2024 T20 World Cup

by Duty281 Wed May 22, 2024 1:04 pm

First topic message reminder :

Just over a week away now from some glorious six-hitting in the cricketing heartlands of Barbados, Trinidad, Saint Lucia and, um, New York City.

England are defending the crown they won at the MCG in front of 80,000 people in November 2022. They'll probably be hoping it goes a bit better than their defence of the 50 over title! The tournament is, as T20 competitions are, very wide open. If England were to win it again they'd be the first men's team to win back to back World T20 titles in the history of the competition.

Chasing them keenly are the bookmakers favourites India, who are very, very thirsty because of a drought that has existed since 2013 in ICC tournaments. Australia will obviously be there or thereabouts, and there's plenty of excitement around the West Indies, twice winners of this competition, and how glorious it would be to see them lift a trophy at home.

Or perhaps South Africa will finally stop being Tottenham and actually win something? But it's T20. So it could be anyone. Ireland, Scotland, Uganda....USA?

I thought the format of the last couple of T20 World Cups was absolutely perfect. Naturally, then, the ICC have altered it for this year! So we've now got 20 teams, up from 16, and 55 matches in total, up from 45.

There's no preliminary round this time. All teams start off the same. Four groups of five teams. All play each other once. Top two in each group go through to the Super 8s. Super 8s is split into two groups of four. No points are carried over and all teams play each other once in the Super 8s. Top two in each Super 8 group go through to the semi-finals, from which it's a straight knockout. Means a team will play nine games if they are to lift the trophy, in comparison to England's seven games to win it in 2022.

One curious thing about the format, and the ICC love curious things (such as there being no reserve day for one semi-final), is that the finishing places in the initial group are seeded. For example, England are designated B1 in their group, and Australia are B2, which means that it's irrelevant if England come first or second. They will go through to Group 2 of the Super 8s regardless of finishing first or second. I suppose it guarantees certainty for fans, as they know where teams are playing after the initial group stage.

While I don't think it's been directly said, the draw was not a fair and open one. It took place behind closed doors and ensured India/Pakistan were in the same group, as well as some other long-standing rivalries, such as USA v Canada. I'm surprised the ICC didn't put India and Pakistan in the same Super 8 group as well! The groups are:

Groups:

The fixture list is all over the place with timings, so try and keep up! If you're in the UK, games can start at 01:30, or they might begin at 18:00, and quite a few matches seem to overlap in the early stages.

Fixture List (All times BST):

Squads (Not yet finalised):

Outright Odds (Bet365):

The USA and Canada will be starting this one off in Texas. That's the most unlikely cricket sentence ever uttered.

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:02 pm

Argh. Buttler goes after such a good over from Arshdeep.

That's huge. On a pitch where spin will play such a key role, Buttler is an even bigger wicket than usual.

Moeen in to target the SLA. Please actually target it then Mo... There's no point putting a pinch hitter up if he plays like a pinch strike rotator.

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:11 pm

Oh dear. Bairstow gets a 3 ball duck.

England in a world of trouble.

It's going to take something miraculous from Brook to get anywhere near.

by Duty281 Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:14 pm

Buttler was looking in good touch, but fell. Salt played an ugly shot. Those were the key men.

As I've already said, Bairstow is finished. No idea why England are persisting with him. Moeen at 3. Brainless again.

Unless Brook can mastermind something, this is done.

by Duty281 Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:18 pm

Well that sums it all up.

Moeen averaged 14 with the bat at this World Cup, but the England management decided that meant he was a 3. Doh

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:20 pm

I fear that Rohit had played one of his innings where he looks like he's on a different track.

It's certainly feeling that way at the moment!

Oh, dear. Comical. Moeen stumped off a wide. When it isn't your day, it really isn't your day.

It shouldn't make any difference from here, but, I'd rather Surran came in that Livi at this point given. Hey, it is Curran! Everything's going to be OK... Laugh

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:22 pm

3 of the 4 wickets have fallen from the first ball of an over. Doesn't mean much, I accept. But it just struck me when looking back through.

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 pm

4 of the 5 wickets have fallen from the first ball of an over. Doesn't mean much, I accept. But it just struck me when looking back through.

That's plumb. Always going to review in the situation. It's absolutely stone dead though.

Disappointing watch for an England fan but India have been fantastic with the ball after a very good batting innings.

by Duty281 Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 pm

That's another first baller.

Heavy defeat this. Hope making the semi-finals doesn't cover up the reality that England's record is 1-3 against the top nations at this World Cup, with (looking like) two big defeats. Time for a change at the top after a rubbish 9 or so months of limited overs cricket.

by KP_fan Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:25 pm

New viewers might be forgiven to think test series is continuing

by alfie Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:30 pm

England not at the races today. Did suspect the Indian total was way over par ...and against this bowling attack never getting near it. They've not batted well but obviously came out thinking they needed to get their runs early...but apart from Arshdeep there is no one to target in this Indian attack Brook is sensibly starting in measured style but he's almost out of partners already so I'm not expecting a Stokes type miracle...

by Duty281 Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:38 pm

It doesn't matter now, but I can't believe how idiotic England have been to persist with this lack of batting depth.

They got a fair warning v South Africa, but continued with this balance. Moeen at 3. Sticking with Bairstow. Brook at 5. All nonsensical.

by alfie Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:41 pm

Anyway this should end soon so I can get to bed before sunrise...Congrats to India , and for all I'd have loved to see England make it through it is clear the two best teams are in the final.. which should be a cracker.

by VTR Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:42 pm

Moeen at 3 and not bowling on a spinning wicket is definitely nonsense. Probably not made any difference though, that was a very patchy bowling performance, and 170 looked and is proving to be far too much to chase

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:44 pm

Brook goes. Another smart bit of bowling by Kuldeep. Invites Brook to go for the sweep again but brings it slightly straighter and quicker. He's developed into a excellent bowler since adding that bit more pace.

It's been a terrific performance from India to be fair. Beaten by a better team. It's as simple as that sometimes.

A few players who might be at the end or very close to the end of their England stories though. This is surely it for Mo. Bairstow may well be dropped from the Test team for summer by the sounds of rumours. Jordan is 35.

Livi has been flattering to deceive with the bat for a while but his useful spin might keep him around for a bit yet.

Will Mark Wood play much more white ball cricket for England? Surely from here they concentrate on nursing him through the 5 Tests with India next summer and the Ashes down under.

This era of England's white ball team ending with a whimper rather than a flourish. It does feel like 1 CWC and 1 T20 World Cup is unders for how good they were at points. Australia have the same returns and their white ball program in that time has consisted of just rocking up at tournaments, picking the familiar suspects and seeing what the f**k might happen if they get to the KO stages.

by Duty281 Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:45 pm

Oh, and what was the point of picking Hartley? Most bizarre World Cup selection since Sven decided to give Theo a holiday in Germany.

by KP_fan Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:47 pm

Eng is not losing it in batting, but rather they gave away 30 to 40 runs too many
They should have used all 3 spinners , and maybe played Hartley for someone.
( means read the pitch wrong)

Once you have to chase 170, you have to take more risks and keep going, means giving away wickets more easily.

If you restrict to 130 to 140, you can bat in a more organized way and come closer.

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:51 pm

I think it's important to give India their dues for how good this bowling unit is. There's par for the wicket. Then there's par for the wicket if you need to chase against this attack.

England let them get too many. I think around 150-160 would be par against if you're chasing against any other attack in the comp though. So it's not really 30-40 runs too much. It's an absolutely gun bowling attack which makes it look that way.

by KP_fan Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:52 pm

whose fault was that R.O?
I think just despondency

by Marky Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:54 pm

Wish it had rained instead...

by **Pal Joey** Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:55 pm

alfie wrote:Anyway this should end soon so I can get to bed before sunrise...Congrats to India , and for all I'd have loved to see England make it through it is clear the two best teams are in the final.. which should be a cracker.

Yes, it should be an interesting final. SA going for their second ICC trophy since 1998 and India their sixth since 2013.
India look strong and are building more confidence as the tournament goes deeper; SA capable of producing something special too if things go their way on the day.
I favour India slightly... barring any dramatic implosion at the final hurdle, I just feel they are better placed to go all the way this time.

alfie, a quick nap as the sun rises, then the debate at 11 am... Smile

by KP_fan Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 pm

king_carlos wrote:
England let them get too many. I think around 150-160 would be par against if you're chasing against any other attack in the comp though. So it's not really 30-40 runs too much. It's an absolutely gun bowling attack which makes it look that way.

as I counted and posted earlier
8 overs of spin went for 49 runs
12 over of pace for 122 runs...so I can agree with that Eng make-up of bowing only 8 overs of spin 150 to 160 was par
If Eng played Hartley and used 12 to 14 overs of spin......they could have restricted India to 130-140

Archer bent on top scoring today...he can bat

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 pm

Marky wrote:Wish it had rained instead...

Indignance would feel far better than this.

by KP_fan Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:04 pm

If the pitch is anywhere close to this one in final, SA will have a hard time.
SA's best bet would be to win the toss, put whatever runs they can on board and hope India chokes.

The two unbeaten teams march thru one sided semi finals

by king_carlos Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:05 pm

KP_fan wrote:
king_carlos wrote:
England let them get too many. I think around 150-160 would be par against if you're chasing against any other attack in the comp though. So it's not really 30-40 runs too much. It's an absolutely gun bowling attack which makes it look that way.

as I counted and posted earlier
8 overs of spin went for 49 runs
12 over of pace for 122 runs...so I can agree with that Eng make-up of bowing only 8 overs of spin 150 to 160 was par
If Eng played Hartley and used 12 to 14 overs of spin......they could have restricted India to 130-140

Archer bent on top scoring today...he can bat

That's only if those spinners are as effective though. Kuldeep is absolutely spell binding at the minute. Jadeja and Axar are fantastic bowlers. England haven't got near the same quality as that below Dilly.

Livi got through his 4 quietly but England notably used him when new batters came to the crease and after the drinks break. He effectively got nursed through those 4 overs by bowling him when you'd expect a quieter over anyway.

Whereas India had 3 spinners you could bowl just about whenever you wanted on this wicket. Axar come on in the PP against a set Buttler and got a wicket immediately. Kuldeep was bordering on unplayable. Then Jadeja practically came on as an afterthought.

That's completely different to the spinners England can bowl other than Rashid.

by KP_fan Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:26 pm

king_carlos wrote:
KP_fan wrote:
king_carlos wrote:
England let them get too many. I think around 150-160 would be par against if you're chasing against any other attack in the comp though. So it's not really 30-40 runs too much. It's an absolutely gun bowling attack which makes it look that way.

as I counted and posted earlier
8 overs of spin went for 49 runs
12 over of pace for 122 runs...so I can agree with that Eng make-up of bowing only 8 overs of spin 150 to 160 was par
If Eng played Hartley and used 12 to 14 overs of spin......they could have restricted India to 130-140

Archer bent on top scoring today...he can bat

That's only if those spinners are as effective though. .

Yes that's true and that's why I wrote when chasing 130-140 Eng would have come close.
I think Indian spinners + Bumrah would have defended 140.

In Post match Butler acknowledged he should have bowled Moeen
I doubt 5 overs of Moeen & Hartley would have gone for 50 to 55
more like 30 to 35

by KP_fan Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:42 am

India hasn't won an ICC trophy for 11 years & yet made to finals of all 3 formats in this year.
That's no mean feat, that's glass 90% full, although it appear a lot emptier.
Although I am conservative & cautious rather than overly optimistic about India, I think this time Ind are favorites to win this final.

What's diffrent conpared to 2022 in SA?

1- Pitches are slower and gripping for spinners
2- India has 3 all-rounders . Last time Jadeja was missing and Axar was not an all-rounder for SA conditions.
3- Bumrah was missing last time. Not only is he there, but at the top of his game & the top bowler in world in all conditions and all formats.

