606v2 IPL - Fixture/Results/Table

League Table

	Team	P	Won	Lost	Tie	Points	VD
1	Chennai Super Kings	9	9	0	0	18	+49	CHAMPIONS
2	Delhi Daredevils	9	5	2	2	12	+18
3	Pune Warriors	9	4	2	3	11	+9
4	Kings XI Punjab	9	4	2	3	11	+7
5	Mumbai Indians	9	4	3	2	10	+10
6	Kolkata Knight Riders	9	3	4	2	8	-2
7	Rajasthan Royals	9	2	4	3	7	-11
8	Royal Challengers Bangalore	9	3	6	0	6	-14
9	Kochi Tuskers	9	2	6	1	5	-13
10	Deccan Chargers	9	1	8	0	2	-52

Fixtures

Week 10

Semi Final 1 = Chennai Super Kings beat Kings XI Punjab (6-1)
Semi Final 2 = Delhi Daredevils beat Pune Warriors (5-1)

Week 11

Third Place Playoff = Pune Warriors beat Kings XI Punjab

Final = Chennai Super Kings beat Delhi Daredevils (5-2)

Results - (Votes in Brackets)

Week 1

Spoiler:

Week 2

Spoiler:

Week 3

Spoiler:

Week 4

Spoiler:

Week 5

Spoiler:

Week 6

Spoiler:

Week 7

Spoiler:

Week 8

Spoiler:

Week 9

Spoiler:

Gregers, how will the results and scoring be done?

We will vote on which team we think would win out of the two lineups.

I will post the pitch conditions for each match on Thursday. Tactics due by Sat at Midnight. Voting is then open from then until Tuesday at noon.

I will then work out the average and that side will get the 2 points for a win.

I will also be drawing injuries for each side per week

How common will the injuries be will it be like 2 one week and none another or 1 per week?

Im not sure yet mate, trying to make it as fair as possible. I think we should all discuss the injuries on monday/tuesday

Yeah that sounds good mate.

Gregers why don't we all PM you our predictions for each match. Make things easier for you and it will only be us voting anyway

Nah we should do it openly. That way you have to explain your prediction, and can't just vote someone to lose because you don't like them

Fists that way I see arguments spilling out.

Fists of Fury wrote:Nah we should do it openly. That way you have to explain your prediction, and can't just vote someone to lose because you don't like them

agree!

We are all mature enough here to vote as we would see it going, and we all know enough about cricket to know that certain sides would be better in certain conditions than others.

It needs to be transparent and open, so that we can see that there is valid reasoning behind each persons vote.

Fists of Fury wrote:Nah we should do it openly. That way you have to explain your prediction, and can't just vote someone to lose because you don't like them

or because KP plays for them

Fists of Fury wrote:We are all mature enough here to vote as we would see it going, and we all know enough about cricket to know that certain sides would be better in certain conditions than others.

It needs to be transparent and open, so that we can see that there is valid reasoning behind each persons vote.

Not sure I would agree with that tbh, haha:P

Mad for Chelsea wrote:

Fists of Fury wrote:Nah we should do it openly. That way you have to explain your prediction, and can't just vote someone to lose because you don't like them

or because KP plays for them

Liam_Main wrote:

Mad for Chelsea wrote:

Fists of Fury wrote:Nah we should do it openly. That way you have to explain your prediction, and can't just vote someone to lose because you don't like them

or because KP plays for them

It's a valid reason... *cough* *cough*

I agree it should be open with a sentence saying why

Gregers wrote:

Liam_Main wrote:

Mad for Chelsea wrote:

Fists of Fury wrote:Nah we should do it openly. That way you have to explain your prediction, and can't just vote someone to lose because you don't like them

or because KP plays for them

It's a valid reason... *cough* *cough*

I agree it should be open with a sentence saying why

Gregers i've never known why you hate KP, is it that he's got a incredibly hot wife or because he's got stack loads of money?

Where do I start?

I can pm you them if you want Haha

Feel free, haha

Tell us all why, Gregers! Haha

Gregers mate rather than you giving injuries i think you should make a stipulation that each player can play only 8 out of the 9 matches.This would make this comp more tactical.A coach would have to decide against which side does he need a particular player more.Injuries could affect the balance of the side adversely.This idea of mine would be better as its tactical.

