About v2Martinez v Barker write up
+13
milkyboy
Scottrf
Fists of Fury
KingMonkey
Commander
Lumbering_Jack
SugarRayRussell (PBK)
coxy0001
Volcanicash
AlexHuckerby
6oldenbhoy
TRUSSMAN66
Seanusarrilius
17 posters
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 
1, 2
Martinez v Barker write up
by Seanusarrilius Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:08 pm
First topic message reminder :
site now closed
site now closed
Last edited by Seanusarrilius on Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
Seanusarrilius- Moderator
- Posts : 5145
Join date : 2011-02-15
Re: Martinez v Barker write up
by captain carrantuohil Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:38 pm
I've said this before, but Richie Woodhall should really be kept away from fights involving British boxers. He's articulate and knows what he's talking about, but whenever a British fighter challenges for world honours, he is incapable of leaving off the patriotic blinkers and delivering an impartial analysis. Pre-fight, during the fight and post-fight, Richie sees the world in shades of red, white and blue.
captain carrantuohil- Posts : 2508
Join date : 2011-05-06
Re: Martinez v Barker write up
by Soldier_Of_Fortune Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:41 pm
coxy0001 wrote:Soldier_Of_Fortune wrote:coxy0001 wrote:After 6 rounds I had Barker up
How? Landed noticeably less and was throwing less... Had him always behind save for 3 or so i gave him
By landing effective eye catching clean blows which did visable damage, rather then shots which seem to hitting his Barkers guard. I had it 58 -57
Take it Martinez is a touchy subject haha.
Not especially, and you're more than welcome to your opinion but Martinez was always in control of the fight. I haven't read or heard from anyone with sense that Barker was at any point threatening an upset, most people seem to be complaining Barker didn't come to fight. Find it a bit bizarre you had him winning when 98% of people saw it differently. But again, you're free to voice your opinion and be in that 2% i guess.
Thats was after 6 rounds. He was down on my card 97 -95 if thats ok with you?
Like to see were your getting your stats from aswell haha
Last edited by Soldier_Of_Fortune on Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:45 pm; edited 2 times in total (Reason for editing : cant add up)
Soldier_Of_Fortune- Posts : 4420
Join date : 2011-03-14
Location : Liverpool JFT96 YNWA
Re: Martinez v Barker write up
by Scottrf Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:43 pm
Very poor card through 10. I'd have had something similar through 9.Soldier_Of_Fortune wrote:Thats was after 6 rounds. He was down on my card 87-85 through 10 if thats ok with you?
Scottrf- Posts : 14359
Join date : 2011-01-26
Re: Martinez v Barker write up
by Soldier_Of_Fortune Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:47 pm
Scottrf wrote:Very poor card through 10. I'd have had something similar through 9.Soldier_Of_Fortune wrote:Thats was after 6 rounds. He was down on my card 87-85 through 10 if thats ok with you?
Haha sorry. Now amended
Soldier_Of_Fortune- Posts : 4420
Join date : 2011-03-14
Location : Liverpool JFT96 YNWA
Re: Martinez v Barker write up
by milkyboy Mon Oct 03, 2011 2:48 pm
i know where you're coming from capt... he was ott on macklin sturm. On barker martinez i think the whole commentary team took the starting position of expecting barker to get outclassed and probably ko'd quickly... so when it didn't turn out that way, they were all a bit excitable in terms of how he was doing, not just richie!
milkyboy- Posts : 7762
Join date : 2011-05-22
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics» Darren Barker wants Martinez....
» Has Barker a hope v Martinez?
» Barker-Martinez report
» Barker v Martinez - October 1st
» Martinez vs Barker.... leaves me frustrated
» Has Barker a hope v Martinez?
» Barker-Martinez report
» Barker v Martinez - October 1st
» Martinez vs Barker.... leaves me frustrated
The v2 Forum :: Sport :: Boxing
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum