieved when he was hacking?

Hmmm.... that's the best hacking of all - just work for the people you were hacking and this time get to cover your tracks with Security Clearance.

Nobody has ever done that before.... Whistle

by Guest Mon 26 Sep 2016, 4:07 pm

ShahenshahG wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
ShahenshahG wrote:Give him two slaps and then put him to work finding holes in your system.

If you can put nazis, kgb and various terrorists to use, why not hackers?

And Gary Glitter should be given a job working with children...

by SecretFly Mon 26 Sep 2016, 4:12 pm

Glitter should teach young children how to 'hack' - after all, it's good for the keyboard skills and problem solving that they'll need later in life.

"GlitterGang Hacking Group uncovers suppressed evidence of Savile innocence!"

by TRUSSMAN66 Mon 26 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm

Gary Glitter and ISIS on the same thread...

This forum is full of surprises..

by Guest Mon 26 Sep 2016, 4:24 pm

TRUSSMAN66 wrote:Gary Glitter and ISIS on the same thread...

This forum is full of surprises..

I hear Peter Sutcliffe is gobbing off about how prison life is a piece of p!ss as well.

by **ShahenshahG** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 4:27 pm

DAVE667 wrote:
ShahenshahG wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
ShahenshahG wrote:Give him two slaps and then put him to work finding holes in your system.

If you can put nazis, kgb and various terrorists to use, why not hackers?
And Gary Glitter should be given a job working with children...

I'm not sure how Gary glitter bumming Jr would help the U.S keep their files secure?!

by Guest Mon 26 Sep 2016, 5:01 pm

ShahenshahG wrote:
DAVE667 wrote:
ShahenshahG wrote:
TRUSSMAN66 wrote:
ShahenshahG wrote:Give him two slaps and then put him to work finding holes in your system.

If you can put nazis, kgb and various terrorists to use, why not hackers?
And Gary Glitter should be given a job working with children...

I'm not sure how Gary glitter bumming Jr would help the U.S keep their files secure?!

And I'm not sure how giving him access to the files he couldn't prevent himself from hacking and passing onto terrorists is a good idea...unless you forgot to add that he should be first made to promise not to do it again before he's given his new work ID card.

by **ShahenshahG** Mon 26 Sep 2016, 5:48 pm

Why would you give him access to the files? You want him to hack those files so you can see where the breaches in your security are, only this time he is sitting in the same room as you and you can kick seven shades of Sh*t out of him/ put a bullet in him if he tries getting rid of it/selling it. Essentially doing the same thing he has always done but in front of the security so the security can fix the weak points. I'm not saying release him totally but perhaps kept in a secure location and monitored. They've caught this one but i bet theres hundreds of breaches where people shrewder than him have gotten in and out without the authorities realizing not through superior technical skills but because they've been alot more discreet with how they went about selling/exposing the data. I'm not advocating a total release - just saying if he's good enough for this then its worth utilising him rather than locking him away in prison.

by Guest Tue 27 Sep 2016, 11:24 am

ShahenshahG wrote:Why would you give him access to the files? You want him to hack those files so you can see where the breaches in your security are, only this time he is sitting in the same room as you and you can kick seven shades of Sh*t out of him/ put a bullet in him if he tries getting rid of it/selling it. Essentially doing the same thing he has always done but in front of the security so the security can fix the weak points. I'm not saying release him totally but perhaps kept in a secure location and monitored. They've caught this one but i bet theres hundreds of breaches where people shrewder than him have gotten in and out without the authorities realizing not through superior technical skills but because they've been alot more discreet with how they went about selling/exposing the data. I'm not advocating a total release - just saying if he's good enough for this then its worth utilising him rather than locking him away in prison.

No, shoot him in the face without bothering to give him access.

by SecretFly Tue 27 Sep 2016, 11:34 am

Sitting in the same room as you? But knows infinitely more than you - given that you need him to tell you how he hacked the files?

Hmmmm........... but you'd still know what he was doing when he was pretending to show you how he hacked the files you're looking at when in truth he's hacking files you can't see right under your nose.... and the alarms are going off all across the country in every Nuclear Missile Launcher?

But you keep looking at the kid, keeping an eye on his every move. He looks timidly your way as if to seek reassurance that everything is still okay. You gaze into his eyes, letting him know you'll spot any smart move he tries to make. You quietly give him the nod to proceed: "Keep going. I'm watching...."

by Guest Tue 27 Sep 2016, 12:14 pm

SecretFly wrote:Sitting in the same room as you? But knows infinitely more than you - given that you need him to tell you how he hacked the files?

Hmmmm........... but you'd still know what he was doing when he was pretending to show you how he hacked the files you're looking at when in truth he's hacking files you can't see right under your nose.... and the alarms are going off all across the country in every Nuclear Missile Launcher?

But you keep looking at the kid, keeping an eye on his every move. He looks timidly your way as if to seek reassurance that everything is still okay. You gaze into his eyes, letting him know you'll spot any smart move he tries to make. You quietly give him the nod to proceed: "Keep going. I'm watching...."

I couldn't be bothered trying to explain this to Shah, he's an idiot...and quite possibly a terrorist sympathizer. Why else would he not opt for shooting the lad in the face?

by **rIck_dAgless** Tue 27 Sep 2016, 12:40 pm

To be fair for 20 years the access codes to the US nuclear arsenal was "00000000" so you may as well learn something before carking it

by SecretFly Tue 27 Sep 2016, 1:48 pm

rick_dagless wrote:To be fair for 20 years the access codes to the US nuclear arsenal was "00000000" so you may as well learn something before carking it

A better class of Security technician in those days. Fooled the nerd idiots into thinking they were too smart to fall for "00000000". "It's beneath my super-intelligence even to try that number! And even if it is the correct code, I refuse to be the first nerd to try something so simple."

by **ShahenshahG** Tue 27 Sep 2016, 4:11 pm

SecretFly wrote:Sitting in the same room as you? But knows infinitely more than you - given that you need him to tell you how he hacked the files?

Hmmmm........... but you'd still know what he was doing when he was pretending to show you how he hacked the files you're looking at when in truth he's hacking files you can't see right under your nose.... and the alarms are going off all across the country in every Nuclear Missile Launcher?

But you keep looking at the kid, keeping an eye on his every move. He looks timidly your way as if to seek reassurance that everything is still okay. You gaze into his eyes, letting him know you'll spot any smart move he tries to make. You quietly give him the nod to proceed: "Keep going. I'm watching...."

That's not quite how it works otherwise they wouldn't use CEH qualified people in U.S government agencies, this would be just be the same thing but monitored by experts because the fecker in question isn't certified/got security clearance.

by **ShahenshahG** Tue 27 Sep 2016, 4:15 pm

rick_dagless wrote:To be fair for 20 years the access codes to the US nuclear arsenal was "00000000" so you may as well learn something before carking it

Was it Clinton who tied the nuclear codes to his credit cards with a rubber band and dropped them down the back of a sofa and didn't find em for three weeks (possible while getting fellatio'd by the nearest female)?

by Guest Tue 27 Sep 2016, 4:16 pm

ShahenshahG wrote:
rick_dagless wrote:To be fair for 20 years the access codes to the US nuclear arsenal was "00000000" so you may as well learn something before carking it

Was it Clinton who tied the nuclear codes to his credit cards with a rubber band and dropped them down the back of a sofa and didn't find em for three weeks (possible while getting fellatio'd by the nearest female)?

Yes, that must have been embarrassing...especially as he was with Chelsea at the time.

by SecretFly Tue 27 Sep 2016, 4:25 pm

Who cares about the Nuclear codes getting lost! Small change. He still had The Monica Briefings stashed away in a safe place.

by **ShahenshahG** Tue 27 Sep 2016, 4:36 pm

SecretFly wrote:Who cares about the Nuclear codes getting lost! Small change. He still had The Monica Briefings stashed away in a safe place.

It took a lot of spunk for her to go through all that court case, luckily she had stashed away a sample just in case.

by SecretFly Tue 27 Sep 2016, 4:51 pm

Right enough of the Carry On gags! This is a damn serious thread about How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

by Guest Tue 27 Sep 2016, 5:37 pm

Carry on Gagging.....

by dyrewolfe Wed 28 Sep 2016, 1:16 pm

DAVE667 wrote:Carry on Gagging.....

Isn't that what Bill said to Monica?

I'm not helping, am I? Run

by Sponsored content