Ind's only question will be whether to play Dubey? or bring in Samson?
In the midst of the semifinal they lost so much faith in him that they would not have sent him to bat if not needed, when he was specifically selected to come at 5 and go after spinners
His first ball dismissal might have reaffirmed team management's loss of faith.

The only reason to retain him will be one linked with superstition " don't change the winning combination "

by alfie Fri Jun 28, 2024 8:55 am

After a bit of sleep I am not too distressed over that result. Truth is India have been far more solid throughout this WC and were likely to win that semi in almost any circumstances. On that low and spinny pitch their chances were even higher - and I suspect England would have been better advised to bat first , try and get a modest total , and hope nerves upset the Indian bats. (Not hindsight : I was rather hoping England would lose the toss because I did fear they were hoping to reprise the 2022 game ...and conditions here were always going to be hugely different) But it probably wouldn't have made that much of a difference : as others have said , India's attack (especially the spin options) is on another level to England's.

Once the dust clears and all the serial moaners have had their on-line fun heaping hysterical abuse on players and coaches England can take their time planning to refresh for the next white ball event. Test Matches next thank heavens !

India/SA final as logically expected and whoever wins will have totally deserved their success. Like PJ , I think India will probably prevail as they just look more solid overall , with an attack better suited to the conditions - unless the final venue unexpectedly turns up a seamer's paradise Smile

Not ruling SA out , because they have shown great determination throughout this WC : but I think they would need everything to go right if they're to upset India this time. Hope we get a good contest thumbsup

by VTR Fri Jun 28, 2024 11:25 am

Yeah, agree, wasn't bothered really, because India had the much better side on paper regardless of conditions, and England had not really had a convincing tournament. So the expected result happened, which is never exactly disappointing

Also cushioning the blow is yes this is a World Cup, but doesn't feel like it in the same way as the ODI version. I guess that's because it's a bit devalued by being played almost every year, and England only seemed to win it a few weeks ago!

by Duty281 Fri Jun 28, 2024 12:08 pm

Player Ratings for England

Buttler 7.5/10. Not the dominating figure we like to see, but not the disaster he was in the previous fifty over World Cup. Biggest score was against the Americans, got starts in most other innings but failed to kick on. Extra half a point for good keeping.

Salt 8/10. Played a leading role in England's only win over a top nation, and set up the chase v Australia, but did little outside of those games. Strike rate of 159 was England's best.

Bairstow 4/10. Out cheaply in three games, the only saving grace being his 48* v the West Indies. Nowhere near his aggressive, destructive best. Time for retirement.

Moeen 2/10. One day, we'll know how Moeen has such a strange hold over the England hierarchy. His abilities are vastly inflated by the top brass in all formats. This tournament Moeen frequently batted above Brook, and his scores took on a symmetry as they got lower and lower with each passing innings, going from OK to bad. Also bowled a few overs sparingly.

Brook 8/10. Difficult to rate. He has been managed by a bunch of clowns. He came out at 6 v Australia and 5 v South Africa. He would have probably led England to victory over SA, thus avoiding the India SF, if he came out at 4. Couldn't do anything about the India defeat, again coming out at 5, which was too low.

Jacks 1/10. Probably remembered for a 22 run over...that he bowled, rather than batted, alas. That sealed his fate as England panicked and adjusted the balance.

Livingstone 6/10. Bowled a few tidy overs, but was wrongly chosen to bowl v the West Indies, which cost 20. Had one good innings v SA, but little other chances to exhibit his batting prowess. Might be on borrowed time because he's up to 48 T20is now and we still haven't seen the best of him, or really understand what his role is.

Curran 1.5/10. Came back for the balance, didn't replicate 2022. Tournament bowling figures of 12-0-115-3 says it all I think. Not much chance with the bat either.

Jordan 2.5/10. Might seem harsh, but his figures are massaged heavily by the USA game, and full credit for the hattrick. But went for over 12 an over v India, and 11 an over v Australia, in the games that were true tests. Picked up a lot of cheap wickets against batsmen on the slog. Most expensive bowler for England.

Rashid 8.5/10. Ah, was this the end? Another fine tournament for his Rashidness, who I think is England's greatest ever limited overs bowler. Only blemish in this tournament was the 1/41 v Australia. Otherwise he was typical Rashid, with 1/25 v India, 1/20 v South Africa, and 1/21 v West Indies. Tournament economy under 7 and England's joint leading wicket taker.

Archer 8/10. Didn't strike in the PowerPlay as often as England would have wanted, but he was a consistent wicket taker and England's second most miserly quick. Great to see him back.

Topley 7/10. Tough to rate. On the one hand, very cheap, on the other, just two wickets in 18 overs. The best teams need strikes in those PowerPlay overs and Topley didn't deliver on this front. But he didn't give much away, either.

Wood 1.5/10. Went wicketless and at about 11/12 an over in the three games v test opponents. Minor redemption to his figures with 3/12 v Oman (worth half a point that). Has had a really tough run for the last nine months in all formats.

Duckett N/A. Didn't play. Was worth a shot considering his left handedness and Bairstow not doing much.

Hartley N/A. Didn't play. But didn't expect him to. A baffling selection. Still don't understand it.

Mott 0/10. Time to go. English limited overs cricket needs a rebuild towards the next major ICC trophy (which is early next year, there's one every year!) and Mott isn't the man to do it. Made numerous strange calls for this tournament. Why is Moeen a 3/4? Why was Bairstow not dropped? Why was Brook so low? Why was Hartley picked? Why was the balance bowling heavy when extra batting was required? Why did Duckett not play? This failure follows straight on from the last one. And, yes, it is a failure. I know some might look at it and say, 'semi-finals, that's not bad'. But England's record v the top nations was 1-3, with two big defeats. The only notable victory was over the West Indies.

by king_carlos Fri Jun 28, 2024 7:18 pm

All feels fair enough there, Duty.

I'd maybe quibble with Curran being quite that low. Probably a 3 or 4 from me - on par with Jordan. His figures at face value aren't good but he was often bowling tough overs. They started using him in the 6th which last I checked was on average the highest scoring before the death as it's the final over of the PP. Then they used him at the death again. His batting as a lower middle order hitter in T20is just hasn't worked though. He's better further up the order in franchise stuff. That 6/7 hitting from ball one role hasn't worked for him though, whilst there are better batting talents up the order. He's a bit of a curates egg at the minute across formats. There's so much talent there though and he's still only 26. I hope whatever the next setup is tries him in a different role, though even typing that I'm not quite sure what.

I'm curious whether Buttler will want to continue with the captaincy. He starting to get that end stage Joe Root beleaguered look to him. I really hope he continues as a player though. It would be such a shame if the CWC and this whimper were the final hurrah of such a magnificent white ball player.

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 2:11 pm

The final is this afternoon. Two teams with unbeaten records face off for the trophy, and whoever wins will be the first team to have gone unbeaten through the T20 World Cup.

In one corner is South Africa. Masters of the close finish. Winning a low scorer v SL, edging out the Dutch by four wickets, beating Bangladesh and Nepal by four runs and a solitary run respectively, then pulling out wins of 18 runs, seven runs and three wickets in the Super Eights. It's not been easy, but they've got here. De Kock is the only one really firing with the bat, but they have plenty of options with the ball, as all of their main bowlers have enjoyed good to strong tournaments. Can SA finally get over the line in a major ICC tournament?

Facing them is India. Their passage has been rather more serene. They dispatched every team that crossed them in the Super Eights with some ease and comfort, to follow up their wins over Ireland, USA and Pakistan in the initial phase. Pakistan got the closest, losing by just six runs. India's team looks absolutely loaded. Rohit, Yadav and Pant are all doing well, with Pandya providing a boost down the order. The bowling is terrifying, principally because probably the best ever T20 bowler in Bumrah is having a magnum opus. And if he doesn't get you, surely one of the spin trio will, or even Arshdeep, who is India's leading wicket taker at this competition. Will 11 years of hurt, and 17 years since India, home of the IPL, last won this competition, end today?