Gregers
Plz have a look at my suggestion mate.

yh shanky i think thats a very good idea.

I like that idea mate. Maybe make it 8 out of 10 games?

And I was thinking about having a rule that all of your overseas players must play at least once (or maybe twice) in the group stages.
Thoughts?

na i dont agree with the overseas rule, but i think what shanky said was good..

i dont think you should make the rule about the overseas players.

I think a coach should be nominate one player who can play all the matches and 4 others who can play 9 matches.The rest can only play 8 matches.

Thoughts?


i think having each overseas player playing 2 matches might be a bit too much.

This is made even more confusing, 6 indians in a line-up, 4 U25's, now only 1 player who can play all the matches?

Why do we have to keep arsing about with our squads??

I've already had to chop and change enough as it is without having to do it further!!

Why change it now aswell after the auction?

Liam_Main wrote:This is made even more confusing, 6 indians in a line-up, 4 U25's, now only 1 player who can play all the matches?

mate this is a tactical comp.If there is no such rule,then the team with the best first XI will win the tournament everytime.This comp is meant to test our tactics.

I'm sorry but continually implementing new rules is just making matters even more confusing, I thought we'd all settled on a system that works well?

It's ment to be a bit of fun, nothing serious. The side with the best XI on certain conditions should win.

Sainty wrote:I'm sorry but continually implementing new rules is just making matters even more confusing, I thought we'd all settled on a system that works well?

just think about it mate,this rule is better coz the coach can decide which game a player sits out of.Otherwise if Gregers gives an injury to a particular player when you need him the most it could affect the team adversely.

Liam_Main wrote:It's ment to be a bit of fun, nothing serious. The side with the best XI on certain conditions should win.

It would become too predictable mate.I think it should test our tactics as coaches of our respective teams.

If I knew this though I would of bought more players in the auction. I can't now though

Gregers earlier said that he would give injuries.Dont you think this rule wherein a coach can decide which game a player sits out of is better than Gregers giving an injury?

No because one of my best players might not get a injury and I won't have to leave him out.

Right well would a 'gentlemens' agreement that you cannot pick the same 11 every week work?

That way its at the discretion of each of us to look at the pitch conditions and also what we believe the opposition to be weak against and pick an 11 to beat them.

All I'm interested in is making sure that the teams aren't the same every week.

Liam_Main wrote:No because one of my best players might not get a injury and I won't have to leave him out.

Thats why I suggested you can nominate one icon player who can play all the matches.

Yeah that sounds good Gregers

Gregers
The best way is probably for you to change the pitch conditions every week.

Gregers wrote:Right well would a 'gentlemens' agreement that you cannot pick the same 11 every week work?

That way its at the discretion of each of us to look at the pitch conditions and also what we believe the opposition to be weak against and pick an 11 to beat them.

All I'm interested in is making sure that the teams aren't the same every week.

If I pick an XI in week1 I cant pick that in week 2 but can I pick that in week 3 or 4?

Basically yes Shanky. As in you must make a change every week to you playing XI.

Pitch conditions should force that anyways.

If everyone is happy with that then it means that we don't need to do injuries, nominations or anything else

Yeah that sounds simpler and better

So what are the pitch conditions for my first match against Liam?
I will be around next week but I cant wait.So can you post the pitch conditions today itself?I will post my XI now and is there anything else you want me to post?

shankythebiggestengfan wrote:So what are the pitch conditions for my first match against Liam?
I will be around much next week but I cant wait.So can you post the pitch conditions today itself?I will post my XI now and is there anything else you want me to post?

someone's very exictable about this lol.

are the pitch conditions going to be realistic? eg jaipur is either flat or turning and offers little for the faster bowler

and hyderrebad turns square

delhi is the only one i can think of that helps fast bowlers

delhi slow and low last year

yeah I think not playing the same XI every week works, it just gets too confusing if we have say one guy who can play all the matches, a further few who can play all but one, and the rest need to sit out at least two. I agree that it's not great if we just pick the same XI week in week out, but let's not make this too complicated...