For me it looks very similar to the last 50 over World Cup final. India are the better team on paper and are clear favourites, but it is just one game, and the pressure, which India haven't handled well in the past, is all on them. Unlike Australia however, SA are not a team with international winners. It should be India's, but one magic innings, like Head's century, or one magic spell can alter things drastically.

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 4:12 pm

India winning the toss and batting first. Both unchanged.

Seven of the eight winners of the T20 World Cup have won the toss...

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 4:40 pm

Wow, this final's alive.

India 23 runs in the first eight balls, but Maharaj strikes back with two wickets in three balls. Rohit and Pant accounted for. 23/2.

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 4:51 pm

And now South Africa go ahead, as Yadav picks the man in the deep. Neat catch from Klassen.

34/3 and the three heavyweights in the top four taken out. Kohli hasn't been in good form, but is currently on 22 and is now the main hope of the innings. He's joined by Axar, up at 5.

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 4:52 pm

On a min 160 pitch and 180 par , India in a hole 34-3
Kohli needs to bat thru

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 5:15 pm

Axar and Kohli rebuilding nicely.

75/3 at halfway. Really well balanced. Couple of quick wickets after the drinks break and India will be struggling to reach 140. But if these two stick together for a bit longer, they'll set it up for Pandya and Jadeja to lift them to 170+.

Shamsi and Nortje have six overs left, which is a big plus in SA's favour for this second half.

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:00 pm

No idea why SA have bowled Jansen through his full allocation, it's not been a good day for him right from the off.

He's getting taken for a few in the 19th.

Kohli out for 76. A potential match winning innings that one. Kept India together when the early wickets were tumbling, along with Axar who was also good, and India 163 with seven balls left.

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:09 pm

176 the final score. Some of SA's fielding left a lot to be desired.

Not impossible, it's a nice batting wicket and not the biggest boundaries, but going to be a very big ask against this bowling unit.

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:14 pm

160 was the min required and 180 would have been good.
Setting 177 to win is still a good effort by India.

Kohli got his comfort zone situation to get-set build , got to 50 off 48 balls and such innings are terrible if batter gets out without giving acceleration after "eating" so many balls.
Fortunately he accelerated.
Dubey cracks very hard and did enuf to play for India more......actually the best place for Dubey is when he come in last 3 or 4 overs and has no option but to hit....and he hits very hard.

Pitch has something for seamers who bend their back and some grip for the spinners.
India looks ahead and for SA to win one of their big-4 ( QDK, Makram, Miler, Klassen) have to play a blinder today like a 40 ball 70

by alfie Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:22 pm

176 enough do you think ? Those late wickets saved SA maybe 10 vital runs but still a tough chase against this Indian attack. They'll be wanting a de Kock special start ...

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:27 pm

Should be enough.

And Bumrah strikes with his third ball, what a peach!

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:27 pm

Bumrah produces a cracker .....it's always a spectacle when a right arm pace bowler clean bowls a RHB

by alfie Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:52 pm

Keeps pace with the Indian innings after 7.. and one wicket less...

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:55 pm

SA negotiated 4 overs of spin without losing a wicket and got after the spinners a bit
Game on now

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:58 pm

It was tempting to take spinner off and bring Pandya....But Rohit didn't blink and bowled one more Axar over
and Stubbs chanced his arm once too many...bowled

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 6:58 pm

Timely breakthrough. De Kock needs to bat through.

by alfie Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:01 pm

Burst of scoring edged SA maybe ahead...but Stubbs wicket has brought that back. A lot on this partnership, eh?

by Duty281 Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:06 pm

96 off 60, seven wickets left.

Pandya/sixth bowler has three overs left, could be pivotal for SA. But not a lot of batting left for SA. Miller next is fine, but Jansen at 7 and Maharaj at 8 are both one place too high.

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:11 pm

Klassen is finding his beast mode slowly
If one of Klassen, QDK or Miller bats until end ,SA will win

by KP_fan Sat Jun 29, 2024 7:17 pm

india take QDK out...falls to AArshdeeps' c.rap delivery

by Sponsored content